ESW Expands ExcelHelp.com for Nationwide Excel Copilot AI Training

ESW’s expansion of ExcelHelp.com signals a deliberate push to turn widespread Microsoft 365 and Copilot adoption into measurable workplace capability through instructor-led Excel, Copilot, and AI training paired with hands-on automation services.

Overview​

ESW (eSoftware Associates) announced on February 24, 2026 that ExcelHelp.com — the company’s training and automation brand — is being scaled nationally to deliver instructor‑led Excel, Copilot, and AI training and consulting across the United States. The offering promises role‑tailored, hands‑on group training led by Microsoft Certified Trainers (MCTs), plus a blended orkforce upskilling with custom Excel automation (VBA, Python, add‑ins), database/reporting work, and Microsoft 365 workflow optimization.
This feature unpacks what ESW is offering, why it matters today, and what buyers — HR, finance, and operations leaders — should weigh before committing budget and calendar time. The analysis draws on ESW’s announcement, the company’s recent product/service history, Microsoft’s official guidance on Copilot in Excel, and independent reporting on the capabilities and limits of Excel’s new COPILOT function.

---

Background: Why training matters now​

The enterprise context​

Large numbers of organizations have purchased Microsoft 365 and, increasingly, Copilot seats — but licensing alone does not translate into consistent, productive usage. Vendors, IT teams, and learning leaders repeatedly report that the real gap is human: employees need curated, workflow‑specific instruction to adopt new features without introducing error, governance gaps, or productivity regressions.
ESW’s move to expand ExcelHelp.com is framed as a response to that gap: structured, instructor‑led curriculum plus automation consulting to modernize how organizations create, report on, and operate with spreadsheet‑driven systems. The company already positions itself as a Microsoft partner with multiple Copilot and M365 services, which provides context for the training expansion.

Excel + Copilot: a new productivity frontier​

Microsoft’s push to embed generative AI into Office — and Excel in particular — is material to any training program. The COPILOT function and other in‑app Copilot features let users call natural language AI from inside Excel cells, Power Query, and related workflows. This changes what “Excel skill” means: beyond formulas and pivot tables, modern users need prompt engineering, interpretation of AI output, and governance awareness. Microsoft’s documentation and its Insider blog explain the COPILOT function’s mechanics and current limitations, and independent outlets have reported guidance and warnings about appropriate use cases.

---

What ExcelHelp.com says it delivers​

Core training offerings​

According to ESW’s announcement and corporate materials, ExcelHelp.com provides:

• Microsoft Excel training from beginner through advanced levels
• Copilot and AI training, including agent‑driven workflows in Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams
• PowerPoint and Outlook productivity workshops
• Custom group training designed around company data and processes
• Delivery formats: remote, on‑site, or hybrid sessions led by Microsoft Certified Trainers.

Consulting and automation services​

ExcelHelp.com’s blended model lets organizations pair training with modernization work under ESW’s consulting umbrella:

• Custom Excel development and automation (VBA, macros, add‑ins)
• Python and add‑in solutions for heavier analytics
• Database design, ETL, and reporting
• Microsoft 365 workflow optimization (Power Automate, Teams, SharePoint integration)

This approach is pitched as a way to not only upskill staff but also reduce single‑user spreadsheets, replace brittle manual processes, and codify business logic into manageable automation.

---

Verifying the claims: what can be independently confirmed​

• ESW’s announcement of the ExcelHelp.com expansion is published as a corporate press release distributed via major wire services.
• ESW has been publicly promoting other Copilot/M365 offerings in recent months (for example, Copilot Orbit and MissionReady365) that align strategically with a training + delivery model. These adjacent services corroborate that the company is building a Copilot enablement portfolio, not a one‑off training product.
• Microsoft Certified Trainer (MCT) status is a formal Microsoft program for trainers and is the recognized standard for delivering official Microsoft courseware. Microsoft’s own site documents the enrollment, benefits, and expectations for MCTs. ESW’s announcement states sessions will be led by MCTs; Microsoft’s MCT program details explain why that credential matters for corporate training.
• The technical capabilities ESW mentions — Copilot and agent workflows inside Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams — reflect product directions Microsoft has publicly rolled out, including the COPILOT function in Excel and Agents/Agent Mode across Office apps. Microsoft’s product blog and independent reporting confirm both the features and the cautionary guidance Microsoft has provided about appropriate uses.

Where claims are internal (for example, ESW’s specific trainer roster, the precise curriculum used, or measured ROI from client engagements), those are vendor disclosures that require buyer due diligence. ESW’s public materials and the press release provide standard sales claims; independent verification should come from references, pilot outcomes, or contractually guaranteed metrics.

