AMD RDNA 3.5 Graphics: Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 25.04 Performance Benchmarks

  • Thread Author
AMD RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics have long been a topic of interest among Windows and Linux enthusiasts, and the recent testing on a Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 with an AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 SoC provides fresh insights into how far driver optimizations have come. In a head-to-head comparison of performance between a fully updated Windows 11 Pro installation and a clean Ubuntu 25.04 beta, the benchmarks zero in on native iGPU workloads. With both platforms leveraging the latest drivers—Radeon Software on Windows versus the fresh Mesa 25.0 and Linux 6.14 kernel stack on Ubuntu—the results are a fascinating study in how open-source solutions are closing gaps that once seemed insurmountable.

A laptop, wireless mouse, and monitor displaying colorful cooling fan graphics on a desk.Testing Environment & Hardware Overview​

Before diving into the benchmark results, it’s worth taking a closer look at the testing environment and the hardware setup:
  • Platform: Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 laptop
  • Processor: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360—a Zen 5 SoC that powers both CPU and iGPU performance
  • Graphics: Radeon 880M, using RDNA 3.5 architecture for integrated graphics
  • Memory: 32GB LPDDR5-7500, ensuring smooth operation across both operating systems
  • Operating Systems:
  • Windows 11 Pro: Pre-installed on the device and fully updated with the latest AMD drivers and patches
  • Ubuntu 25.04 beta: Featuring Linux 6.14 and Mesa 25.0, delivering the newest open-source driver optimizations
The test was conducted with an eye toward native graphics workloads. By avoiding translation layers and API emulation (like Proton, DXVK, or VKD3D), the benchmarks focused squarely on the raw performance capabilities of the respective graphics drivers. This approach not only provides insights into driver efficiency but also highlights how much extra juice is available when bypassing additional translation overhead.

Benchmarking Methodology: Keeping It Native​

What makes this test particularly interesting is its focus on native workloads present on both Windows and Linux. Instead of pitting gaming performance (where various API translation layers might muddy the water), the benchmarks stress the underlying graphics stack itself. This means:
  • Testing was performed using applications and workloads that run natively on both operating systems.
  • Tasks were carefully selected to stress the GPU drivers’ ability to handle complex rendering and compute operations without any intermediary layers.
  • Both platforms were optimized for their respective environments: Windows 11 came pre-loaded with the latest Radeon Software enhancements, while Ubuntu 25.04 beta showcased the latest in open-source innovations like RadeonSI Gallium3D and RADV for Vulkan.
By focusing on native usage, the test provided an unadulterated look at driver performance. For instance, while Windows has traditionally benefited from proprietary drivers finely tuned to hardware, the open-source stack on Linux has matured significantly. Can the Linux drivers match, or even exceed, the performance of their Windows counterparts when translation layers are removed from the equation?

Deep Dive: Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 25.04 Driver Performance​

Windows 11: The Refined Proprietary Experience​

Windows 11 has long been the home of refined, proprietary drivers that are optimized for a wide range of hardware configurations. In this context:
  • Driver Maturity: Windows drivers for AMD hardware have evolved over many cycles, with continuous updates addressing bugs, performance hiccups, and compatibility issues. The latest AMD updates ensure that even integrated graphics solutions like the Radeon 880M can deliver impressive performance.
  • Optimized for Enterprise and Gaming: Windows 11’s ecosystem benefits from robust support for games and professional applications alike. The Radeon Software suite offers advanced control panels, performance tweaking features, and seamless integration with the OS.
  • Hardware Interface Nuances: Differences in how Windows exposes hardware data compared with Linux’s interfaces might result in minor discrepancies in diagnostics and benchmark readings. However, these differences do not necessarily imply performance imbalance, but rather reflect how each OS interacts with the underlying system components.
In this benchmarking exercise, Windows 11’s performance under a fully updated system environment sets a high bar. Even under intense native workloads, the proprietary drivers are finely optimized to extract every drop of performance from the integrated graphics.

