📎 AI Summary:
The thread centers on a copyright lawsuit involving a tattoo artist claiming that copying his design onto actor Ed Helms’ face for the *Hangover* sequel amounts to “tattoo piracy,” raising whether movie stars should worry about Tyson’s tattoo artist. The key question is whether the actor’s face tattoo constitutes unauthorized copying protected under copyright or whether it’s part of the film’s creative use. Overall, the sentiment is cautious and skeptical, treating Tyson-themed legal action as a risky development but focusing more on the legal premise than on any defendant’s wrongdoing.

cybercore

New Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
15,626
Thread Author #1
He might be a bit past his prime, but angering Mike Tyson is still an incredibly bad idea, as the main characters of the 2009 hit movie The Hangover learned—repeatedly. But should movie stars like Ed Helms (pictured at left) quiver in fear because of Tyson’s tattoo artist? The tattooist is trying to block the launch of the sequel with a copyright lawsuit, saying that copying his design onto actor Helms’ face is actually a kind of tattoo piracy.


s-MIKE-TYSON-FACE-TATTOO-large300.jpg



More Link Removed