CVE-2025-40313: ntfs3 fix marks $Extend as regular files for VFS compatibility

  • Thread Author
A new kernel fix quietly landed this week that closes a subtle NTFS metadata handling issue in the in‑kernel ntfs3 driver: CVE‑2025‑40313, described as “ntfs3: pretend $Extend records as regular files.” The change is small in code but important in principle — it corrects how the driver classifies $Extend metadata records so they meet the kernel's expectations for inode modes introduced by a VFS change. The vulnerability record and upstream patch references are now public in multiple vulnerability databases and the kernel trees; administrators who process untrusted NTFS images (VM disk images, USB media, forensic or CI ingestion systems) should verify whether their kernels include the fix and deploy updated kernel packages promptly.

A penguin studies glowing NTFS VOLUME and file-icons panels in a neon data center.Background / Overview​

The Linux kernel’s ntfs3 driver provides a full read/write NTFS implementation in‑kernel (CONFIG_NTFS3_FS / module ntfs3). NTFS exposes certain internal attributes that the driver must interpret correctly; among these are special metadata records such as $Extend and the $DATA attributes that encode runlists and allocation information used to map files to disk clusters.
CVE‑2025‑40313 arises from a mismatch between how the ntfs3 driver represented a particular on‑disk metadata record ($Extend) and a VFS-level assumption that certain inode mode values are required for may_open checks. A recent VFS commit hardened may_open to validate inode modes and only accept standard inode types (S_IFDIR, S_IFLNK, S_IFREG, S_IFCHR, S_IFBLK, S_IFIFO, S_IFSOCK). Where ntfs3 previously exposed an inode mode that did not satisfy that constraint, the change can cause unexpected behavior; the upstream remedy is to mark $Extend records as regular files (S_IFREG) so they satisfy the may_open requirements. The CVE entry and the referenced kernel commits describing the fix are publicly visible. This is not the same bug class as the integer‑overflow run_unpack issue (CVE‑2025‑40068) that affected runlist decoding earlier in the year, but both CVEs underline a common theme: filesystem drivers must carefully validate and present on‑disk metadata in ways that match kernel‑level invariants. The two issues illustrate different failure modes — one a classification/semantic mismatch, the other an arithmetic overflow in runlist decoding — but both are remedied by small, surgical changes in the ntfs3 codepath and require distribution/vendor backports to reach deployed kernels.

What exactly changed (technical summary)​

  • The VFS commit that tightened mode validation requires inodes to be one of the recognized file types when may_open is invoked. If a driver exposes an inode with an unexpected mode, higher-level checks may fail or return an error path that the filesystem code does not expect.
  • The upstream ntfs3 patch addresses this by ensuring that $Extend records are represented with the S_IFREG (regular file) mode so may_open accepts them as valid file objects. The change is conservative: it does not change on‑disk layout semantics, only the in‑kernel presentation of the metadata to the VFS layer.
  • The fix is intentionally minimal to avoid regressions in a critical subsystem (filesystem I/O in kernel space). The upstream commit(s) implementing the change are referenced by the CVE records and included in the kernel stable trees.
This is primarily a correctness/defensive fix rather than an obvious privilege‑escalation or remote code‑execution issue. However, filesystem correctness issues can create denial‑of‑service (kernel oops/panic) or data‑integrity risks if left unaddressed, especially on hosts that mount untrusted images.

Who should care — affected systems and practical attack surface​

  • High priority: Virtualization hosts, image ingestion and CI pipelines, backup/restore appliances, forensic analysis systems, container hosts that may mount guest images, and any managed service that accepts third‑party NTFS images.
  • Medium priority: Desktops and single‑tenant endpoints that occasionally mount external NTFS media (USB drives, cameras, Windows‑formatted disks).
  • Lower priority: Hardened, air‑gapped systems that never mount external NTFS media and custom kernels built without ntfs3 support.
Microsoft’s product mapping effort has already identified Azure Linux kernel artifacts as a product known to ship the affected upstream component; operators running Azure Linux should treat that as an authoritative signal to patch according to Microsoft’s published guidance. However, vendor attestations are not exhaustive — whether a host is actually vulnerable depends on the kernel build configuration (CONFIG_NTFS3_FS) and module presence. Run‑time verification on each host remains essential.
Note: Because the vulnerability concerns how the kernel represents on‑disk metadata to the VFS, an attacker generally needs the ability to supply or cause the kernel to parse crafted NTFS metadata — commonly through a mounted or loopback‑mounted disk image or external media. It is therefore a local or image ingestion vector rather than an unauthenticated remote network service issue.

