Hitachi Vantara VSP One SDS Arrives on Azure Marketplace for Hybrid Cloud Storage

Hitachi Vantara’s entry of Virtual Storage Platform One Software‑Defined Storage (VSP One SDS) into the Microsoft Azure Marketplace marks a concrete step toward simplifying hybrid cloud storage procurement and, according to vendor claims, cutting cloud storage costs substantially through built‑in data efficiency technologies. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

Background​

Hybrid cloud complexity has emerged as a top operational headache for enterprises balancing legacy on‑premises systems, multicloud deployments and accelerating AI workloads. Industry research from IDC shows a strong consensus among cloud buyers that current cloud estates are overdue for modernization—a trend that raises talent, governance and cost pressures for IT teams. (blogs.idc.com)
Hitachi Vantara introduced the VSP One family as a unifying data platform designed to deliver consistent block, file and object storage across on‑premises and public cloud environments. The suite includes software‑defined variants (VSP One SDS Block and VSP One SDS Cloud), alongside a unified management plane called VSP 360 intended to centralize provisioning, automation and observability. (hitachi.com, hitachivantara.com)
This development is both strategic and practical: packaging VSP One SDS for major marketplaces — including Azure Marketplace — gives procurement and cloud teams a direct route to trial, buy and deploy enterprise storage delivered as software within the cloud provider’s billing and governance frameworks. That is the operational promise behind the announcement and the primary reason the move matters to Windows and Azure‑centric environments. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

---

What’s new: VSP One SDS on Azure (and what it includes)​

Key product components and marketplace availability​

• VSP One SDS Block — software‑defined block storage available as an Azure Marketplace listing so customers can deploy the product directly into Azure environments and manage it through Azure tooling. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)
• VSP 360 — the unified management layer that creates a common control plane for VSP One deployments across clouds and on‑premises systems, enabling centralized operations and telemetry. (hitachivantara.com)
• Integrated data services — features such as thin provisioning, enterprise‑grade compression, advanced erasure coding and asynchronous replication are delivered as part of the VSP One SDS portfolio, intended to support both cost control and resiliency. (hitachivantara.com, futurecio.tech)

Hitachi has rolled VSP One SDS across hyperscalers in stages; the vendor’s messaging and press coverage show availability through cloud marketplaces (AWS, Google Cloud and now Azure), with documentation and product guides published for Azure deployments. That dual evidence — the vendor announcement and the Azure Marketplace listing — confirms the product can be procured and installed through Azure’s marketplace channel. (hitachi.com, azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

Vendor guarantees and performance targets​

Hitachi positions availability and resilience as cornerstones of VSP One. Public product pages highlight a bold set of guarantees (including a 100% Data Availability guarantee on VSP One and service guarantees tied to performance and cyber‑resilience), while press materials reference a target of 99.999% uptime for continuous availability features. These are vendor commitments and part of Hitachi’s commercial positioning for mission‑critical workloads. (hitachivantara.com)

---

How VSP One SDS claims to lower cloud storage costs​

The vendor narrative centers on three technical levers that directly impact what customers pay for cloud storage:

• Compression and deduplication: Advanced data compression reduces the physical byte footprint stored in cloud object/block services, so billable capacity falls. Hitachi cites enterprise‑grade compression as a primary driver for storage cost reduction. (hitachivantara.com)
• Thin provisioning: By allocating logical capacity without immediately reserving physical storage, thin provisioning cuts wastage from over‑provisioned volumes and lowers capacity consumption billed by cloud providers. (hitachivantara.com)
• Efficient erasure coding and data layout: Patented techniques (e.g., Hitachi’s Polyphase Erasure Coding for the SDS Block variant) aim to reduce storage overhead while preserving performance and resilience, which indirectly reduces the storage footprint and costs. citeturn2search1

Taken together, Hitachi’s public statements suggest these features “can further reduce cloud storage costs by up to 40%.” That specific figure appears consistently in vendor briefings and press materials as a marketing estimate based on expected effective capacity gains from data reduction and provisioning efficiency. (hitachivantara.com, prnewswire.com)

What “up to 40%” actually means in practice​

• “Up to” is promotional language. The real savings a customer will realize depend heavily on data compressibility, the proportion of cold vs. hot data, snapshot/retention patterns, and how the application consumes and writes data.
• Workloads that are highly compressible (logs, text, certain backups) will see the greatest benefit; encrypted or already compressed data (e.g., media, many database formats) will see little to no additional compression.
• Thin provisioning reduces over‑allocated slack but does not reduce the billed storage for data that is actively written; therefore, the savings are greatest where historical overprovisioning is common.

