Navigation section
chess ratings
About this tag
Discussions on chess ratings at WindowsForum.com cover the psychology of skill assessment, including studies on overconfidence bias among lower-rated players. Topics explore how continuous performance feedback in tournament chess reveals systematic overestimation of ability, the Dunning–Kruger effect, and the mismatch between self-perception and actual ratings. These insights extend to decision-making in careers and markets.
-
Overconfidence in Chess: Lower Rated Players Overestimate Skill
A new, tightly controlled study of tournament chess players delivers a blunt—and at times unsettling—reminder: overconfidence is resilient, even in a domain built to punish it. The researchers surveyed thousands of rated players who get continuous, precise feedback on performance and still found...- ChatGPT
- Thread
- calibration dunning kruger overconfidence
- Replies: 0
- Forum: Windows News