BitLocker Recovery Nightmares: Auto Encryption Locks Backups on Windows

A Windows reinstall that should have been routine instead turned into a data nightmare: a user reported two 3TB backup drives became inaccessible after a fresh Windows install when BitLocker — or Windows’ automatic device encryption — locked them and demanded recovery keys that the user did not have, leaving large amounts of data effectively irretrievable unless the recovery keys were found. This incident shines a harsh light on how default encryption, tight TPM integration, and opaque recovery-key handling can protect data from attackers while also creating catastrophic single‑points‑of‑failure for ordinary users.

Background​

Microsoft introduced BitLocker as a full‑disk encryption feature in Windows Vista, and over time encryption has become integral to the Windows security model. On modern hardware BitLocker (and Windows Device Encryption) increasingly ties encryption to the platform’s Trusted Platform Module (TPM), enabling seamless unlocks for the OS drive while providing strong protection against offline attacks. However, default behaviors in Windows 11 — including automatic enabling of device encryption in some Out‑Of‑Box Experience (OOBE) flows when signing into a Microsoft account — have shifted responsibility for cryptographic key custody to users in ways many do not anticipate.
For many users the feature works exactly as intended: if their machine is lost or stolen, the data remains securely encrypted. But when encryption is enabled without explicit attention to recovery key storage, or when system changes (reinstalls, firmware updates, boot‑order tweaks) trigger BitLocker’s recovery mode, the result can be permanent data loss if the necessary keys are unavailable. Microsoft and community incident threads confirm that unexpected BitLocker recovery prompts can and do happen, and that installing specific Windows updates has, in the past, been required to address widespread recovery‑related issues.

---

The incident in practical terms​

What the user reported​

According to published reporting derived from a Reddit post, the user (identified there as u/Toast_Soup) carried six drives in their system including the boot drive and two large 3TB backup drives. After feeling the system was sluggish, they performed a clean Windows reinstall and, upon booting into the fresh system, discovered the two backup drives were locked by BitLocker and inaccessible. Windows requested a recovery key the user had not saved or seen before. The user was able to recover access to the new boot volume only after saving its recovery key following a second reinstall, but the older backup drives remained encrypted and inaccessible. This scenario illustrates the worst outcome BitLocker can produce for users who do not maintain control of recovery keys. The original reporting frames the event as a consequence of automatic device encryption behavior in Windows 11. (Note: that account is based on user reporting; independent verification beyond the published article and the Reddit thread is not publicly available.)

Why a reinstall can trigger BitLocker recovery​

BitLocker’s recovery prompt is triggered when the platform detects a change or condition that might indicate tampering: major firmware updates, secure‑boot or TPM state changes, changes to boot configuration, or mismatched TPM owner records. When those changes occur, the TPM may refuse to release the decryption protector and BitLocker will fall back to requiring the 48‑digit recovery password. Community posts and Microsoft updates documenting similar recovery prompts show that routine maintenance or even firmware updates can create such scenarios, sending users into recovery mode unexpectedly. fileciteturn0file12turn0file3

---

Technical anatomy: TPM, Device Encryption, and BitLocker​

TPM and automatic key release​

• The TPM holds secrets (keys) tied to specific platform state measurements.
• When BitLocker is configured to use TPM‑only protection for the OS drive, Windows can automatically release volume keys and unlock the drive when the platform's integrity checks pass.
• If the system’s measured state changes (e.g., after reinstall, different boot manager, or firmware update), the TPM may withhold that secret and BitLocker will require the recovery password.

This model maximizes protection against offline attacks but couples device configuration to key availability. For users who never explicitly back up recovery keys, a routine maintenance action can convert accessible backups into sealed cryptographic vaults.

Device Encryption vs. BitLocker Drive Encryption​

• Device Encryption is an automated, simplified encryption option present on many consumer Windows 11 devices and typically ties to a Microsoft account to store the recovery key automatically.
• BitLocker Drive Encryption is the fuller feature set available on Windows Pro, Enterprise, and Education with more manual controls and management options.

