• Thread Author
HGF has begun a major overhaul of its data estate, choosing Microsoft Fabric as the technical foundation and Microsoft Power BI for reporting, with Simpson Associates engaged to lead platform design, implementation and dashboard delivery—a move that aims to replace fragmented legacy reporting, speed insight to decision-makers, and provide a governed, future‑proof data platform for a fast-growing European IP firm. (globenewswire.com)

Background​

HGF is one of Europe’s larger intellectual property practices, positioning itself as a Private Equity‑backed, growth‑oriented IP firm with a multi‑country footprint and “190+” attorneys and specialists listed on its corporate site. This combination of scale, cross‑jurisdiction work and regulated client data makes data governance, security and accurate operational reporting business‑critical. (hgf.com, globenewswire.com)
Simpson Associates—an established Microsoft Solutions Partner and recent winner of Microsoft’s Community Response Partner of the Year award—will deliver the project using a three‑phase approach (Platform Discovery & Build; Data Store Development; Power BI Configuration) and a Fabric Accelerator option they promote for faster rollout. Simpson’s partner credentials, Fabric‑focused offerings and public case examples show they have an operational playbook for Microsoft Fabric rollouts. (simpson-associates.co.uk)
This article summarises the announcement, verifies the core technical claims, and provides a practical, critical analysis of the opportunity, likely benefits, implementation pitfalls, and longer‑term governance and cost considerations for HGF and firms contemplating a similar path.

What Microsoft Fabric brings—and what HGF is buying into​

Microsoft Fabric in brief​

Microsoft Fabric is a unified, SaaS data platform that bundles data engineering, data integration, data warehousing, real‑time analytics and Power BI reporting into a single tenant experience with OneLake as the organisation’s logical lakehouse. OneLake, Fabric’s built‑in logical data lake, centralises storage and metadata while exposing governance features via the OneLake catalog and integrated policies. These governance controls (sensitivity labelling, domain/workspace scoping, cataloging and recommended governance actions) are core Fabric features designed to reduce the fragmentation and manual controls that typically burden large firms. (learn.microsoft.com)
Key Fabric benefits relevant to legal & IP firms:
  • Centralised data estate (OneLake) to reduce duplication and enable a single source of truth for finance, legal matter data, resource utilisation and client billing. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Integrated governance (cataloging, sensitivity labels, domain scoping) to help enforce who can see what across legal, finance and operations. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • End‑to‑end data pipelines (ingest → transform → semantic models) in a single environment that reduces ETL fragmentation and hand‑offs to multiple teams. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Power BI as the reporting finish line, simplifying the creation and distribution of executive dashboards and self‑service analytics. (learn.microsoft.com)
Simpson Associates intends to deliver HGF’s platform using a proven accelerator and a staged rollout: discovery and platform build, followed by data store consolidation, finishing with Power BI reports that track HGF’s business KPIs and replace manual spreadsheets. The approach prioritises minimal disruption while ensuring governance and scalability are built in from day one. (globenewswire.com, simpson-associates.co.uk)

Technical validation: governance and real‑time insights​

Microsoft’s documentation confirms Fabric’s governance tooling inside OneLake: a govern tab surfaces insights, recommended actions and metadata‑driven checks to help administrators improve policy coverage, sensitivity labeling and item freshness—functions that are directly relevant to legal practices that must enforce strict data access rules. These features are not marketing fiction; they are implemented controls available in Fabric today. (learn.microsoft.com)
Power BI supports near real‑time reporting scenarios when configured with DirectQuery semantic models, automatic page refresh, or streaming/push datasets. Important caveat: Microsoft distinguishes “near real‑time” from literal sub‑second streaming and notes latency and architectural constraints; organisations should treat “real‑time” as operationally current rather than instantaneous. Planner teams must design pipelines and refresh strategies to meet the business definition of “real‑time” for each KPI. (learn.microsoft.com)

The business case for HGF: expected benefits​

1) Single source of truth and reduced manual effort​

Consolidating finance, matter, resource and operational data into a governed OneLake reduces the need for reconciliation across spreadsheets and legacy systems. For HGF, that means fewer disputes over numbers and faster, repeatable month‑end reporting aligned to board KPIs. The press release highlights this as a primary business driver. (globenewswire.com)

2) Faster, trustworthy dashboards for executives​

Replacing manual reporting steps with Power BI dashboards gives executive and practice leaders near‑instant access to performance metrics—utilisation, matter profitability, WIP and billing cadence—enabling faster decisions on pricing, staffing and client strategy. Simpson’s Power BI configuration work is positioned to deliver these outcomes. (globenewswire.com, simpson-associates.co.uk)

3) Governance, compliance and auditability​

IP firms process sensitive client inventions, litigation materials and PII. Fabric’s OneLake catalog, sensitivity labels and integration with Purview/Information Protection let organisations enforce export controls, data classification and audit trails—reducing compliance risk and simplifying GDPR‑style controls across multiple countries. Microsoft documentation shows tenant‑level controls and sensitivity label integration with Power BI and Fabric. (learn.microsoft.com)

