What I saw of your post was
http://www.mediafire.com/view/70ddd9zu4my5614/Windows_7_Permissions_thread.jpg and such a message could well have been from a bot.
It was a misunderstanding, due to a probable lack in the message I read, like you can see in the clip I provided. The message I saw didn't contain any true essence, it was more like an invitation to "get somewhere", and that's quite typical for bots and such. What you sent was probably not what I read.
Quite simply, I think your original message got stumped, leading to the whole mess we're talking about. I hope we get over this, and get on with our lives. I consider the matter discussed.
I got over this as soon as I wrote my response to your last message. I find writing extremely recuperative. To show you that I know nothing about computer stuff, I have no idea what a bot is. It would have been silly of me to offer someone help if I did know or understood the workings of Windows. I just happen to know about the issue of permissions.. Lastly, it was not my intention to post that message. As you can see, it is clearly incomplete and at times nonsensical. I wrote it for myself to vent. I was involved in a very serious car accident a few days ago and I'm not quite back to myself. I must have inadvertently clicked on the "post reply.' button. And like you, I consider this triviality closed. It was an insignificant event that had no impact on my life. And besides not know what a bot is, I am having issues navigating through these post sites.
It was a misunderstanding, due to a probable lack in the message I read, like you can see in the clip I provided. The message I saw didn't contain any true essence, it was more like an invitation to "get somewhere", and that's quite typical for bots and such. What you sent was probably not what I read.
Quite simply, I think your original message got stumped, leading to the whole mess we're talking about. I hope we get over this, and get on with our lives. I consider the matter discussed.
Sir, A misunderstanding is a relatively small disagreement. This was no misunderstanding or disagreement. You in essence had the temerity to imply that I was a liar. The night I offered my services on a subject I am familiar with was the first day of having joined the Forum. I w as excited about showing anyone the simplicity of resolving the issue, I believe it was the following day when I received a message from you. Despite what I felt your message implied I replied in a very agreeable and courteous manner, and like the lady I am. However, I was livid. Your implications were crystal clear. TThe "should" and "needed: you did I found so offensive as they clearly implicated I need to go to various sources to become knowledgeable in area you obviously thought I knew nothing about. But the statement you made about "Window was quite paranoid about permissons." was ludicrous and outrageous. I suspect the arrogance I felt from that message was your attempt to belittle me and possibly scare me because of "Windows paranoia regarding permissions" .Paranoia can oftentimes cause violence because unwarranted fear or go in a completely opposite direction, the biggest of which is.: isolaztion. I don't think people at Microsoft will come after me because I know about the confidential, for your eyes only, top secret of permissions. But that is silly because you may have someonr on the insiide who keeps you up to date on Microsoft position concerning proprietary issurs. Wait, Ithe only reason you have rhe insiscoop on and involves a psyxhiatric condiion knowof th I have been told a very plausible explanation for the inclusion of that idiotic functon but as is evident you may have a source at Microsoft who is in the know about the sentiments of "Windows", who keeps you abreast of Microsoft's positon and sentiments. I know, you play golf with Bill Gates, no no no, your are Bill Gates. company who feelingwas paranoid about reason do and was once your attempt to put me in the place you thought I should be.was your ridiculous whata/onhat Ishould various sourceimplicate that I knew nothing and that I need to checkk I don't I just don't understand how you could view my genuine offer to help a person plagued with the permission issues so / I may not know a lot but I know that subject having learned how to disable permission in less than a minute, I don't know when you reported me but in response to your message, I replied that I was offering help, not soliciting.A
What I saw of your post was
http://www.mediafire.com/view/70ddd9zu4my5614/Windows_7_Permissions_thread.jpg and such a message could well have been from a bot.
c
There's absolutely nothing personal here, I hope you can understand that. Misunderstandings do happen.
