Epic’s Easy Anti-Cheat (EAC) has finally been made compatible with Windows on Arm, removing a major technical barrier that has kept many multiplayer PC games—including Fortnite—off Qualcomm-powered Copilot+ laptops and other Snapdragon X Series machines; Epic delivered the compatibility through an Epic Online Services (EOS) SDK update and will battle‑test the rollout with Fortnite before other studios adopt the new client.
Windows on Arm has been steadily improving as Microsoft, Qualcomm, and middleware vendors iterate on emulation and native tooling. The recent Prism improvements and Arm64EC tooling have narrowed the compatibility gap for user-mode applications, but kernel-mode components—chief among them anti‑cheat drivers—remained resistant to translation and emulation. That incompatibility effectively blocked many high-profile multiplayer games from running on Arm laptops because their anti‑cheat stack would not initialize under Prism.
Epic’s announcement addresses that precise problem. By shipping an Arm‑compatible EAC client and packaging it as part of the Epic Online Services SDK, Epic provides a canonical integration path developers can adopt to enable EAC‑protected titles on Snapdragon X-based Windows machines. Epic has specifically called out Fortnite as the first title to receive the support and as the battle‑test for real‑world validation.
This “battle‑testing” approach is pragmatic: a working Fortnite rollout will provide a tested template—bootstrapper updates, installation repair flows, driver signing interactions, and telemetry smoothing—that other studios can replicate. However, the timing is incremental: Epic’s messaging and multiple reports point to a phased, later‑in‑the‑year rollout rather than an instant catalog flip.
Practical signals to watch for:
That said, the victory is tactical rather than total. Performance parity, publisher priorities, and adoption by other anti‑cheat vendors remain the factors that will determine how broadly and quickly Arm becomes a mainstream gaming platform. The next 6–12 months will show whether the combination of Prism enhancements, OEM silicon improvements, and middleware support is enough to shift developer economics toward shipping native or hybrid Arm builds. In the meantime, the EAC port clears a major roadblock—and for gamers who wanted to keep their Copilot+ laptop as a viable gaming device, that is welcome news.
Conclusion
Making Easy Anti‑Cheat compatible with Windows on Arm was an essential — and technically difficult — milestone. Epic’s SDK delivery and Fortnite rollout plan create a practical path forward for studios and players, but the broader success of Windows‑on‑Arm gaming will depend on continued vendor cooperation, careful driver hardening, and realistic expectations about emulation‑era performance. Developers and publishers should follow Epic’s SDK release notes and validate builds on representative Snapdragon X hardware; consumers and IT teams should verify game‑specific support before assuming their favorite multiplayer titles will work out of the box.
Source: TechRadar Epic fixes anti-cheat games so they work on laptops with Arm CPUs - and I'm glad to see the back of this big stumbling block for gamers
Background / Overview
Windows on Arm has been steadily improving as Microsoft, Qualcomm, and middleware vendors iterate on emulation and native tooling. The recent Prism improvements and Arm64EC tooling have narrowed the compatibility gap for user-mode applications, but kernel-mode components—chief among them anti‑cheat drivers—remained resistant to translation and emulation. That incompatibility effectively blocked many high-profile multiplayer games from running on Arm laptops because their anti‑cheat stack would not initialize under Prism. Epic’s announcement addresses that precise problem. By shipping an Arm‑compatible EAC client and packaging it as part of the Epic Online Services SDK, Epic provides a canonical integration path developers can adopt to enable EAC‑protected titles on Snapdragon X-based Windows machines. Epic has specifically called out Fortnite as the first title to receive the support and as the battle‑test for real‑world validation.
Why anti‑cheat was the last big barrier
Kernel drivers don’t translate
Most anti‑cheat systems require hooks and monitoring that operate at kernel privilege. Emulators like Prism translate user‑mode instructions but historically do not translate or emulate kernel‑mode drivers. An x64 anti‑cheat driver cannot simply run on Arm under Prism; it must be ported or recompiled for Arm64 and integrated with the platform’s security model. That mismatch is the root cause of multiplayer games being blocked on Arm machines, not the game logic itself.Emulation and Arm64EC help — but don’t solve everything
Windows’ Arm64EC model and Prism improvements allow hybrid compositions where parts of an app can be native Arm and parts can be translated. That reduces overhead for many titles, but kernel components still need native support. Porting anti‑cheat to Arm is therefore necessary for reliable multiplayer support; the EOS SDK update is a practical way to distribute that work to developers rather than forcing each studio to reinvent the wheel.What Epic shipped and how developers will use it
Epic’s delivery is an SDK update that adds Windows‑on‑Arm compatibility to EAC. The practical elements developers must integrate are straightforward but essential:- Update the game installer/launcher bootstrapper to the new EAC/EOS bootstrapper so the correct Arm runtime can be installed on Arm devices.
