AI and Web Development in 2025: A Deep Dive into the State of AI-Powered Website Builders

Generative AI and web development are increasingly converging, sparking a wave of innovation that promises to reshape how websites are built and managed. For creators, entrepreneurs, and small businesses, the allure is obvious: delegate complex coding, content creation, and even image design to artificial intelligence. In practice, though, does the current generation of AI-powered website builders actually deliver on its grand promises? After in-depth hands-on testing and critical analysis of the major contenders—including Squarespace, Wix, 10Web, GoDaddy, and Hostinger—the landscape in 2025 is both exciting and underwhelming, with glimmers of genius marred by unfinished execution. This comprehensive review examines the state of AI-driven web design, highlights what each platform excels at (and where they stumble), discusses broader implications for the future, and offers practical guidance for anyone seeking to leverage AI for web presence today.

The Hype: Why AI Seems Perfect for Website Building​

On paper, the synergy between AI and web design is extraordinary. Website creation juggles a host of tasks—structuring pages, choosing layouts, writing compelling copy, curating images, aligning color palettes, and maintaining site-wide design coherence. These are exactly the kinds of problems generative AI tools have shown promise in solving, from text generation to image synthesis and even rudimentary code writing.
AI ostensibly offers several key advantages:

• Speed: Generate a ready-to-publish site in minutes, not days or weeks.
• Creativity: Suggest content and visuals you might not have imagined.
• Accessibility: Lower the technical barrier for users with no coding or design experience.
• Adaptability: Personalize the site based on user needs, feedback, or evolving data.

Leading analysts and vendors predict the AI web builder market could disrupt traditional website development, putting powerful site creation in the hands of the masses. Yet, one critical question remains: Are these platforms, as of 2025, truly as capable as the marketing materials claim?

The Reality Check: Deep-Dive Testing and Insights​

To separate substance from spin, a six-month exhaustive evaluation was conducted, involving 70+ hours of direct use, 236 company emails, hands-on site builds, and iterative testing. A consistent methodology was used: Each builder had to create a site for a fictional consulting detective business themed around Sherlock Holmes, leveraging recognizable branding, a “dark academia” visual aesthetic, and clever detective iconography.
What surfaced was a striking disconnect between aspiration and execution.

Squarespace: Design Flair, Minimal AI​

Squarespace is well-known for its polished templates and relentless marketing. Initial setup lets users designate a “brand personality” (Professional, Playful, Sophisticated, etc.), then pick among several themed templates—quickly delivering a sleek-looking site.
AI Reality:

• Only observable generative AI featured in text-edit dialogs (marketed as Blueprint AI), usable for headline and body text suggestions.
• No AI assistance for layout, color palettes, font choices, or design themes.
• No AI-driven logo design or image creation.
• Wizard-driven onboarding and site management tied to template selection, not AI intelligence.

Strengths:

• Rapid, consistent results using a robust template library.
• Intuitive for novices.

Weaknesses:

• AI claims are misleading; most “automation” is pre-canned, hard-coded wizard logic, not true intelligence.
• Innovation mostly limited to a basic LLM text box in content fields.

Critical Take: Squarespace is a template powerhouse, but its AI features are superficial. For those expecting meaningful AI-driven design, the reality is a letdown.

Wix: Most Holistic AI... at First Glance​

Wix introduces a more dynamic onboarding, with its Astro AI asking interview questions to deduce a site’s intended focus and assembling suggested layouts, content, and even headlines like “Unraveling mysteries with precision and expertise.” Astro-generated service pages made logical sense for the Sherlock Holmes use case (Case Consultation, Crime Scene Analysis, etc.).
AI Reality:

• Active interview process determines structure and some services.
• Basic layout, color, and font recommendations via AI; not particularly creative after regeneration attempts.
• Text and image generation tools built-in, with image synthesis available in the workflow (no need for third-party tools).
• Images are often thematically adjacent, but lack polish (e.g., generated a possible “Jack the Ripper” instead of Sherlock; initial attempts were sometimes graphically inappropriate).
• AI functions mostly during initial build; afterward, edits are manual and AI cannot globally update the site.

Strengths:

• Astro’s “interview” simulates a semi-personalized consultant.
• Good for ideation and rapid prototyping.
• Built-in image generation is convenient.

Weaknesses:

• AI only “sees” the site during setup phase—no ongoing holistic editing.
• Quality of AI-generated images and color palettes is uneven.
• Logo designer remains non-functional.

Critical Take: Wix is currently the top AI website builder for users who want a creative jump-start but are prepared to take over for refinements. Sustainable long-term AI editing is not yet implemented.