Confirming whether a host is affected — verification checklist​

Operators should verify at both build/configuration and runtime levels.
Quick runtime checks (perform on systems you control):
  • Show the running kernel: uname -a
  • Check whether the ntfs3 module exists in the kernel module tree:
  • sudo modinfo ntfs3
  • If modinfo returns metadata for ntfs3.ko, the module is present.
  • Check whether the module is currently loaded:
  • lsmod | grep ntfs3
  • Check compiled kernel config for the ntfs3 flag:
  • zgrep CONFIG_NTFS3_FS /proc/config.gz
  • or grep CONFIG_NTFS3_FS /boot/config-$(uname -r)
  • If the ntfs3 module is absent from both module tree and config, the host is not affected by this kernel CVE as shipped; if present, treat the host as in scope.
For cloud images or vendor kernels (Azure Linux, Marketplace images, WSL kernels), inspect vendor VEX/CSAF artifacts or kernel release notes where available, then confirm with the commands above in the running image. Microsoft has published machine‑readable attestations mapping certain upstream kernel components to Azure Linux artifacts — that reduces ambiguity for Azure Linux customers but does not substitute for host‑level checks.
If you run custom kernels or embedded/OEM images, check the kernel changelog for the specific commit(s) mentioned in the CVE or confirm the presence of the upstream patch in your source tree before declaring a host patched.

Remediation: patching and compensating controls​

Definitive remediation:
  • Install a kernel package from your distribution or vendor whose changelog includes the upstream commit(s) referenced by CVE‑2025‑40313 and reboot into the patched kernel. Upstream commits are merged into stable trees so mainstream distros will publish package updates; follow vendor advisories for exact package versions.
Short‑term mitigations if patching is delayed:
  • Prevent mounting of untrusted NTFS images on hosts that must remain available. Remove or limit user and automation privileges that permit mounting.
  • Blacklist the ntfs3 module to prevent it being loaded as a module (if ntfs3 is modular and not built‑in): add a blacklist line in /etc/modprobe.d/ (e.g., blacklist ntfs3) and rebuild initramfs if required. This does not protect systems with ntfs3 built‑in; it only prevents module loading.
  • Isolate image‑processing workflows: run image analysis in disposable VMs or sandboxes, avoid mounting images directly on shared hosts, and use user‑space tools or containerized analyzers with least privilege.
  • Monitor kernel logs for OOPS or panic signatures referencing ntfs3 codepaths or may_open failures and add telemetry to detect suspicious image ingestion events.
Practical rollout steps (recommended sequence):
  • Inventory hosts and images (findmnt -t ntfs; search for images that may be loop-mounted).
  • Map running kernel versions to vendor advisories (check distro security trackers).
  • Stage updated kernel packages in a pilot ring and test critical workloads.
  • Deploy updates and reboot hosts into the patched kernel.
  • Validate: confirm uname -r shows expected kernel, check kernel changelog or packaging notes reference the CVE/commit, and monitor kernel logs for residual errors.
Multiple vendors and public trackers have already added CVE‑2025‑40313 to their feeds; follow your distribution’s advisory for the exact package mapping and testing notes before mass rollout.

Detection, hunting and incident response​

Detection guidance:
  • Hunt for kernel messages in dmesg and journalctl that mention ntfs3, may_open, or the specific call stacks that appear in vendor advisories. Kernel oops traces are the most likely immediate indicator that a crafted image triggered unexpected VFS interactions.
  • Correlate image ingestion logs (CI pipelines, VM import logs, NFS/SMB mounts) with kernel events — investigate images used within a short window before the observed kernel log lines.
  • Preserve suspect images and capture volatile memory if exploitation is suspected. Kernel panics can destroy runtime evidence, so if you suspect malicious activity, isolate the host and preserve artifacts for offline analysis.
Hunting rules (short list):
  • Search for sudden kernel OOPS entries referencing ntfs3 or VFS mode validation failures.
  • Look for automation that mounts or previews guest images (containers, CI runners, hypervisor hosts).
  • Validate instrumented hosts by mounting known-good and crafted read‑only images in a sandbox to reproduce the issue safely.
If exploitation is suspected, isolate the host and follow your incident response playbook: preserve images, capture logs and memory as appropriate, and contact vendor support for assisted analysis.

