AI-Powered PCs: The Rise, Challenges, and Future Beyond Microsoft’s Copilot+

Microsoft’s ambitious bet on Copilot+ PCs was supposed to unleash a new era for personal computing: one in which local artificial intelligence (AI) transformed productivity, creativity, and the fundamental PC experience. But a year after the initial hype, the industry is facing a sobering reality check. Far from dominating the market, Copilot+ PCs have struggled to capture consumer imaginations or wallets. Yet beneath the disappointment, a deeper transformation may be underway—one that suggests AI-powered hardware is not a matter of if, but when.

The Copilot+ Dream: Hype, Hardware, and Hesitation​

When Microsoft unveiled Copilot+ in 2024, the messaging was clear: this was not just another evolutionary leap in the Windows ecosystem, but the dawn of AI as an embedded, everyday computing tool. With major manufacturers such as Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Samsung, and Microsoft’s own Surface division onboard, Copilot+ PCs promised a radically new experience. At the heart of each machine: a processor featuring a neural processing unit (NPU) capable of a blistering 40 trillion operations per second (TOPS), designed to rival—if not surpass—the AI horsepower found in cloud services.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella spoke of “bringing real joy and a sense of wonder back to creation on the PC,” referencing integrated features like Paint Cocreator and Recall, which were intended to make everyday tasks smarter, faster, and more intuitive. From the outside, it looked like Microsoft was poised to capture the AI zeitgeist — similar to Apple’s success integrating neural engines in its Mac lineup or Google’s emphasis on AI-first devices.
But reality has not matched the vision.

By the Numbers: A Disappointing Debut​

Despite the gold-plated branding and cross-industry buy-in, Copilot+ PCs stumbled immediately after their official ship date on June 18, 2024. According to data from IDC, less than 1% of all Windows PCs shipped during 2024 were Copilot+ devices—just 1.3 million out of more than 200 million PCs sold worldwide. In the first quarter of 2025, that share crept up to 1.9% of all PCs, but with only 1.2 million additional units sold.
When put into context, these figures are even less impressive. The surge in traditional AI PCs—that is, PCs with some level of NPU but falling short of the Copilot+ 40 TOPS threshold—was much more substantial. IDC estimated a whopping 28.2 million Windows AI PCs shipped in 2024, representing 14% of the Windows PC market. That number jumped to 12.2 million in Q1 2025, or an impressive 27% of Windows PCs sold in that quarter.
The contrast could not be starker: where generic AI PCs found a ready market, Copilot+ systems were met with consumer indifference.

Why the Reluctance? Price, Perception, and Practicality​

Several critical factors contributed to the slow adoption rate of Copilot+ PCs:

1. Premium Pricing and Value Proposition​

Copilot+ models launched with notably higher prices than their less-powerful siblings, an issue flagged by both analysts and consumers alike. As Bob O’Donnell, president of TECHnalysis Research, noted, the pricing made it hard to justify Copilot+ over more affordable traditional models—especially when the tangible benefits could be unclear or absent for everyday users.

2. Confusing Feature Rollout​

The initial suite of Copilot+ features was hampered by delays and inconsistent delivery. Microsoft’s high-profile “Recall” feature—which used the PC’s NPU to search archived local information—was itself put on hold multiple times due to serious security concerns. Users (and IT departments) saw not breakthrough utility, but risk and uncertainty.
Even now, it remains unclear to many buyers which features require Copilot+ hardware, which run on generic AI PCs, and which are simply cloud-powered functions everyone gets anyway. Compounding the confusion, apps like Paint Cocreator (which needs a Copilot+ NPU) share branding and conceptual overlap with features available to any Windows 11 user—further eroding the perceived advantage of the premium models.

3. Platform Fragmentation and Slow Vendor Support​

Microsoft prioritized Copilot+ features for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon platform, delaying support for competing AI PC silicon from AMD and Intel. This narrowed the early audience and frustrated would-be adopters eager for choice. Intel only shipped its commercial Core Ultra Series 2 (“Lunar Lake”)—Copilot+ ready chips—at CES in January 2025, months after the big Copilot+ push.
Even after rollout, the key development APIs for efficient AI workloads on Windows (notably Windows Machine Learning) are still labeled as “experimental” by Microsoft, leaving developers reluctant to commit, and customers waiting for killer apps that have yet to arrive.