The automated model reduces friction but also lowers user visibility into where keys are stored and how to retrieve them under recovery conditions. Community guidance repeatedly urges users to verify where recovery keys are saved and to keep offline copies. fileciteturn0file14turn0file12

---

What we can verify now (and what remains uncertain)​

• Verified: BitLocker and Device Encryption are designed to trigger recovery mode when platform state changes are detected; TPM is central to that behavior. This is a fundamental aspect of how these features secure data. fileciteturn0file12turn0file14
• Verified: Microsoft has previously acknowledged recovery‑screen issues tied to updates and recommended specific cumulative updates as fixes (for example, updates in August 2024 addressed a recovery prompt problem for some users). That shows Windows updates have previously been the remediation path. fileciteturn0file3turn0file5
• Reported but not independently verified within the available files: the specific Reddit case details (the user named “Soup,” the two exact 3TB drives lost, and the claim that the drives are permanently unrecoverable). The reporting is consistent with other disaster stories in forum archives where missing recovery keys meant users ultimately had to reformat encrypted volumes, but the single‑case specifics come from user posts and press accounts. Treat those specific narrative details as credible anecdote-level reporting rather than independently audited fact. fileciteturn0file12turn0file11
• Performance impact claims (e.g., a reported 45% drop in random I/O when encryption is applied) have been made by press outlets, but they require hardware-, driver-, and configuration‑specific benchmarking to generalize. Performance varies widely by CPU, NVMe controller, use of hardware OPAL support, and whether encryption is hardware‑offloaded or done in software; therefore treat big percentage claims with caution unless reproduced on the reader’s specific hardware. Further validation on the precise platform in question is necessary before treating a specific performance number as universal.

---

Strengths and benefits of BitLocker (why it exists)​

• Strong protection of data at rest: BitLocker prevents attackers from reading raw data even if they physically remove a drive. This is foundational for laptops and portable media protection.
• TPM integration: When working smoothly, TPM‑tethered encryption provides “frictionless” security – users don’t need to type passwords at boot to get the benefit.
• Enterprise manageability: In business environments BitLocker can be centrally managed, with recovery keys escrowed in directory services — a strong model for organizations that maintain key custody.

Those advantages explain why Microsoft continues to push encryption deeper into Windows: it’s a crucial layer of defense for both consumers and enterprises.

---

The risks and failure modes exposed by this story​

• Unintended defaults create hidden dependencies
  When encryption is enabled automatically during OOBE — typically upon signing into a Microsoft account — many users never see the key backup prompt or understand where recovery keys are stored. This creates hidden single points of failure.
• Reactive recovery behavior after routine operations
  Reinstalling Windows, changing boot order, or installing firmware updates are routine tasks. If these actions trigger BitLocker recovery, an unprepared user can lose access to all encrypted volumes.
• Opaque key management for non‑technical users
  Recovery keys might be in a Microsoft account, printed, stored on a USB stick, or never backed up at all. If keys aren’t explicitly backed up and the account association is unclear, recovery is impossible. Forum history is full of cases where users were told “there is nothing you can do without the recovery key.” fileciteturn0file11turn0file9
• Performance tradeoffs may degrade user experience
  On some hardware and workloads, software‑based BitLocker can reduce random I/O and make systems feel slower. While the security tradeoff is worthwhile for many users, it can lead to a user blaming their sluggish machine on unrelated problems and taking corrective actions (like a reinstall) that precipitate a recovery event. Performance impact is hardware- and workload-dependent and should be measured per system.
• False sense of safety
  Encryption is excellent at preventing unauthorized access, but it does not guard against accidental loss of keys. Without a clear, user‑centric recovery plan, encryption becomes a binary outcome: full access or permanent loss.

---

Practical guidance: immediate and preventive steps for Windows users​

The following steps reflect what administrators and community experts have found useful when confronting BitLocker surprises. Where possible, commands and Settings locations are called out so readers can act deliberately.

Immediate triage if you see a BitLocker recovery screen​

• Stop and document the screen: note the volume ID and any error codes.
• Attempt to locate your BitLocker recovery key:
• If you used a Microsoft account during setup, log into that account on another device and search for BitLocker recovery keys.
• If your organization manages your device, contact IT to retrieve the escrowed key.
• If you find the recovery key, you can unlock the volume at the prompt and then export or back up the key locally. Community guides show this is the routine recovery path; missing keys, however, mean the volume is unrecoverable without extraordinary measures. fileciteturn0file12turn0file5

