Identity First Security for EHRs: Frictionless, Phishing-Resistant Access

Electronic health records (EHRs are now the operational heart of modern healthcare, but expanding clinician access without undermining patient safety demands a careful, risk-based redesign of identity, authentication, and access controls across people, devices, and applications.

Background​

EHR adoption is nearly universal in outpatient care: the CDC reports that 88.2% of U.S. office-based physicians used an EHR system in 2021, a figure that underlines how critical secure access to these systems has become.
This proliferation creates a tension every CIO and CISO recognizes: clinicians require fast, frictionless access at the point of care to avoid delays to treatment, while regulators, privacy rules, and adversaries demand robust protections for protected health information (PHI). Federal policy — most notably the 21st Century Cures Act and its information‑blocking and interoperability rules — further complicates this balance by requiring frictionless flows of electronic health information (EHI) for legitimate uses while protecting patient privacy and safety.
Against that backdrop, healthcare organizations are adopting a modern identity-first security posture for EHRs: treat the EHR as a high‑assurance application, apply risk-based controls, and systematically remove brittle practices (shared accounts, hard-coded credentials, unsupported TLS or crypto modules) that have produced real-world exposures in imaging, device integrations, and clinical viewers. Recent advisories and vulnerability reports illustrate how quickly an insecure access path can become a patient‑safety incident, reinforcing the need for layered defenses.

---

Overview: The security-access tradeoff and a guiding principle​

Securing access to EHRs is not a single technology project — it's an operational redesign that must satisfy three linked goals:

• Enable clinicians to access the right data at the right time with minimal friction.
• Ensure access decisions are provably correct, auditable, and revocable.
• Keep cryptographic, network, and device controls up to accepted federal standards.

The central guiding principle is this: adopt an identity‑first, risk‑based model that uses contextual signals (role, device posture, location, time, and behavioral patterns) to make access decisions, while prioritizing phishing-resistant, low-friction authentication methods for clinicians.

---

Core strategies for securing EHR access​

Prioritize frictionless, phishing‑resistant authentication​

Clinician workflows cannot be interrupted by multi‑minute login processes. Yet authentication must be strong and resistant to phishing and credential theft — the leading root cause of large enterprise breaches.

• Move to phishing‑resistant authenticators (FIDO2 / passkeys) where possible. Modern guidance explicitly recognizes syncable passkeys and device‑bound passkeys as meeting NIST assurance thresholds; passkeys are both easier to use and significantly reduce credential phishing risk.
• Design login flows for seconds, not minutes: inline biometric unlock on workstation or mobile devices, secure USB/FIDO tokens for high‑assurance access, and QR + mobile approval flows for shared workstation scenarios.
• Offer flexible authenticator options: clinicians work in varied settings with different device sets — allowing device‑bound passkeys, platform biometrics, or hardware FIDO tokens makes adoption smoother and reduces risky workarounds.

Why this matters: credential theft and MFA‑bypass attacks are common and often begin with user fatigue or workarounds; replacing passwords with cryptographic passkeys reduces the probability of successful phishing and session replay attacks.

Apply role‑based access control (RBAC) combined with just‑in‑time elevation​

Role‑based policies are the baseline for mapping clinical duties to privileges.

• Define fine‑grained roles aligned with clinical workflows (e.g., primary physician, covering physician, pharmacist, lab technician) and apply the principle of least privilege.
• Layer in just‑in‑time (JIT) and time‑bound elevation for high‑risk actions (e‑prescribing controlled substances, viewing psychiatric notes, accessing audit logs).
• Audit role‑to‑permission mappings regularly; remove or reclassify stale roles and automated service accounts.

RBAC simplified administrative control, but in healthcare it must be implemented with clinician workflows in mind so that constraints do not produce shadow access patterns (shared accounts, sticky passwords, or printed credentials).

Adopt a Zero‑Trust access model: never trust, always verify​

Zero trust reframes every access decision as conditional and continuous.

• Evaluate access requests against contextual signals: user's role, device security posture (OS/patching, disk encryption), network location (on‑prem vs. remote VPN), time, and recent behavior.
• Use risk‑based policies to present step‑up authentication only when the risk score exceeds thresholds (e.g., new device, atypical location). This reduces unnecessary friction for routine care while protecting against high‑risk attempts.
• Integrate continuous monitoring to revoke sessions quickly if compromise indicators appear.

Zero trust helps reconcile the need for clinician agility with the requirement to limit lateral movement and privilege abuse.

Enforce strong cryptography across the board​

Cryptography is foundational: use TLS and validated cryptographic modules, and avoid legacy, deprecated ciphers.

