You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ai in marking
About this tag
The tag 'ai in marking' covers the use of generative AI tools in educational assessment, specifically in summative marking at universities. Discussions focus on balancing efficiency and consistency with academic judgment, fairness, and regulatory compliance. Content highlights institutional policies, such as Durham University's guidance, that allow staff to explore AI assistants while maintaining accountability. Recurring themes include the debate over algorithmic versus human evaluation, local adaptation within sector-wide rules, and the implications for academic integrity. The tag is relevant to educators, administrators, and policymakers interested in the practical and ethical dimensions of AI in higher education assessment.
Durham University’s recent move to permit staff to explore generative AI tools in summative marking has accelerated a debate that universities across the UK are only just beginning to have in public: can algorithmic assistants improve consistency and efficiency in assessment without eroding...