Commands and Windows tools to control BitLocker (use with care)​

• Use manage-bde for granular control from an elevated Command Prompt or PowerShell:
• Check status: manage-bde -status D:
• Unlock with recovery password temporarily: manage-bde -unlock D: -RecoveryPassword YOUR-48-DIGIT-KEY
• Disable BitLocker (start decryption): manage-bde -off D:
• Enable automatic unlock for a fixed data drive after unlocking the OS drive: manage-bde -autounlock -enable D:
  Community help threads regularly recommend manage-bde for situations where the GUI is missing (e.g., Home edition) or when more direct control is needed. Always ensure you have the recovery key before attempting to decrypt. fileciteturn0file6turn0file7

Preventive checklist (what every Windows user should do now)​

• Confirm where your device saves recovery keys (Microsoft account, printed copy, USB, enterprise escrow).
• Keep at least one offline copy of recovery keys in secure storage (physical printout or an encrypted password manager).
• Before you reinstall Windows or change firmware/boot settings, suspend BitLocker or back up keys and confirm you can unlock all data drives afterwards.
• If you prefer not to have device encryption auto‑activated during OOBE, avoid signing into a Microsoft account during first setup and create a local account instead; then manually enable encryption on your terms.

---

Policy, design, and product‑management considerations​

This incident surfaces a broader tension between secure defaults and user control. Security designers oscillate between minimizing user mistakes (by turning good security on by default) and avoiding hidden behaviors that surprise users at critical moments. The following points are important for product teams and policy makers:

• Defaults must be discoverable: If encryption is enabled automatically, the OS should make the recovery key save-and-recovery process highly visible and frictionless for the user to verify (not buried in account dashboards).
• Recovery‑first UX: Offer a mandatory, explicit recovery‑key checkout step during OOBE that requires users to store the key in at least two locations before proceeding.
• Better local options: Provide clearer on‑device options for users who prefer not to use cloud escrow (e.g., a prominent “Print & Save” flow).
• Transparent change logs: When updates or firmware changes can trigger recovery, supply a targeted notification that instructs users to back up keys and how to avoid automatic recovery prompts.
• Enterprise/consumer split: For business devices, central key escrow is appropriate. For consumer devices, the company should treat key custody as a user problem and provide simple, auditable tooling to avoid entangling users in unrecoverable encryption states. fileciteturn0file3turn0file5

---

What to do if your backup drives are already locked and you don’t have the key​

• First, double‑check all likely key repositories: any Microsoft account that was ever used on the machine, printouts, password managers, or enterprise key escrow. Community threads repeatedly show recovery keys are often discoverable in unexpected accounts. fileciteturn0file11turn0file5
• Second, try to unlock the drive temporarily using manage-bde if you can obtain the key from another device or an account session. If you can unlock, immediately export and secure the key and begin decryption if you want the data unencrypted going forward.
• Third, recognize the hard truth: without the recovery key or a valid protector, BitLocker encryption is cryptographically strong. Attempts to “recover” by standard data‑recovery tools will not succeed because the underlying bytes are intentionally inaccessible without the key. Forum histories contain many accounts where format-and-rebuild was the only recovery path when keys were missing. fileciteturn0file9turn0file11

---

Final assessment and recommendations​

BitLocker and device encryption are essential security features that have protected untold amounts of data from theft and abuse. Their integration with TPM provides strong, automated protection that benefits the majority of users. At the same time, the model is brittle when key custody is unclear: an automated protection that is invisible to the user can transform an ordinary maintenance action into permanent data loss.

• For users: treat encryption keys like primary backups. If you cannot afford to lose the data on a drive, ensure you explicitly and redundantly back up the recovery key. Prefer manual enablement where possible so you understand the state of each drive.
• For IT pros and enthusiasts: document recovery procedures, escrow keys in reliable systems, and educate non‑technical users before handing them devices with Device Encryption enabled.
• For vendors and Microsoft: preserve the security benefits of strong defaults while making the recovery process discoverable, auditable, and enforced during initial setup. A single mandatory “save‑your‑key” flow could prevent many of these incidents.

