CISA’s BOD 25-01: Essential Federal Cloud Security Standards & Action Steps

If you work for a U.S. government agency and you haven’t heard about CISA’s Binding Operational Directive 25-01, you might want to check your inbox, or possibly your junk folder—because ignoring this directive is about as hazardous to your career as leaving “12345” as your admin password. Welcome to the whirlwind world of federal cloud security, where new deadlines are dropping faster than you can say “phishing-resistant multifactor authentication,” and where IT professionals are about to get a firsthand tour of the Secure Cloud Business Applications (SCuBA) project.

Why All the Fuss? The SCuBA Project and BOD 25-01, Explained​

The world is a dangerous place for cloud environments. Malicious actors, ranging from nation-state hackers to that disgruntled intern who just discovered PowerShell, are always looking for their next opportunity. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), in a remarkable display of “closing the barn door before the horse is out,” launched the SCuBA project. It offers secure configuration baselines for major cloud services—currently Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace—because, apparently, just trusting the default settings is, in hindsight, a bit too “YOLO” for government work.
BOD 25-01, issued as part of SCuBA, isn’t just another strongly worded memo destined for your “Read Later” folder. It demands that U.S. federal civilian executive branch agencies implement a whole new set of secure configuration baselines for select cloud software-as-a-service (SaaS) products. Right now, the main focus is on Microsoft 365, but CISA has made it clear that other “fun” could be headed your way if you run cloud systems deemed important in the future.
So, what’s at stake? In a word: everything. Federal compliance isn’t just about avoiding strongly worded emails from the inspector general; it’s foundational to safeguarding data, public trust, and, frankly, your ability to use sick days proactively rather than reactively.
Yes, private sector friends, these rules are technically for government agencies. But before you start feeling smug about your comparative freedom, remember: these security baselines are what common sense would look like if common sense came with a mandate, a checklist, and, probably, a performance review.

BOD 25-01 in Scope: Who Needs to Get Their Act Together?​

There’s no hiding in the metaphorical HR supply closet—if you operate a production or operational Microsoft 365 cloud tenant that qualifies as a federal information system, get ready to roll up your sleeves. The list of affected parties is broad: if you fall under the federal civilian executive branch, you’re up next. And CISA reserves the right to widen the net if your cloud products begin to look interesting (read: risky) to them.
Now, let’s talk deadlines. CISA’s BOD 25-01 isn’t content with a “just do it sometime this fiscal year” attitude. Specific dates are being thrown around like confetti:

• By February 21, 2025: Submit your tenant name and system-owning agency/component for each cloud tenant and update the inventory annually. Yes, annually means every single year, not whenever you remember.
• By April 25, 2025: Deploy your SCuBA assessment tools and begin continuous reporting. Continuous, as in “never take your eye off the dashboard.”
• By June 20, 2025: Implement all mandatory SCuBA policies as specified in BOD 25-01’s Required Configurations.

There are also requirements about rolling out future updates to mandatory SCuBA policies and having everything locked down before granting an Authorization to Operate to new cloud tenants. In other words, if you’re provisioning a new M365 environment, forget about shortcuts—compliance has to start on Day 1.
Witty aside: If you regularly think “They can’t possibly add more paperwork,” CISA is here to prove you wrong in increasingly creative ways.

The Must-Do List: Required SCuBA Configurations for Microsoft 365​

Let’s cut to the chase—the heart of BOD 25-01 isn’t its deadlines, but its extensive and concrete configuration requirements. Forget vague best practices. This is a point-by-point, SHALL-and-SHOULD-laden prescription for hardening your Microsoft 365 enviroment until not even the office coffeemaker gets external network access without multi-factor authentication.

Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD): Thou Shalt Not​

• No More Legacy Authentication: Outdated authentication systems are persona non grata. Block them.
• Block High-Risk Users/Sign-ins Automatically: If Entra ID flags a user or sign-in as high risk, they’re out, no questions asked.
• Mandatory Phishing-Resistant MFA: All users—yes, all—must have it, unless you want to implement an alternate MFA in the interim and explain yourself. Microsoft Authenticator must show login context info to fight token theft.
• Password Expiry Is Out: User passwords “SHALL NOT” expire—finally some relief for users, panic for the “change every six weeks” crowd.
• Tighter Privilege Management: Only admins can register or consent to applications, and those admins can be no fewer than two and no more than eight global admins. “Just assign Global Admin to everyone and call it a day” is, tragically, off the table.
• Alerts, Approvals, and PAM: Assigning or activating privileged roles must now trigger alerts, require approval, and go through a proper Privileged Access Management (PAM) system.
• Cloud-Only for Privileges: Highly privileged accounts must be cloud-only—no hybrid identity mixing for you.