10Web: Bold Promises, Rough Performance​

10Web brands its AI assistant as Co-Pilot (echoing Microsoft), and it immediately impressed by weaving Sherlock’s famous “221B Baker Street” into the test site unprompted. The system also generated credible mission and legacy pages.
AI Reality:

• Smart reference-matching (Sherlock’s address) shows AI’s capability for contextual understanding.
• Text-to-image and text generation available.
• Major weaknesses in image text (e.g., image labeled “crince” instead of “crime”), odd world map additions, and logo maker churned out errors (“Sierloik Holmes, Conslligy Detect”).
• Text rewriting was verbose and sometimes ignored original content’s brevity.
• Recurring errors and reliability issues throughout tests; features frequently errored out.

Strengths:

• Demonstrates AI’s potential for nuanced, context-rich content generation.
• Multi-modal content creation.

Weaknesses:

• Image and text generators are unreliable.
• Site-wide AI-based control is missing.
• Error handling and user feedback are poor.

Critical Take: 10Web shows promise but is plagued by beta-grade reliability and execution. Its AI-generated content can hit some impressive highs, quickly followed by embarrassing lapses.

GoDaddy: AI in Name Only​

GoDaddy’s website builder, long associated with domain registration, touts AI text description “get copy suggestions,” but comprehensive AI is conspicuously absent in practice.
AI Reality:

• Site construction requires a registered domain before setup (classic GoDaddy upsell approach).
• Logo designer produces basic, manual-like icons rather than AI-derived visuals.
• Copy suggestion tool is slow and cycles through repetitive, generic options with little apparent intelligence; no visible integration with LLMs.
• No AI functionality for color, font, themes, CSS, or image creation.
• Customers can buy images from iStock, but there is no AI-driven content creation.

Strengths:

• Rapid, no-nonsense onboarding for basic sites.
• Familiar interface for GoDaddy loyalists.

Weaknesses:

• Almost all “AI” features are simple automations or repackaged manual steps.
• Image and copy innovation is negligible.

Critical Take: GoDaddy’s claims to AI website building are the thinnest among major providers. Users hoping for generative intelligence will be disappointed.

Hostinger: Two Approaches, Both Early-Stage​

Hostinger offers both a standard site builder with basic AI elements (pre-interview-led template suggestion) and a separate “Horizon” chatbot-style AI builder.
AI Reality:

• Standard Website Builder: Offers template suggestions based on brief interviews and fills in site sections with generated text—similar to its peers.
• Hostinger Horizon: Chat interface promises genuine generative AI features, but routinely fails on basic requests. Logo design falters, image swapping isn’t responsive, and commands to tweak layout/margins or implement new color schemes return inconsistent results.
• Horizon’s value proposition is clear: control the whole website project through conversational interaction, but actual results lag far behind the vision.

Strengths:

• Horizon is one of the first attempts to let users shape their website live via chat—not just during initial setup.
• Hostinger’s visual design and feature set shows they’re thinking ahead.

Weaknesses:

• AI is unreliable for non-textual changes (graphics, layout, margins).
• Incapable of juggling user-edits with AI-edits or resolving conflicts.
• Not ready for mass adoption or paid upsell.

Critical Take: Hostinger’s Horizon could transform AI web building if executed properly. Today, however, it remains more of a proof-of-concept with real usability hurdles.

The Missing Ingredient: Truly Holistic, Persistent AI​

Across all platforms, the most glaring absence is any real sense of “site-wide” AI awareness or persistent intelligence. Current AI tools act like assistants for isolated tasks: generate this paragraph, create this hero image, suggest a button color. None can reason about the website as a system, harmonizing branding, content, theme, and style across the entire experience. Efforts to inject generative technology into onboarding workflows create an illusion of intelligence, but what’s under the hood is usually a series of wizard-driven forks or API calls to third-party LLMs, rather than persistent, integrated, conversational AI.
Common shortcomings include:

• Limited scope: AI only engaged at initial setup, rarely available for ongoing editing, refactoring, or holistic design adjustments.
• Fragmentation: No true integration of text, images, CSS, and user edits within a single coherent AI pipeline.
• Missed opportunities for coding: Not a single provider offers AI-generated CSS or code editing—the very task AI coding assistants already perform reliably elsewhere.

The Competitive Threat: Why Not Just Use ChatGPT?​

A surprising and somewhat damning verdict: for most significant tasks, using ChatGPT or another consumer LLM in parallel with a regular site builder produces superior results. Third-party AI can generate custom copy, suggest CSS code, even use plug-ins to create site-specific scripts or generate images (via tools like Midjourney or DALL-E) with more flexibility than hosted site builders. Then, the user can simply copy and paste the desired result into their platform of choice.
Advantages include:

• Higher-quality text and code: Direct prompts to ChatGPT tend to yield more accurate and creative results than built-in site builder tools.
• Greater versatility: AI tools aren’t artificially limited by platform restrictions.
• Cost efficiency: With free and low-priced plans, consumer AI is available for a wide range of applications—not just web building.

This approach does require a more hands-on workflow; you won’t achieve “one-click” site launches. But for users willing to invest a bit of time, the quality and creativity leap far ahead of the current state of AI-powered hosted builders.

