Azure Linux attestation clarifies CVE-2023-0465 OpenSSL risk

Microsoft’s short, product-focused wording is accurate but limited: Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the vulnerable OpenSSL component for CVE‑2023‑0465, but that attestation is not an exclusivity guarantee — other Microsoft artifacts could still ship the same library until they are inventory‑checked and either attested or patched. ([msrc.microsoft.cosoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0465/))

Background / Overview​

CVE‑2023‑0465 is an OpenSSL certificate‑policy handling defect disclosed in March 2023. In short, when applications use non‑default certificate verification options — for example, explicit policy checks supplied by callers — OpenSSL could silently ignore invalid policies present in a leaf certificate and skip further policy checks for that certificate. The practical consequence: a malicious or misconfigured Certificate Authority (CA) could assert an invalid policy that causes policy enforcement to be bypassed for that certificate. OpenSSL published the advisory and fixed the issue in subsequent OpenSSL releases.
Why this matters in real-world terms: certificate policy checking is an optional, sometimes niche part of TLS/X.509 validation. Many systems never enable explicit policy processing; for those, the practical attack surface is smaller. Still, for environments that rely on X.509 policy constraints (for example, enterprise PKI with policy OIDs, constrained usages in a multi‑CA ecosystem, or automated attestation systems that check policy OIDs), a bypass can be meaningful and merits remediation.
OpenSSL’s fixes for CVE‑2023‑0465 are present in:

• OpenSSL 3.1.1 and later,
• OpenSSL 3.0.9 and later,
• OpenSSL 1.1.1u and later,
• and the 1.0.2zh line for legacy consumers.

What Microsoft actually said — and what that language means​

Microsoft’s MSRC entry for the CVE states, in effect, that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected,” and adds that Microsoft will update the CVE if additional Microsoft products are identified. That single sentence is an important operational signal: it confirms Microsoft has completed an inventory mapping for the Azure Linux product family and found the implicated upstream component there. It does not, however, declare that no other Microsoft product ships the same component. (msrc.microsoft.com)
Put bluntly:

• The MSRC line is an authoritative, product‑scoped attestation for Azure Linux —in scope and apply Microsoft’s guidance and updates.
• The statement is not a blanket, company‑wide exclusion for all other Microsoft products. Absence of a similar MSRC attestation for other products is absence of attestation, not proof of absence. Independent verification is necessary for other artifacts.

Microsoft has also publicly committed to expanding machine‑readable CSAF/VEX attestations for Microsoft product families (a program that began rolling out in October 2025), and the companthe CVE entry if further products are found to be carriers. That transparency program makes the MSRC wording operationally useful, but it still places a real burden on customers that consume many Microsoft artifacts: you cannot assume a product is safe just because MSRC named only Azure Linux.

---

Technical recap: what CVE‑2023‑0465 actually requires to be exploitable​

Understanding the exploit preconditions helps prioritize fixes:

• Root cause: policy‑processing logic in OpenSSL failed to enforce certificate policy checks in some code paths when callers enabled non‑default policy verification parameters. A specially crafted certificate could cause policy checks to be ignored.
• Trigger conditions:
• The application must opt into policy processing (policy checks are disabled by default).
• The application must rely on those policy checks for security decisions.
• A malicious CA (or a CA whose signing keys are compromised) would need to issue a certificate containing the deliberate invalid policy attributes.
• Impact severity: the community rated the defect as Low/Medium because it requires specific verification settings and an active attack from a CA or CA‑level compromise; it is not an immediate, remote code execution or universal TLS bypass for default configurations. Still, for policy‑sensitive deployments the integrity impact is real.

---

Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that includes the vulnerable library?​

Short answer: No — not necessarily. Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested to include the vulnerable OpenSSL component for CVE‑2023‑0465; Microsoft has pledged to update the CVE and its machine‑readable VEX/CSAF records if it discovers additional affected Microsoft products. That means:

• If you run Azure Linux images, treat them as confirmed carriers and pr image updates from Microsoft. Microsoft’s attestation is authoritative for that product family. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• If you run other Microsoft artifacts (for example, Microsoft‑distributed Linux images, container images, appliances, SDKs, or prebuilt binaries), do not assume they are unaffected simply because they were not named. You need to check them at the artifact level via SBOMs, package queries, image scanning, or by consulting Microsoft’s expanding the distinction matters: Microsoft’s attestation model is product‑scoped. When Microsoft says a product “includes” a component, it means Microsoft has located that component in the product’s published artifacts and thus treats that product as potentially affected. But Microsoft ships a broad family of artifacts and images; each one must be inventory‑checked separately. The company’s plan to publish CSAF/VEX information is meant to shrink that gap, but until your specific Microsoft artifact is listed you should verify locally.