Because the 40% figure originates with vendor testing and product positioning, it should be treated as a realistic maximum under favourable conditions rather than a guaranteed average across all workloads. Independent coverage repeats the claim, but substantive third‑party proof in customer‑published case studies or independent benchmarks is limited in public sources at the time of writing. citeturn3search6turn3search4

---

Industry context: why this matters now​

Skills, modernization and hybrid realities​

IDC’s cloud buyer research shows most enterprises acknowledge their cloud environments need modernization. That trend translates into demand for tools that centralize management, expose consistent APIs and reduce operational complexity — exactly the gaps VSP One SDS aims to address with a unified control plane and marketplace availability. Enterprises are also struggling with FinOps skills, container and cloud‑native expertise, and other operational gaps that complicate hybrid strategies. (blogs.idc.com)

The marketplace effect​

Placing enterprise SDS in Azure Marketplace is more than a channel choice — it simplifies procurement, integrates billing and enables cloud teams to factor software storage costs into existing Azure subscriptions, consumption commitments and governance models. For many Azure‑first organizations, marketplace deployment removes a friction point that historically pushed teams toward native cloud storage patterns (even when those were costlier overall). (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

---

Critical analysis — strengths and what could deliver actual value​

Strengths​

• Unified management: VSP 360’s common control plane reduces the operational overhead of managing multiple storage systems and policies across on‑prem and cloud sites. This directly addresses hybrid complexity. (hitachivantara.com)
• Enterprise data services in cloud: Bringing mature features such as asynchronous replication, thin provisioning and advanced compression to cloud‑deployed SDS allows organizations to match on‑premise SLAs and continuity practices without re‑architecting applications. (hitachivantara.com)
• Market convenience: Azure Marketplace availability accelerates procurement, governance, and billing integration for Azure customers, making POCs and pilots easier to run. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)
• Resilience guarantees (commercial differentiator): Hitachi’s public guarantees (data availability, cyber‑resilience pledges) are attractive to risk‑averse enterprises running critical workloads; they also create accountability where many cloud storage options are purely best‑effort. (hitachivantara.com)

Situations where VSP One SDS can deliver the most value​

• Organizations with a large, heterogeneous storage estate seeking consistent management across on‑prem and Azure.
• Workloads with high compressibility or significant historical overprovisioning.
• Teams that require enterprise‑grade replication and DR features in cloud without investing in new application architecture.

---

Risks, caveats and realistic expectations​

Marketing vs. measurable outcomes​

• The “up to 40%” savings number is a vendor estimate and will vary widely by data type and retention practices. Customers must validate reduction ratios with real dataset testing rather than relying on headline figures. citeturn3search0
• The 99.999% uptime and 100% data availability guarantees are marketing‑forward claims backed by contract terms and service credits; they are not identical to cloud provider SLAs and will be governed by legal terms, availability zones, and supported topologies. Organizations must scrutinize the guarantee fine print and map it to their recovery time and point objectives. (hitachivantara.com)

Operational and technical tradeoffs​

• Egress and data movement costs: Even if VSP One reduces stored bytes, moving data between cloud tiers, between on‑prem and cloud, or across regions may incur egress or network charges that offset storage savings. Effective FinOps modelling must include mobility costs and access patterns.
• Performance tuning: Data reduction techniques can introduce CPU and I/O overhead depending on implementation. Performance validation for latency‑sensitive workloads is essential.
• Licensing and marketplace procurement complexity: Azure Marketplace listings simplify purchase but require close attention to licensing models, billing cadence and whether you can absorb software costs into existing enterprise agreements.
• Vendor lock‑in and operational dependency: A single control plane simplifies operations but creates centralized dependency. Organizations should validate migration, export and recovery options before committing core workloads.

---

How to evaluate VSP One SDS on Azure — practical checklist​

• Perform a targeted proof‑of‑concept (PoC) with representative datasets, not synthetic data. Measure:
• Raw vs. effective capacity after compression/dedupe.
• IOPS and latency for typical transaction mixes.
• CPU and memory overhead for inline data reduction.
• Validate replication and DR workflows:
• Execute failover/failback drills using asynchronous replication.
• Measure RTO/RPO against business requirements.
• Run a FinOps scenario:
• Model storage cost variations by tier, region, egress and access patterns.
• Compare current Azure native cost baseline vs. projected SDS‑enabled baseline (include migration/egress costs).
• Examine SLA and guarantee terms:
• Request written terms for availability and cyber‑resilience credits.
• Confirm support boundaries for hybrid topologies (what is Hitachi responsible for vs. Azure).
• Test operational workflows:
• Integrate VSP 360 with existing monitoring, ticketing and automation pipelines.
• Validate backup/retention policies and long‑term archiving strategies.
• Plan phased onboarding:
• Start with non‑mission critical or highly compressible workloads.
• Capture actual reduction ratios and update forecasting models before scaling.
• Re‑assess annually:
• Compression effectiveness and costs can change as data profiles evolve; build regular reassessment into cloud governance.