Ubuntu 25.04: The Rise of Open-Source Graphics​

On the flip side, Ubuntu 25.04—released as a beta—features cutting-edge components that promise significant gains for Linux users:
  • Linux 6.14 Kernel & Mesa 25.0: With the latest kernel and Mesa drivers, Ubuntu offers a fresh graphics stack that is particularly tuned for modern GPUs using AMD’s RDNA 3.5 technology. The improvements present in Mesa 25.0 highlight the active development and commitment by the open-source community.
  • RadeonSI Gallium3D & RADV Vulkan Drivers: The integration of these drivers means that both traditional rendering (using Gallium3D) and new-generation compute tasks (via RADV for Vulkan) are benefiting from the most recent optimizations. Users can expect lower latency, better power management, and enhanced stability in demanding workloads.
  • Clean, Minimal Install: The testing was performed on a clean Ubuntu beta install, ensuring that extraneous software or background tasks did not skew the results. This allows for a purer benchmarking scenario directly focused on driver efficiency.
The performance of the open-source drivers is particularly noteworthy because it challenges the long-held assumption that proprietary drivers always lead the charge in graphics performance. By removing translation overhead and diving straight into native workloads, Ubuntu 25.04 demonstrates that open-source drivers can potentially match—or in some cases, surpass—the performance of their Windows equivalents.

Comparative Analysis: No Translation, Just Pure Performance​

When it comes to graphics performance between Windows and Linux in this test scenario, there are a few standout observations:
  • Native Workload Efficiency:
    Both operating systems were measured under conditions where no additional API translation layers (such as Proton or DXVK) were involved. This plays a pivotal role, as it isolates the performance of the drivers themselves.
  • Windows 11 shows robust performance, thanks to decades of optimization in its proprietary drivers.
  • Ubuntu 25.04, leveraging the latest Mesa and Linux kernel improvements, demonstrates that open-source drivers are not far behind, even in scenarios traditionally dominated by proprietary solutions.
  • Graphics Stack Maturity:
  • Windows’ established ecosystem has a clear advantage in terms of stability and longevity. The drivers have had ample time to iron out bugs and optimize for a wide range of applications.
  • However, Linux’s rapid development cycle—with continual improvements in both the kernel and the Mesa drivers—allows it to catch up quickly. The recent Linux 6.14 kernel and Mesa 25.0 updates are a testament to this evolution.
  • Benchmark Focus & Future Implications:
    The testing notably steers clear of gaming benchmarks, instead focusing on workloads that directly engage the graphics drivers. This pivot is significant because it suggests that the open-source driver improvements are not merely theoretical. They’re measurable, day-to-day performance enhancements that could impact content creation, data visualization, and other professional applications on Linux.
  • Driver Overhead & Efficiency:
    One of the most compelling findings from the test is the potential for lower driver overhead on Ubuntu when bypassing additional compatibility layers. In native scenarios, the benefits of an optimized open-source stack can sometimes even outshine proprietary solutions, particularly when every millisecond counts in demanding workloads.

Addressing the Hardware Information Interface​

It was also noted that while the underlying hardware remains identical, how each operating system exposes its information can vary. For example:
  • On Windows 11, system tables might report hardware information in a way that aligns with legacy components and methodologies, ensuring compatibility with a long list of applications.
  • Ubuntu, however, tends to reveal more granular details about the hardware, thanks to its open-source nature and the evolving Linux hardware abstraction layers.
While these differences are more cosmetic than performance-critical, they serve as a reminder that performance parity isn’t the entire story. The richer diagnostics on Linux could provide developers with more granular control and insights—a boon for those interested in performance tuning and troubleshooting.

Broader Implications for the Tech Community​

The implications of these findings extend well beyond the lab:
  • For Windows Users:
    The reassurance is clear—Windows 11 continues to deliver high performance through its proprietary driver ecosystem. With consistent updates from AMD and Microsoft, gamers, developers, and professionals have every reason to stay confident in the platform’s capabilities.
  • For Linux Enthusiasts:
    The performance gains observed under Ubuntu 25.04 are a strong indicator that the gap between Windows and Linux in graphics performance is narrowing. This bodes well for users who value open-source software and seek environments with lower system overhead and greater customization.
  • The Developer Community:
    With native workloads now showing comparable results between the two operating systems, developers might be encouraged to push for more cross-platform compatibility in their applications. The reduced need for translation layers means that performance optimizations can be more straightforward, potentially leading to a more unified development approach across platforms.
  • Enterprise and Professional Use:
    As integrated graphics performance continues to improve on Linux, enterprises that have traditionally relied on Windows for high-performance tasks might reassess their operating system strategies. Improved driver performance, paired with Linux’s reputation for stability and security, could well be a game-changer in fields such as digital media production, CAD, and even certain aspects of cybersecurity advisories.

