Claude Now Embedded in Microsoft 365 with MCP Connector and Skills

Anthropic’s Claude is now embedded directly into Microsoft 365 and Teams, giving enterprise users a conversational interface that can search, summarise, and analyse content from Word, Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive without manual uploads — a move that deepens Anthropic’s enterprise footprint and accelerates the shift toward a multi‑model, agentic workplace.

Background​

Anthropic’s Claude has long been positioned as a workplace‑focused large language model family. The company’s latest update adds a pre‑built Microsoft 365 connector — implemented via the open Model Context Protocol (MCP) — that allows Team and Enterprise customers to link Claude to Microsoft 365 tenants and surface contextual content from Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive and Calendar inside Claude conversations. Admin enablement is required before users can connect, and access mirrors existing Microsoft 365 permissions.
At roughly the same time, Anthropic published its Agent Skills framework: modular, folder‑based packages (YAML + Markdown) that teach Claude task‑specific behaviour and can be loaded on demand using progressive disclosure. That feature is designed to reduce context overhead, lower compute costs, and let organisations encapsulate workflows — from spreadsheet generation to brand‑compliant content creation — in re‑usable packages. Anthropic explicitly warns administrators to only install skills from trusted sources and to audit code and bundles before enabling them.
These two announcements — Microsoft 365 connectivity and Skills — are tightly coupled to larger industry trends. Microsoft has been moving Copilot toward multi‑model orchestration and has adopted MCP across several surfaces; GitHub and Copilot products are already multi‑model, and Microsoft has made Anthropic models available as options in Copilot Studio and Microsoft 365 Copilot. The result is an ecosystem in which multiple model vendors and standard connectors co‑exist across the enterprise stack.

---

What Anthropic’s Microsoft 365 connector actually does​

Surface context from across Microsoft 365​

The connector gives Claude read access — governed by normal Microsoft 365 permissions — to:

• SharePoint sites and OneDrive libraries (documents, slides, spreadsheets)
• Outlook mailboxes and email threads
• Teams chats and channel conversations
• Calendar events and meeting metadata

This lets users ask natural language questions like “summarise the last three client emails about Project Apollo,” “what decisions were made in last week’s engineering standup?” or “find the Q4 budget deck in SharePoint,” and Claude will pull and synthesise the underlying content. Anthropic documents and press coverage demonstrate these capabilities in action.

Admin & tenant controls​

Enterprise enablement is two‑phased:

• A Microsoft Entra administrator must register MCP service principals in the tenant and complete a one‑time setup for organisation‑level enablement.
• Once the org‑wide service is configured, Team or Enterprise plan owners can enable the connector; individual users then authenticate to start using Claude with their Microsoft 365 accounts.

Anthropic’s help documentation walks through the exact Graph API service principal steps and shows how to test the connector after setup. This isn’t a consumer‑grade “one‑click” connection — it requires Microsoft admin involvement, tenant configuration, and careful permission choices.

Enterprise search & projects​

Beyond per‑chat lookups, Anthropic added a dedicated enterprise search project type inside Claude that aggregates connected sources into a searchable knowledge surface for teams. This is intended to create a single pane for team knowledge, preloaded prompts, and curated relevance to reduce time spent hunting for information across silos.

---

Claude Skills: modularising workflows for real work​

What Skills are​

Skills are directory‑style packages that bundle instructions, templates, scripts, and resources for specific tasks. A Skill typically contains:

• A YAML frontmatter and a SKILL.md (metadata + instructions)
• Optional resources (images, reference docs) kept on the filesystem
• Small executable helper scripts where needed (for tasks like formatting Excel or filling PDFs)

The Skills system uses three levels of loading: metadata (names/descriptions) at startup, full instructions when relevant, and resource files only when required — the progressive disclosure model that limits context bloat and computation. Anthropic provides a skill‑creator and prebuilt skills (pptx, xlsx, docx, pdf) and exposes Skills via API and the Claude Agent SDK.

Why Skills matter for IT​

Skills let organisations:

• Operationalise best practices (brand rules, legal disclaimers) centrally.
• Reuse proven prompts and small scripts across projects.
• Reduce the need for long prompts, saving tokens and reducing latency.
• Version control and distribute agent behaviours via repositories or plugins.

