Critical Vulnerabilities in Hitachi Energy ICS Devices: Patching and Mitigation Strategies

Introduction​

In today’s ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, even the most robust industrial control systems (ICS) are not immune to vulnerabilities. A recently disclosed advisory on Hitachi Energy’s PCU400 and PCULogger products draws attention to critical flaws that could allow remote exploitation. Although these devices are primarily used to manage complex process control operations in industries like manufacturing, the underlying vulnerabilities in their implementation of OpenSSL can serve as a stark reminder: whether on a Windows workstation or an industrial control network, patching and vigilance are essential.

Executive Overview and Key Points​

The advisory highlights a suite of vulnerabilities in the Hitachi Energy PCU400 series and its companion PCULogger. Here are the primary takeaways:

• Affected Equipment:
  • PCU400: Vulnerable in versions 6.5 K and below and versions 9.4.1 and below.
  • PCULogger: Compromised in versions 1.1.0 and earlier.
• Vulnerability Types:
  • Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (Type Confusion)
  • Multiple Instances of NULL Pointer Dereferences
  • Use After Free
  • Double Free
  • Observable Discrepancy
  • Out-of-bounds Read
• Potential Impacts:
  Exploitation could lead to sensitive data exposure, crashing of the application, or even causing a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. In some cases, remote attackers could manipulate network messages or certificates to initiate an attack.
• Risk Ratings:
  The vulnerabilities carry CVSS v3 base scores ranging up to 7.5 for several critical issues, flagging them as significant threats, especially given that the attacks can sometimes be performed remotely with low complexity.
• Mitigations:
  Software updates and specific configuration changes are recommended. These include upgrading to PCU400 versions 6.6.0 or 9.4.2 (depending on existing firmware) and awaiting a compatible update for PCULogger.

This advisory, initially published by CISA and reported by a researcher from Dragos, serves as a timely call-to-action for operators of these devices to re-examine their security settings and apply the necessary patches promptly.

In-Depth Vulnerability Analysis​

1. Type Confusion in X.400 Address Processing​

One of the critical vulnerabilities involves a type confusion issue during the parsing of X.400 addresses in X.509 certificates. Here’s what happens:

• Technical Detail:
  The device incorrectly interprets an ASN1_STRING as an ASN1_TYPE during certificate chain processing. This misinterpretation occurs when the CRL (Certificate Revocation List) check is enabled.
• Possible Impact:
  An attacker, by supplying a crafted certificate chain and CRL, could force the application into passing arbitrary pointers to a memory comparison function. This could lead to reading of sensitive memory contents or cause a system crash.
• CVE Assignment & Score:
  Identified as CVE-2023-0286, with a CVSS base score of 7.4.

2. NULL Pointer Dereference Vulnerabilities​

Multiple instances of NULL pointer dereferences have been identified, each affecting different functions of the OpenSSL library used within these products.

• DSA Public Key Check Vulnerability:
  • Detail: The function responsible for verifying DSA public keys might be fed malformed input causing a NULL pointer to be referenced.
  • Impact: Likely results in a denial-of-service due to application crashes when processing untrusted keys.
  • CVE: CVE-2023-0217 (CVSS score: 7.5).
• PKCS7 Data Processing Vulnerability:
  • Detail: Malformed or manipulated PKCS7 data triggers an unsafe dereference via functions like d2i_PKCS7.
  • Impact: Can crash the device application, opening the door for DoS conditions.
  • CVE: CVE-2023-0216 (CVSS score: 7.5).
• Signature Verification Issue:
  • Detail: The vulnerability in verifying digital signatures on PKCS7 data can trigger an unhandled NULL pointer when legacy cryptographic providers are absent.
  • Impact: Results in application crashes, particularly in environments with FIPS 140-3 configurations.
  • CVE: CVE-2023-0401 (CVSS score: 7.5).

3. Use After Free in BIO_chain Management​

• Mechanism:
  When the device’s API function for streaming ASN.1 data (BIO_new_NDEF) is called, a failure in handling an invalid CMS recipient key can lead to a lingering pointer to a freed object. Essentially, if an error occurs and the chain isn't completely cleaned, subsequent operations (like BIO_pop) could erroneously reference freed memory.
• Impact:
  This use-after-free condition is particularly dangerous because it can cause system crashes in production environments.
• CVE Assignment:
  Marked as CVE-2023-0215 with a CVSS base score of 7.5.

4. Double Free Vulnerability​

• Issue Detail:
  The function parsing PEM files using PEM_read_bio_ex might inadvertently free the same memory buffer twice if it handles a malformed file that produces an empty payload.
• Impact:
  Such an error could lead to memory corruption and application crashes, thus acting as a denial-of-service vector.
• CVE:
  This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2022-4450 and carries a CVSS score of 7.5.

5. Observable Discrepancy via Timing Side Channel​

• Description:
  An observable discrepancy, essentially a timing-based side-channel attack, is present in the RSA decryption processes used in certificate verification. An attacker could theoretically use a Bleichenbacher-style attack, albeit requiring a vast number of trials.
• Impact:
  Although less severe compared to direct memory corruptions, the vulnerability (CVE-2022-4304, CVSS score: 5.9) indicates that sensitive timing information could eventually leak cryptographic secrets.