Microsoft Defender: Paranoia, But Automated​

• Preset Security Policies Required: Enable standard or strict policies for everybody, no exceptions.
• Sensitive Accounts Get Extra Love: They need the strict protection preset, not just the standard.
• PII Blocking Custom Policy: Block sharing of credit card numbers, ITINs, Social Security Numbers, and other sensitive info wherever possible. At last, a policy that doesn’t just vaguely promise to “protect PII.”
• Detailed Auditing: Purview Audit (Standard and Premium) must be enabled for everything and everyone.

Exchange Online: Fortress Mode​

• No External Forwarding: Automatic forwarding to external domains is gone, much to the chagrin of users keen on bypassing oversight.
• SPF, DMARC, and SMTP AUTH: Sender Policy Framework and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance must be deployed and “hardened,” with specific email addresses mandated for aggregate reports (and no, you can’t use “[email protected]” for everything anymore).
• Mailbox Auditing: It must be enabled. Oh, and admins need to collect aggregate reports, too.
• External Sharing/Warnings: Contact folders, calendars, and sender warnings are all tightly controlled.

Power Platform: Lockdown​

• Environment Creation is for Admins Only: No more “shadow IT” creation of trial environments.
• Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Policies: Must restrict connector access and be present in all environments. Tenant isolation is required.

SharePoint Online & OneDrive: Nobody Gets In​

• Restrict Sharing: Only existing guests or people in your organization can share externally.
• Default Sharing With ‘Specific People’: Forget anyone with the link—specific people only, view-only permissions by default.
• Proactive Expiry & Reauthentication: Sharing links expire fast, and reauthentication cycles are tight.

Microsoft Teams: Stranger Danger​

• No Anonymous Meeting Starters: You now need a name tag, and probably three-factor authentication, just to be mistaken for someone else in a meeting.
• External Access Only on a Per-Domain Basis: Each external domain must be vetted.
• Unmanaged Users and Skype Are Out: No more contact with Skype users (what year is it, anyway?). Unmanaged users can’t just barge in.
• Email Integration Disabled: Because nothing says “human risk vector” like forwarding that meeting link to your personal Gmail.

Beyond the Minimum: Additional Configurations to Consider​

While CISA’s mandatory checklist is long enough to make your eyes glaze over, there’s a “nice-to-have” list that would make any CISO weep tears of joy—or frustration, depending on your resource pool.
Among the “SHOULD” items:

• Admin Notifications: Inform admins when high-risk users are detected—because who doesn’t love getting alerts at 2 AM?
• Requiring Managed Devices for Auth and MFA: No bring-your-own-laptop shenanigans here.
• Guest Access Limitations: Tighten up guest user invitations and access.
• Impersonation Protections and Safe Attachments: Make phishing attacks more difficult, if not impossible.
• Block Overly Permissive IP/Safe Lists: Those handy “just allow my home IP for everything” lists are a relic of the past.
• Restrict App Installation: Only allow Microsoft, third-party, and custom apps approved by the agency—not just the ones that make your group chat a little more fun.

Witty aside: The “SHOULD” list is the security equivalent to flossing. You absolutely, definitely should—but let’s all admit our compliance is a bit, ahem, aspirational.

The Risks CISA Can’t Save You From​

Clearly, BOD 25-01 is an ambitious, comprehensive, and (let’s say it) heavy-handed effort to force security hygiene across a sprawling, fragmented federal cloud landscape. It’ll improve resilience, if not outright security, across agencies. But let’s pump the brakes before popping the digital champagne.

Resource Strain: Hope You Hired More IT Staff​

Smaller agencies—and, let’s be honest, many large ones—are about to meet their new best friend: operational workload. Continuous monitoring and assessment, rigorous configuration management, and (everyone’s favorite) preparing for auditors will strain already thin teams. Expect a spike in “call out sick” days immediately before major compliance deadlines.