Why this fix matters (analysis of risk and impact)​

Strengths of the upstream response:
  • The patch is surgical and minimal, focusing on aligning the driver’s inode presentation with a VFS invariant. That reduces the risk of regressions that can be costly in storage code.
  • Upstream merging into stable trees makes vendor backporting practical; distributions can produce backports with limited regression surface.
Why operators should still act quickly:
  • Filesystem correctness issues often have outsized operational impact. Even a seemingly minor VFS mismatch can surface as kernel errors, corrupted mounts, or data‑integrity problems under certain combination of events and workloads.
  • Multi‑tenant or shared infrastructure (cloud hosts, virtualization servers, CI runners) magnify the blast radius: a single crafted image could affect many tenants if auto‑mounted in a privileged context. That operational risk justifies prioritizing hosts that process untrusted images.
Residual risks and caveats:
  • Vendor mapping is a snapshot: Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF attestation currently maps Azure Linux artifacts as known affected, but other Microsoft kernels (WSL, linux‑azure, CBL‑Mariner derivatives, Marketplace images) may or may not include ntfs3 depending on their build config. Per‑host verification remains essential — do not assume a vendor attestation covers every artifact.
  • No publicly known proof‑of‑concept exploit for CVE‑2025‑40313 has been published at time of writing. That reduces urgency compared with an actively exploited remote bug, but absence of a PoC is not a reason to delay remediation in exposed environments. Attackers often chain primitives; validation/defensive gaps can be combined with other bugs to increase impact.

Cross‑checking the record (what we validated and how)​

Key claims were cross‑checked across multiple independent sources:
  • The existence and public description of CVE‑2025‑40313 (ntfs3: pretend $Extend records as regular files) is present in at least two open vulnerability databases and enrichment systems (OpenCVE / cvedetails / OSV). Those entries reference upstream kernel commits implementing the fix.
  • The broader context around ntfs3 issues earlier in 2025 (for example, the integer overflow in run_unpack — CVE‑2025‑40068) is documented by NVD, OSV, vendor advisories and distribution trackers, confirming that multiple ntfs3 fixes have been applied and distributed across stable kernels. This confirms a pattern of incremental hardening in the ntfs3 subsystem.
  • Microsoft’s attestation process (VEX/CSAF) and product mapping for Azure Linux was used to determine which Microsoft kernel artifacts ship the affected upstream component; Microsoft’s published mapping for Azure Linux reduces uncertainty for Azure customers but is not an exhaustive statement about every Microsoft kernel artifact. Operators should verify their artifacts individually.
Caveat on direct kernel commit inspection: some canonical kernel hosting endpoints (git.kernel.org) may be rate‑limited or present access restrictions from some locations and automated fetchers. Where direct commit pages could not be fetched in this environment, vulnerability databases and distro advisories that include the kernel commit references were used to confirm the technical summary. The databases and vendor advisories cited are consistent about the nature of the fix.

Action checklist for WindowsForum readers managing mixed fleets​

  • Inventory: map all hosts and images that run Linux kernels (VMs, host OSes, WSL instances, container nodes).
  • Verify: on each host, run the quick checks (modinfo ntfs3, lsmod, check /proc/config.gz).
  • Prioritize: patch virtualization hosts, image ingestion servers, CI runners, and file servers first.
  • Patch & Validate: install vendor kernel updates, reboot, and confirm uname -r and changelog indicate the upstream commit/CVE inclusion.
  • If you cannot patch immediately: blacklist the ntfs3 module (if modular), restrict mounting of untrusted NTFS images, and analyze untrusted images in sandboxed disposable VMs.
  • Monitor: add kernel log detection for ntfs3/may_open messages and watch for unexpected kernel oops/panic lines.
A practical 5‑step runbook:
  • Identify all hosts that might mount NTFS (findmnt -t ntfs; check automount rules).
  • Confirm module presence and kernel config.
  • Consult your distro’s security tracker for package → CVE mapping and planned backports.
  • Stage the updated kernel, reboot and validate functionality.
  • Document and monitor — keep records of affected images, kernel logs, and remediation timelines.

Final analysis and closing thoughts​

CVE‑2025‑40313 is an instructive example of how API invariants at the kernel/VFS boundary matter: small mismatches between how a filesystem driver presents on‑disk metadata and what the VFS expects can create operational failures or open unusual attack vectors in real‑world deployments. The upstream fix is narrowly focused — marking $Extend records as regular files so may_open validates successfully — and that minimalism both reduces regression risk and makes vendor backporting feasible.
The immediate operational takeaway for administrators is straightforward: inventory, verify, and patch — prioritizing hosts that process untrusted NTFS images. Vendor attestations such as Microsoft’s Azure Linux VEX outputs reduce triage uncertainty for those specific vendor artifacts, but they do not replace per‑host verification. Treat any vulnerability affecting filesystem drivers seriously because the kernel privilege boundary and the potential for data integrity or availability impact make even local-image vectors meaningful in multi‑tenant and production infrastructures. Where details remain incomplete (for instance, whether a specific OEM or marketplace image is affected) the correct operational approach is to verify the kernel build and module presence on the image itself rather than inferring from vendor statements alone. If there is any doubt about exposure in critical infrastructure, isolate image processing until a patched kernel can be applied.
By aligning ntfs3’s inode presentation to the VFS invariant the upstream community has closed a correctness gap; now the practical job belongs to operators and vendors: validate, patch, and monitor.

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
 

Back
Top