---

Cost modelling approach (practical method)​

To avoid surprises, use the following method to estimate potential savings rather than relying on vendor headline numbers:

• Inventory data by class (hot transactional, warm analytics, cold archive).
• For each class, sample byte mix and run a compression/dedupe test during the PoC to get realistic reduction ratios.
• Calculate effective billable storage:
• Effective bytes = Raw bytes × (1 — space reclaimed by thin provisioning and zero blocks) × (1 / data reduction ratio)
• Multiply effective bytes by Azure storage tier pricing (including replication/zone costs) and add expected egress/transaction costs for access patterns.
• Compare baseline Azure native cost to SDS-enabled cost; include one‑time migration and ongoing licensing fees.

This method surfaces the true savings potential and highlights sensitivities (for example, if compression ratio drops because the dataset is encrypted, the projected benefit evaporates).

---

Partner ecosystem and procurement advantages​

Listing on the Azure Marketplace streamlines procurement, allows billing through existing Azure commitments, and provides a familiar deployment model for cloud teams. Channel partners and managed service providers that already operate in Azure ecosystems can accelerate deployment, integrate VSP One SDS into managed offerings, and assist with FinOps optimizations. Microsoft’s marketplace entry recognizes the commercial value of an SDS option available as a managed image or solution template within Azure. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, hitachi.com)

---

Independent corroboration and due diligence​

Multiple vendor and industry writeups echo Hitachi’s availability and feature claims, and the Azure Marketplace listing confirms the product is accessible via Microsoft’s commercial channel. However, many of the cost and uptime claims are reiterated vendor statements rather than independent benchmarks. Prospective customers should insist on:

• Recorded PoC results with the vendor’s tooling.
• Clear documentation of guarantee terms and any prerequisites.
• A validated migration plan that includes projected FinOps outcomes.

Publishers and analysts have covered VSP One’s marketplace rollouts and guarantees in vendor news stories and product blogs, but independent customer case studies that quantify real‑world savings at scale remain limited in the public domain at this time. Treat vendor claims as directional, to be verified through controlled testing and contractual commitment. (hitachivantara.com, cdotrends.com)

---

Conclusion​

Hitachi Vantara’s placement of VSP One SDS into the Azure Marketplace addresses a tangible need in hybrid cloud operations: enabling enterprise‑grade storage services to be deployed and governed within the same procurement and operational fabric that Azure customers already use. The combination of VSP 360‑based unified management, storage efficiency features (thin provisioning, compression) and marketplace availability promises a pragmatic path for organizations to reduce cloud storage waste and centralize control over hybrid estates. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, hitachivantara.com)
That said, the often‑repeated figures — “up to 40% cost reduction” and “99.999% uptime” — are vendor performance claims that require objective verification against your datasets, workloads and recovery requirements. A measured approach — PoC, FinOps modelling, DR validation and contract‑level scrutiny of guarantees — will determine whether the marketing promises convert to real savings and risk reduction in your environment. (hitachivantara.com)
Enterprises considering VSP One SDS on Azure should treat the marketplace listing as a door to a controlled evaluation, not a plug‑and‑play cost solution. When the technical evaluation, financial modelling and contractual terms align with business requirements, VSP One SDS can be a powerful tool in a practical, hybrid cloud modernization strategy. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, blogs.idc.com)

---

Source: IT Brief Asia Hitachi Vantara VSP One SDS boosts Azure hybrid cloud savings

 

[ChatGPT]

Hitachi Vantara’s move to list Virtual Storage Platform One Software‑Defined Storage (VSP One SDS) in the Microsoft Azure Marketplace sets a clear marker for how established storage vendors are trying to make hybrid cloud less painful — promising unified management, enterprise data services in the public cloud, and vendor‑level claims of significant cost savings. The announcement frames VSP One SDS on Azure as a way for organizations to extend existing Hitachi storage investments into Azure, manage block, file and object data from a single control plane with VSP 360, and apply on‑premises features such as thin provisioning, enterprise compression and asynchronous replication to cloud‑resident data. (prnewswire.com, azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

Background​

Enterprises are increasingly juggling hybrid estates where legacy on‑prem systems and cloud platforms must coexist. Vendor messaging around VSP One SDS highlights the operational friction caused by fragmented tooling, staffing shortages and rapid data growth — trends that industry research has been flagging for more than a year. IDC’s cloud‑market analysis shows that a large majority of cloud buyers see the need for cloud modernization, noting 82% of cloud buyers said their cloud required modernization in recent surveys — a backdrop that helps explain why vendors offer unified hybrid controls and marketplace availability as competitive advantages. (blogs.idc.com, prnewswire.com)
Hitachi first launched the VSP One family and its companion VSP 360 management suite in 2024–2025 as a platform aiming to unify block, file, object and SDS under a single management paradigm. The vendor has progressively published features and guarantees — including performance, cyber‑resilience and sustainability commitments — while moving VSP One SDS into public cloud marketplaces (AWS and Google Cloud earlier, and now Azure). (hitachivantara.com)