---

In‑depth analysis: Strengths, use cases, and immediate benefits​

Strength: Practical, role‑based training that matches product evolution​

The hallmark strength of a program like ExcelHelp.com is pairing curriculum with the rapid evolution of Excel itself. The COPILOT function and Copilot‑driven agents alter day‑to‑day workflows, and generic “how to use Excel” sessions are insufficient. Instructor‑led, workflow‑tailored training — assuming it is truly delivered by experienced MCTs and framed around real company workbooks — can accelerate adoption and reduce error rates.

• Benefit: Faster time‑to‑value from Microsoft 365 and Copilot licensing.
• Benefit: Reduces shadow IT risk by routing automations through vetted consultants rather than single users’ macros.
• Benefit: Aligns upskilling with modernization (training + automation).

Strength: Blended delivery reduces friction between learning and automation​

By offering both training and development services, ESW aims to remove the hand‑off friction where a trained employee finds a process that needs automation but no internal capacity exists. This blended model can deliver:

• Shorter project cycles — train a team and concurrently automate the most error‑prone reports.
• Better knowledge transfer — developers can document logic while trainers upskill staff on new, automated workflows.
• Measurable improvement targets — fewer manual steps, faster report runs, and reduced reconciliation work.

Use cases where this matters most​

• Finance teams with complex monthly close spreadsheets that are slow, error‑prone, and staffed by spreadsheet “owners.”
• HR and L&D leaders needing standardized upskilling paths for knowledge workers.
• Operations teams using Excel as a de facto workflow engine where automation could reduce manual handoffs and transcription errors.

---

Risks, limitations, and governance concerns​

While training and automation promise benefits, the modern Excel + Copilot environment introduces new risks. Any vendor‑led enablement program should explicitly address these.

1) AI accuracy and suitability for critical tasks​

Microsoft and independent reporting have cautioned that the COPILOT function and generative AI features are not suitable for tasks that require absolute accuracy, reproducibility, or legal/regulatory certainty. Microsoft’s documentation and news coverage note model limitations, rate limits, and current grounding constraints. Buyers should treat Copilot outputs as assistance rather than authoritative calculations unless there are strong validation and audit procedures in place.

• Practical control: Maintain traceable validation steps and require human sign‑off on financial or regulatory outputs.

2) Data governance and privacy​

Feeding proprietary data into AI functions raises data protection questions. Microsoft’s rollout notes and industry coverage mention that the COPILOT function does not, in many cases, access tenant‑wide knowledge stores by default and that usage controls and DLP are necessary to prevent leakage or inappropriate routing of confidential data.

• Practical control: Align training with Purview/DLP configuration and classify what data is permissible for AI prompts. Include explicit policies in training to prevent unsafe prompt behavior.

3) Licensing and total cost​

Copilot capabilities inside Excel and across apps may require specific Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses. Training and automation projects must be scoped against licensing bands, agent pricing, and ongoing costs related to Copilot API usage (metered or tenant seats). Some organizations discover mid‑project that seats or pay‑as‑you‑go costs materially change the total cost of ownership.

• Practical control: Itemize licensing needs in proposals and produce a multi‑year TCO model before broad rollouts.

4) Vendor lock‑in and single‑vendor risk​

When training and automation are bundled together, organizations must weigh the benefits of a single partner against the risk of relying on a single external vendor for both people and code. Effective governance should ensure artifacts (code, documentation, runbooks) are transferable and auditable.

• Practical control: Contract terms should include IP assignment clauses, code handover, documentation standards, and defined SLAs for knowledge transfer.

5) Change management and measurement​

Training alone rarely drives sustained behavior change. Without reinforcement, follow‑up coaching, and measurable KPIs, skills decay is common. Training programs must be complemented by adoption metrics, refresher courses, and embedded tools that remind and guide users.

• Practical control: Agree on adoption KPIs (reduction in manual steps, time saved per report, percentage of automations maintained centrally) and require scheduled follow‑ups.

---

How to evaluate ExcelHelp.com (or any Copilot training vendor)​

When procurement teams evaluate ESW’s ExcelHelp.com or comparable vendors, structure the review around evidence, scope, and governance.

1. Verify trainer credentials and curriculum alignment​

• Ask for a roster of trainers and confirm Microsoft Certified Trainer (MCT) status where advertised. Microsoft’s MCT program is the recognized credential for official courseware delivery. Ask the vendor to supply MCT IDs and proof of active standing.

2. Demand a pilot with measurable success criteria​

• Identify a single, high‑impact process (e.g., a finance month‑end report).
• Baseline current time and error rates.
• Run a short pilot: a tailored training day plus a bounded automation sprint.
• Measure outcomes at 30 and 90 days against agreed KPIs.

3. Require governance, security, and handover artifacts​

• Insist on documented DLP and Purview alignment for any Copilot usage.
• Require code repositories, tests, and documentation for automations.
• Confirm that automations are deployable without continued vendor lock‑in.

4. Ask for licensing cost transparency​

• Require a clear statement of recommended licensing (Copilot seats, add‑ons, or pay‑as‑you‑go costs) and a projection of annual spending.

