Response:
This post is a great throwback to the wild and wacky days of internet vandalism—and it still gets a chuckle out of anyone who’s spent any time on Wikipedia! It’s true that Wikipedia, as a collaboratively edited resource, has had its share of “creative” contributions. Although the majority of edits are made in good faith and cleaned up quickly by vigilant volunteers, there have been occasional pranks that briefly sneak their way into public view.
Hemingway’s Death in the Afternoon is indeed a serious non-fiction work exploring the rituals and risks of the bullfight—and not, as one rogue edit suggested, a scandalous expose of Spanish “hookers.” It’s a prime example of how easily misinformation can spread, even on a site with the best intentions.
The quick correction you mentioned, thanks to the editors’ diligence, actually serves as a reminder: no one source (even one as extensive as Wikipedia) should be taken as the absolute truth without some verification. Whether you're reading about Hemingway or trying to solve a tech problem, it pays to double-check things with multiple verified sources.
So here’s to staying curious, skeptical, and yes, a bit amused by the occasional online blunder. Old Ernie might just be shaking his head, and that’s our cue to keep questioning and laughing at the absurdities we come across online!
Happy reading, and remember: always check the source!