4) Future expansion to AI and advanced analytics​

Once data is consolidated and catalogued in OneLake, organisations can add advanced analytics and predictive models—forecasting matter budgets, predicting client churn or automating novelty monitoring for patent filings. Simpson and other partners highlight Fabric as a platform for future AI/ML capabilities; the platform’s unified model makes scaling such experiments more straightforward than cobbling together siloed components. (simpson-associates.co.uk)

Practical delivery model: three phases explained​

Simpson Associates has proposed a three‑phase delivery model for HGF:
  • Platform Discovery & Build
  • Technical and compliance discovery, tenant provisioning, Identity integration (Azure AD), and initial OneLake/Workspace setup. This phase reduces rework later and aligns the factory to HGF’s security posture. (globenewswire.com)
  • Data Store Development
  • Consolidate and transform fragmented sources (time capture systems, billing, HR/people data, matter management systems) into governed lakehouse structures and curated semantic models. This typically includes medallion architecture (bronze/silver/gold) to move from raw to business‑ready data.
  • Power BI Configuration
  • Build semantic models, design dashboards aligned to KPIs, and roll out role‑based access with sensitivity labels and row‑level security. The objective is to move teams from manual Excel reporting to governed, repeatable Power BI reports. (globenewswire.com, learn.microsoft.com)
This sequence is consistent with best practice in Fabric and lakehouse implementations: discover, stabilise the platform, centralise data and then operationalise reporting.

Strengths: where this move makes the most sense​

  • Tightly integrated governance and cataloguing reduce the compliance overhead typical in multi‑jurisdiction practices. Microsoft’s OneLake govern tab gives administrators a central view of governance posture—useful for a firm needing to demonstrate controls to regulators and clients. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • End‑to‑end platform: Fabric removes tooling complexity by unifying data engineering and BI in one cloud tenant, cutting integration gaps and support overhead when compared with entirely bespoke stacks. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Industry‑focused delivery partner: Simpson Associates’ Fabric Accelerator and partner credentials indicate an established set of templates, patterns and accelerators that can speed time‑to‑value for HGF. Their Microsoft Partner of the Year recognition and Fabric Featured Partner status are practical signals of capability. (simpson-associates.co.uk)

Risks and caveats HGF should plan for​

1) Licensing and cost complexity​

Microsoft has reworked Power BI and Fabric licensing across 2024–2025. Power BI pricing increases and the retirement/replacement of Power BI Premium capacity SKUs in favour of Fabric capacity (F‑SKUs) mean organisations must closely map usage patterns, distribution needs and concurrency to commercial options. In many cases, Fabric capacity is more expensive than legacy Premium capacity—reserved or pay‑as‑you‑go options and the possibility to pause capacity introduce new operational trade‑offs (for example, paused capacity can break always‑on distribution to global users). HGF should model scenarios carefully and use partner expertise to estimate both steady‑state and peak costs. (powerbi.microsoft.com, microsoft.com, element61.be)
Cautionary note: licensing details and pricing tiers change periodically; all cost assumptions must be validated against current Microsoft pricing and HGF’s procurement agreements before committing to capacity purchases. (powerbi.microsoft.com)

2) Vendor lock‑in and multi‑cloud strategy​

Fabric’s value grows with centralisation. That is also its strategic trade‑off: deeper adoption increases dependency on Microsoft’s SaaS and Azure ecosystem. HGF should identify any existing multi‑cloud or proprietary on‑prem data sources and decide how to handle them (federation, mirroring or controlled replication). Mirroring and federated access exist as technical options but can add engineering complexity and egress risk if mis‑designed.

3) Migration complexity and data quality​

Law firms often have decades of legacy data inside billing systems, matter management platforms and local drives. Cleaning, mapping and curating that data into a lakehouse requires disciplined data stewardship, business glossaries and an explicit data quality program—no technical platform alone will produce trustworthy KPIs. The governance expectations in Fabric will reduce manual ad‑hoc fixes, but success relies on HGF appointing data stewards and processes to maintain quality.

4) Cultural and upskilling costs​

Delivering dashboards is only half the story: attorneys, finance teams and partners must adopt new ways of working. The project should budget for training, change management and the development of a centre of excellence to manage models, semantic changes and dashboard lifecycle. Simpson’s post‑delivery support model addresses this need, but HGF must resource adoption activities internally. (globenewswire.com)

5) False expectations around “real‑time” and AI​

“Real‑time Power BI dashboards” is an attractive promise, but there are architectural limits (data source latency, network and refresh windows). Similarly, the platform eases the path to AI, but predictive and generative AI use cases still require curated data, model validation, security reviews and alignment with client confidentiality obligations. Treat AI pilots as stepwise experiments, not immediate productivity replacements. (learn.microsoft.com)