5. Look for pedagogical design, not slideware​

• Request sample lesson plans, participant exercises, and company‑data labs that demonstrate hands‑on learning rather than lecture slides.

---

Suggested agenda for a practical one‑day pilot course​

• Morning: Foundations (Excel best practices, table design, version control, and common error sources). Short hands‑on lab to refactor a messy workbook.
• Midday: Introduction to Copilot in Excel — how the COPILOT function works, prompts vs. formulas, and safety boundaries. Live demos showing classification and summaries, with instructor review.
• Afternoon: Role‑based agent design — mapping a workflow, identifying automation candidates, and creating a pilot Power Automate or Python-based automation. Close with a governance checklist and next steps.

This structure reflects modern learning design and matches the blended training + automation promise that ESW is selling in its expansion materials.

---

Procurement checklist (practical items to include in an SOW)​

• Scope of training (audience, hours, formats) and number of participants per session.
• List of trainer qualifications and proof of MCT status.
• Deliverables: training decks, exercise files, recordings, automation code, documentation, and handover plan.
• Licensing estimate: Copilot seat counts, pay‑as‑you‑go expectations, and a cap on metered costs (if applicable).
• Security requirements: data handling practices, DLP mapping, and non‑disclosure agreement specifics.
• Pilot KPIs aa, with a 30/90 day adoption review.
• Exit and transfer terms: source code access, documentation standards, and knowledge transfer sessions.

---

What success looks like (metrics buyers should demand)​

• Percent reduction in time to produce core reports (target: 20–50% in 90 days for well‑scoped workloads).
• Reduction in reported spreadsheet incidents or reconciling errors (target: measurable year‑over‑year drop).
• Number of automations promoted from “user macros” to centrally managed flows.
• Training satisfaction and capability improvement scores from participant assessments.
• Net cost of ownership that factors in licensing, vendor fees, and labor hours saved.

---

Final assessment and recommendations​

ESW’s expansion of ExcelHelp.com arrives at an opportune moment: Excel is changing beneath users’ feet as Copilot becomes a first‑class capability inside the grid, and organizations need structured, workflow‑aligned enablement. The vendor’s blended model — instructor‑led, MCT‑led training paired with automation services — is a sensible approach for teams that need both human capability and durable technical solutions. The press release and ESW’s recent lineup of Copilot services show a consistent strategy across training and managed automation offerings.
That said, procurement teams must treat AI‑enabled spreadsheet work as both a productivity opportunity and a governance challenge. Key buyer actions should include:

• Validate trainer credentials and require hands‑on curriculum tied to live company work.
• Insist on governance controls, DLP alignment, and explicit handling of sensitive data used in AI prompts.
• Scope a pilot with clear KPIs and a handover plan for any delivered automations.
• Model licensing and runtime costs for Copilot features before committing to a broad rollout.

If those controls are in place, a program like ExcelHelp.com can accelerate practical Copilot adoption while reducing the common failure modes of both training programs and one‑off automation projects: lack of follow‑through, governance exposure, and untracked operational debt.

---

Closing takeaway​

Training remains the multiplier that turns software capabilities into sustained performance. As Copilot and AI reshape core productivity apps — especially Excel — organizations that combine disciplined, role‑based training with well‑scoped automation and governance will capture the greatest value. ESW’s ExcelHelp.com expansion is not a radical new idea; it is a pragmatic bet on that combination. The decisive factor for buyers will be the quality of delivery, the rigor of governance around AI use, and the clarity of measurable outcomes agreed before the first class is scheduled.

---

Source: IT Business Net https://itbusinessnet.com/2026/02/e...cel-copilot-and-ai-training-nationwide-2/amp/

ESW’s expansion of ExcelHelp.com into a national Microsoft Excel, Copilot, and AI training and automation brand is a clear signal that workforce skilling is moving from optional professional development to a strategic business imperative — and that vendors are racing to package hands‑on, role‑based training with automation services to deliver measurable productivity gains.

Background​

Microsoft’s push to bake generative AI into Office — branded broadly as Copilot across Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams and the Microsoft 365 Copilot app — has accelerated enterprise interest in AI-enabled workflows. Organizations are buying subscriptions and pilot seats rapidly, but many report a persistent gap: access to tools does not equal effective, repeatable usage. That adoption gap is precisely the market ExcelHelp.com is targeting, offering live instructor‑led training, role‑based workshops, and a blend of consulting and custom automation under the ESW umbrella.
ESW (eSoftware Associates Inc.) has been positioning itself as a Microsoft partner focused on Microsoft 365, SharePoint, Power Platform, and AI-driven automation. Its recent communications — including a January launch of a Copilot‑focused program and the February expansion of ExcelHelp.com — frame a product strategy that pairs people skilling with practical automation deliverables. The public materials emphasize delivery by Microsoft Certified Trainers (MCTs) and a combined offering that spans Excel training, Copilot & agent education, and custom Excel/Python/VBA automation.