4. The GPU Factor: Power Users Remain on the Sidelines​

Gamers and creative professionals—the power users most enthusiastic about AI-assisted workflows—have largely been excluded from the Copilot+ program due to Microsoft’s singular focus on NPUs rather than discrete, far more powerful Nvidia GPUs. For these users, buying a Copilot+ machine often meant taking a step back in raw AI capability.

The AI PC Tipping Point? Beyond Copilot+ Hype​

The Copilot+ stumble does not spell doom for AI PCs in general. Far from it: all roadmaps from major chip vendors show relentless movement toward more powerful, integrated AI processing—even if the marketing headlines shift from "Copilot+" to broader promises of smarter computing.

AI Hardware Evolution—Relentless, If Uneven​

First-generation AI PCs powered by Intel’s Core Ultra Series 1 (“Meteor Lake”) delivered around 11.5 TOPS, while AMD’s Ryzen 8000 mobile chips offered up to 16 TOPS. These machines, though not Copilot+ “certified,” were already capable of running AI-enhanced features locally, providing a bridge experience that felt substantial for the average user.
Where Copilot+ initially stumbled over unclear benefits and high prices, the broader availability and affordability of AI PCs is changing the picture. Industry watchers are nearly unanimous: locally processed AI workloads on PCs are inevitable, driven less by immediate killer apps and more by gradual hardware diffusion.
“I think it’s safe to say that within two years, we will be running lots of AI workloads locally on PCs,” commented Tom Mainelli, group vice president at IDC. Notably, this evolution isn’t driven by Copilot+ branding but rather by pervasive, quietly improving hardware capabilities and a slow but steady ramp of genuinely useful AI software.

The Windows 10 Sunset: A Catalyst in Waiting​

A major inflection point looms with Microsoft’s steady wind-down of Windows 10 support, set to end in October. Millions of aging PCs—many unable to upgrade to Windows 11—will need to be replaced. This broad refresh cycle offers the perfect opportunity for Copilot+ (or generic AI PC) features to become standard by default, regardless of whether consumers actively seek them out.

Platform Wars: Qualcomm, Intel, and AMD​

Qualcomm: AI First, but Market Lagging​

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite has been the flagship of Copilot+—boasting the most advanced NPU and league-leading battery life. But with only a sliver of the PC market compared to Intel and AMD, Snapdragon adoption remains slow. The company, however, is all-in; every chip it ships now includes an NPU, embedding AI deeply at the hardware level.

Intel: Dominant, But Entering a Transition​

Intel still accounts for an estimated 75% of worldwide PC CPU shipments, with an even higher share in laptops—the heart of the Copilot+/AI PC push. The transition to “Lunar Lake” (Core Ultra Series 2) finally brings full Copilot+ support. By fall, the even more advanced “Panther Lake” successor is expected, promising even higher TOPS via the rumored “NPU 5.”
Despite this, Intel’s sales in 2024 revealed heavy customer demand for older “n-2” CPUs like Raptor Lake over the newest models, possibly due to pricing, performance questions, or tariff avoidance. There’s every reason to expect a correction as next-gen NPUs become more commonplace and value improves, but mainstream buyers have not proven eager for first-generation Copilot+ PCs.

AMD: The Challenger​

AMD, whose Ryzen AI Max will span both desktops and laptops, appears ready to follow the broader Copilot+ arc. While its desktop ambitions are still in formation, upgrades to NPU performance are a given. The niche Ryzen 8000 series already includes basic NPU capabilities, presaging further AI-focused design.

Software: The Missing Piece​

All the hardware in the world cannot overcome lackluster software. For most users, current Copilot+ features are either duplicative of what’s available via cloud (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.), flashy but functionally marginal (Paint Cocreator), or not yet mature enough to justify upgrades. Security confusion—especially the Recall retrenchment—has dampened both excitement and trust.
Even as Microsoft expands the Copilot brand to cover all manner of cloud and device-bound AI tooling, the importance of compelling, locally run AI experiences cannot be understated. Productivity enhancements, smarter search, instant media generation, and more will eventually benefit from local AI horsepower—but clear, must-have applications remain elusive.
Analysts routinely highlight that both IT decision makers and individual consumers remain confused about what AI PCs actually offer. The market is being asked to pay up now for advantages that are, to a large extent, still “coming soon.” This “aspirational” sales model was bound to create friction until tangible, everyday benefits appear.

Markets Speak: The Shift Toward “Premium” Rebranding​

There are signs Microsoft is adjusting its positioning. Increasingly, Copilot+ devices are presented not solely as “AI PCs” but as “premium” systems—emphasizing high-quality displays, long battery life, and advanced connectivity alongside (but not solely because of) AI features. This soft rebrand may help reduce confusion and recalibrate expectations, turning Copilot+ into a subset of high-end Windows hardware rather than an all-or-nothing proposition.