The Road Ahead: Trends and Future Directions​

Despite underwhelming present-day performance, the long-term potential for AI-driven websites is enormous. Most major providers are clearly in the exploratory phase, layering shallow AI features atop proven template-driven engines. Yet signs point to an imminent leap—one where AI can:

• Interpret user intent site-wide, not just per field.
• Harmonize content, colors, fonts, and images with an understanding of brand and audience.
• Apply code-level changes (CSS, JavaScript, integrations) via conversational commands.
• Offer live, AI-powered collaborative editing (“Make the hero section more dramatic; reposition testimonials; create a dark-academia palette”).
• Blend user and AI edits seamlessly, maintaining a version-controlled project history.

Major platforms like Microsoft and Google are already pushing in this direction, with Gemini and Copilot showing the capability to manage complex project file structures and offer AI coding tools across multiple assets. As API prices for high-quality LLMs drop, the cost deterrent for hosting companies will diminish, making it easier to deliver advanced features without nickel-and-diming customers.
Additionally, the most powerful advances may arise when AI web builders are integrated into productivity suites, rather than remaining as standalone offerings. Imagine an AI assistant deeply familiar with your business documents, presentations, and branding guidelines, capable of orchestrating a comprehensive web presence drawing from your broader digital footprint.

Risks and Concerns: Where Caution Is Warranted​

While the possibilities excite, risks abound:

• Content accuracy and brand safety: Automated text and image generation can yield off-brand, offensive, or factually incorrect outputs—as seen with disturbing crime scene AI images.
• Over-reliance on automation: Relying solely on AI can limit site uniqueness and stifle creativity if all brands draw from the same pool of models and wizards.
• Security considerations: Poorly implemented AI integrations could expose vulnerabilities in site code or user data, especially if AI-driven code outputs are not rigorously tested.
• Transparency of “AI” claims: Vendors must be honest about which features are genuinely AI-driven versus traditional automation.

Anyone considering these platforms should test extensively and never assume outputs are ready-to-publish without careful review.

Final Verdict: Where Do the Best AI Website Builders Stand in 2025?​

After 70+ hours of testing, countless emails, and real-world builds, not a single hosted AI-powered website builder currently fulfills the grand vision of true, holistic, persistently intelligent web development. The field features flashes of ingenuity but is ultimately hampered by partial integrations, fragmented workflows, and premature marketing claims.
Who’s the best right now? If you absolutely want an “AI-powered” hosted builder as of 2025:

• Wix’s Astro offers the most comprehensive initial AI guidance, good for quick launches and basic creative brainstorming.
• 10Web shows impressive contextual understanding—when it works—but needs more stability.
• Hostinger Horizon is worth watching as a proof-of-concept for genuine conversation-driven site management, but don’t rely on it for business-critical projects just yet.

For those more concerned with ultimate quality or who desire complex customization, integrating ChatGPT (or similar general AI tools) into a manual workflow beats everything the current site builders offer. This approach gives you more creative control, higher output quality, and flexibility—at the expense of a couple extra steps.

Practical Guidance: Choosing and Using AI Website Builders Today​

Deciding whether to use an AI-powered builder (and which one) comes down to your tolerance for both quirks and uncertainty. Here’s what to consider:

• Evaluate your needs: If you want a basic, visually appealing site with minimal effort and don’t mind tweaking, Wix is your best bet. For more control and hands-on refinement, go with traditional platforms but supplement with standalone AI tools.
• Test before committing: Most providers offer trials or free tiers. Spend at least an hour in each before deciding.
• Don’t trust automated outputs blindly: Review all AI-generated content for accuracy, tone, and brand alignment.
• Demand transparency: Expect vendors to clearly label which components use real AI and provide access to changelogs (especially for critical updates).
• Stay updated: As this category is rapidly evolving, revisit available tools at least once per quarter if AI-driven design is important to you.

Looking Forward: What Will It Take for AI Website Builders to Fulfill Their Potential?​

The pieces for revolutionizing website creation with AI already exist—robust LLMs, image generators, and cross-document coding assistants are widely available. The critical missing ingredients are smarter integration, true conversational editing, and persistent site-wide AI awareness.
Providers that invest in:

• Real-time AI copilots with full visibility into site structure and assets,
• Secure, high-quality LLM integrations,
• Seamless merging of user and AI edits,
• Multi-modal creative generation (text, code, graphics, layout) within a holistic pipeline,
• And clear, honest communication about what is and isn’t “AI,”

will rise above competitors and truly redefine how websites are created.
In summary, AI-powered website builders in 2025 remain a work in progress—sometimes clever, often clumsy, always evolving. Watch this space. As the technology matures, website creation may genuinely become a matter of simple conversation, guided not just by wizards, but by persistent, site-savvy artificial intelligence. Until then, savvy users will mix and match tools, staying critical, creative, and informed.

---

Source: ZDNET Looking for an AI-powered website builder? Here's your best option in 2025