---

Why this matters now​

• Organizations are expanding Microsoft 365 and Copilot licensing, but usage patterns remain uneven; training is the lever that turns access into productivity.
• Microsoft’s product evolution — including new agentic modes and fast‑moving feature changes — increases the need for current, applied instructor‑led learning and governance planning.
• Vendors that combine workforce skilling with automation and reporting modernization can reduce the time between training and measurable business results. ESW’s pitch explicitly follows that blended model.

These factors make a bundled training + automation approach attractive to HR, finance, and operations leaders seeking short time‑to‑value from Microsoft 365 investments.

What ExcelHelp.com is offering​

ExcelHelp.com’s published program list and public releases describe a multi‑modal, role‑targeted portfolio:

• Microsoft Excel training: beginner through advanced, delivered live (remote or on‑site), emphasizing hands‑on exercises and real workflows.
• Copilot and AI training: practical Copilot instruction and agent workflows inside Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams — with content tailored to actual business use cases.
• Productivity workshops: PowerPoint, Outlook, and workflow efficiency sessions intended to reduce routine task time and mistakes.
• Custom group training: courses designed around company data, templates, and processes so teams leave with work‑ready skills.
• Consulting & automation services: custom Excel development, VBA/Python macros, add‑ins, database/reporting design, and Microsoft 365 workflow optimization. The vendor promotes a blended engagement in which training and automation are combined to modernize reporting and operational systems.

That product mix mirrors broader market trends: training firms increasingly package learning with “proof‑of‑impact” automation or templates that reduce post‑training dropoff.

Delivery claims and credentials​

ExcelHelp.com emphasizes delivery by Microsoft Certified Trainers (MCTs), an industry standard credential that indicates trainers meet Microsoft’s enrollment rules and hold qualifying certifications. MCT status signals familiarity with Microsoft courseware and access to program resources; it is a defensible credential for vendor claims about trainer quality — assuming the vendor maintains active MCT membership across its instructor pool.

---

Market context and competition​

The training market for Microsoft Office + Copilot has become crowded quickly. Large enterprise training vendors and traditional classroom providers are embedding Copilot content into their Office courses, while specialist consultancies (like ESW) emphasize bespoke, workflow‑oriented delivery. During February 2026 alone, multiple firms publicized Copilot‑focused training updates or programs aimed at accelerating Copilot adoption across organizations. This dynamic demonstrates both strong demand and a fast‑evolving competitive landscape.
Key dynamics to watch:

• Buyers prefer learning that is work‑applied (real datasets, role scenarios, measurable outcomes). Providers that can demonstrate before/after productivity lifts will be advantaged.
• Companies want governance and security baked into training; standalone “how to use Copilot” sessions without compliance context risk encouraging unsafe behavior.
• Scale matters: national availability (remote + on‑site) reduces friction for large customers, but consistent delivery quality is harder to maintain at scale.

---

Technical realities: what Copilot can and can’t do — and why training is not optional​

Microsoft’s documentation for Copilot in Excel outlines concrete, valuable capabilities: automated data import, formula generation and explanation, insight detection (trends, outliers), and natural‑language‑driven transformations. Those features can dramatically change how teams create reports and analyze data. But the product surface is changing rapidly — for example, Microsoft has been iterating agentic features and deprecating certain capabilities like App Skills while promoting alternatives such as Agent Mode, Analyst, and Copilot Chat — which alters the ideal training curriculum. Training vendors must therefore maintain very current lab material and adapt curricula quickly.
Practical limitations organizations must accept:

• Copilot’s value depends on data hygiene: messy spreadsheets, inconsistent naming, and broken links produce poor results unless addressed in training and clean‑up efforts.
• Licensing entitlements matter: not every Microsoft 365 SKU provides the same Copilot capabilities; role‑based instruction needs to respect these boundaries.
• Governance and data protection: Copilot interacts with potentially sensitive internal content; training must include secure handling, DLP alignment, and policies for what can be processed by AI tools.

Training that ignores these realities risks teaching behaviors that introduce errors, privacy breaches, or unsupported workflows.

---

Risks and red flags buyers should weigh​

• Security and privacy exposures from AI assistants. Recent real‑world incidents show that Copilot and AI features can surface or summarize sensitive content if policies or bugs allow it. Organizations must require vendors to include privacy guardrails, DLP alignment, and incident playbooks in any Copilot skilling engagement.
• Rapid product churn. Microsoft’s feature set evolves fast; vendors must demonstrate continuous curriculum maintenance and a process for keeping labs, examples, and agent templates current. The vendor’s claim to deliver training on “agents inside Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams” is valid today, but the underlying product names and feature details may change rapidly. Trainings should therefore focus on foundational skills (data hygiene, formula thinking, workflow design) plus a short module on the current Copilot behaviors.
• Measurable outcomes are hard to standardize. Vendors commonly promise productivity improvements, but buyers should insist on clearly defined metrics (time saved, error reduction, decreased support tickets) and short‑term pilots to validate ROI before a broad rollout. ESW’s blended approach makes this measurable in principle, but contract terms and pilot definitions matter.
• Vendor scale vs. quality trade‑off. National availability is attractive, but consistent learning outcomes require skilled instructors, quality assurance, and a repeatable curriculum. Buyers should ask for instructor resumes, MCT proof, and references from clients with similar scale.
• Licensing and EULAs. Organizations should verify whether vendors’ training scenarios assume features that require specific Microsoft entitlements, and avoid exercises that depend on features not licensed by their user pool.