- Ship or reference the Arm‑compatible EAC client module in the game build or have the launcher fetch it at install time.
- Validate driver signing, Windows hardening settings (Memory Integrity / Core Isolation), and telemetry/repair flows during QA across representative Snapdragon X Series hardware.
Fortnite: the canary in the coalition
Epic plans to bring Fortnite to Snapdragon X devices first and use the game as a stress test to validate the Arm EAC client under live multiplayer conditions. Fortnite’s enormous player base and frequent update cadence make it an ideal real‑world proving ground to surface edge cases, telemetry anomalies, and platform‑specific interactions that static lab testing may miss. Qualcomm confirmed that Fortnite will be among the first titles to take advantage of the compatibility.This “battle‑testing” approach is pragmatic: a working Fortnite rollout will provide a tested template—bootstrapper updates, installation repair flows, driver signing interactions, and telemetry smoothing—that other studios can replicate. However, the timing is incremental: Epic’s messaging and multiple reports point to a phased, later‑in‑the‑year rollout rather than an instant catalog flip.
What this unlocks — and what it doesn’t
Immediate wins
- Multiplayer for many EAC titles: Hundreds of multiplayer games that depend on Easy Anti‑Cheat become eligible for Arm support if developers adopt the updated EOS SDK. That dramatically increases the software pool for Copilot+ and other Snapdragon X machines.
- Standardized developer path: Shipping Arm support in the EOS SDK reduces repeated porting effort for studios and offers a single, maintained integration route.
- Stronger market proposition for Arm laptops: OEMs can more credibly market Snapdragon X Series Copilot+ laptops to gamers when core multiplayer titles are no longer blocked by anti‑cheat incompatibility.
Ongoing limitations
- Performance parity is not guaranteed: Adding EAC support does not magically convert an x64 build into a high‑performance Arm app. If the game remains entirely x64 and runs under Prism translation, performance will vary and often lag behind equivalent x86 laptops—especially for GPU‑heavy AAA titles. Only native Arm64 builds or carefully engineered Arm64EC mixes can approximate parity.
- Other anti‑cheat vendors still matter: Epic’s work benefits EAC‑protected games. Titles that use BattlEye, Valorant’s Vanguard, or bespoke kernel hooks will require those vendors to ship Arm builds too. Industry work is ongoing—BattlEye and others have announced Arm initiatives—but vendor adoption pace will dictate which games become playable.
- Publisher decisions and QA costs: Even with SDK availability, publishers must decide if the engineering and QA cost justifies supporting Arm. Some studios will prioritize x64 only. That means availability will be a catalog of decisions, not a platform‑wide instant conversion.
Security, privacy, and operational risk
Shipping kernel‑mode code on a new architecture requires care. The same risks that apply to anti‑cheat on x64 Windows apply here, with a few added wrinkles:- Kernel‑mode risk surface: Kernel drivers run with the highest privileges. Bugs can cause blue screens, crashes, or potentially create new attack vectors. Rigorous QA and defensive coding practices are non‑negotiable.
- Compatibility with Windows hardening: Windows features such as Memory Integrity (Core Isolation) and hardware‑enforced stack protections may conflict with older or improperly signed drivers. Anti‑cheat vendors must ensure their Arm drivers are fully compatible with the latest Windows hardening and driver‑signing models.
- Telemetry and privacy: Deeper system integration technically enables broader telemetry collection. Vendors and publishers must be explicit about what is collected, why, and for how long. These disclosures reduce friction and build trust with enterprise and privacy‑minded consumers.
- Update and repair complexity: Effective repair and update flows (e.g., the EasyAntiCheat_EOS installer/repair commands widely used today) must be extended and validated for Arm. Fragmented update mechanisms across launchers and stores could create support headaches for users and help desks.
Developer checklist: shipping EAC‑enabled games on Arm
- Download the latest Epic Online Services SDK build that advertises Windows‑on‑Arm EAC support and review release notes in detail.
- Replace the anti‑cheat bootstrapper used by your installer with the Arm‑aware bootstrapper from EOS.
- Package or reference the Arm‑compatible EAC client module in your game installer or ensure the launcher can fetch and repair it at install time.