For enterprises scaling AI assistants, Skills become a practical way to standardise agent behaviour while keeping the underlying model generic.

Safety & governance controls for Skills​

Anthropic’s engineering guidance is explicit: Skills can include executable code and external resources, so organisations must treat Skills like any other extension or package. Recommended controls include:

• Install only trusted Skills from verified internal or vendor repositories.
• Audit SKILL.md and any bundled scripts before deployment.
• Limit Skills that can execute code or perform network requests.
• Use versioning and code‑review processes for Skills distributed via git or plugin stores.

Anthropic’s own warning — to “thoroughly audit” Skills from less‑trusted sources — is a rare, explicit admonition in the agent tooling world and should be treated as a baseline policy for IT teams.

---

Why this matters to Microsoft, Anthropic, and enterprise buyers​

A challenger inside Microsoft’s ecosystem​

Claude’s Microsoft 365 connector positions Anthropic not merely as a third‑party model provider but as a runnable assistant inside the Microsoft productivity stack. This is notable because Microsoft itself is building integrated intelligence into Windows and Microsoft 365, and it now supports multiple model backends (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) for Copilot experiences. Organisations can therefore choose models for different workloads — a move that reduces single‑vendor dependency. Microsoft’s own documentation shows Anthropic models available as choices in Copilot Studio and Microsoft 365 Copilot environments.

Multi‑model Copilot and strategic diversification​

Microsoft’s multi‑model approach — making Anthropic models available in Copilot Studio and expanding model choice within Microsoft 365 Copilot — signals a strategic desire to create a federated model ecosystem. That benefits CIOs who want:

• Resilience (fallback options if one provider has outages or policy changes)
• Cost optimisation (different models for different SLAs)
• Feature differentiation (models that excel at code generation, summarisation, safety)

GitHub’s multi‑model Copilot announcement and GitHub documentation also confirm Anthropic’s presence in dev tooling, reinforcing the multi‑vendor reality across Microsoft’s portfolio.

---

Security, privacy, and compliance: the new operational frontiers​

The surface area has grown​

MCP and connectors like Anthropic’s Microsoft 365 integration increase the attack surface by design: AI agents now routinely read documents, execute small workflows, and may invoke tools or Skills that perform operations on behalf of users. Several recent academic and industry studies show new classes of attacks that exploit tool‑integration layers — including resource poisoning, preference manipulation of tool listings, and parasitic toolchain attacks — that can lead to data exfiltration or conversation hijacking. Enterprises need to treat MCP servers, Skills, and connectors as first‑class security vectors.

Known MCP‑era vulnerabilities​

Independent research has documented a variety of MCP‑adjacent risks:

• Prompt‑injection via external resources (malicious content hidden inside PDFs or calendar invites) that can cause agents to leak information or run unintended actions.
• Tool description and registry manipulation that biases model tool selection toward malicious or rogue servers.
• Third‑party MCP server vulnerabilities (e.g., npm package command injection) that can lead to remote code execution if improperly configured.

These categories are not theoretical — proof‑of‑concepts and CVEs have already been published, and security teams must move faster than the threat research community to harden deployments.

Enterprise controls you must enforce now​

Security teams should adopt a practical set of controls for MCP‑enabled agents and Skills:

• Enforce tenant‑level admin enablement and prevent user‑initiated global connections without approval. (Anthropic requires admin setup.)
• Apply least privilege to MCP service principals and connectors; restrict connectors to necessary sites and mailboxes.
• Maintain an allowlist for Skills and MCP servers; block unverified external MCP endpoints.
• Require mandatory code review for any Skill that contains scripts or network capabilities; ban any Skill that exfiltrates data.
• Turn on audit logging for every connector action and forward logs to SIEM for anomaly detection.
• Introduce a staging environment for Skills and connectors before rolling out to production users.
• Implement human review gates for tasks that touch regulated data (PHI, PII, customer information).

These are practical, incremental safeguards that squarely address the new threats introduced by agentic connectors.