• Ensure all EHR client–server and API traffic uses TLS configured per NIST guidance (TLS 1.2+ with FIPS‑approved cipher suites; plan for TLS 1.3 where supported). NIST SP 800‑52 provides practical configuration guidance.
• For data at rest, use well‑managed envelope encryption and hardware‑backed key protection (HSMs, KMS) and ensure cryptographic modules meet FIPS 140‑2/140‑3 as required by policy.
• Move integrations away from password exchange towards public‑key mechanisms and mutual TLS or signed JWTs for machine‑to‑machine authentication when possible. These approaches reduce the surface area for credential interception.

Modernize multifactor authentication (MFA) — not just add more clicks​

MFA must be both secure and usable.

• Favor phishing‑resistant authenticators (passkeys, hardware tokens) over SMS or knowledge factors.
• Use step‑up authentication based on risk rather than blanket friction for every sign‑in.
• Provide secure fallback mechanisms and break‑glass procedures that are auditable and limited (e.g., timeboxed emergency accounts with mandatory post‑use review).

If MFA is rigid and brittle, clinicians will seek shortcuts that erode security; balance matters.

Use fine‑grained logging, analytics, and behavioral detection​

Visibility is the gatekeeper for rapid response.

• Capture detailed access logs for EHR actions (view, modify, export) with immutable storage and robust retention policies for investigations.
• Apply behavior analytics to detect anomalous access patterns (mass downloads, access outside normal shift hours, cross‑department activity).
• Ensure logging covers not only application events but also identity events (authenticator enrollment, MFA failures, privilege changes).

Detailed logs plus analytics reduce dwell time and help prove the scope of exposure when incidents happen.

Harden endpoints, medical devices, and integration layers​

Many breaches begin at poorly managed endpoints or third‑party integrations.

• Segment clinical networks and place imaging and device systems on dedicated VLANs or zero‑trust network microsegments to limit lateral movement. Recent advisories show how exposed viewers or misconfigured services can lead to wide PHI exposure.
• Inventory and maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for EHR integrations and embedded device software.
• Require vendor attestations for secure defaults, and treat device firmware and viewer software as first‑class patchable assets.

Medical device lifecycles and clinical-availability requirements make upgrades hard; plan maintenance windows and rollback strategies in advance.

Protect high‑sensitivity functions with higher assurance​

Classify EHR functions by risk and require commensurate assurance.

• Consider e‑prescribing for controlled substances, access to psychotherapy notes, or bulk data export as high‑assurance operations and require device‑bound authenticators (AAL3 or equivalent) and enhanced identity proofing.
• The DEA and related guidance require identity proofing and two‑factor credentials for controlled‑substance e‑prescribing; institutional registration and approved credential service providers are part of that ecosystem. Design enrollment flows to support those requirements.

Evaluate emerging identity technologies (FIDO2, passkeys, mobile IDs) — but pilot first​

Several technologies promise both security and convenience, but they must be operationally validated.

• FIDO2 / passkeys are now recognized in NIST guidance as meeting phishing‑resistant requirements when implemented per supplemental guidance; they are a promising baseline for clinician authentication. Pilots should validate device coverage across clinical endpoints.
• Mobile driver’s licenses (mDL) and digital IDs may be useful for identity proofing and enrollment workflows, but adoption is uneven and legal/regulatory privacy questions remain. Treat mDLs as an enrollment aid rather than a production authentication token until governance is mature and verifiable. The DEA permits remote identity proofing for e‑prescribe enrollment, but mDL usage remains an emerging practice and should be piloted with careful privacy controls.
• Blockchain can provide immutable audit trails and decentralized authorization models in research or inter‑institutional exchange scenarios, but it does not remove the need for strong off‑chain access controls or encryption. Academic reviews show blockchain has potential for interoperability and integrity, yet practical deployments require careful design on privacy, scaling, and governance.