Shadow IT: The Hydra Won’t Die​

A strict policy regime often leads to “creative” workarounds. If your users see configuration baselines as barriers—rather than enablers—expect a surge in shadow IT, unsanctioned app usage, or clever but risky tricks to bypass controls. You can lock down OneDrive sharing, but you can’t stop someone from zipping a file and sending it via Signal.

Usability vs. Security: The Never-Ending Battle​

Is it more secure? Absolutely. But is it always practical? Not always. Forcing reauthentication every few days, tightly limiting group permissions, and restricting app integrations can quickly transform enthusiastic cloud adoption into a bureaucratic slog. Prepare for user feedback—likely in the form of a support ticket flood.
Witty aside: IT’s new unofficial motto— “Secure, but with significant inconvenience.” Just imagine the helpdesk lines.

Hidden Strengths: Where BOD 25-01 Shines​

Despite the operational overhead, there are real strengths to be acknowledged—and, dare I say it, even admired.

Consistency Across Agencies​

For the first time in a long time, federal IT teams aren’t re-creating the security wheel—or launching yet another “unique” configuration strategy that will age as well as “Out Of Office” auto-replies. BOD 25-01 offers consistency, which pays off in interoperability, threat intelligence sharing, and cross-agency crisis response.

Automation and Audit Readiness​

The “continuous monitoring” requirement might feel like a bear, but in modern cloud environments, it’s increasingly achievable. And the days of panicked audits (well, entirely panic-free may be optimistic) could give way to streamlined, tool-driven reporting—if IT shops invest in the right platforms.

Stronger Baseline for Vendors​

Vendors managing SaaS for the government now know exactly what’s needed to play ball. This dramatically shortens the “guess what the client wants” phase of sales calls and curtails inconsistent requests from disparate procurement offices.
Witty aside: Imagine, finally, a baseline that doesn’t change with every new CIO. Miracles do happen.

Tools to the Rescue: Auditing and Enforcement with Tenable​

If your heart rate spiked reading the above, here’s the good news: you don’t have to do it all by hand. Tenable Vulnerability Management, with its Nessus scanners, offers audit files tailored for the CISA SCuBA baseline. Whether you’re tackling Entra ID, Defender, Exchange Online, Power Platform, SharePoint, OneDrive, or Teams, there’s a configuration file waiting to tell you exactly how non-compliant you are.
Their solutions help agencies automatically assess, monitor, and prove their configuration posture against CISA’s rapidly updating standards. So, instead of “hoping” things are set right, you’ll know—with dashboards to back it up.
Witty aside: Think of Tenable as that nosy aunt who spots your dust bunnies, but at least she tells you where they are.

Real-World Implications: The IT Pro’s Perspective​

Let’s talk turkey. This directive won’t be without disruption, but here’s how it looks from the trenches:

• The Security Team: You’re getting an audit trail for Christmas every year from now until eternity. Document everything. Twice.
• The End Users: Habits will change—expect initial resistance, followed by resigned acceptance, followed by password reset requests and a deep love/hate for MFA.
• The Executives: Sleep better knowing your agency is less likely to make headlines (for the wrong reasons). At least until attackers move on to your printer fleet.
• The Shadow IT Rebels: Your days of unchecked app installs are numbered. But you always find a way, don’t you?

Conclusion: Compliance Isn’t Optional, And Neither Is Humor​

CISA’s BOD 25-01 is a milestone in federal cloud security, whether you see it as a blessing, a curse, or just another project to juggle alongside “modernizing SharePoint.” While government agencies have no choice but to comply, private enterprises and the wider security community would do well to take a close look at these baselines—not just because “CISA said so,” but because these measures genuinely raise the bar for resilience in cloud environments.
Sure, the road ahead won’t be smooth. Expect friction, soup-to-nuts retooling, and a lot of coffee-fueled nights wrestling with configs. But at the end of it all, agencies (and maybe some private sector stragglers) will emerge more secure, more consistent, and—who knows—maybe even a little more confident the next time a phishing email lands.
As always, the surest baseline for IT pros everywhere remains the same: document, automate, caffeinate, and when in doubt, refuse to click that weird link—no matter what the “CEO” says.

---

Source: Security Boulevard CISA BOD 25-01 Compliance: What U.S. Government Agencies Need to Know