- Test on representative Snapdragon X hardware (X, X Plus, X Elite variants where available) with Memory Integrity enabled, secure boot active, and realistic multiplayer sessions.
- Monitor telemetry for false positives and crash metrics; tune detection heuristics to minimize harm to legitimate users.
The rollout timeline and practical expectations
Epic’s public statements and reporting place Fortnite’s Arm support “later this year,” with an SDK release already distributed to developers; however, expect a staggered cadence. Fortnite’s rollout will produce real‑world learnings that other studios can reuse, but publishers must still allocate QA time and sign‑off processes before enabling local installs on Arm devices. Don’t expect wholesale catalog compatibility overnight.Practical signals to watch for:
- Announcements from major publishers confirming Arm support for specific titles.
- Epic’s official EOS SDK release notes or developer portal entry confirming the exact SDK build and binary artifacts. (A specific build number has been reported in press coverage; teams should verify against Epic’s official release notes before shipping.)
- Independent performance and compatibility tests on representative Snapdragon X models that compare emulated x64 performance, Arm64EC mixes, and native Arm64 builds.
Why this matters for buyers, OEMs, and IT managers
- Buyers: If your purchase decision hinges on playing a particular multiplayer title, check the publisher’s statements or patch notes for Arm/EAC support before buying a Copilot+ or Snapdragon X laptop. EAC compatibility removes a major blocker, but not every publisher will act immediately.
- OEMs: Removing the anti‑cheat blocker materially improves the story OEMs can tell gamers about Arm hardware. It reduces a hard “no” on multiplayer titles and allows marketing to highlight a larger compatible gaming library—though realistic performance comparisons against x86 gaming laptops should remain part of the messaging.
- IT managers / fleet admins: Treat the initial Arm anti‑cheat rollout as a pilot. Validate common titles in a controlled environment, confirm that EAC drivers install and repair cleanly, and prepare support playbooks for common EAC update/repair flows. Avoid broad deployments until compatibility and stability are proven on target hardware.
Strengths, risks, and the broader ecosystem picture
Strengths
- Ecosystem leverage: Packaging Arm support in the EOS SDK scales the solution without requiring every developer to rewrite low‑level logic.
- Practical validation path: Using Fortnite as a live test makes sense; it surfaces real‑world scenarios at scale and speeds up hardening.
- Momentum for Arm gaming: Combined with Prism improvements and other vendors (BattlEye et al.) working on Arm drivers, Epic’s move lowers a structural barrier and improves platform credibility.
Risks and unanswered questions
- Driver fragility: Kernel code on new platforms can be fragile. Poorly tested drivers can cause instability or create exploitable conditions.
- Fragmentation: If some major anti‑cheat vendors or publishers lag, gamers may see an inconsistent catalog where some games work and others do not.
- Performance tradeoffs: For competitive titles that demand high framerates and low latency, emulated builds may still be insufficient without native Arm optimization.
Final assessment
Epic’s port of Easy Anti‑Cheat to Windows on Arm is a decisive engineering and ecosystem milestone. It eliminates one of the most concrete and disruptive compatibility problems that kept multiplayer titles off Snapdragon X laptops, and it supplies a repeatable SDK‑based path for studios to follow. The practical effect for gamers is immediate: Fortnite will be the first headline title to benefit and will serve as a real‑world stress test that should accelerate broader adoption among EAC‑protected games.That said, the victory is tactical rather than total. Performance parity, publisher priorities, and adoption by other anti‑cheat vendors remain the factors that will determine how broadly and quickly Arm becomes a mainstream gaming platform. The next 6–12 months will show whether the combination of Prism enhancements, OEM silicon improvements, and middleware support is enough to shift developer economics toward shipping native or hybrid Arm builds. In the meantime, the EAC port clears a major roadblock—and for gamers who wanted to keep their Copilot+ laptop as a viable gaming device, that is welcome news.
Conclusion
Making Easy Anti‑Cheat compatible with Windows on Arm was an essential — and technically difficult — milestone. Epic’s SDK delivery and Fortnite rollout plan create a practical path forward for studios and players, but the broader success of Windows‑on‑Arm gaming will depend on continued vendor cooperation, careful driver hardening, and realistic expectations about emulation‑era performance. Developers and publishers should follow Epic’s SDK release notes and validate builds on representative Snapdragon X hardware; consumers and IT teams should verify game‑specific support before assuming their favorite multiplayer titles will work out of the box.
Source: TechRadar Epic fixes anti-cheat games so they work on laptops with Arm CPUs - and I'm glad to see the back of this big stumbling block for gamers
Last edited:
