- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,176
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 39,032
Chomsky on Obama vs. Free Speech
In this thought-provoking YouTube video, Noam Chomsky addresses the significant challenges to freedom of speech posed by recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings, particularly during the Obama administration. He characterizes this period as seeing "the first major attack on freedom of speech in the United States since the notorious Smith Act back around 1940."
Chomsky discusses a specific Supreme Court case that he considers ominous, which was brought forth by the Obama administration. The case involved the "Humanitarian Law Project," which provided legal advice to a group listed on the U.S. State Department's terrorist list. This advice included urging the group to pursue nonviolent means. Chomsky argues that such legal guidance is now criminalized, marking a disturbing trend in the erosion of free speech rights.
The broader implications of government-defined "terrorist lists" come into sharp focus. Chomsky points out the arbitrary nature of these lists, citing historical examples, including how the Reagan administration removed Saddam Hussein from the list to support him against Iran, despite his record of violence. This raises critical questions about the legitimacy and oversight of what constitutes a terrorist organization.
As Chomsky notes, "the idea of barring material support extending to straightforward speech like legal advice" represents a sizable and disturbing infringement on the rights to free expression and legal counsel.
This video is significant for anyone interested in civil liberties and the evolving landscape of free speech in the U.S., making it a must-watch for those engaged in discussions about the implications of government policies on personal freedoms.
What are your thoughts on Chomsky's analysis? Do you believe that the government is overstepping its bounds regarding freedom of speech? Share your insights below!
In this thought-provoking YouTube video, Noam Chomsky addresses the significant challenges to freedom of speech posed by recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings, particularly during the Obama administration. He characterizes this period as seeing "the first major attack on freedom of speech in the United States since the notorious Smith Act back around 1940."
Chomsky discusses a specific Supreme Court case that he considers ominous, which was brought forth by the Obama administration. The case involved the "Humanitarian Law Project," which provided legal advice to a group listed on the U.S. State Department's terrorist list. This advice included urging the group to pursue nonviolent means. Chomsky argues that such legal guidance is now criminalized, marking a disturbing trend in the erosion of free speech rights.
The broader implications of government-defined "terrorist lists" come into sharp focus. Chomsky points out the arbitrary nature of these lists, citing historical examples, including how the Reagan administration removed Saddam Hussein from the list to support him against Iran, despite his record of violence. This raises critical questions about the legitimacy and oversight of what constitutes a terrorist organization.
As Chomsky notes, "the idea of barring material support extending to straightforward speech like legal advice" represents a sizable and disturbing infringement on the rights to free expression and legal counsel.
This video is significant for anyone interested in civil liberties and the evolving landscape of free speech in the U.S., making it a must-watch for those engaged in discussions about the implications of government policies on personal freedoms.
What are your thoughts on Chomsky's analysis? Do you believe that the government is overstepping its bounds regarding freedom of speech? Share your insights below!
Similar threads