---

Practical deployment checklist for CIOs and IT leaders​

• Prepare the tenant: Identify a Microsoft Entra admin and plan the Graph API service principal registration; follow Anthropic’s published setup steps.
• Risk assessment: Map data flows to determine which mailboxes, SharePoint sites, and Teams channels will be reachable by Claude; classify data and impose exclusions.
• Skills governance: Create an internal Skills registry and a policy for review, signing, and distribution; require code review and vulnerability scans for Skills with execution logic.
• Least privilege & monitoring: Restrict service principals to only required APIs; enable comprehensive logging and SIEM ingestion for all Claude‑driven actions.
• User training & consent: Educate end users about what it means to “connect Claude” to their account and make connection opt‑in with clear consent language.
• Incident playbook: Add MCP/Skill compromise scenarios to incident response plans; rehearse exfiltration and rollback workflows.

---

Risks and trade‑offs: a balanced assessment​

What’s compelling​

• Speed of insight. Claude can dramatically reduce the time teams spend finding context across files, email, and chats, converting siloed information into actionable summaries.
• Operationalised workflows. Skills promise to make AI assistants repeatable and auditable rather than one‑off prompt engineering efforts.
• Vendor flexibility. Microsoft’s multi‑model stance gives enterprises choice — a strategic hedge against lock‑in and single‑vendor availability risk.

What keeps me up at night​

• Toolchain exfiltration. MCP’s power to orchestrate multiple tools creates new exfiltration vectors that aren’t fully mitigated by current filtering strategies. Recent academic work and CVEs illustrate these vectors in practice.
• Skill supply‑chain risk. Skills that bundle code and resources act like miniature applications; without strict controls, they can introduce remote execution or data‑leakage channels. Anthropic’s recommendation to audit Skills is necessary but not sufficient without enterprise processes.
• Governance lag. The pace of product development outstrips most corporate governance cycles; policies, compliance controls, and technical guardrails must be modernised to keep up.

---

Broader industry implications​

The Claude–Microsoft coupling is a visible example of the industry moving from monolithic AI services toward a federated, multi‑model agent ecosystem. MCP acts like an interoperability layer — a standardised bridge — that lets models connect to tools regardless of vendor. That has three big consequences:

• Developers will increasingly build agents composed from many models and tools, choosing the best model for each subtask.
• Enterprises will need to evolve governance from model‑centric controls to toolchain and connector governance.
• Security research will shift from LLM jailbreaks to supply‑chain and protocol attacks that target the connective tissue between models and systems.

Academic work and industry incidents already show both the promise and the risk of this approach. Organisations that design repeatable, least‑privilege architectures and that treat Skills and MCP servers like internal software packages will have a clear advantage.

---

The near future: agents that write agents?​

Anthropic’s Skills design explicitly supports iterative development: Claude can help capture successful approaches and common mistakes into Skills during a workflow, and researchers outside Anthropic are actively demonstrating agentic frameworks that autonomously discover and refine skills. This portends a future where agents partially bootstrap their own tooling repertoire, which could multiply productivity — but also escalate risk if controls aren’t in place. Treat statements about fully autonomous skill‑writing with caution: the foundational research is promising and Anthropic has signalled intent, but production‑grade, self‑evolving agents remain an emerging area with open safety questions.

---

Conclusion: what to do next​

Anthropic’s Claude integrating with Microsoft 365 and the debut of Claude Skills mark a step change in how enterprises will embed AI into daily work. The capability is compelling: consolidated context, reusable workflows, and model choice inside Microsoft’s ecosystem. But the change also introduces new operational responsibilities — from MCP server hardening to Skills supply‑chain management and expanded incident planning.
Practical next moves for enterprise teams are straightforward:

• Treat the Microsoft 365 connector as an enterprise integration project, not a consumer add‑on. Plan admin enablement, permissions, and pilot scopes before rollout.
• Build a Skills governance pipeline: code review, scanning, allowlists, and staging.
• Harden MCP endpoints and log everything: assume your agents will touch many systems and instrument them accordingly.

When orchestrated thoughtfully, Claude inside Microsoft 365 illustrates the future workplace: distributed intelligence, selectable models, and modular agent behaviours that accelerate meaningful work. When deployed without governance, it magnifies existing risks and creates new ones. The winners will be the organisations that plan for both.

---

Source: UC Today Anthropic’s Claude Integrates With Microsoft Teams and 365, Deepening Enterprise Roots