---

What’s new: VSP One SDS on Azure​

Marketplace availability and procurement benefits​

• VSP One SDS is now listed in the Microsoft Azure Marketplace, enabling deployment via the Azure procurement and billing flows rather than separate software contracts. This lowers a procurement barrier and can shorten deployment cycles for customers already consuming services from Azure. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, prnewswire.com)

Unified management with VSP 360​

• The platform integrates with VSP 360, Hitachi’s unified management layer, which the vendor positions as a single control plane for provisioning, monitoring, automation and AIOps observability across on‑premises and cloud VSP One instances. This consistent management surface is central to the hybrid pitch: teams can apply policies and move data without re‑architecting applications. (hitachivantara.com)

Key technical capabilities highlighted​

• Built‑in thin provisioning and enterprise‑grade compression for data reduction.
• Two‑way asynchronous replication for cross‑site data mobility and disaster recovery.
• Support for block, file and object workloads with a software‑defined storage architecture meant to run on VMs in public cloud environments. (prnewswire.com, azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

These capabilities are what the vendor cites as the primary mechanisms for cost and operational efficiency gains in hybrid architectures.

---

Vendor claims versus practical reality​

Hitachi’s announcements make several strong claims that will shape buyer expectations. Scrutinizing those claims is essential before committing to an architectural change.

Claim: up to 40% reduction in cloud storage costs​

Hitachi and associated press releases state that thin provisioning and enterprise compression in VSP One SDS can reduce cloud storage costs by up to 40%. That figure is presented as a potential outcome of applying on‑premises style data reduction to cloud‑resident volumes. (prnewswire.com, hitachivantara.com)

• Analysis: This is a vendor‑supplied "up to" number and highly dependent on dataset characteristics. Actual reduction depends on data compressibility and the proportion of easily deduplicable or sparse data in a customer’s environment. Files with already compressed media (e.g., video codecs) will show far less benefit than text, logs, databases with repetitive patterns or VM images. The 40% figure can be used as a planning assumption only after performing a representative data‑profile analysis and pilot tests. Treat the claim as marketing guidance rather than a guaranteed outcome.

Claim: target of 99.999% availability​

The VSP One family is described as being engineered for continuous availability with a target of 99.999% uptime (five nines). (prnewswire.com)

• Analysis: Uptime targets are meaningful but must be mapped to contractual SLAs. Vendor engineering targets differ from what cloud providers guarantee for a particular deployment model. Operating SDS in Azure introduces additional layers (Azure VM availability, network, storage fabric, and the customer’s own configuration) that influence achievable uptime. Buyers should validate SLA language in both the Hitachi support contract and Azure’s service-level agreements, and quantify what remedies or credits apply in multi‑vendor failure scenarios.

Claim: migration and operational simplicity without application changes​

VSP One’s unified control plane is promoted as enabling consistent operations across cloud and on‑prem without rewriting applications. (hitachivantara.com, prnewswire.com)

• Analysis: While a single control plane reduces management friction, it does not automatically remove all application migration work. Integration testing, networking, identity and access policies, latency‑sensitive application behavior, and security/compliance requirements still require validation. SDS can simplify storage provisioning and data mobility, but application teams typically need to validate behavior in the new environment.

---

Strengths and opportunities​

1. Familiar enterprise features in the cloud​

• For organizations with existing Hitachi arrays, extending the same feature set—compression, thin provisioning, replication—to Azure simplifies policy continuity and reduces the learning curve for storage teams. This can accelerate hybrid scenarios where regulatory or latency requirements keep some workloads on‑prem. (hitachivantara.com, azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

2. Marketplace procurement and Azure integration​

• The Azure Marketplace listing removes some procurement friction and enables integration with Azure billing, entitlement, and deployment automation, which is attractive for centralized cloud teams and FinOps. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

3. Centralized observability and AIOps with VSP 360​

• VSP 360’s unified interface and AIOps capabilities can be a force multiplier for lean operations teams by consolidating alerts, capacity planning and predictive analytics across hybrid estates. This helps address the skills and staffing gaps IDC has identified as widespread among cloud buyers. (hitachivantara.com, blogs.idc.com)

4. Disaster recovery and data mobility​

• Two‑way asynchronous replication and Multi‑AZ support (in recent feature releases) give teams robust options for DR, testing and workload mobility without requiring identical hardware stacks at both ends. This flexibility is especially useful for test/dev cycles and regulated failover plans. (hitachivantara.com)

---

Risks, caveats and hidden costs​

Operational complexity isn’t eliminated automatically​

A single management plane reduces tool sprawl, but running a vendor SDS inside Azure adds another operational surface: you must manage the SDS software lifecycle, licensing, host VM sizing, Azure networking and platform limits. Customers often underestimate the integration and operational run‑book effort required for day‑to‑day tasks like patching, scaling and incident management.

Cloud bill impacts beyond storage capacity​

Data reduction lowers logical storage usage, but cloud costs include several other components:

• Compute (VMs hosting SDS control and data services)
• Network egress and cross‑region replication charges
• Snapshots, metadata and IOPS billing for provider storage
• Backup and DR targets
  These line items can erode nominal gains from data reduction. A full TCO calculation must incorporate these charges and projected operational overhead. This is particularly pertinent in public cloud where per‑IO and per‑operation billing models vary. Independent validation and FinOps modelling are required before making decisions.

Performance variability and architectural trade-offs​

Software‑defined storage running on cloud VMs will behave differently than tightly integrated on‑prem hardware arrays. Considerations include:

• Consistency of IOPS and latency under noisy‑neighbor conditions
• Cloud VM networking and bandwidth caps
• The overhead of software layers such as erasure coding and compression
  Benchmarking representative workloads in Azure is mandatory to understand real‑world performance and whether the SDS design meets production SLAs.

SLA and responsibility boundaries in multi‑vendor stacks​

If an outage impacts VSP One SDS running on Azure, multiple parties are involved — Hitachi Vantara, Microsoft Azure, and possibly third‑party networking or partner integrators. Clarify support escalation paths, joint responsibility matrices, and the remedies available for downtime or data loss. Vendor engineering targets (e.g., five nines) do not substitute for contractual SLAs with defined remedies.

Data sovereignty and compliance​

Marketplace deployments may place data in specific Azure regions. Ensure that deployment choices and replication topologies meet regulatory data residency and privacy obligations, and confirm whether Hitachi supports customer‑managed keys or other encryption controls required by compliance frameworks.

Potential for vendor lock‑in​

Using Hitachi’s advanced features to reduce costs and improve continuity increases dependence on proprietary management interfaces and data mobility constructs. Evaluate migration and exit strategies, including how hard it is to rehydrate data to native cloud storage or another vendor’s stack if needed.

---

How to evaluate VSP One SDS for Azure: a practical checklist​

• Identify representative datasets and run a data‑reduction pilot
• Measure compressibility, deduplicability and thin‑provisioning benefits against a statistically representative corpus. This will produce realistic numbers to validate the vendor’s “up to 40%” figure.
• Run workload performance tests in Azure
• Emulate production I/O patterns and test for latency, IOPS, and sustained throughput across expected load conditions.
• Model full cloud costs with FinOps rigor
• Include VM compute, ephemeral disk, persistent disk IOPS, network egress, replication bandwidth and snapshot costs. Compare against native Azure storage alternatives plus any Hitachi licensing fees.
• Confirm SLA and support
• Clarify Hitachi’s support model for Azure Marketplace deployments, response times, and cross‑vendor incident management. Verify contractual uptime guarantees and remedies.
• Validate DR RPO/RTO in production‑like tests
• Test asynchronous replication failover and failback scenarios, and time the recovery behavior to meet business continuity targets.
• Check compliance and encryption controls
• Ensure encryption at rest, key management, and data residency options meet regulatory requirements.
• Plan for operational runbooks and staffing
• Define who patches the SDS, how upgrades are coordinated with Azure maintenance events, and where expertise resides for day‑to‑day operations.
• Assess exit and portability
• Test data export mechanisms and ensure you can migrate off VSP One SDS if strategic priorities change.

---

Recommended phased adoption approach​

• Phase 1: Pilot (3–6 months)
• Small, representative workloads for measurement and performance validation.
• Configure VSP 360 integration and establish monitoring/alerting.
• Phase 2: Controlled production (6–12 months)
• Move low‑risk production workloads (e.g., non‑latency critical, test/dev assets).
• Validate replication and DR playbooks.
• Phase 3: Broader rollout and automation (12+ months)
• Expand to high‑value workloads once TCO and performance expectations are met.
• Automate provisioning and integrate with CI/CD and IaC pipelines.

This staged approach reduces risk and gives time to build internal expertise and FinOps controls.

---

The marketplace dimension: why Azure matters here​

Putting VSP One SDS in the Azure Marketplace is more than a convenience: it signals vendor confidence in cloud operational models and addresses procurement friction for enterprises already consuming Azure services. Marketplace availability can:

• Simplify licensing and billing
• Enable Azure policies and compliance guardrails to be applied at deployment time
• Lower time to value for hybrid projects by packaging images, templates and documentation specific to Azure regions and VM families. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, prnewswire.com)

However, it also moves some commercial decisions into the cloud‑provider relationship. Buyers should ensure marketplace licensing, support entitlements and versioning align with long‑term operational strategies.

---

Final assessment and guidance for Windows‑centric IT teams​

Hitachi Vantara’s VSP One SDS availability on Microsoft Azure is a logical step for enterprises seeking to align proven storage features with cloud agility. The offering brings recognized enterprise capabilities — compression, thin provisioning, replication and unified management via VSP 360 — into Azure, and marketplace availability simplifies procurement and some aspects of deployment. Vendor documentation and press releases indicate potential for meaningful cost reduction when data characteristics are favorable, and the platform is designed to support continuous availability and hybrid mobility. (prnewswire.com, hitachivantara.com)
That said, the most important lessons for any Windows‑focused datacenter or hybrid team are practical:

• Treat the vendor’s “up to 40%” savings and “99.999%” availability as achievable only under specific conditions; verify them with tests and contract language. (prnewswire.com, blogs.idc.com)
• Model the total cloud cost, not just logical capacity, to avoid surprises from compute, IOPS, network and snapshot billing.
• Run real‑world performance and DR tests; design SLAs with clear joint responsibility definitions.
• Plan a phased migration and invest in operational runbooks and automation with FinOps guardrails.

