You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
model safety
About this tag
Model safety is a critical concern in the deployment of large language models and agentic AI systems. Discussions on WindowsForum highlight persistent vulnerabilities such as jailbreaks and the Policy Puppetry technique, which bypass safety alignment in models from OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Anthropic. Enterprises are urged to adopt lifecycle security approaches like Prisma AIRS 2.0 to protect agentic AI from design through execution. Recurring themes include the inadequacy of current safety measures like RLHF, the ease of exploiting AI systems, and the need for robust, continuous security practices in production environments.
Prisma AIRS 2.0 signals a pivotal shift in how enterprises must think about agentic AI: not as a feature to bolt on, but as a distinct class of identity, data flow and runtime behavior that demands lifecycle security from design through live execution. Background / Overview
Autonomous AI agents...
Jailbreaking the world’s most advanced AI models is still alarmingly easy, a fact that continues to spotlight significant gaps in artificial intelligence security—even as these powerful tools become central to everything from business productivity to everyday consumer technology. A recent...
adversarial attacks
ai ethics
ai in business
ai jailbreaking
ai regulation
ai research
ai risks
ai security
artificial intelligence
cybersecurity
generative ai
google gemini
language models
llm vulnerabilities
llms
modelsafety
openai gpt
prompt engineering
security flaw
For years, the safety of large language models (LLMs) has been promoted with near-evangelical confidence by their creators. Vendors such as OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Anthropic have pointed to advanced safety measures—including Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)—as...