Future Outlook and What to Watch​

Looking ahead, it’s clear that both driver ecosystems have room for further refinement and innovation:
  • Windows 11 Updates:
    With AMD and Microsoft in a continuous feedback loop, we can expect even more finely tuned performance updates. For users, this means that a fully updated Windows 11 environment will always leverage the latest optimizations for both proprietary drivers and system stability.
  • Ubuntu and Open-Source Drivers:
    Ubuntu 25.04’s demonstration of near-parity in driver performance is only the beginning. The open-source community is known for its rapid iteration cycles, and with the Linux kernel and Mesa drivers evolving at a breakneck pace, we may soon see further breakthroughs that position Linux as a formidable competitor in native graphics performance.
  • Driver Collaboration:
    One of the most exciting prospects is the potential for closer collaboration between proprietary hardware vendors and the open-source community. The performance gains so far reflect an era where even traditionally competitive ecosystems can benefit from shared innovations and insights.

Conclusion​

The AMD RDNA 3.5 iGPU performance test on the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 serves as a reminder that innovation is alive and well across both Windows and Linux. With Windows 11’s polished and robust proprietary drivers performing admirably and Ubuntu 25.04’s open-source stack demonstrating impressive gains, users now have more options than ever when it comes to harnessing the power of integrated graphics. Whether you’re a dedicated Windows user or a committed Linux enthusiast, the future holds promise for enhanced performance, reduced driver overhead, and a more unified computing experience.
Key takeaways:
  • Both driver ecosystems have made significant strides, particularly in native workload performance.
  • Testing with minimal translation overhead provides a clearer picture of true driver efficiency.
  • The open-source advancements on Ubuntu 25.04 underscore a competitive edge that was once exclusive to Windows.
As these developments continue to unfold, it’s an exciting time for the tech community—one where high-performance computing is increasingly available regardless of your preferred operating system.

Source: Phoronix AMD RDNA 3.5 Graphics On 2025 Drivers: Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 25.04 iGPU Performance - Phoronix
 
Last edited:
The rapid evolution of integrated graphics technology is no longer just about raw numbers—it's becoming a story of platform optimization, driver innovation, and a tug-of-war between proprietary and open-source ecosystems. Recent benchmarks on a Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6, armed with AMD’s Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 SoC and its Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics, have stirred up interest among both Windows and Linux users. These tests, as reported by Phoronix, compare the performance of AMD’s latest RDNA 3.5 drivers on Windows 11 against the open-source drivers bundled with Ubuntu 25.04. Let’s dive deep into what these findings mean for Windows users and tech enthusiasts alike.

Hardware and Driver Innovations​

At the heart of this performance comparison is the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6. This modern machine is powered by an AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 SoC, which combines the robust processing capabilities of the Zen 5 architecture with the impressive Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 iGPU. The resulting synergy offers a glimpse into what the future of integrated graphics might hold—efficient multitasking, responsive UI interactions, and unexpectedly compelling gaming or creative workloads.
  • The AMD Zen 5 SoC is designed for high efficiency and robust performance.
  • The Radeon 880M, built on a streamlined RDNA 3.5 architecture, benefits from rapid architectural improvements and fine-tuning in driver support.
  • Windows 11 Pro on this system comes preloaded with the latest AMD drivers, which have benefited from numerous performance updates over the past half-year.
These hardware innovations not only set the stage for stellar performance but also highlight how dynamic modern computing systems have become. With AMD pushing the envelope in driver and firmware refinement, users can expect performance that scales with real-world needs—whether that means enhanced productivity, more immersive gaming experiences, or smoother multimedia performance.

Benchmarking: Windows 11 Versus Ubuntu 25.04​

The testing environment was as critical as the hardware itself. Before resetting the Windows installation on the ThinkPad T14s Gen 6, extensive benchmarks were conducted under Windows 11, leveraging the latest AMD drivers and cumulative OS updates. These tests provide a head-to-head comparison with Ubuntu 25.04, which employs open-source AMD drivers.