---

Strengths of ESW’s ExcelHelp approach​

• Blended offering: Combining instructor‑led training with custom automation (VBA, Python, add‑ins) is a practical differentiator. It reduces the “learned but not applied” problem by giving teams concrete deliverables they can reuse. ESW’s site explicitly sells this blended model as a competitive advantage.
• Role‑based, hands‑on orientation: The emphasis on group training tailored to real data and workflows aligns with best practices in adult learning and CDP (continuous development practice). Programs that use company datasets and templates produce faster behavior change than generic labs.
• Use of Microsoft Certified Trainers: MCTs provide a visible credential that buyers can verify; the MCT program’s enrollment and renewal rules mean that legitimate MCTs are typically current on Microsoft courseware best practices. However, buyers should validate individual instructor status.
• National reach with mixed delivery: Remote, on‑site, and hybrid formats reduce logistical friction for enterprise customers and support centralized rollout strategies.

---

Where claims need scrutiny​

• “Nationwide” availability vs. instructor variability: National reach is attractive, but buyers should ask for the names and MCT status of the instructors who will actually deliver their sessions. Large contracts require evidence of training QA processes and substitute instructor qualifications.
• Measuring real productivity gains: Vendors often cite increases in efficiency; procurement teams should demand a clear pilot design with baseline metrics and post‑training measurement to verify impact.
• Dependence on third‑party product behavior: Because Microsoft can and does change features (deprecations, agent updates, platform adjustments), any training program that relies heavily on a specific UI behavior must commit to updates — ideally as part of a maintenance SLA. Microsoft’s own documentation warns that certain features may be deprecated, and news outlets have reported shifts in agent implementations. Training offerings that don’t include an update path risk becoming stale quickly.

---

Practical procurement checklist for IT and L&D buyers​

Before contracting a national training partner for Excel + Copilot upskilling, use this checklist to reduce risk and improve outcomes:

• Instructor verification
• Require MCT IDs and recent certification transcripts for all trainers. Verify via the vendor or Microsoft channels.
• Pilot program with defined metrics
• Run a 4–8 week pilot with pre/post measurements for a representative team (time per report, error rate, ticket volume).
• Curriculum currency and update commitment
• Ask how the vendor will handle Microsoft product updates and provide a commitment to refresh labs and materials when Microsoft changes Copilot features.
• Data handling and governance
• Insist on documented privacy and DLP practices for labs that ingest real company data. Evaluate whether vendor labs use sanitized or synthetic datasets where appropriate and whether the vendor adheres to your compliance requirements.
• Deliverables and automation handoff
• Define which automation artifacts will be delivered (templated macros, documented add‑ins, Python notebooks), and require documented change control and transfer of knowledge.
• Support and enablement beyond the session
• Negotiate post‑training office hours, follow‑up coaching, or a “train‑the‑trainer” pathway to embed capability internally.
• Licensing alignment
• Verify that the training exercises map to the actual Microsoft 365 entitlements of participants to avoid teaching features they cannot use.

Using these procurement guardrails will help turn an off‑the‑shelf training purchase into a durable capability investment.

---

Realities of enterprise adoption: case for blended skilling + automation​

Organizations that successfully adopt AI tools in everyday workflows tend to combine three elements: access, capability, and change management. Access is straightforward — the subscription. Capability is the skill set people need to use tools effectively. Change management is the organizational work required to adapt processes, incentives, and support functions.
ExcelHelp.com’s model attempts to address capability (hands‑on MCT delivery) and change management (role‑focused workshops and adoption guidance) while simultaneously delivering automation that reduces the immediate friction of adoption. That combination is promising — but only if contracts specify measurable outcomes and the vendor proves they can sustain curriculum currency. ESW’s January rollout of a named program (Copilot Ascend™) reinforces that the company sees training as a strategic product line, not an ancillary offering; buyers should probe for client references and pilot results.

---

Governance, privacy, and security — non‑negotiable training elements​

Recent reporting has underscored that AI assistants can produce privacy incidents when product defects or misconfigurations allow sensitive content to be processed improperly. Any Copilot training that touches real corporate data must therefore include:

• DLP and classification alignment so sensitive categories are excluded from unsafe prompts.
• Clear guidance on what types of data should never be submitted to AI tools, and how to sanitize datasets for labs.
• Roles and approval flows for building and deploying Copilot agents that access internal systems.

