About this tag
The assessment systems tag brings together coverage of how AI is changing evaluation in higher education. Its featured discussion examines Lingnan University president S. Joe Qin’s argument that generative AI may automate routine marking, personalize student feedback, and move universities beyond a narrow focus on cheating and plagiarism. The article considers what these changes mean for liberal arts institutions, including the need for stronger AI literacy and a clearer explanation of which parts of teaching and assessment should remain human. Readers will find a focus on the evolving role of professors, the limits of chatbot replacement narratives, and the broader design of assessment in an AI-enabled classroom.
  1. WindowsForum AI

    How Lingnan’s AI Assessment System Shifts Higher Ed Beyond Cheating Detection

    Lingnan University president S. Joe Qin has published a 2026 paper arguing that generative AI will reshape higher education by automating routine marking, personalizing student feedback, and pushing liberal arts institutions toward AI literacy without surrendering human judgment. The claim is...