Key Testing Considerations​

  • OS Ecosystem: Windows 11 brings a tightly integrated environment with regular driver updates and streamlined security patches, while Ubuntu 25.04 represents a community-driven approach with its open-source stack.
  • Driver Differences: The proprietary AMD drivers on Windows are optimized to extract maximum performance from the RDNA 3.5 iGPU. In contrast, the open-source drivers on Ubuntu, though mature and steadily improving, sometimes lag behind the bleeding-edge performance as fine-tuned by AMD for Windows platforms.
  • Benchmark Variety: The tests included a range of synthetic benchmarks alongside real-world usage scenarios—3D rendering, compute tests, and everyday multimedia tasks.

Highlights from the Benchmark​

  • Frame Rate and Responsiveness: Windows 11’s driver ecosystem is engineered for rapid updates, which means frame rates in demanding 3D applications and games can see noticeable improvements compared to Ubuntu. This is particularly evident in scenarios where quick driver fixes and performance enhancements make a difference.
  • Stability Under Load: While Ubuntu’s open-source drivers deliver reliable performance, there are marginal variations under heavy workloads. Windows 11, benefiting from frequent and dedicated proprietary driver updates, holds an edge in maintaining consistent performance.
  • Power Management and Thermal Efficiency: The integration of hardware and software on Windows often results in fine-tuned power management strategies. This leads to cooler operation and more efficient energy use during intensive tasks, a feature that is sometimes less optimized in Linux environments.
These benchmark insights suggest that while both platforms are exceptionally capable, Windows 11 currently offers a slight performance benefit for workloads that demand real-time responsiveness and stability. For many Windows users, especially those who rely on their devices for high-performance tasks, this is a reassuring confirmation of the platform’s maturity.

The Divergent Driver Ecosystem: Proprietary vs. Open-Source​

One of the most intriguing aspects of this comparison revolves around the fundamental differences in driver ecosystems. Windows 11 benefits from AMD’s proprietary driver roadmap—a system that allows for rapid iteration, bug fixes, and comprehensive optimizations. Meanwhile, Ubuntu’s reliance on open-source drivers, although highly collaborative and transparent, sometimes means that they trail behind in exploiting the full potential of new hardware features immediately after launch.

Windows 11 Drivers: The Proprietary Edge​

  • Frequent Updates: Microsoft's update ecosystem integrates seamlessly with driver updates, ensuring that users benefit from the latest performance tweaks as soon as they are released.
  • Optimization Depth: Proprietary drivers can be fine-tuned specifically to leverage the strengths of RDNA 3.5 architectures, driving higher frame rates, smoother textures, and overall enhanced performance in demanding applications.
  • Integrated Diagnostics: Windows 11’s diagnostic tools and automated troubleshooting can help users quickly resolve driver conflicts, ensuring a smoother experience.

Ubuntu’s Open-Source Drivers: The Community-Driven Approach​

  • Transparency and Flexibility: Open-source drivers offer unparalleled transparency, enabling the community to contribute improvements and rapidly iterate on performance enhancements.
  • Customization Potential: Enthusiasts and professionals who prefer tweaking their systems often favor Linux, where driver adjustments can be manually fine-tuned to their specific needs.
  • Steady Improvements: Although the open-source drivers may not always match the performance ceilings of their proprietary counterparts, the consistent improvements from community contributions and AMD’s occasional direct support are closing the gap.
A quick comparison table illustrates this difference concisely:
FeatureWindows 11 (AMD Proprietary)Ubuntu 25.04 (Open-Source)
PerformanceHigher frame rates in demanding 3D and multimedia tasks; faster response times due to continuous optimizations.Competitive performance with occasional lag in the most demanding scenarios.
Driver MaturityRegular, rapid updates with tight integration into Windows Update.Continued improvements, though sometimes slower to implement the newest tweaks.
OS IntegrationSeamless with Microsoft’s ecosystem and security patches.Highly customizable but requires more manual intervention for optimal performance.
StabilityProven stability in a wide range of workloads and applications.Generally stable with room for enhancements in peak-load scenarios.