What a rigorous risk mitigation plan for HGF should include​

  • Definitive licensing workshop with finance and a Microsoft licensing specialist to evaluate:
  • Per‑user vs capacity needs
  • Fabric reservation discounts vs pay‑as‑you‑go
  • Impact of Power BI pricing updates on renewals and budget. (powerbi.microsoft.com, microsoft.com)
  • Data governance blueprint:
  • Appoint named data stewards for each domain (finance, matters, HR).
  • Create a business glossary and rules for sensitivity labelling and retention policy.
  • Define RACI for data quality remediation. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Controlled migration plan:
  • Start with a narrow, high‑value set of KPIs (billing accuracy, WIP ageing, utilisation) to prove value.
  • Use medallion architecture (bronze/silver/gold) to stage ingestion and transformation.
  • Document lineage and maintain automated testing for model changes.
  • Cost and operations guardrails:
  • Define quotas for workspace creation, data object lifecycle policies and automated cleanup of stale items.
  • Use administrative controls to restrict workloads that can incur unexpected Fabric consumption.
  • Adoption and training:
  • Deliver cohort‑based training for Power BI consumers and authors.
  • Establish an internal centre of excellence with ongoing support from Simpson or a managed service. (globenewswire.com)

Independent verification of key claims​

  • The project announcement and quotes from HGF and Simpson Associates are published on GlobeNewswire. The press release explicitly states the three‑phase approach, the platform choice (Microsoft Fabric) and the intention to deliver Power BI dashboards. (globenewswire.com)
  • HGF’s corporate site confirms the firm’s market‑leading position and lists “190+ patent attorneys, trade mark attorneys, IP solicitors and Rechtsanwälte,” supporting the press release’s staffing facts and the business case for scale‑appropriate reporting. (hgf.com)
  • Simpson Associates’ own site and blog highlight their Microsoft Partner of the Year recognition and Fabric accelerator offerings, corroborating the partner credentials cited in the announcement. Simpson’s public materials also document their Microsoft specialisations and partner relationships (Databricks, IBM, Denodo). (simpson-associates.co.uk)
  • Technical claims about OneLake governance, sensitivity labels in Power BI, and the mechanics of near‑real‑time reporting are documented in Microsoft’s official Fabric and Power BI learning content. These pages explain the available governance controls and how to enable sensitivity labelling across Fabric and Power BI artifacts. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Recent Fabric platform analyses and technical community write‑ups (internal forum and analysis archives) discuss mirroring/integration with Databricks, Materialized Lake Views, and other Fabric enhancements that materially affect architecture and governance trade‑offs—useful context for HGF’s architects and procurement teams. These practitioner discussions highlight both the technical capabilities and the non‑trivial migration/operational work required to extract value from Fabric.

Final appraisal: the right move—with disciplined execution​

HGF’s decision to centralise its data estate on Microsoft Fabric and use Power BI for reporting is strategically sound given the firm’s scale, cross‑border operations and regulatory obligations. Fabric’s OneLake, integrated governance and the ability to deliver governed Power BI experiences directly align to the need for a single source of truth, auditable access and faster executive reporting. Simpson Associates has the partner profile and Fabric‑specific accelerators that reduce execution risk and accelerate value realisation. (globenewswire.com, simpson-associates.co.uk)
However, the success of this modernisation will depend on HGF’s ability to:
  • Treat licensing and TCO as a first‑class decision variable, not an afterthought, given ongoing Power BI and Fabric pricing changes. (powerbi.microsoft.com, microsoft.com)
  • Invest in data stewardship, quality and lifecycle processes so dashboards are trusted and sustainable. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Manage vendor dependency deliberately—use design patterns that allow controlled federation or data export where multi‑cloud flexibility is strategically required.
  • Build a people‑first adoption plan so technical delivery translates into changed behaviours and measurable outcomes. (globenewswire.com)
In plain terms: HGF appears to have chosen the right platform family for its goals; the difference between a successful rollout and a costly programme will be the quality of governance, licensing decisions and change management exercised during implementation.

Short checklist HGF’s executive sponsors should confirm before signing full‑scale contracts​

  • Confirm expected monthly and annual Fabric capacity costs in three scenarios: pilot, steady‑state and peak distribution (include reservation options). (element61.be)
  • Verify compliance controls (sensitivity labels, retention, encryption) are testable against a representative sample of matter and client data. (learn.microsoft.com)
  • Prioritise three “quick wins” dashboards (billing accuracy, WIP ageing, utilisation) to validate data pipelines, governance and user adoption. (globenewswire.com)
  • Define the data stewardship operating model, including named owners, SLAs for data refreshes and an audit cadence.
  • Negotiate a partner commitment for knowledge transfer, training and a minimum post‑delivery support window to ensure capability isn’t locked externally. (simpson-associates.co.uk)

HGF’s public announcement is a pragmatic and timely example of legal services firms embracing platform modernisation: by centralising data, enforcing governance, and delivering action‑oriented dashboards, HGF gains the operational visibility required to scale and to compete. The technical and commercial choices are defensible—but only if the firm pairs the platform build with rigorous governance, clear cost modelling and an explicit adoption programme that turns dashboards into changed business outcomes. (globenewswire.com, hgf.com)

Source: GlobeNewswire HGF to Transform Their Data Estate with Microsoft Fabric and Power BI, Delivered by Simpson Associates