- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,990
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,155
Fmr. Chief of Staff John Kelly: We don't need a wall from sea to sea
In a recent talk at Duke University, former Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly made headlines by stating that he does not believe a continuous wall is necessary for border security. This statement comes in the wake of ongoing discussions about border security in the U.S. and the policies enacted by the Trump administration. Kelly highlighted that many Border Patrol officials he has spoken with view the wall as a significant waste of resources.
### Key Insights from the Discussion
1. Border Security Debate: Kelly's remarks challenge the predominant narrative pushed by President Trump regarding the necessity of a barrier stretching from coast to coast. His insights reflect a growing skepticism among those who previously supported such measures.
2. Senate Vote on Border Emergency: The Senate is on track to vote on a resolution to end the President's emergency declaration concerning the border wall. Some Republicans are expected to side with Democrats, indicating potential shifts in the party's stance on this controversial issue.
3. Republican Dynamics: Although senator votes may not change fundamentally due to Kelly’s comments, they add to the complexity of the internal party dynamics, especially as Trump faces increasing criticism from within.
4. Congressional Actions: The discussion touched upon other important topics, including the House Democrats' resolution to condemn anti-Semitism and the ongoing developments in the race for the 2020 presidential election, highlighting the political landscape's drastic shifts and the potential for challenges within party lines.
### Conclusion
John Kelly's statements serve as a reminder that opinions on border security can vary significantly, even among those who have worked closely with the Trump administration. His perspective may not sway immediate votes, but it does contribute to an evolving dialogue about the effectiveness and financial logic of extensive border walls.
What are your thoughts on the wall's effectiveness versus the necessity of alternative security measures? Feel free to share your opinions or any related experiences below!
In a recent talk at Duke University, former Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly made headlines by stating that he does not believe a continuous wall is necessary for border security. This statement comes in the wake of ongoing discussions about border security in the U.S. and the policies enacted by the Trump administration. Kelly highlighted that many Border Patrol officials he has spoken with view the wall as a significant waste of resources.
### Key Insights from the Discussion
1. Border Security Debate: Kelly's remarks challenge the predominant narrative pushed by President Trump regarding the necessity of a barrier stretching from coast to coast. His insights reflect a growing skepticism among those who previously supported such measures.
2. Senate Vote on Border Emergency: The Senate is on track to vote on a resolution to end the President's emergency declaration concerning the border wall. Some Republicans are expected to side with Democrats, indicating potential shifts in the party's stance on this controversial issue.
3. Republican Dynamics: Although senator votes may not change fundamentally due to Kelly’s comments, they add to the complexity of the internal party dynamics, especially as Trump faces increasing criticism from within.
4. Congressional Actions: The discussion touched upon other important topics, including the House Democrats' resolution to condemn anti-Semitism and the ongoing developments in the race for the 2020 presidential election, highlighting the political landscape's drastic shifts and the potential for challenges within party lines.
### Conclusion
John Kelly's statements serve as a reminder that opinions on border security can vary significantly, even among those who have worked closely with the Trump administration. His perspective may not sway immediate votes, but it does contribute to an evolving dialogue about the effectiveness and financial logic of extensive border walls.
What are your thoughts on the wall's effectiveness versus the necessity of alternative security measures? Feel free to share your opinions or any related experiences below!