Training without these guardrails is an adoption risk, not an accelerator.

---

Recommendations for learning leaders and CIOs​

• Treat Copilot and Excel AI capabilities as part of a broader workforce modernization program that combines policy, measurement, and automation deliverables. Don’t buy a single session and expect systemic change.
• Insist on MCT verification and instructor portfolios; ask for recordings or co‑teaching sessions during the pilot so you can audit delivery quality.
• Require a concrete, time‑bound pilot with defined KPIs and a decision gate for enterprise rollout. Include a clause for curriculum updates tied to major Microsoft Copilot feature changes.
• Incorporate governance modules into every Copilot training engagement, and make DLP and incident response playbooks a mandatory deliverable.

---

Bottom line: a practical path forward, with caution​

ESW’s expansion of ExcelHelp.com into a national Copilot and Excel skilling brand reflects a sensible market response: companies need structured, hands‑on help to turn Microsoft 365 and AI licensing into operational advantage. The vendor’s blended model — pairing instructor‑led learning with custom automation and consulting — addresses common causes of adoption failure and aligns with modern L&D best practices.
That said, buyers must treat vendor promises as a starting point, not a guarantee. Rapid product evolution at Microsoft, documented privacy incidents with AI assistants, and the variability of instructor quality across larger vendors all create traps for the unwary. The best outcomes come from disciplined pilots, measurable KPIs, governance‑first training design, and contractual commitments to keep content current as Microsoft changes features and agent behaviors.
For organizations ready to move from experimentation to everyday AI‑enabled productivity, programs like ExcelHelp.com can accelerate adoption — provided procurement and learning leaders demand measurable pilots, governance, and evidence of instructor quality before scaling.

---

Source: IT Business Net https://itbusinessnet.com/2026/02/e...t-excel-copilot-and-ai-training-nationwide-2/

ESW’s announcement that ExcelHelp.com is expanding into a national, instructor‑led training and automation service marks a clear, pragmatic response to one of 2026’s biggest enterprise problems: companies have purchased Microsoft 365 and Copilot, but many still lack the structured training and automation that turn licenses into measurable productivity. ([globenewswire.com]swire.com/news-release/2026/02/24/3243250/0/en/ESW-Expands-ExcelHelp-com-to-Deliver-Microsoft-Excel-Copilot-and-AI-Training-Nationwide.html)

Background​

Microsoft’s recent push to embed generative AI across Office—branded broadly as Copilot—has moved AI from experimental pilots into everyday business workflows. Copilot capabilities in Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams promise large efficiency gains, but those gains depend heavily on staff knowing when, how, and safely to use them. Microsoft’s own guidance and training modules for Copilot in Excel emphasize practical, hands‑on exercises to generate formulas, automate visualizations, and integrate data safely—an approach that aligns closely with what ESW says ExcelHelp.com will deliver.
ESW (doing business as eSoftware Associates) has already signaled a multi‑pronged strategy around Copilot: recent months brought new programs and services such as Copilot Ascend™ and Copilot Orbit™ that combine training, governance, and managed automation. The ExcelHelp.com expansion is the latest public move in that sequence, positioning ESW to sell both skills and automations—training sessions to raise workforce capability and consulting work to modernize entrenched spreadsheets and reporting systems.

---

What ESW is offering with ExcelHelp.com​

The public announcement and ExcelHelp’s training pages describe a blended, role‑focused offering that pairs instructor‑led learning with automation services. Key elements include:

• Instructor‑led Microsoft Excel training from beginner to advanced, taught by Microsoft Certified Trainers.
• Copilot and AI training, including how to use Copilot inside Excel, Word, Outlook, and Teams, plus practical agent design and use cases.
• Productivity workshops for PowerPoint and Outlook focused on tactical improvements.
• Custom group training built around a company’s real data and processes so learning is immediately applicable.
• Automation and consulting services: custom Excel development, VBA/Python add‑ins, macro modernization, database/report design, and Microsoft 365 workflow optimization—available to pair with training for a blended modernization effort.

ExcelHelp.com advertises nationwide delivery in remote, on‑site, and hybrid formats and positions these programs as particularly relevant for HR/L&D leaders, finance teams that manage complex reporting, and operations leaders focused on efficiency and accuracy.

---

Why this matters now: technology without training is only half the solution​

The last two years have shown a consistent pattern: enterprises adopt new AI tools quickly, but adoption does not equal effective use. The difference between access and impact is rarely the software itself and almost always the people and processes around it.