Real-World Implications for Windows Users​

For many Windows enthusiasts and professionals, these benchmarks are more than just numbers—they signal the benefits of a well-supported, mature driver model that continuously evolves alongside the hardware. Here’s what this means for you if you’re running Windows 11 on a device powered by AMD’s latest RDNA 3.5 iGPU:
  • Enhanced Multimedia Performance: Video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming workloads benefit directly from driver optimizations that Windows 11 offers. The integration of frequent updates into the Windows ecosystem ensures that critical performance tweaks are delivered without delay.
  • Robust Application Support: Software applications, especially those that leverage GPU acceleration for tasks like AI, machine learning, or complex simulations, are optimized further by proprietary drivers. This advancement ensures a seamless user experience across a diverse range of applications.
  • Driver Update Confidence: With Windows 11, the update process is streamlined through the OS’s update mechanism. This means that the latest driver features and bug fixes are more likely to reach your device promptly, bolstering performance and security.
  • Balanced Workloads: Whether you're a content creator, a gamer, or a professional in need of reliable performance, the increased efficiency seen in Windows 11 provides a balanced platform that caters to a wide variety of demands.
For IT professionals and system administrators, these insights translate into actionable strategies:
  • Ensure that devices are running the very latest Windows 11 updates—this is central to harnessing the full potential of AMD's RDNA 3.5 power.
  • Keep an eye on AMD’s release notes for driver updates to know when performance enhancements or bug fixes are expected.
  • Consider periodic benchmarking of your fleet to assess the real-world gains after each driver or OS update.

In-Depth Performance Analysis​

Delving deeper into the benchmark methodologies, the tests on the ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 involved a combination of synthetic tests and real-world application scenarios. Synthetic benchmarks are designed to isolate graphics performance under rigorous conditions, focusing on metrics such as frame rates, pixel fill rates, and texture mapping efficiency. Real-world tests, on the other hand, mimic everyday tasks—from video playback to light gaming and professional 3D applications.

Key Insights from the Analysis​

  • Consistent Performance Gains: On Windows 11, the latest AMD drivers delivered consistent performance improvements. This is particularly noticeable in high-demand scenarios like 3D rendering or gaming, where the optimization of the Radeon 880M is most leveraged.
  • Marginal Differences Under Heavy Load: While Ubuntu 25.04’s open-source drivers showcase an admirable level of performance, the proprietary enhancements on Windows 11 often provide crucial advantages when the system is under heavy load.
  • Importance of Software Optimization: A recurring theme is the critical role that software—especially system-level drivers—plays in unlocking hardware potential. The nuanced differences between Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04 in handling these optimizations highlight why driver updates are as important as hardware upgrades.
The benchmarks underscore a broader point: performance is the sum of both hardware prowess and the finesse afforded by top-notch drivers. Windows 11’s integration with AMD’s proprietary updates makes it an ideal platform for users who demand nothing but the best in performance and reliability.

Advice for IT Professionals and End Users​

Keeping the system optimized is as crucial as choosing the right hardware. For those who might be tempted to switch operating systems or try different driver versions, consider these practical steps:
  • Update Regularly:
  • Utilize Windows Update to ensure that your system receives the latest security patches and performance improvements.
  • Regular check-ins with AMD’s official website will alert you to driver releases specifically tailored to enhance your RDNA 3.5 performance.
  • Benchmark Your System:
  • Periodic benchmarking of your device can help you track performance improvements following major Windows 11 updates or AMD driver upgrades.
  • Use a variety of benchmarking tools to capture a well-rounded performance profile—not just synthetic benchmarks but also real-time usage simulations.
  • Assess Workload Requirements:
  • If you’re a professional relying on graphics-intensive applications, consider the tested improvements on Windows 11. The intra-ecosystem updates might offer advantages that translate directly to increased productivity.
  • For mixed-use cases, where you might run both productivity and creative workloads, the refined performance on Windows could tip the scales in favor of sticking with the proprietary driver model.
  • Explore Customization Options:
  • While Ubuntu’s open-source drivers are a strong contender, many organizations have found that the integrated and streamlined nature of Windows 11’s ecosystem reduces the need for manual tweaking.
  • For those with expertise in system configuration, Linux offers the flexibility of detailed custom tuning. However, if ease-of-use and reliability are your priorities, Windows 11 presently has the upper hand.

Future Outlook and Developments​

As the integrated graphics space continues to evolve, the competition between Windows and Linux environments is likely to intensify. AMD’s RDNA 3.5 architecture represents a significant leap forward in efficiency and performance, and both operating systems are working hard to harness this potential. Looking ahead:
  • Continuous Driver Improvements: Expect further refinements as AMD works closely with both Microsoft and open-source communities. Continuous enhancements in driver software mean that performance gaps are likely to narrow over time.
  • Next-Generation Hardware Synergies: Future laptops and desktops will increasingly rely on systems that blend the best of both worlds—powerful hardware and finely tuned driver ecosystems. For Windows users, this synergy will be particularly noticeable as updates unlock new capabilities.
  • Benchmarking as a Standard: Routine performance evaluations will become even more integral to system optimization. For enterprise and professional users, staying informed through consistent benchmark analysis will be essential for making well-informed upgrade decisions.
  • The Open-Source Movement: Linux distributions will continue to work on making open-source drivers more competitive. For those who favor transparency and control, the future remains bright. However, the ease-of-use and refined performance seen on Windows 11 will keep many mainstream users firmly planted in the Microsoft ecosystem.
The evolution of driver technology, particularly for AMD RDNA 3.5 graphics, is a reminder that performance isn’t just defined by hardware. It’s equally about the continuous improvements in software that bring out the best in that hardware. For Windows users, the current landscape signals that sticking with Windows 11—backed by AMD’s proprietary drivers—remains a sound choice for those who require peak performance and reliability.

Key Takeaways​

  • AMD’s AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 and Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 iGPU, as seen in the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6, represent a significant advancement in integrated graphics performance.
  • The proprietary AMD drivers on Windows 11, bolstered by frequent updates and optimizations, deliver a slight performance advantage over Ubuntu 25.04’s open-source drivers—especially under demanding scenarios.
  • Windows 11’s seamless integration with Microsoft’s update ecosystem enables quicker deployment of performance improvements and driver fixes.
  • For IT professionals and end users, regular system updates, benchmarking, and understanding workload requirements are key steps in maintaining optimum performance.
In conclusion, while Linux and its open-source philosophy continue to champion transparency and customization, Windows 11 is carving its niche with tangible performance groups—especially in areas where integrated graphics are critical. The ongoing evolution of AMD’s driver support means that whether you lean towards Windows or experiment with Linux, there’s never been a more exciting time to witness the convergence of hardware excellence and software ingenuity.

Source: Phoronix [Phoronix] AMD RDNA 3.5 Graphics On 2025 Drivers: Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 25.04 iGPU Performance Image (Amd Rdna35 2)
 
Last edited:
AMD’s latest RDNA 3.5 graphics technology is setting the stage for an intriguing performance duel between modern operating systems. In a recent hands-on benchmark using a Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 equipped with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 SoC—boasting the Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU—we’re treated to a side-by-side comparison of Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04. This discussion, originally featured by Phoronix Media , provides Windows enthusiasts and Linux aficionados alike with valuable insights into how integrated graphics solutions fare under two vastly different driver approaches.

Setting the Scene: The Test Environment​

The heart of the study is the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6. This modern workstation pairs AMD’s Zen 5 architecture with a Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 iGPU—a setup ideally tailored for both productivity and multimedia tasks. With Windows 11 Pro pre-installed and the system subsequently updated with the latest AMD drivers and Windows updates, the stage is set for a rigorous performance assessment. On the flip side, the emerging Ubuntu 25.04 release leverages open-source AMD graphics drivers that have evolved significantly over time.
Key details of the test environment include:
  • The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 SoC with Radeon 880M RDNA 3.5 iGPU
  • A comparison between proprietary AMD drivers on Windows 11 and open-source drivers on Ubuntu 25.04
  • Benchmarks designed to stress different aspects of integrated graphics performance, from gaming to multimedia rendering
  • A focus on improved power efficiency and driver optimizations after a half-year after the platform’s launch
In essence, this benchmark explores the race between cutting-edge hardware optimization and the maturity of two distinct operating system ecosystems.

