Crane Case Study: Microsoft Fabric OneLake Delivers Real-Time Global Analytics

iLink Digital’s work with Crane demonstrates how a focused data modernization program, built on Microsoft Fabric and Azure services, can turn fractured reporting and slow decision cycles into a unified, near real‑time decision engine that supports global operations and strategic leadership.

Background​

Crane — a long‑established global manufacturing company operating across multiple industries — faced a classic enterprise data problem: years of incremental systems, technical debt, and siloed reporting that left business leaders without a single, trusted view of operations. According to the Microsoft customer story provided by iLink Digital, the partnership targeted disconnected systems, manual reporting, and slow access to insights that consumed employees’ time and hampered agility.
To address those issues, iLink implemented a unified data platform using Microsoft Fabric as the backbone, alongside Azure Synapse Analytics and Azure Databricks, consolidating data from disparate global sources into a governed OneLake data lake. The end result (as reported) was real‑time dashboards and faster executive decision‑making enabled by a single shared data model and Power BI reporting.
This feature examines that transformation in depth: the technical architecture, what Microsoft Fabric and OneLake actually provide, how Synapse and Databricks fit, the business outcomes Crane reported, and the realistic risks and operational caveats an enterprise must manage when pursuing similar projects.

---

Overview: Why Microsoft Fabric matters for enterprise data modernization​

Microsoft Fabric is positioned as a unified analytics platform that connects ingestion, storage, governance, analytics, and BI into a single SaaS experience centered on OneLake — a tenant‑wide logical data lake. OneLake provides a single place to store Delta/Parquet data, with Fabric workloads (Data Engineering, Warehouses/SQL, Real‑Time, Notebooks, Power BI) operating against that same storage without repeated copies. This single‑lake design aims to reduce data sprawl and simplify governance.
Important Fabric capabilities that underpin projects like Crane’s include:

• A single logical data lake (OneLake) that is provisioned per tenant and stores tabular data in open formats like Delta/Parquet.
• Direct Lake and Power BI integrations that let semantic models query delta tables in OneLake with high performance and without full data imports.
• Mirroring features that create managed, read‑only replicas of operational warehouses/databases into OneLake (using CDC / snapshots) to enable analytics without impacting source systems.
• Native connectors and integration patterns for Azure Synapse Analytics and Azure Databricks, enabling mixed‑environment migrations and co‑existence strategies.

Those features explain why iLink’s approach — consolidating Crane’s global data into a governed OneLake and layering analytics + Power BI on top — maps cleanly onto Fabric’s technical design and governance model.

---

Implementation: The Crane case — what iLink built​

Key pain points and objectives​

iLink’s engagement began with a typical discovery phase: mapping fragmented systems, identifying manual reporting bottlenecks, and agreeing a business‑aligned set of KPIs and outcomes. The emphasis was not just on centralizing data, but on delivering trusted, timely insights to leadership so decisions could be faster and higher impact.

Architecture and components deployed​

iLink implemented a layered Fabric architecture, combining these elements:

• OneLake as the single governed data lake to hold cleansed and normalized enterprise data (bronze/silver/gold medallion layers). This eliminated inconsistent copies and provided a shared semantic layer.
• Azure Synapse Analytics as a SQL analytics and warehousing component in scenarios requiring enterprise T‑SQL and familiar Synapse patterns. Synapse artifacts and pipelines were used where organizations already relied on Synapse investments.
• Azure Databricks for heavy data engineering, complex Spark transformations, and advanced data science workloads—integrated with OneLake via supported connectors and medallion patterns. This allowed teams to reuse Databricks for ML pipelines while Fabric handled governance and BI consumption.
• Fabric mirroring (or managed ingestion pipelines) to bring operational data into OneLake without disrupting source systems, enabling near‑real‑time analytics.
• Power BI and Direct Lake semantic models on top of OneLake to deliver dashboards to leadership with near‑real‑time data access.

iLink paired the technology implementation with organizational change: training, a semantic data model design process, and embedding reporting patterns so Crane’s business users could self‑serve while governance remained enforced.

Resulting capabilities​

As a result of the deployment, Crane gained:

• Faster access to cross‑division metrics with a single source of truth rather than conflicting spreadsheets or delayed regional reports.
• Real‑time dashboards and executive views, enabling leadership to respond faster to operational issues.
• A transition for IT from “keeping the lights on” to delivering strategic insights that drive decisions — an outcome articulated by Crane’s IT leadership in the case narrative.

---

Technical deep dive: OneLake, mirroring, Synapse, Databricks and Power BI​

OneLake as the anchor for a governed data estate​

OneLake is a tenant‑scoped logical data lake built on Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2. Each Fabric tenant has a single OneLake that organizes data into workspaces and items (lakehouses, warehouses, mirrored databases), with tabular data stored in Delta/Parquet formats to provide ACID properties and time‑travel capabilities. OneLake is designed to be open—it uses industry formats and standard storage APIs so multiple engines can operate over the same files.
This design is what lets teams consolidate global datasets without repeated copies and standardize security, cataloging, and lineage—crucial for a multinational manufacturer like Crane.

Mirroring and change data capture (CDC) into OneLake​

Fabric’s mirroring features create replicas of existing operational sources in OneLake, using an initial snapshot plus CDC to keep those replicas in near‑real‑time sync. Mirrored databases appear in Fabric as read‑only delta tables with a SQL analytics endpoint for T‑SQL exploration. Mirroring reduces the need for custom ETL, but it is a preview/gradual feature and has operational considerations (e.g., CDC requirements on source systems).
Operational caveat: while Fabric advertises managed mirroring features and “free” replication compute in some capacity tiers, independent practitioners warn that cost and operational accounting can be nuanced; expected free replication compute may still generate downstream query charges, and not every source or connectivity pattern is supported by default. These practical concerns matter when sizing and forecasting costs.

Where Azure Synapse fits​

Azure Synapse Analytics remains relevant for enterprises migrating from legacy warehouses or where Synapse pipelines and SQL pools are already core to operations. Fabric can interoperate with Synapse (read/write into OneLake, reuse of pipelines, and migration utilities) so organizations can preserve existing investments while modernizing toward Fabric’s lakehouse model. For customers like Crane, Synapse was used where it made sense to support enterprise SQL workloads and to ease transition.

Where Azure Databricks fits​

Databricks continues to be the platform of choice for heavy Spark data engineering and established ML workflows. Fabric supports integration patterns with Databricks and OneLake so teams can run Databricks jobs while relying on OneLake as the governed storage plane—useful when data science teams prefer Databricks notebooks and tooling. Integration patterns include mounting OneLake storage and using medallion architectures across both ecosystems.

Power BI, Direct Lake, and operational dashboards​

Power BI’s Direct Lake mode allows semantic models to read delta tables directly in OneLake with performance characteristics close to import mode while avoiding data duplication. This is the primary mechanism that enables real‑time executive dashboards in Fabric deployments. For Crane, Power BI on Fabric enabled leadership dashboards that consumed the same governed datasets the data engineering teams produced.

---

Business impact: what Crane gained (and what’s reasonable to expect)​

From the case text, Crane realized several qualitative outcomes:

• Faster, better decision‑making from leadership because data and metrics were consolidated and available in near‑real‑time.
• Reduced manual effort for data gathering, freeing analysts and managers to focus on insights rather than ETL.
• A shift in IT’s role from operational maintenance to strategic enablement — delivering “the right data driven insights to leadership teams” as an explicit outcome reported by Crane’s IT lead.

These outcomes align with the broader value propositions Microsoft and partners claim for Fabric: unified governance, reduced copy proliferation, accelerated time‑to‑insight, and readiness for AI/ML scenarios. Independent guidance and practitioner reports also corroborate that these are typical benefits when an organization consolidates around a lakehouse and enforces semantic models.
Caveat on quantification: The public case narrative does not include specific, independently verified ROI numbers (e.g., reduction in hours, cost savings, or throughput improvements). Those metrics are commonly captured in internal project reports but are not always published verbatim in customer stories; treat qualitative leadership‑enablement claims as valid outcomes, and treat precise percentage improvements or cost savings as claims that need direct verification from project telemetry.

---

Risks, limitations, and operational considerations​

No technical stack is a silver bullet. The Crane story reflects many best practices, but there are realistic caveats organizations must consider before replicating the pattern.

1. Mirroring and connectivity limitations​

Fabric’s mirroring simplifies replication but is subject to source‑system prerequisites (CDC, log mining, supported versions) and preview‑stage limitations for some connectors. Not all enterprise sources or private network topologies will be supported out of the box. Testing and gateway architectures are often required.