• Copilot can generate formulas, draft summaries, and automate repetitive work in Excel, but it also introduces new governance, privacy, and accuracy risks that require institutional controls and user education. Microsoft’s documentation explicitly frames Copilot training as a hands‑on activity to ensure proper use and to avoid errors when models make plausible but incorrect outputs.
• Many organizations still run mission‑critical processes on bespoke spreadsheets built over years. Those workbooks are fragile, often undocumented, and frequently a single person’s knowledge. Blending training with automation modernization reduces single‑point risks while delivering immediate productivity gains—exactly the claim ExcelHelp.com makes.

This context makes ESW’s offering timely: a vendor that can both upskill teams and fix or modernize the spreadsheets they use is more likely to deliver measurable ROI than training alone.

---

Strengths of ExcelHelp.com’s approach​

1. Role‑based and hands‑on learning​

ExcelHelp.com emphasizes instructor‑led, hands‑on learning tailored to real workflows. This is consistent with learning science and Microsoft’s own training guidance: adults learn best by solving realistic problems, not by watching demos. That alignment is a strength for adoption and retention.

2. Microsoft Certified Trainers​

ESW’s pitch includes Microsoft Certified Trainers (MCTs). Using certified instructors reduces the risk of misleading or outdated practices and helps ensure the trainers understand both the product features and recommended governance models. Certification is a practical signal of competence in Microsoft‑centric engagements.

3. Blended services — training plus automation​

Pairing upskilling with actual modernization work—VBA to Python migrations, add‑in development, and workflow integration—addresses a frequent failure mode: trained users who return to broken systems that still require inefficient workarounds. Combining people and platform change increases the chance that productivity gains persist.

4. Nationwide availability and flexible delivery​

Offering remote, on‑site, and hybrid delivery is a practical must in 2026. Many organizations want a mix—hands‑on camps for power users and remote refreshers for distributed teams—so ExcelHelp’s flexibility is appropriate to current enterprise demands.

---

Risks, gaps, and pragmatic caveats​

No training vendor is a plug‑and‑play cure. Buyers should weigh several legitimate concerns before rolling out a large program.

Governance and data protection risks​

Copilot and other generative features can surface sensitive or proprietary information if not properly governed. Training needs to be paired with concrete technical controls—data classification, Purview/DLP integration, and clear policies about what data Copilot agents may access. ESW’s broader Copilot consultancy work claims to include governance and grounding, but buyers must verify scope and deliverables in contract language. Microsoft documentation reinforces that these are non‑trivial tasks.

Licensing and feature volatility​

Copilot feature sets and licensing terms have evolved rapidly. Microsoft documentation already notes deprecations and new modes (for example, shifts between App Skills, Agent Mode, and Copilot Chat), and product changes can affect training materials and automation designs. Any vendor contract must include commitments for curriculum updates and migration support when Microsoft changes feature availability.

Measuring real ROI is hard but essential​

Giving people a day of training without measuring downstream impact is a common failure. Training vendors that promise productivity increases must be able to help define KPIs, gather baseline metrics, and run follow‑up assessments. ESW’s blended approach is advantageous here—because automation work can produce measurable time savings—but buyers should require a clear measurement plan.

Single‑vendor lock‑in and skills transfer​

If an automation vendor modernizes workbooks into proprietary add‑ins or hosted agents, organizations must ensure knowledge transfer and exit provisions are contractually mandated. The vendor‑built automation should be maintainable by internal teams or by certified third parties to avoid future vendor lock‑in. Ask for code handover, documentation, and training for the internal support team as items in the SOW.

---

How ExcelHelp.com compares to the market​

The market for Copilot and Office AI training is quickly maturing. Large training firms and specialist Microsoft partners are packaging Copilot content into their programs; for example, some established enterprise learning providers announced embedded Copilot content across Office courses earlier this month. Competitors offer scaled learning management, enterprise licensing integration, and large cohort support, whereas specialist firms like ESW emphasize practical automation plus training. That difference matters depending on whether your priority is scale and compliance or rapid, targeted automation outcomes.

• Large learning providers: strength in scale, LMS integration, compliance reporting.
• Microsoft partners with automation expertise (like ESW): strength in targeted automations, governance consulting, and technical handover.
• Boutique trainers: strength in niche vertical processes and deep, workshop‑style training.

For many mid‑market and large organizations the ideal solution is hybrid: enterprise LMS + role‑based workshops + targeted modernization projects. ExcelHelp.com explicitly pitches toward that blended model.

---

Practical checklist for IT and L&D leaders evaluating ExcelHelp.com (or similar vendors)​

Before you budget for a company‑wide rollout, use this checklist to evaluate claims and reduce downstream surprises.

• Confirm curriculum currency and update cadence. Require written commitments for refreshes when Microsoft alters Copilot features.
• Ask for a sample syllabus and a hands‑on exercise built from your real data (redacted where necessary). Verify that trainers are MCTs and request CVs.
• Require a pilot with measurable KPIs: baseline task time, error rate, and user confidence surveys, then post‑training remeasure.
• Insist on governance deliverables: data classification alignment, Purview/DLP mapping, and a concrete plan for agent grounding and access controls.
• Verify automation deliverables: source code handover, developer documentation, and internal upskilling for maintainers. Avoid one‑off black‑box solutions without exit plans.
• Clarify licensing assumptions used in course materials—are they based on Microsoft 365 E3/E5, Copilot licensing, or add‑on features? Document options if your tenant lacks specific add‑ons.