---

Practical verification steps for organizations (how to check your estate)​

If you rely on Microsoft products or images, follow a prioritized, evidence‑bas presence/absence and apply fixes:

• Prioritize Azure Linux first
• Apply Microsoft’s Azure Linux updates and image updates immediately for your Azure VM images or AKS node pools that use Azure Linux. Microsoft’s attestation makes Azure Linux the highest priority. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• Search product SBOMs and VEX/CSAF outputs
• Retrieve Microsoft’s CSAF/VEX data (where available) and search for OpenSSL or the CVE. Microsoft is expanding these machine‑readable attestations; check them for updates.
• Artifact‑level discovery (every platform you manage)
• Linux VMs / images: run package queries ior RPM‑based images: rpm -qa | grep -i openssl
• For Debian/Ubuntu: dpkg -l | grep -i openssl
• Container images: use your container scanner (e.g., trivy, Clair, Grype) to identify OpenSSL versions inside images.
• Firmware / appliances / SDKs: request SBOMs from the vendor or unpack installers to enumerate included shared libraries.
• Windows products that ship Linux artifacts (WSL kernels, embedded Linux in devices): check the specific binary distributions Microsoft provides for WSL or device kernels; those may include third‑party libraries.
• Binary inspection for statically linked consumers
• Use tools like strings, ldd, or binwalk to identify static or dynamic linkage to OpenSSL if you suspect static builds. Static linkage may hide library usage from package managers.
• Query OpenSSL runtime version where feasible
• If you can run the binary, ask it for its OpenSSL version (for example, many server binaries expose linked OpenSSL versions via status pages or diagnostic output). Where apps are not cooperative, offline binary inspection is required.
• Track fixed versions and apply updates
• Upgrade OpenSSL to at least the fixed versions: OpenSSL 3.1.1+, 3.0.9+, 1.1.1u+ (or vendor‑packaged equivalents). If vendors backported fixes, apply vendor updates rather than only upstream numbers.
• If you find a Microsoft product not listed on MSRC that contains the library, notify Microsoft and request VEX/CSAF attestation
• Microsoft has said it will update CVE pages when additional Microsoft products are identified; customer reports help accelerate that mapping. Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center))

---

Detection and mitigation playbook (short checklist)​

• Immediate: Patch Azure Linux images via Microsoft’s published updates. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• High priority: Run image/package scans across your fleet and containers for vulnerable OpenSSL versions.
• Medium: If your application does not use X.509 policy checks (the non‑default verification modes), deprioritize but still patch as part of routine crypto library hygiene.
• Longer term: Integrate SBOM generation and automated VEX/CSAF ingestion into your patching pipeline so you can map vendor attestations to your deployed artifacts automatically.

---

Risk assessment — who’s actually at risk?​

• High risk:
• Any system or service that explicitly enables OpenSSL policy checking and relies on those checks for critical access control or multi‑tenant segregation.
• Environments where an adversary can act as, control, or coerce a Certificate Authority (e.g., private PKIs, enterprise CAs in a compromised environment).
• Moderate risk:
• Deployments that use OpenSSL broadly but do not enable policy processing; attackers would first need CA‑level access plus a non‑default verification path to exploit.
• Low risk:
• Typical consumer TLS clients and default server configurations that don’t enable certificate policy processing.

This straers: CVE‑2023‑0465 is not an unqualified catastrophic failure of OpenSSL’s default behavior — it is a policy‑processing bug that affects specific, non‑default verificatiuces the universal blast radius but does not eliminate the need to patch for correctness and future‑proofing.