6. Out-of-Bounds Read Vulnerability​

• Mechanism:
  A read buffer overrun during the verification of certificate name constraints presents another risk.
• Impact:
  This can trigger application crashes and, in theory, could lead to data exposure if parts of the memory contain sensitive information.
• CVE Assignment:
  Labeled as CVE-2022-4203 with a more moderate CVSS score of 4.9.

Mitigations and Defense Strategies​

Software and Firmware Updates​

The most straightforward mitigation is updating affected products:

• PCU400 Devices:
  • For versions 6.5 K and below, update to version 6.6.0 or later if IEC62351-3 secure for IEC104/DNP3 is implemented.
  • For versions 9.4.1 and below, update to version 9.4.2 or later.
• PCULogger:
  Upgrade from version 1.1.0 to the pending release version 1.2.0 (ensure compatibility with updated PCU400 firmware).

These updates address the underlying code issues that lead to the memory handling problems.

Network Segmentation and Defensive Practices​

For those managing industrial control systems, applying network-level defenses is equally important:

• Implement Firewall Configurations:
  Ensure that process control networks are isolated from the general enterprise network. Minimal port exposure and strict access controls can help limit remote access opportunities.
• Physical Security and Controlled Access:
  Process control devices should reside in secured physical locations with limited direct access, reducing the risk of unauthorized interventions.
• Strict Scanning Protocols:
  Before connecting portable computers or removable storage to control systems, users should scan devices rigorously for malware.

CISA and Industry Best Practices​

CISA’s recommendations reinforce a proactive stance in vulnerability management:

• Regular Risk Assessments:
  Institutions are advised to perform regular impact analyses and risk assessments before implementing new defensive measures.
• Reference to ICS Cybersecurity Frameworks:
  Organizations should review available ICS cybersecurity advisories and technical guidance—many of which echo the importance of defense-in-depth strategies to mitigate such vulnerabilities.
• Proactive Reporting and Incident Handling:
  Any anomalous behaviors or suspected intrusions should be documented and reported through established organizational channels for further investigation.

Broader Impact on Information Security​

While the immediate concern centers on Hitachi Energy’s products, these vulnerabilities are symptomatic of broader challenges in maintaining industrial control systems secure in an interconnected world.

Parallels with Windows Security Practices​

For many Windows users, the principle is familiar: keep your software up-to-date. Just as patch management is critical to protect Windows 11 and enterprise endpoints, ensuring that ICS devices incorporate the latest security fixes is essential for preventing unauthorized access or catastrophic service interruptions.

• Software Updates Are Universal:
  Whether dealing with operating system patches or firmware updates for industrial devices, regular updates help maintain system integrity.
• Defense in Depth:
  From layered firewall restrictions to well-trained IT security teams, the best defenses employ multiple overlapping mechanisms to thwart attackers. Windows environments, like industrial settings, benefit from such strategies.
• Vulnerability Management Processes:
  This advisory highlights how comprehensive vulnerability management — from initial detection and detailed technical analysis to prompt mitigations — is central to securing critical infrastructure. Organizations managing Windows networks should view this as a reminder to bolster both their IT and operational technology (OT) security practices.

The Significance of OpenSSL in Critical Systems​

The repeated appearance of OpenSSL-related vulnerabilities across different operational contexts underscores its ubiquity—and its risk:

• Widespread Use, Common Weakness:
  OpenSSL is a cornerstone for secure communications, whether in web servers, Windows systems, or ICS devices. Vulnerabilities in its implementation can have cascading impacts across industries.
• Tailored Patches Required:
  Even when OpenSSL patches are released, vendors like Hitachi Energy must integrate these updates into their specialized firmware. End-users should remain alert to release notes and advisories from their device manufacturers.
• Shared Lessons Across IT and OT Domains:
  The mechanisms exploited in these vulnerabilities—such as type confusion or buffer overruns—are not limited to industrial devices. They serve as instructive examples for all IT professionals regarding secure coding practices and careful validation of external inputs.

Conclusion​

The recent advisory against Hitachi Energy’s PCU400 and PCULogger series underscores the persistent challenges in securing both IT and operational technology systems. The detailed breakdown of vulnerabilities—from type confusion to out-of-bounds reads—highlights multiple attack vectors that, if left unpatched, could jeopardize critical infrastructure.
For Windows users and IT professionals alike, this serves as a reminder: regardless of whether you’re protecting a corporate network or industrial control systems, proactive patch management and defense-in-depth strategies are vital. Staying informed, conducting regular risk assessments, and following manufacturer-recommended mitigations can make the difference between a secure deployment and a potential security breach.
Now is the time to review your systems for vulnerabilities, implement necessary updates, and tighten network defenses. As always, vigilance and timely action are your best allies in safeguarding today's increasingly interconnected digital ecosystems.

---

Source: CISA Hitachi Energy PCU400 | CISA