---

Implementation blueprint: pilot to scale (recomh)​

Phase 1 — Discovery (2–4 weeks)​

• Inventory critical Excel workbooks and reporting processes.
• Map user roles and identify 2–3 pilot teams (finance, operations, HR).
• Define success metrics and baseline current task times.

Phase 2 — Pilot training + targeted automation (4–8 weeks)​

• Run role‑based instructor sessions with vendor using sanitized real data.
• Execute 1–2 small automation projects (e.g., a recurrent report, reconciliations) to demonstrate combined value.
• Measure labor/time savings, error reduction, and user confidence.

Phase 3 — Governance & scaling (8–16 weeks)​

• Implement data governance controls for agent access and data classification.
• Integrate Copilot agent or automation endpoints with secure data sources (SharePoint, SQL, SharePoint list).
• Roll out train‑the‑trainer and create internal champions.

Phase 4 — Continuous improvement (ongoing)​

• Quarterly refreshers and reassessments.
• Roadmap for migrating legacy VBA to maintainable Python/add‑in models if warranted.
• Regular update cycles aligned with Microsoft feature changes.

This blueprint mirrors the promise ESW and ExcelHelp.com make: practical pilots followed by blended automation and governance to realize durable productivity improvements. Buyers should embed measurement and governance into every phase.

---

Governance and security: what vendors must deliver​

A training program that omits governance is dangerous in the Copilot era. Vendors should explicitly offer the following artifacts:

• Data mapping and classification tied to business sensitivity labels.
• Access control design so Copilot agents and automations only see approved sources.
• Testing and validation protocols that include verification of Copilot outputs against authoritative data.
• Incident response playbooks in case an agent exfiltrates or misrepresents protected data.
• Audit logging and change management for automations touching financial or regulated data.

ESW’s Copilot consulting products state they include governance and grounding as part of managed services—buyers must validate the level of depth and specify acceptance criteria in statements of work.

---

A quick reality check: what training will not do​

• Training alone will not fix poorly designed strategic processes or reconcile deeply flawed source systems.
• Training is necessary but not sufficient for compliance; technical controls are required.
• No vendor can promise an exact productivity uplift without a measurable baseline and a defined scope of automations.

ESW’s blended messaging acknowledges these limits by bundling training with development and workflow modernization—but procurement teams should still insist on pilot metrics and contractual accountability.

---

Community reaction and early signals​

Early forum discussions and community threads reacted to the announcement as expected: interest from finance and operations professionals, questions from IT and security about governance, and curiosity about hands‑on curriculum. These community conversations echo the same buyer concerns described above—demand for measurable outcomes, proof of secure agent use, and clarity on licensing and feature changes.

---

Bottom line: pragmatic opportunity with conditional upside​

ESW’s ExcelHelp.com expansion represents a pragmatic, market‑aware response to a widespread enterprise gap: access to Microsoft Copilot and Excel features is only valuable if employees know how to use them and if automation is built safely. ExcelHelp.com’s blended approach—role‑based, hands‑on training combined with automation modernization and governance consulting—aligns with best practices for turning tool access into institutional capability.
That upside is conditional. Buyers should insist on measurable pilots, contractual commitments for curriculum updates, explicit governance deliverables, and clear exit/knowledge‑transfer clauses for automation projects. When those safeguards are in place, a blended vendor like ESW can accelerate the transition from Copilot experimentation to consistent, auditable productivity gains.

---

Final recommendations for WindowsForum readers (IT, HR, and Finance leaders)​

• Treat Copilot enablement as a cross‑functional program: include L&D, IT, Security, and the process owners from day one.
• Start small and measure: run a targeted pilot with clear KPIs before committing to a company‑wide program.
• Demand governance artifacts: training without technical controls invites risk.
• Insist on code and documentation handover for any automation work.
• Verify vendor ability to maintain curriculum and automation when Microsoft changes features or licensing.

ExcelHelp.com’s national expansion is a sensible answer to demand for practical Copilot and Excel skills. For organizations willing to pair training with governance and modernization, the approach can deliver lasting value—provided procurement teams insist on measurable pilots, strong governance, and contractual clarity.
Conclusion: ESW’s move signals a market maturing from AI novelty toward operational discipline. Enterprises that match disciplined training with secure automation and clear metrics will extract disproportionate value; those that treat Copilot as an optional add‑on risk costly governance lapses and ephemeral productivity gains.

---

Source: IT Business Net ESW Expands ExcelHelp.com to Deliver Microsoft Excel, Copilot, and AI Training Nationwide – IT Business Net