Dissecting Windows 11: A Closer Look at Proprietary Performance​

Windows 11, with its sleek interface and robust support for gaming and multimedia, continues to be the go-to for many users. In this test, the proprietary AMD drivers on Windows 11 have been pushed to their limits to showcase the potential of RDNA 3.5:
  • Proprietary drivers on Windows offer tightly optimized routines designed for the integrated GPU architecture.
  • The enhancements provided by Windows 11 updates play a substantial role in ensuring low-latency performance and streamlined multitasking capabilities.
  • Benchmarks indicate that for many workloads, particularly in gaming and heavy multimedia processes, the Windows ecosystem’s mature API implementations (such as DirectX 12 Ultimate) leverage the full suite of hardware features.
However, it’s not all sunshine and roses. While the proprietary drivers provide excellent performance, they sometimes trade off openness and flexibility for optimization. Enthusiasts are well aware that updates can occasionally introduce performance regressions or compatibility challenges with a subset of applications. Nonetheless, Windows 11 remains a solid platform for leveraging AMD’s technological advances—especially in a business environment where stability and support are paramount.

Windows 11 Performance Snapshot​

In benchmark comparisons, Windows 11 often pulled ahead in:
  • 3D rendering tasks where DirectX 12 optimizations played to the hardware’s strength
  • Applications requiring efficient multitasking and speedy driver updates
  • Real-world gaming scenarios that benefit from a well-supported driver ecosystem
Experts note that these strengths are highly relevant for users who rely on a consistent and commercially supported environment for both work and play.

Ubuntu 25.04: Open-Source Progress and Innovation​

Under the hood of Ubuntu 25.04, the open-source AMD graphics drivers have seen significant advancements. Linux enthusiasts have long championed the open-source approach, which promises transparency and community-driven innovations. In this latest round of benchmarks, Ubuntu 25.04 offers several compelling attributes:
  • A continually evolving open-source driver model that adapts rapidly to new hardware challenges.
  • Enhanced support for real-time kernel level updates and community feedback, allowing for rapid iterations and custom optimizations.
  • Competitive performance in various graphical benchmarks, especially in scenarios that favor open-source API implementations like Vulkan and OpenGL.
While the open-source drivers have made great strides, they sometimes lag behind the proprietary drivers in areas where vendor-specific optimizations come into play. For instance, certain gaming titles and professional multimedia applications still see improved results on the Windows platform due to optimized driver pathways and tailored API support. However, for users committed to a Linux environment, Ubuntu 25.04 represents a significant leap forward in ensuring that integrated graphics are no longer a weak link.

Ubuntu 25.04 Performance Highlights​

The benchmarks revealed that:
  • In tasks fueled by Vulkan and OpenGL, Ubuntu’s drivers have closed many of the performance gaps traditionally seen in Linux environments.
  • Although marginal differences in peak performance exist compared to Windows 11, the open-source drivers shine in stability and modularity.
  • The community-driven drivers offer promising avenues for future optimizations, especially as AMD continues to collaborate with the open-source kernel community.
For users willing to tweak and optimize their systems, Ubuntu 25.04 provides a sandbox for creativity, and the performance remains more than adequate for everyday computing tasks and moderate gaming.

A Comparative Look: What Do the Benchmarks Really Tell Us?​

The crux of the matter revolves around understanding the trade-offs between proprietary enhancements and open-source innovation. While the benchmarks clearly showcase the prowess of Windows 11 in pushing the hardware to its maximum potential through vendor-optimized routines, the gap narrows significantly when compared to Ubuntu 25.04’s evolving open-source drivers.

Key Comparative Takeaways​

  • Both operating systems deliver robust performance with AMD’s RDNA 3.5 iGPU—though each takes a different route to get there.
  • Windows 11 benefits from highly optimized, proprietary driver support, leading to top-tier performance in scenarios that demand the best out of the hardware.
  • Ubuntu 25.04’s open-source approach demonstrates marked improvements and promises a future of even better performance as community contributions continue to drive innovation.
  • The performance differences, while evident in benchmark scores, might be negligible for everyday users who prioritize system stability and the open-source philosophy over minute performance gains.
This benchmark is a testament to the progress in Linux graphics drivers, highlighting how far the open-source community has come in competing with the tightly controlled environments of Windows. It also raises interesting questions about the future of driver development—especially in an era where multi-OS compatibility is becoming a critical consideration for many businesses and personal tech enthusiasts.