2. Cost posture and chargeback complexity​

While Fabric messaging highlights generous mirroring and capacity allocations, real‑world billing can be complex: querying mirrored data, OneLake operations, and cross‑engine compute generate charges that need careful modelling. Independent analyses recommend validating billing behavior in a pilot before rolling out broad mirroring at scale.

3. Hybrid and multi‑tool coexistence friction​

Enterprises with entrenched Databricks, Synapse, or other platforms may face friction when trying to operate both ecosystems simultaneously—especially around fine‑grained access control, private‑link connectivity, and catalog interoperability. Integration patterns exist, but they can require design trade‑offs.

4. Governance and cultural change​

Technical consolidation only succeeds with governance, taxonomy, and business alignment. Creating a shared semantic model and ensuring data owners adopt access and lineage practices is often the harder part. The Crane engagement paired technical implementation with governance and training to drive adoption—an essential lesson for others.

5. Security and compliance​

Centralizing data amplifies the importance of strong identity, access management, and encryption practices. Using OneLake and Fabric’s governance features helps, but regulatory constraints and data residency rules must be assessed in the architecture phase. Fabric integrates with Microsoft’s security portfolio (Entra ID, Defender, Purview) to address these concerns, but they require deliberate configuration.

---

Practical recommendations for IT leaders and architects​

If pursuing a Fabric‑based data modernization similar to Crane, consider these pragmatic steps:

• Map the data estate end‑to‑end and prioritize business outcomes. Start with a limited set of high‑value KPIs and design provider‑agnostic success metrics.
• Run a pilot to test mirroring, Direct Lake performance, and billing behavior using representative production datasets. Validate CDC behavior and network/gateway requirements.
• Design a medallion architecture (bronze/silver/gold) in OneLake and codify semantic models in Power BI with governance guardrails.
• Preserve data science investments—define clear integration patterns for Azure Databricks or Synapse to coexist with OneLake and avoid rework.
• Implement role‑based access, data lineage, and auditing from day one; use the tenant governance model to distribute ownership while retaining central policy enforcement.

---

What iLink’s approach highlights about partner‑led transformation​

The Crane story is a useful example of effective partner engagement: iLink combined Microsoft platform capabilities with a business‑aligned modernization strategy and organizational enablement. The partnership highlights three partner roles that matter:

• Translate technology into business outcomes — not just implement tooling but map capabilities to leadership decisions and KPIs.
• Preserve existing investments — integrate Synapse and Databricks where needed, avoiding unnecessary rip‑and‑replace.
• Operationalize governance — help the customer define semantic models, access practices, and training that make the platform sustainable over time.

This combination is why enterprise modernization projects often succeed when an experienced partner leads the technical migration while aligning closely with business sponsors.

---

Final analysis: strengths, caveats, and the pragmatic path forward​

The Crane case is illustrative of how a OneLake‑centric, Fabric‑driven architecture can consolidate a fragmented global data estate and convert manual reporting into real‑time leadership dashboards. The technical foundations (Delta/Parquet, Direct Lake, mirroring, and integration with Synapse/Databricks) support the narrative reported by Crane and iLink.
Strengths demonstrated in the case:

• Modernized, governed single source of truth enabling consistent KPIs.
• Speed to insight via Direct Lake + Power BI for leadership dashboards.
• Partner‑led change management, converting technology into measurable leadership value.

Risks and open questions:

• Mirroring operational limits and billing complexity demand a careful pilot and cost model validation.
• Coexistence with Databricks/Synapse requires explicit design for connectivity, security, and catalog interoperability to avoid lock‑in or duplicated effort.
• Quantitative ROI claims are not published in the publicly available customer story; such numbers should be validated internally before being used as planning assumptions.

For organizations considering a similar path, the pragmatic route is to run a small, value‑focused pilot that validates performance, governance, and billing assumptions, then scale with a partner that can bridge business outcomes and technical execution.

---

Crane’s transformation with iLink Digital and Microsoft Fabric is a useful, real‑world example of how modern lakehouse platforms can convert noisy, siloed enterprise data into strategic assets — provided the organization treats governance, integration, and operational costs with the same rigor it applies to technical design.

---

Source: Microsoft iLink Digital unifies data and accelerates transformation with Microsoft Fabric | Microsoft Customer Stories