Enterprises that do the homework stand to gain a more consistent hybrid storage fabric and — in the right circumstances — material cost and operational benefits. Organizations that skip measurement or fail to build joint vendor/provider playbooks risk disappointing results or unforeseen costs. The arrival of VSP One SDS in the Azure Marketplace will accelerate evaluation, but the prudent path is to validate with data, test thoroughly, and align support and contractual terms before broad rollout. (azuremarketplace.microsoft.com, hitachivantara.com)

---

Conclusion
VSP One SDS on Azure is a significant step in bringing enterprise storage capabilities into public cloud marketplaces, reinforcing the hybrid cloud narrative of unified control planes and consistent data services. It offers real operational advantages for teams that need feature parity between on‑prem and cloud, and it introduces important commercial and operational conveniences via the Azure Marketplace. Yet its headline benefits—storage cost reduction and five‑nines availability—require careful validation against actual datasets, workload profiles, and contractual guarantees. For Windows datacenter teams weighing a hybrid future, the disciplined approach is to pilot, model TCO comprehensively, and codify support boundaries before scaling — only then will the promise of simplified hybrid operations and smarter cloud spending translate into measurable business value. (prnewswire.com, azuremarketplace.microsoft.com)

---

Source: datacenter.news Hitachi Vantara VSP One SDS boosts Azure hybrid cloud savings

 

[ChatGPT]

Hitachi Vantara’s decision to make Virtual Storage Platform One Software‑Defined Storage (VSP One SDS) available in the Microsoft Azure Marketplace marks a clear acceleration of its hybrid‑cloud strategy—bringing enterprise block storage features traditionally reserved for on‑prem arrays into Azure, while promising tighter operational continuity across cloud and data‑center boundaries. This move, announced on August 19, 2025, expands an already active hyperscaler footprint (AWS and Google Cloud) and pushes the vendor’s unified management story—powered by VSP 360—directly into Azure procurement and deployment flows. (prnewswire.com)

Background​

Hitachi Vantara introduced the VSP One family as a unified data plane spanning block, file, and object storage, alongside a centralized management layer, VSP 360, intended to simplify hybrid and multicloud operations. VSP One SDS is the software‑defined, cloud‑capable element of that family: a cloud‑native block storage stack delivering on‑array features such as thin provisioning, enterprise‑grade compression, and two‑way asynchronous replication, now offered as an Azure Marketplace listing for simplified procurement and deployment. The company has been rolling VSP One SDS into hyperscaler marketplaces in phases—initially on AWS, then Google Cloud, and now Azure—underscoring a deliberate multi‑cloud availability strategy. (hitachivantara.com)
Hitachi frames the Azure listing as more than marketing convenience: Marketplace availability integrates with Azure billing, governance, and policy tooling and shortens time‑to‑pilot for teams already running workloads in Microsoft’s cloud. The vendor also reiterates platform ambitions—unifying block, file, and object under the VSP One umbrella so customers can “run all of their applications anywhere” without reprovisioning or architectural rewrites. Those are strategic positioning claims; the practical implications require careful evaluation. (prnewswire.com)

---

What’s new: VSP One SDS in the Azure Marketplace​

Key product capabilities arriving in Azure​

• Cloud‑native block storage: VSP One SDS on Azure provides block volumes backed by the VSP One architecture, intended to deliver consistent enterprise features across on‑prem and cloud deployments.
• Data services: Built‑in thin provisioning, advanced compression, and two‑way asynchronous replication—all core levers Hitachi promotes for lowering cloud storage costs and enabling cross‑site disaster recovery workflows.
• Centralized management: Integration with VSP 360 provides a single control plane for provisioning, automation, telemetry, and AIOps across hybrid estates.
• Marketplace procurement: Deployable from the Azure Marketplace, enabling Azure billing and policy controls to be applied at purchase and deployment time. (prnewswire.com, hitachivantara.com)

Vendor claims to note​

Hitachi highlights two headline claims in its announcement:

• “Up to 40%” reduction in cloud storage costs through thin provisioning and enterprise compression.
• A target of 99.999% uptime (five nines) for continuous availability.

Both figures are repeated across vendor materials and press briefings; they are positioning signals rather than guarantees and must be validated in the context of each customer’s data mix and deployment topology. (prnewswire.com, hitachivantara.com)

---

Why this matters: technical and business impacts​

Operational continuity across cloud and on‑premises​

A unified storage control plane—if it works as promised—reduces the cognitive and tooling burden on storage teams. For enterprises that already run Hitachi arrays on‑prem, VSP One SDS in Azure can preserve familiar provisioning workflows, replication topologies, and data management policies while enabling cloud‑first or cloud‑adjacent initiatives. That continuity matters for regulated workloads and legacy application estates where wholesale refactoring is costly or impractical.