The Tom's Hardware–reported case and similar forum histories are cautionary tales: encryption is only as good as your ability to recover the keys. When security becomes opaque, it ceases to be helpful and starts to become a hazard. Users, administrators, and vendors must align around practices that keep data safe both from attackers and from accidental, irreversible lockouts. fileciteturn0file12turn0file3

---

If any of the technical commands or settings referenced above need to be converted into a step‑by‑step checklist tailored to a specific Windows edition or device model, those instructions can be prepared and validated against the exact Windows build and hardware in question; different builds and firmware can alter the safe order of operations and the location of GUI elements. fileciteturn0file6turn0file7

---

Source: Tom's Hardware BitLocker reportedly auto-locks users' backup drives, causing loss of 3TB of valuable data — Windows automatic disk encryption can permanently lock your drives

 

[ChatGPT]

A Windows reinstall that should have been routine instead turned into a catastrophic data loss: a Reddit user reports more than 3 terabytes of personal backups rendered inaccessible after a clean Windows 11 install when BitLocker (or Windows’ automatic device encryption) locked the volumes and demanded recovery keys that the user did not have. This episode emphatically exposes how default encryption, TPM‑tethered key management, and opaque recovery‑key handling can protect data from theft while simultaneously creating a single point of failure for ordinary users.

Background​

Windows’ full‑disk encryption story is long: BitLocker debuted as a built‑in Windows feature with Windows Vista and has been refined over multiple releases to integrate with hardware security like TPM (Trusted Platform Module). In modern Windows releases, particularly with Windows 11 version 24H2, Microsoft changed consumer install flows so that signing in with a Microsoft account during OOBE (Out‑Of‑Box Experience) commonly triggers automatic device encryption and cloud backup of recovery keys. That design intent—protecting data by default—improves security for lost or stolen devices, but it also moves cryptographic key custody into places users may not be consciously managing.
Community incident threads and press coverage show this is not a one‑off: multiple users have reported being locked out of secondary drives after reinstalling Windows 11 or changing system configuration, and at least one high‑profile forum and news write‑up describes a 3TB loss associated with this automatic‑encryption behavior. Those community threads also document other BitLocker/TPM interactions and past Microsoft advisories about recovery prompts after system changes.

---

What happened in the reported 3TB case​

The user’s account, in brief​

• The user (posting as u/Toast_Soup on Reddit, as reported in press coverage) said his machine had six drives: the boot drive (C plus two large backup volumes (D: and E that together stored roughly 3TB of data.
• After experiencing system slowdowns, he performed a clean Windows 11 installation and signed in during OOBE. On first login the D: and E: drives were immediately locked by BitLocker and requested a 48‑digit recovery key the user had never seen or recorded.
• He believed he had never enabled BitLocker manually. After a second reinstall he saved the recovery key for the new C: drive (which then became accessible), but the original D: and E: recovery keys were not present in his Microsoft account and remained locked—apparently permanently.

Key facts that can and cannot be independently verified​

• Verifiable: BitLocker and Windows Device Encryption will enter recovery mode when the platform detects a change in measured state (TPM owner differences, boot configuration changes, firmware updates, or reinstall actions); recovery requires the 48‑digit key. Microsoft documentation and community Q&A confirm where recovery keys may be stored (Microsoft account, Azure AD, printout, USB, organizational escrows).
• Reported but not independently verifiable from public records: the precise detail that the D:/E: keys for this specific Reddit user were never uploaded to his Microsoft account, and that the data is therefore irrecoverable. The account is credible and consistent with many community reports, but the final, absolute status of those specific volumes cannot be independently audited from public sources. Treat the case as a credible anecdote that illustrates a real risk rather than a formally verified forensic report.

---

How BitLocker + TPM + OOBE conspire to create surprise encryption​

TPM and automatic unlocks​

When BitLocker uses TPM protection for an OS volume, the TPM holds secrets (keys) that are released only if the platform’s measured boot state matches trusted values. That enables the seamless, passwordless unlock of the system volume after a normal boot. If the measured state changes—because the bootloader was replaced, Secure Boot state changed, firmware (UEFI) updated, the TPM was reset, or a different Windows installation created new platform measurements—the TPM may withhold the secret and BitLocker falls back to requiring a recovery password (the 48‑digit key). This model defends strongly against offline attacks but couples access to an exact hardware/firmware/installation state.

Automatic device encryption in modern consumer flows​

With the rollout of Windows 11 24H2, Microsoft broadened automatic device encryption so that a consumer who signs into a Microsoft account during OOBE will often have encryption enabled automatically and their recovery key uploaded to that Microsoft account. That reduces setup friction and ensures keys are escrowed in the cloud for many users—but it also introduces two common pitfalls:

• Users who don’t realize encryption was enabled will not have proactively saved the recovery key elsewhere.
• If a user later loses access to the Microsoft account used for the device (account lockouts, forgotten credentials, alternate emails changed), recovery keys in the cloud become effectively unreachable.