Sir, A misunderstanding is a relatively small disagreement. This was no misunderstanding or disagreement. You in essence had the temerity to imply that I was a liar. The night I offered my services on a subject I am familiar with was the first day of having joined the Forum. I w as excited about showing anyone the simplicity of resolving the issue, I believe it was the following day when I received a message from you. Despite what I felt your message implied I replied in a very agreeable and courteous manner, and like the lady I am. However, I was livid. Your implications were crystal clear. TThe "should" and "needed: you did I found so offensive as they clearly implicated I need to go to various sources to become knowledgeable in area you obviously thought I knew nothing about. But the statement you made about "Window was quite paranoid about permissons." was ludicrous and outrageous. I suspect the arrogance I felt from that message was your attempt to belittle me and possibly scare me because of "Windows paranoia regarding permissions" .Paranoia can oftentimes cause violence because unwarranted fear or go in a completely opposite direction, the biggest of which is.: isolaztion. I don't think people at Microsoft will come after me because I know about the confidential, for your eyes only, top secret of permissions. But that is silly because you may have someonr on the insiide who keeps you up to date on Microsoft position concerning proprietary issurs. Wait, Ithe only reason you have rhe insiscoop on and involves a psyxhiatric condiion knowof th I have been told a very plausible explanation for the inclusion of that idiotic functon but as is evident you may have a source at Microsoft who is in the know about the sentiments of "Windows", who keeps you abreast of Microsoft's positon and sentiments. I know, you play golf with Bill Gates, no no no, your are Bill Gates. company who feelingwas paranoid about reason do and was once your attempt to put me in the place you thought I should be.was your ridiculous whata/onhat Ishould various sourceimplicate that I knew nothing and that I need to checkk I don't I just don't understand how you could view my genuine offer to help a person plagued with the permission issues so / I may not know a lot but I know that subject having learned how to disable permission in less than a minute, I don't know when you reported me but in response to your message, I replied that I was offering help, not soliciting.A
What I saw of your post was
http://www.mediafire.com/view/70ddd9zu4my5614/Windows_7_Permissions_thread.jpg and such a message could well have been from a bot.
c
There's absolutely nothing personal here, I hope you can understand that. Misunderstandings do happen.
Sir, A misunderstanding is a relatively small disagreement. This was no misunderstanding or disagreement. You in essence had the temerity to imply that I was a liar. The night I offered my services on a subject I am familiar with was the first day of having joined the Forum. I w as excited about showing anyone the simplicity of resolving the issue, I believe it was the following day when I received a message from you. Despite what I felt your message implied I replied in a very agreeable and courteous manner, and like the lady I am. However, I was livid. Your implications were crystal clear. TThe "should" and "needed: you did I found so offensive as they clearly implicated I need to go to various sources to become knowledgeable in area you obviously thought I knew nothing about. But the statement you made about "Window was quite paranoid about permissons." was ludicrous and outrageous. I suspect the arrogance I felt from that message was your attempt to belittle me and possibly scare me because of "Windows paranoia regarding permissions" .Paranoia can oftentimes cause violence because unwarranted fear or go in a completely opposite direction, the biggest of which is.: isolaztion. I don't think people at Microsoft will come after me because I know about the confidential, for your eyes only, top secret of permissions. But that is silly because you may have someonr on the insiide who keeps you up to date on Microsoft position concerning proprietary issurs. Wait, Ithe only reason you have rhe insiscoop on and involves a psyxhiatric condiion knowof th I have been told a very plausible explanation for the inclusion of that idiotic functon but as is evident you may have a source at Microsoft who is in the know about the sentiments of "Windows", who keeps you abreast of Microsoft's positon and sentiments. I know, you play golf with Bill Gates, no no no, your are Bill Gates. company who feelingwas paranoid about reason do and was once your attempt to put me in the place you thought I should be.was your ridiculous whata/onhat Ishould various sourceimplicate that I knew nothing and that I need to checkk I don't I just don't understand how you could view my genuine offer to help a person plagued with the permission issues so / I may not know a lot but I know that subject having learned how to disable permission in less than a minute, I don't know when you reported me but in response to your message, I replied that I was offering help, not soliciting.A