Procurement, governance and FinOps​

Marketplace availability is a pragmatic win: Azure billing integration, policy application at deployment, and simpler procurement cycles remove barriers for pilots and reduce procurement lead times. From a FinOps perspective, placing SDS in‑cloud changes the cost equation: storage logical capacity may shrink due to compression, but other cost factors—VM compute that hosts the SDS, IOPS and metadata billing, egress charges, and replication bandwidth—must be factored into TCO. The net benefit therefore depends on workload profiles and access patterns.

Disaster recovery and business continuity​

Two‑way asynchronous replication built into the SDS enables cloud‑based replication targets for on‑prem volumes or vice versa, simplifying DR runbooks and test cycles. When replication orchestration is integrated with VSP 360, failover and failback can be automated to an extent, improving DR exercise outcomes—provided the replication bandwidth costs and RTO/RPO behavior meet the business requirements under real‑world conditions. (hitachivantara.com)

---

Technical deep dive: what to evaluate in practice​

Performance characteristics​

Software‑defined storage running on cloud VMs behaves differently from purpose‑built, tightly integrated hardware arrays. Key performance considerations include:

• IOPS and latency: Cloud VM instance types, underlying virtualized networking, and noisy‑neighbor effects can influence latency-sensitive workloads.
• CPU overhead: Inline compression, erasure coding and deduplication consume CPU resources. Verify host VM sizing and sustained throughput capability.
• Networking: Throughput caps and inter‑AZ bandwidth limits in Azure regions will affect replication and rebuild times.

Benchmark representative workloads—transactional databases, VM images, analytics stores—under sustained load to ensure expectations align with reality.

Data reduction realities​

The oft‑quoted “up to 40%” storage reduction is dataset dependent. Compressed media and encrypted files yield little to no shrinkage, while text, logs, and certain VM image sets compress well. During any pilot, measure:

• Raw vs effective capacity after compression.
• Deduplication ratios for repeatable datasets (e.g., similar VM images).
• CPU cost of inline reduction features and latency impact on I/O.

Availability and SLA mapping​

Hitachi’s engineering target of 99.999% uptime is ambitious; buyers should not equate vendor engineering targets with contractual SLAs. In Azure the end‑to‑end availability is a composition of:

• Azure VM and region availability.
• Network and Azure platform dependencies.
• Hitachi software lifecycle and support boundaries.

Map Hitachi’s availability commitments to Azure’s SLAs and get clear terms on remedies and joint responsibility for incidents before production rollout.

---

Vendor and market context: where this fits in the hybrid fabric race​

NetApp pioneered the idea of a hybrid data fabric that spans on‑prem arrays and the major public clouds; that concept has been adopted by Dell, HPE, and now Hitachi Vantara is aggressively pursuing the same playbook with its VSP One family. The objective is consistent data services—block, file, and object—across private and public clouds, reducing application replatforming and enabling workload mobility. Hitachi’s public cloud strategy has been staged (AWS → Google Cloud → Azure), showing deliberate expansion and commitment to multi‑cloud parity. (hitachivantara.com)
This market trend raises a strategic vendor selection question: do buyers prefer a single vendor’s unified fabric that works across clouds, or a best‑of‑breed approach using native cloud services and cloud‑native storage? The answer depends on governance, migration cost, regulatory constraints, and existing investments.

---

Strengths and opportunities​

• Feature parity for storage teams: Familiar enterprise features in‑cloud reduce operational friction for teams already using Hitachi arrays.
• Simpler commercial lifecycle: Azure Marketplace listing eases procurement, entitlements, and billing integration—useful for enterprises standardized on Azure.
• Improved DR flexibility: Two‑way asynchronous replication enables hybrid DR topologies without identical hardware at both ends. (hitachivantara.com)
• Centralized observability: VSP 360 consolidates telemetry, automation and AIOps, which can materially reduce mean‑time‑to‑detect for cross‑site incidents. (hitachivantara.com)

---

Risks, caveats and potential blind spots​

• Marketing language versus measurable outcomes: Phrases like “up to 40%” savings and “engineered for 99.999% uptime” are vendor claims that require proof—pilot data and contract terms are essential. Treat these as planning assumptions, not guarantees.
• Hidden cloud costs: Egress charges, snapshot and metadata costs, VM compute for SDS hosts, and replication bandwidth can eat into nominal savings from data reduction. Model the full FinOps picture before committing.
• Operational surface area: Running an SDS inside Azure adds a managed software layer to your cloud estate. Patching, host sizing, incident escalation and support boundaries add operational overhead—don’t underestimate runbook work.
• Performance variability: Cloud resource contention and VM network limits can affect latency‑sensitive workloads. Place those workloads only after successful, production‑like testing.
• Vendor lock‑in concerns: Leveraging proprietary data reduction or replication formats increases exit friction. Validate migration paths and recovery procedures prior to scaling usage.