The Competitive Landscape: Apple, Nvidia, and the Rest​

While Microsoft has set the pace for AI PC marketing, it is not alone. Apple’s Macs, powered by M1, M2, M3, and (new in 2025) M4 silicon, have set high bars for local AI performance—albeit primarily via the CPU and GPU rather than discrete NPUs. IDC counts Macs with M4’s 38 TOPS as qualified for generative AI PC status, blurring the lines further.
Nvidia, by contrast, has seen explosive growth in demand for discrete GPUs—not just for one-off AI workloads but for powering research, gaming, and creative applications that outstrip any NPU. Microsoft’s decision to sideline discrete GPUs in its Copilot+ program has frustrated some advanced users, but reflects an intent to steer the “mainstream” laptop market, not the high-powered specialist segment.

A Look Ahead: AI Capability as Baseline​

Despite the Copilot+ misstep, it is now almost a foregone conclusion that NPU-enabled, AI-enhanced PCs will become standard over the next few years. Every new laptop and most desktops will feature hardware-accelerated machine learning, regardless of whether buyers consciously demand it.

Analogies With GPUs: From Specialty to Standard​

Industry veterans liken the trajectory of NPUs to that of integrated graphics two decades ago. Once the exclusive domain of discrete expansion cards, GPUs ultimately became standard on virtually every device. Today’s premium Copilot+ badge may soon be as unremarkable as “HD graphics” branding once was—expected, and table stakes for modern performance.

Desktops and Gaming: Different Timetables​

One major caveat: the AI PC revolution is still overwhelmingly focused on laptops. Virtually no desktops or gaming rigs currently ship with high-end Copilot+ NPUs, and there is no comprehensive Copilot+ desktop initiative yet. For professional creators, researchers, and gamers, Nvidia’s GPU-centric solutions retain dominance—and this is unlikely to change in the immediate term.
AMD’s Ryzen AI Max and Intel’s future Arrow Lake architecture may make inroads eventually, but the transition will be gradual. In the meantime, AI PC branding will continue to align more with everyday productivity and mobility than with highly specialized power computing.

Critical Analysis: Strengths, Risks, and What Needs to Change​

Strengths and Emerging Value​

• Long-Term Hardware Trajectory: Regardless of initial market ambivalence, the steady advance of AI hardware is both obvious and inevitable. Vendors are committed, and machine learning workloads are only increasing in both complexity and market importance.
• Battery Life and Performance: Copilot+ and similar AI-focused chips often bring secondary benefits—superior battery life, rapid wake and sleep, and improved media performance—making them attractive even if AI usage is low.
• Momentum from Software Developers: Early APIs might be immature, but the pipeline of software in development—especially from Microsoft—is robust. As new use cases materialize, the utility of AI PCs will rise dramatically.

Risks, Uncertainties, and Consumer Skepticism​

• Lack of Compelling Use Cases: The biggest risk to AI PC adoption is inertia. Until there are clear, everyday tasks that materially benefit from local AI, most consumers will defer upgrades as long as possible.
• Security Concerns: Mishaps like the Recall rollout debacle are not just speed bumps but real credibility issues, particularly for enterprise buyers.
• Vendor Fragmentation: Microsoft’s dependence on specific chip platforms (first favoring Qualcomm, then racing to support Intel/AMD) has fragmented both the market and developer efforts.
• Pricing Premium: Unless Copilot+ features become foundational—rather than an expensive extra—mainstream buyers will continue to see little justification for paying a premium.

The Unavoidable AI Future​

With all three major chipmakers now making AI-focused hardware a priority, and software slowly catching up, the next generation of PCs will quietly (or loudly) ship with NPUs capable of running advanced local AI. For many, the transition will be transparent; for others—especially enterprises managing large fleets—it could trigger both opportunity and short-term headaches.
The final word: Microsoft’s Copilot+ push may have fizzled as a must-have, irresistible upgrade. But the tide of AI hardware is turning inescapably. In the years to come, even as marketing buzzwords fade, AI PCs will be as ubiquitous—and as unremarkable—as the humble GPU. The story is not about Copilot+ itself, but about the industry’s slow march toward an AI-powered future for all.

---

Source: PCWorld A year in, Microsoft's Copilot+ gamble is a bust. But AI PCs still feel inevitable