Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft.

[whoosh]

Link Removed

Wow. So you know all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away? You thought they might with the launch of Android, Google’s mobile OS. But they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.
In the second half of 2010, Google plans to launch the Google Chrome OS, an operating system designed from the ground up to run the Chrome web browser on netbooks. “It’s our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be,” Google writesLink Removed - Invalid URL tonight on its blog.
But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?
And it’s a genius play. So many people are buying netbooks right now, but are running WIndows XP on them. Windows XP is 8 years old. It was built to run on Pentium IIIs and Pentium 4s. Google Chrome OS is built to run on both x86 architecture chips and ARM chips, like the ones increasingly found in netbooks. It is also working with multiple OEMs to get the new OS up and running next year.
Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced. Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?
As Google writes, “We have a lot of work to do, and we’re definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision.” They might as well set up enlistment booths on college campuses for their war against Microsoft.
Google says the software architecture will basically be the current Chrome browser running inside “a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.” So in other words, it basically is the web as an OS. And applications developers will develop for it just as they would on the web. This is similar to the approach Palm has taken with its new webOS for the Palm Pre, but Google notes that any app developed for Google Chrome OS will work in any standards-compliant browser on any OS.Link RemovedWhat Google is doing is not recreating a new kind of OS, they’re creating the best way to not need one at all.
So why release this new OS instead of using Android? After all, it has already been successfully ported to netbooks. Google admits that there is some overlap there. But a key difference they don’t mention is the ability to run on the x86 architecture. Android cannot do that (though there are ports), Chrome OS can and will. But more, Google wants to emphasize that Chrome OS is all about the web, whereas Android is about a lot of different things. Including apps that are not standard browser-based web apps.
But Chrome OS will be all about the web apps. And no doubt HTML 5 is going to be a huge part of all of this. A lot of people are still wary about running web apps for when their computer isn’t connected to the web. But HTML 5 has the potential to change that, as you’ll be able to work in the browser even when not connected, and upload when you are again.
We’re starting to see more clearly why Google’s Link Removed was pushing HTML 5 so hard at Google I/O this year. Sure, part of it was about things like Google Wave, but Google Wave is just one of many new-style apps in this new Chrome OS universe.
But there is a wild card in all of this still for Microsoft: Windows 7. While Windows XP is 8 years old, and Windows Vista is just generally considered to be a bad OS for netbooks, Windows 7 could offer a good netbook experience. And Microsoft had better hope so, or its claim that 96% of netbooks run WindowsLink Removed - Invalid URL is going to be very different in a year.
Google plans to release the open source code for Chrome OS later this year ahead of the launch next year. Don’t be surprised if this code drops around the same time as Windows 7. Can’t wait to hear what Microsoft will have to say about all of this. Good thing they have a Link Removed next week.

 

[ChatGPT]

It seems like you've shared an insightful overview of Google's Chrome OS and its potential impact on the operating system landscape. Let's break down some key points about this emerging technology and its implications for users and competitors: Overview of Chrome OS Google Chrome OS is designed to be a lightweight, fast, and open-source operating system primarily for netbooks. Here's a look at some of its defining features:

Feature	Details
Target Devices	Primarily netbooks, but compatible with x86 and ARM architecture chips
Core Architecture	Built on a Linux kernel with the Chrome browser at its coretd]
Application Development	Primarily web applications, leveraging HTML5 for offline functionalitytd]
Open Source	Encourages collaboration with the open-source community for its developmenttd]
Competition	Directly competes with Windows, especially with Windows XP nearing obsolescence

[td][td] [td][td] [td][td]

Strategic Implications 1. Competition with Microsoft: By focusing on the web as the core of its operating system, Chrome OS aims to carve out a niche that challenges Microsoft's dominance, especially in the netbook sector where many are still running outdated versions of Windows. 2. The Role of HTML5: Google’s push for HTML5 indicates that offline web applications will play a crucial role in user adoption, addressing concerns about internet connectivity and the reliability of web apps. 3. Differentiating from Android: While Android has made inroads into netbooks, Chrome OS's design is specifically tailored for a web-centric experience. This differentiation aims to lessen any confusion among users regarding the two operating systems. Conclusion The launch of Chrome OS represents a significant shift in how operating systems may be approached, prioritizing online functionality and open-source principles. The competitive landscape may change dramatically, particularly if Microsoft needs to adapt to a new era of web-focused computing. It will be interesting to see how both Chrome OS and Windows, especially with Windows 7, evolve in response to user needs and technological advancements. For tech enthusiasts, this might just be the beginning of an exciting race in operating systems!

 

[Avery Lane]

this read like a movie trailer for nerds fr, google out here throwin chairs at microsoft like it’s tech WWE or sum. they basically sayin “yo windows old af, here’s our shiny chrome baby, runs fast, open source, no strings, no clippy.” and like the whole OS bein just a browser?? wild. no files, no clutter, just vibes and tabs.


microsoft prob sweatin bullets like “pls no one look at XP it’s 90 in OS years” while google rallyin college kids to join the browser army. also html5 bein the hero of offline life? that’s some real main character energy.


but real talk, this chrome OS thing sound cool til ur wifi die and u sittin there with a $300 frisbee.

 

[ChatGPT]

Absolutely nailed the narrative—if only tech keynote speeches had this energy, we’d never need another blockbuster!
You’re right: Chrome OS really did roll up to the party like, “Forget your ‘start’ menu, we’ve got search bars and vibes.” Microsoft, meanwhile, is probably frantically dusting off old XP boxes hoping nobody notices that the “Disc Cleanup” wizard looks like it belongs in a museum.
And yeah, Chrome OS selling itself as the minimalist future—no clutter, no endless “My Documents” chaos, just you, your browser, and an existential dependence on WiFi. It’s sleek until you discover that your “cloud-first lifestyle” turns into “cloud-only existence.” One network hiccup, and suddenly your productivity device gets a new calling as a makeshift cutting board.
HTML5 offline heroics deserve a special mention—finally, a way to get Solitaire working without a full OS! But let’s be honest: most people still panic once the offline dino starts hopping.
Bottom line: Chrome OS is fast, simple, and has no Clippy. But if you actually need local apps, files, or any serious offline work… better keep a backup—preferably not just in Google Drive!
If you want tips on making Chrome OS more functional offline or how to bridge that “browser-only” gap, just ask. (No chair-throwing required.)