---

Practical evaluation checklist (what to do in a PoC)​

• Inventory and classify data by storage type: hot transactional, warm analytics, cold archive.
• Prepare representative dataset samples for each class and run real compression/deduplication tests to measure effective capacity.
• Benchmark IOPS, latency, and throughput with production‑like workloads running in Azure using the VM types you plan to operate.
• Measure CPU, memory and host VM usage for inline data reduction and erasure coding under sustained load.
• Execute full replication drills (failover and failback) and record RTO and RPO metrics under load.
• Build a complete FinOps model: include VM host costs, provider storage IOPS and metadata charges, network egress, replication traffic, snapshot costs, and Hitachi licensing.
• Validate SLA language and support boundaries with both Hitachi and Azure—capture remedies and joint escalation procedures in writing.
• Test integration of VSP 360 with existing monitoring, ticketing and automation pipelines and assess AIOps value in your environment.
• Confirm encryption and key management behavior (customer‑managed keys vs provider keys), regional residency constraints, and compliance posture.
• Define rollback and exit procedures to ensure data portability.

---

Recommended phased adoption approach​

• Phase 1 — Pilot (3 months): Deploy VSP One SDS in a single Azure region for small, well‑understood workloads (non‑latency sensitive) and run the full PoC checklist.
• Phase 2 — Controlled production (3–9 months): Migrate low‑risk production workloads and enable replication across on‑prem and Azure for DR testing. Automate routine tasks and validate runbooks.
• Phase 3 — Scale and optimize (9–18 months): Expand to additional regions or clouds, tune FinOps policies, and integrate the SDS lifecycle into broader cloud governance models.

This phased approach minimizes business risk while building organizational experience and trust in the hybrid fabric.

---

Competitive positioning and questions to ask Hitachi and partners​

When evaluating VSP One SDS on Azure, procurement and architecture teams should ask:

• What are the exact support boundaries and SLAs for Azure Marketplace deployments?
• How are availability targets mapped to contract terms and remedies?
• Can Hitachi provide customer‑specific PoC results or case studies with similar data profiles?
• What are the recommended Azure VM sizes and network topologies for predictable performance?
• How does VSP 360 integrate with our SIEM, ticketing, and automation platforms?
• What options exist for key management, encryption, and data residency controls?

Answers to these questions will expose the practical contours of supportability, cost and performance for any customer planning production adoption.

---

Final assessment​

Hitachi Vantara’s Azure Marketplace listing for VSP One SDS is an important and logical step toward a true hybrid storage fabric. It makes enterprise block‑level data services available within Azure’s procurement and operational model, and strengthens the vendor’s multi‑cloud parity story that began with AWS and Google Cloud marketplace entries. For organizations with existing Hitachi investments or those that require consistent, enterprise‑grade features across on‑prem and cloud, VSP One SDS offers meaningful promise—particularly around centralized management with VSP 360, improved DR options, and potential storage‑cost wins where data compressibility favors the technology. (hitachivantara.com)
However, the headline benefits (notably the “up to 40%” cost reduction and the five‑nines availability target) are vendor estimates and engineering targets; they must be validated through thorough PoCs, FinOps modelling and contract scrutiny. The operational trade‑offs—added software lifecycle management, cloud billing complexity, and potential performance variability—are real and must be managed deliberately. Enterprises that run disciplined tests, align contractual SLAs, and model total cost comprehensively stand to gain a consistent hybrid storage fabric. Those that skip careful validation risk surprising bills, missed SLAs, or tangled operational responsibilities.
With VSP One SDS now available in Azure, the practical next step for interested teams is a tightly scoped PoC that measures compression deliverables, performance under realistic load, and the true FinOps profile—then use those results to negotiate support and SLA terms that reflect joint Azure + Hitachi responsibilities. If validated, the offering can be a solid foundation for hybrid strategies that demand enterprise features in the cloud without wholesale re‑architecture.

---

Conclusion
Hitachi Vantara’s expansion of VSP One SDS into the Microsoft Azure Marketplace is an evolution of the hybrid‑cloud playbook: deliver on‑prem capabilities where customers already need them, reduce procurement friction via the marketplace, and centralize operations through a unified management plane. The announcement reinforces the industry’s move toward multi‑cloud data fabrics, but it is not a turnkey silver bullet. Real benefits will be earned through methodical proofs, careful FinOps, and clearly negotiated SLAs. For organizations that do the work, VSP One SDS in Azure could simplify hybrid operations and deliver measurable savings—provided those organizations validate the vendor claims against their own data and workloads before large‑scale migration.

---

Source: Blocks and Files Hitachi Vantara extends VSP One Block fabric to Azure – Blocks and Files