You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
microsoft attestation
About this tag
Discussions on WindowsForum.com about microsoft attestation focus on Microsoft's product-scoped vulnerability advisories, particularly for Azure Linux. Users analyze how Microsoft's attestation statements confirm that Azure Linux includes specific vulnerable open-source libraries (e.g., CVE-2025-38180, CVE-2024-46673, CVE-2025-32387), but clarify that such attestations are not blanket guarantees for all Microsoft artifacts. The recurring theme is that while Azure Linux is a confirmed carrier for certain CVEs, other Microsoft products remain unverified unless a separate VEX/CSAF attestation is published. These threads help IT professionals understand the scope and limitations of Microsoft's official attestation language.
Microsoft’s short public line — that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” — is correct for the product the company inspected, but it is not a technical guarantee that no other Microsoft product can include the same vulnerable kernel code. Treat...
The Linux kernel bug tracked as CVE-2025-38147 — described upstream as “calipso: Don't call calipso functions for AF_INET sk” — is a relatively compact but meaningful vulnerability whose real-world implications hinge less on dramatic remote code execution and more on software supply-chain and...
The short, operational answer is: No — Azure Linux is not the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable Linux kernel code behind CVE-2025-38100, but it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested so far to include the upstream component and therefore to be...
A relatively small, targeted fix in the Linux kernel’s SCSI driver tree — tracked as CVE‑2024‑46673 and described upstream as “scsi: aacraid: Fix double‑free on probe failure” — has rippled into the vendor and distribution ecosystems this winter. Microsoft’s public advisory for the issue names...
The short answer is: No — Azure Linux is not necessarily the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable open‑source code, but it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include that component so far. Microsoft’s public wording is an explicit, product‑scoped...
The short, practical answer is: No — Azure Linux is not proven to be the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable library; it is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the affected open‑source component so far. That attestation is authoritative for...