How a reinstall can lock secondary drives​

A clean reinstall can alter the system’s measured boot state or cause the platform TPM owner information to differ from the previous installation. BitLocker protected non‑system volumes can be configured to auto‑unlock after OS login, but if the logic that performs the auto‑unlock relies on TPM or a protector tied to the old installation, the non‑system volumes may also require their recovery keys after a reinstall. In short: a reinstall may sever the automatic, transparent link that previously allowed the secondary drives to unlock, forcing manual recovery. Community threads record this pattern repeatedly.

---

The performance angle: did BitLocker cause the slowdown?​

Many press reports cite a measurable performance penalty when software‑based encryption runs on systems without hardware offload (e.g., self‑encrypting drives or CPU features). Benchmark testing has shown that on some hardware and workloads software BitLocker can reduce random I/O by large percentages—the oft‑quoted figure is “up to 45%” in certain random I/O tests—though the exact impact depends heavily on CPU, SSD controller, firmware, and whether encryption is offloaded to the drive. Tom’s Hardware reproduced scenarios where software BitLocker reduced random write/read performance significantly; other outlets and community benchmarks report smaller or workload‑dependent impacts. This means BitLocker can plausibly explain the original system slowdown that prompted the reinstall, but the performance hit is not universal and must be measured on the target hardware before assigning blame.
Caveat: the precise 45% figure comes from specific benchmarking runs on specific hardware and queue depths; it should not be treated as a universal guarantee. For many modern CPUs and NVMe controllers, hardware acceleration and caching will reduce or hide the user‑perceived penalty. Always test your own workload.

---

Recovery keys: where to look and common failure modes​

Where Microsoft says your key might be stored​

• In your Microsoft account (account.microsoft.com/devices/recoverykey).
• In your work or school (Azure AD) account if the device was ever joined to an organization.
• On a printed paper copy produced when BitLocker was enabled.
• On a USB flash drive saved during setup.
• Escrowed by an IT administrator in Active Directory or management tooling.

Microsoft’s own support material is explicit: if you cannot find the recovery key and cannot revert the change that triggered recovery, the only remaining option is to reset the device and accept data loss. Microsoft cannot recreate or retrieve a lost recovery key for you.

Common failure modes seen in the community​

• Signing into OOBE with a Microsoft account you later cannot access (changed emails, lost two‑factor device, account lockout), so cloud‑stored keys are unreachable.
• Reinstalling Windows with a different Microsoft account or local account, which results in a different set of protectors and no auto‑unlock for old volumes.
• Firmware updates or TPM resets that invalidate the platform measurements tied to the previously stored key protector.
• Users who never saw the key‑backup prompt because the OOBE flow completed key escrow silently to the cloud; they later discover they never printed or exported the 48‑digit key.

---

What to do now — step‑by‑step guidance for Windows users​

Immediate triage if you see a BitLocker recovery prompt​

• Stop. Do not reformat or perform additional clean installs if the drive contains irreplaceable data.
• Attempt to locate the recovery key:
• Sign into your Microsoft account from another device and visit account.microsoft.com/devices/recoverykey.
• If the device was ever used with a work/school account, check Azure AD / organizational device management.
• Search for printed notes, a USB drive with the key saved as text, or any other place you may have stored the 48‑digit string.
• If you can’t find the key, avoid further changes that alter TPM/boot state (don’t reinstall, don’t reset TPM, don’t change boot order), and consult a professional forensic/data‑recovery service—understand they cannot defeat BitLocker encryption without a key but can advise on attempts to recover cloud account access or check for mistaken account associations.

If you’re preparing to reinstall or update Windows (preventive checklist)​

• Back up everything first—multiple copies, including an image backup that you can mount on another machine.
• Before making system changes, check Device encryption / BitLocker status: Settings > Privacy & security > Device encryption (or Control Panel > BitLocker Drive Encryption on Pro/Enterprise). If Device encryption is On and you don’t want it, suspend or turn it off before you make system changes.
• If encryption is enabled and you plan changes, locate and export the recovery key(s):
• Sign into your Microsoft account and download the keys from the recovery key page, or print them and store offline.
• If you rely on a Microsoft account for setup, make sure you have full access to that account (2FA devices, recovery email/phone) before doing OOBE tasks.
• If you must reinstall, temporarily disconnect backup storage drives, or decrypt them prior to reinstalling the OS, to avoid accidental re‑encryption or protector mismatches.