---

Why Microsoft’s wording is operationally smart — and where it creates potential blind spots​

Strengths of the Azure Linux attestation approach

• Clarity for customers of that product: Microsoft’s direct statement immediately tells Azure Linux customers they have a confirmed, authoritative carrier and should patch. That reduces ambiguity and speeds remediation for that large product family.
• Machine‑readable VEX/CSAF commitment: publishing attestations programmatically allows automation and faster inventory matching once customers ingest tining risks and blind spots
• Product‑scoped language leaves a residual verification burden for customers who run many Microsoft artifacts. Not every Microsoft product will be inventory‑checked at the same time; until it is, customers must check artifacts themselves.
• Slow downstream updates: even if Microsoft patches Azure Linux images promptly, third‑party images, vendor devices, or internal enterprise builds that include older OpenSSL may remain vulnerable and outside the MSRC attestation scope.
• Static and embedded builds: libraries statically linked into binaries or included in firmware can be difficult to detect with standard package scans, producing hidden carriers that MSRC’s product attestation won’t necessarily surface.

Because of these blind spots, the operational answer to the user’s question must be: trust Microsoft’s attestation for Azure Linux, but verify everything else.

---

Communication guidance for security teams and CISOs​

• Treat Microsoft’s statement as actionable intelligence for Azure LinuxDocument the changes and communicate the timeline to stakeholders. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• Run an expedited discovery sprint across all Microsoft‑supplied images, SDKs, appliances, and artifacts used in your environment. Use SBOM ingestion, container scanning, and binary inspection tools.
• If your business depends on strict X.509 policy enforcement (for example, internal PKI constraints), elevate this CVE’s remediation priority even where the environment’s OpenSSL usage appears limited.
• File a support/incident ticket with Microsoft if you discover an un‑attested Microsoft product that contains the vulnerable OpenSSL: the vendor’s VEX/CSAF program is designed to incorporate that feedback and update # How vendors and maintainers should respond (developer / engineering guidance)
• Upstream maintainers: ensure OpenSSL is upgraded to the fixed releases and that backports are documented in vendor patches.
• Distributors: publish clear package-level advisories and indicate which packaged OpenSSL versions contain the fix, plus whether backports were applied.
• Application maintainers: if your app uses X.509 policy checks, add explicit test coverage for policy enforcement and verify behavior against the fixed OpenSSL builds.
• Platform vendors (including Microsoft): continue expanding machine‑readable attestations (CSAF/VEX) and ensure SBOMs are available for downloadable images and SDK distributions. That step reduces the manual verification burden on customers.

---

Final assessment and recommended next steps​

• Microsoft’s MSRC attestation naming Azure Linux is authoritative and actionable for that product family, but it does not prove exclusivity; other Microsoft products could still ship the same vulnerable OpenSSL code until they are inventory‑checked and attested. ([msrc.micrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-0465/))
• The technical severity of CVE‑2023‑0465 is medium/limited by non‑default preconditions, but because it involves certificate policy handling the practical risks are significant for certain enterprise PKI or constrained‑policy use cases. Patch where you rely on policy processing; otherwise include this in your routine crypto library hygiene.
• Operational checklist (simplified):
• Patch Azure Linux images immediately following Microsoft guidance. (msrc.microsoft.com)
• Scan all Microsoft artifacts you run (VM images, containers, SDKs, WSL kernels) for OpenSSL versions and apply vendor patches.
• Ingest Microsoft CSAF/VEX outputs as they appear and correlate them against your SBOMs to reduce blind spots.
• If you discover an un‑attested Microsoft artifact carrying the vulnerable library, notify Microsoft so it can update its CVE/VEX mapping. (msrc.microsoft.com)

In short: treat Microsoft’s wording as a precise, product‑scoped attestation — yes for Azure Linux — but do not let that wording lull you into assuming other Microsoft products are safe. Verify your artifacts, patch Azure Linux now, and fold Microsoft’s CSAF/VEX outputs into your automated inventory and patch workflows so the next disclosure becomes a speed bump rather than a surprise.
Conclusion: Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested as including the vulnerable OpenSSL component for CVE‑2023‑0465; that attestation should drive immediate remediation for Azure Linux customers. However, it is not a technical guarantee that other Microsoft products are free of the vulnerable library — artifact‑level verification across your Microsoft footprint remains essential. (msrc.microsoft.com)

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center