---

Implementation roadmap: stepwise, measurable, clinician‑centric​

• Inventory & risk tiering
• Map all EHR entry points (web UI, mobile, APIs, third‑party apps, device integrations).
• Classify functions into risk tiers (high: controlled substance prescribing, exports; medium: orders entry; low: scheduling).
• Baseline hygiene (0–3 months)
• Enforce TLS per NIST SP 800‑52; rotate and retire legacy ciphers and certificates.
• Remove shared accounts; force unique clinician identity and MFA.
• Segment device networks and apply ACLs for imaging and device systems.
• Authentication modernization (3–9 months)
• Pilot FIDO2/passkeys with a volunteer clinician cohort. Validate desktop, thin client, and mobile flows.
• Deploy conditional access/risk‑based policies to reduce day‑to‑day friction.
• Access control and monitoring (6–12 months)
• Implement RBAC + JIT elevation and enforce access reviews.
• Deploy behavior analytics to detect anomalies; integrate alerts into SOC processes.
• High‑assurance protections (9–18 months)
• Harden e‑prescribing workflows with stronger identity proofing and device binding consistent with DEA and NIST guidance.
• Formalize break‑glass processes with logging and post‑use audits.
• Continuous improvement
• Measure time‑to‑access and clinician satisfaction; tune policies to minimize harmful workarounds.
• Conduct regular tabletop exercises and red‑team simulations focused on identity and access.

---

Risks, limitations, and pitfalls​

• Operational friction vs. safety: Overly aggressive MFA or conditional policies can delay care; conversely, lax policies invite breaches. Mitigation: Risk‑based, adaptive controls with clinician input and emergency access plans.
• Legacy systems and vendor constraints: Many EHR modules and third‑party integrations predate modern auth stacks. Mitigation: Use API gateways, mutual TLS, and tokenization to wrap legacy interfaces and enforce modern identity controls.
• Device and endpoint diversity: BYOD and shared workstations complicate device posture checks. Mitigation: Differentiate device classes with policy — allow lower friction on fully managed, patched hospital devices and require stronger steps for unmanaged devices.
• Supply chain and third‑party risk: Integrations, plugins, and vendor remote support are frequent attack vectors. Recent advisories show how exposed viewers or connectors can lead to PHI leaks. Tight vendor SLAs, SBOMs, and contractual security requirements are essential.
• Immature identity ecosystems for mDLs and wallets: Mobile IDs and wallets offer promise for enrollment but raise privacy, revocation, and cross‑jurisdictional questions. Treat them as experimental until policy and standards are widely adopted.

---

Critical analysis: what's strong, what's still risky​

Notable strengths in the current direction:

• The shift to an identity‑first model and NIST‑aligned guidance for passkeys and syncable authenticators gives healthcare a pragmatic path to stronger, easier authentication without forcing passwords on clinicians.
• Zero‑trust and risk‑based conditional access allow organizations to prioritize clinical productivity while increasing assurance for high‑risk transactions.
• Federal rules (21st Century Cures Act) and DEA requirements create a regulatory spine that pushes interoperability and identity proofing improvements in parallel.

Remaining risks and cautionary notes:

• Technology alone will not close the loop: identity governance, credential lifecycle management, and human factors remain the weakest links.
• Patching and hardening of medical imaging and device software is operationally painful; failure here leads to real PHI exposure and operational impacts — the evidence is already in published advisories.
• Emerging solutions like blockchain or mobile IDs are attractive, but they are not silver bullets; each brings governance, privacy, and performance tradeoffs that require pilot programs and independent validation.

Where claims are uncertain:

• Predictions that mobile driver’s licenses will become a common live authentication factor are plausible but speculative today; mDLs are better framed as an enrollment/identity‑proofing enabler until legal, technical, and privacy standards mature. Treat such claims with caution and pilot conservatively.

---

Practical checklist for healthcare IT teams​

• Encrypt all EHR traffic with TLS following NIST SP 800‑52 guidance and require modern cipher suites.
• Inventory EHR entry points and classify access tiers; apply RBAC and enforce least privilege.
• Pilot FIDO2/passkeys for clinicians and plan phased rollout with fallbacks.
• Implement conditional access policies tied to device posture and behavior analytics.
• Harden integrations with public/private key authentication and mutual TLS where possible.
• Segment networks for devices and imaging systems; apply ACLs and dedicated monitoring.
• Prepare high‑assurance enrollment paths (DEA‑compliant for controlled substances) and align with NIST identity guidance.
• Maintain an SBOM, vendor security attestations, and update/patch cadence for third‑party components.

---

Conclusion​

Securing access to EHRs requires a pragmatic blend of modern cryptographic practices, identity‑centric policy, zero‑trust enforcement, and careful attention to clinical workflows. The technical building blocks — FIDO2/passkeys, conditional access, TLS configured to NIST guidance, and strong identity proofing for high‑risk operations — are available and maturing rapidly. However, the real challenge is operational: converting policy into clinician‑friendly workflows, retiring legacy weak points, and imposing discipline on device and vendor lifecycles. When identity is treated as the organizing principle, healthcare organizations can reduce risk while preserving the immediacy clinicians need to deliver safe patient care.

---

Source: TechTarget Top strategies for securing access to EHRs | TechTarget