---

Risk analysis — why this story matters for everyday users​

Strengths of BitLocker that explain Microsoft’s direction​

• Strong protection of data‑at‑rest: BitLocker effectively prevents raw access to drive contents if the hardware falls into wrong hands.
• Seamless security with TPM: When it works as designed, BitLocker gives users robust protection with minimal friction.
• Enterprise manageability: In business settings with centralized key escrowing, BitLocker is a reliable component of data‑protection strategy.

Significant weaknesses and failure modes exposed by the incident​

• Hidden defaults create hidden dependencies: Automatic encryption during OOBE moves control into a flow many consumers do not inspect. If a user never exported or printed the recovery key, they have created a future single point of failure.
• Account dependency: Escrowing keys to a Microsoft account is convenient—until you can’t sign into that account. Users who lose account access effectively lose keys.
• Opaque recovery behavior after routine maintenance: Reinstalls, firmware updates, or TPM operations can trigger recovery mode for multiple volumes, not just the system drive.
• Performance tradeoffs that change user behavior: If encryption measurably slows a system, frustrated users may perform aggressive troubleshooting (clean installs, hardware swaps) that themselves trigger recovery events.

---

Real‑world prevalence — community signals​

Public forum searches show numerous similar anecdotes: users posting after clean installs find secondary volumes locked, ask whether there is any bypass, and are told repeatedly that without the recovery key the encryption is effective and the data unrecoverable. Moderated community threads, user support Q&A, and coverage in mainstream tech press (which relayed the specific 3TB case) align to show this is a recurring pain point for a significant number of users, not a theoretical corner case. WindowsForum community threads collected discussion on the same failure modes and mitigation steps.

---

Responsible caution about “doomsday” claims​

It is important not to conflate every BitLocker recovery prompt with deliberate vendor malfeasance or an irredeemable new norm. BitLocker’s core design goal is to make data inaccessible without the right key; that design is working as intended when users cannot produce the key. The security‑usability tradeoff is real: strong cryptography offers near‑perfect confidentiality at the cost of making key custody the single true determinant of future access. Where reporting says a specific user “lost 3TB forever,” that is consistent with what BitLocker does when the recovery key is unavailable—but the public record for that specific volume‑by‑volume forensic outcome rests with the user’s testimony and has not (to public knowledge) been independently audited. Flag such outcomes as plausible and likely, but treat each as an individual forensic claim until more evidence is produced.

---

Practical recommendations for Windows users and small IT teams​

• Always assume encryption may be enabled by default during OOBE when using a Microsoft account on Windows 11 24H2+. Confirm Device encryption status immediately after first login.
• Export and print recovery keys before making major changes (reinstalls, firmware updates, OS migrations). Keep a copy offline and a second copy in a separate secure location.
• Use a local account during the OOBE if you do not want automatic cloud‑escrowed keys, but understand that local accounts forgo other conveniences (settings sync, OneDrive, etc.).
• For mission‑critical backups, follow the 3‑2‑1 backup rule: at least three copies of data, on two different media, with one copy offsite. Don’t rely on a single internal backup drive that could become encrypted and locked.
• If you encounter a recovery prompt and lack the key, stop and seek professional assistance; repeated system changes make recovery impossible if the key is present elsewhere but the linking information is destroyed.

---

Conclusion​

The reported loss of 3TB to an unexpected BitLocker lockout is a cautionary tale with real, practical lessons. Modern Windows security practices—TPM, default encryption, cloud‑escrowed keys—raise the baseline protection for millions of users, but they also shift responsibility for key management and account access into places many consumers do not actively manage. The combination of automatic encryption in OOBE, TPM‑sensitive recovery behavior, and routine actions like reinstalls creates a credible path from normal maintenance to permanent data loss if recovery keys are not preserved.
That tradeoff does not mean users should abandon encryption. Rather, it underscores two immutable truths: encryption is only as useful as its key management, and backups are the only reliable hedge against accidental lockouts. For every user doing a reinstall or firmware update, a minute spent checking Device encryption status and saving recovery keys may prevent months—or an irrecoverable loss—of regret.

---

---

Source: Bangkok Post BitLocker lockouts cost user 3TB of data in Windows 11 shock