Real-World Implications for Professionals and Gamers​

The implications of these performance comparisons extend well beyond raw benchmarks. For professionals who rely on integrated graphics for video editing, 3D rendering, or even AI workloads, the choice between Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04 becomes a matter of balancing performance against flexibility and support.

Considerations for Different User Groups​

  • Business Users: For those in enterprise environments, Windows 11’s support guarantees and optimized performance make it the obvious choice. The proprietary driver ecosystem ensures that commercial applications run smoothly and benefit from regular updates.
  • Developers and Enthusiasts: Ubuntu 25.04 offers a playground for those who enjoy customizing their systems and exploring the cutting edge of open-source technology. The performance improvements can be an added bonus when combined with the transparency and control Linux offers.
  • Gamers: While Windows 11 retains an edge in many gaming scenarios—thanks to DirectX optimizations and mature driver support—Linux gamers are increasingly seeing improvements, with support for Vulkan-based games narrowing the gap significantly.
Each side of the coin—whether it’s the rock-solid performance of Windows 11 or the innovative strides in Ubuntu 25.04—offers distinct advantages that cater to different user priorities.

What Lies Ahead: Future Trends in Graphics Driver Development​

The enduring competition between proprietary and open-source drivers is shaping the trajectory of integrated graphics development. AMD’s continued investment in its RDNA architecture and the accompanying driver ecosystems will likely result in even more significant performance improvements in the near future. Consider these trends:
  • Cross-platform Optimization: As open-source drivers mature, we may see the differences between Linux and Windows performance fading even further, a boon for users who work in dual-boot environments.
  • Increased Collaboration: The gap between proprietary optimizations and community-driven innovations is closing thanks to increased collaboration between hardware manufacturers like AMD and open-source projects.
  • Enhanced Customization: Linux users stand to benefit from further enhancements that allow for deep system-level customizations—making Ubuntu not just a viable alternative but, in some cases, the preferred platform for power users and developers.
As these trends merge with user demands for flexible, secure, and high-performance systems, the next few years could witness a dramatic rebalancing of the integrated graphics market. The technology landscape is evolving, and both Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04 are poised to play significant roles in that future.

Wrapping Up: Performance Beyond the Benchmarks​

The comparison between Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04 on AMD’s RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics is more than just a technical exercise; it’s a window into the future of computing on diverse operating systems. The benchmarks not only highlight the strengths and limitations of both proprietary and open-source drivers but also hint at a convergence where users may eventually decide based on ecosystem preference rather than raw performance alone.
Key points to remember include:
  • Windows 11 offers a highly optimized environment for AMD’s proprietary driver stack, lending itself well to high-demand applications and professional tasks.
  • Ubuntu 25.04 demonstrates the significant potential of open-source drivers, with ongoing developments that continue to close the performance gap.
  • The future of integrated graphics driver development is likely to see a blend of the best attributes from both systems, benefiting users across the board.
  • Real-world performance is influenced by a variety of factors—from system updates and driver optimizations to community innovations and hardware advancements.
In conclusion, whether you lean towards the tried-and-true environment of Windows 11 or the evolving, flexible playground of Ubuntu 25.04, this benchmark serves as a reminder that the future of integrated graphics is bright. AMD’s RDNA 3.5 technology is not only a technical marvel in its own right but also a harbinger of what’s possible when cutting-edge hardware meets innovative driver software. As the technology race continues, one thing is for sure: the battle of the drivers is far from over, and users stand to gain immensely from the competitive advancements on both fronts.
For readers of WindowsForum.com, this analysis highlights the importance of keeping an eye on future Windows 11 updates and exploring Linux alternatives that are steadily improving. Whether you’re a business professional seeking reliable performance or a tech enthusiast ready to push the boundaries, the evolving driver landscape offers exciting opportunities to redefine what integrated graphics can achieve.

Source: Phoronix [Phoronix] AMD RDNA 3.5 Graphics On 2025 Drivers: Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 25.04 iGPU Performance Image (Amd Rdna35 1)
 
Last edited: