Indonesia's Galang Island medical centre: A humanitarian lifeline for Gaza's wounded

Indonesia is stepping forward with a bold humanitarian initiative, preparing the island of Galang to host a medical centre dedicated to treating approximately 2,000 wounded Palestinians from Gaza, demonstrating Southeast Asia’s growing role in global humanitarian relief. As the ongoing war in Gaza has devastated the territory’s healthcare infrastructure, Indonesia aims to serve not as a place of permanent refuge but as a critical medical lifeline, providing urgent treatment and a temporary sanctuary for those most grievously affected by the conflict. This move comes at a time when international aid corridors to Gaza remain perilously narrow, placing unique importance on innovative efforts like Indonesia’s.

---

Background​

The decision to repurpose the Galang Island facility comes against the backdrop of one of the 21st century’s most protracted and destructive conflicts. Since October 2023, Gaza has been the epicenter of relentless violence, leaving tens of thousands dead and overwhelming the region’s already fragile health system. Indonesian officials, recognizing the scale of the crisis, have repeatedly dispatched medical aid and supplies to Gaza, but escalating casualties and the catastrophic destruction of hospitals have necessitated more radical measures.
Galang Island, located south of Singapore off the coast of Sumatra, carries a legacy of humanitarian purpose. Formerly a refugee camp during the Indochina crisis in the late 20th century, the medical centre on the presently uninhabited island is strategically suited for rapid deployment in international emergencies. Activating it as a treatment center for Gaza’s wounded taps into both Indonesia’s logistical strengths and its historic commitment to humanitarianism.

---

Indonesia’s Galang Island Medical Centre Initiative​

A Strategic Location with Historic Roots​

Galang Island reprises its role as a sanctuary in regional humanitarian crises. The island’s seclusion, accessible yet removed from densely populated areas, offers a controllable environment for large-scale medical operations. The current plan involves the swift reactivation and expansion of its largely dormant facilities, ramping up the hospital’s capacity to accommodate around 2,000 patients and their families for the duration of critical recovery.

Medical and Logistical Readiness​

Indonesia’s approach moves beyond symbolic aid. By setting up a comprehensive makeshift hospital on Galang, the country is aiming to deliver advanced wound care, surgical intervention, and rehabilitation to victims who have suffered severe injuries—including those trapped for days under debris and suffering from complex trauma. The project includes provisions for strictly temporary shelter for accompanying family members, creating a holistic ecosystem of care tailored specifically for survivors of bombardment.
Medical staffing for such an undertaking poses unique challenges. Indonesian authorities are preparing interdisciplinary teams of surgeons, trauma specialists, psychologists, and Arabic-speaking support staff. The logistics of safe patient transfer from Gaza to Indonesia, likely routed via Egypt or other third countries, are being coordinated in close communication with multilateral agencies and humanitarian organizations.

---

Critical Analysis: Ambition and Obstacles​

Humanitarian Leadership in Asia​

Indonesia’s move situates it as a notable outlier among Southeast Asian nations, embracing a role usually reserved for wealthier states or those geographically closer to conflict zones. This initiative could not only elevate Indonesia’s diplomatic profile but might inspire greater Asian participation in future humanitarian responses. The government’s decision to frame the project as a temporary measure—patients will be repatriated to Gaza upon full recovery—seeks to avoid political entanglements associated with long-term resettlement or de facto asylum.

Potential Strengths​

• Medical Relief Beyond Borders: Offering advanced care miles away from the conflict zone allows for more comprehensive treatment, away from active hostilities.
• Safe, Controlled Environment: The isolation of Galang minimizes external security risks and facilitates coordinated aid delivery.
• Symbolic and Practical Impact: This project embodies both Indonesia’s compassion and its sophisticated crisis-response capabilities, likely strengthening its regional leadership credibility.

Anticipated Challenges and Risks​

Despite its strengths, the Galang plan faces formidable practical and ethical hurdles.

1. Safe Transport of Patients​

Transferring severely injured individuals from the heart of Gaza to Indonesia is an operation fraught with risk. Obtaining the necessary clearances through besieged and militarized areas adds uncertainty. Each transfer might require elaborate coordination with Israeli, Palestinian, Egyptian, and possibly international entities—raising the stakes and potential for delays or cancellations.

2. Scaling Medical Capabilities​

While Indonesia’s medical workforce is skilled, the specific demands of mass trauma care, compounded by language and cultural barriers, heighten complexity. Ensuring continuity of care, especially for children and patients with complex psychological trauma, requires both technical and empathic skills in short supply on a hurried timeline.

3. Political Sensitivities​

Indonesia firmly frames the intervention as a temporary medical outreach, yet questions may arise about the return of patients to an unstable and hazardous Gaza. Critics may also question the underlying political calculations—whether the project sufficiently safeguards the dignity and choices of patients and their families or risks being instrumentalized for international prestige.

4. Logistical Limitations​

Galang, however well-suited geographically, is not a major urban medical hub. The need to rapidly expand infrastructure, import advanced medical equipment, and sustain supply chains in an isolated setting could overwhelm the island’s existing frameworks. Power, sanitation, waste management, and telecommunications all require substantial upgrades for continuous operation on this scale.

---

The War in Gaza: Wounds Beyond the Physical​

The Humanitarian Toll​

Reports from Palestinian health officials and international observers describe a harrowing scene: more than 60,000 Palestinians killed as of mid-2025, with the number of severely wounded rising daily. Hospitals—already under-resourced before the war—have been targeted or overwhelmed, leaving countless survivors suffering untreated injuries, infections, and chronic conditions. The psychological scars, including post-traumatic stress and grief, saturate every layer of society.
Indonesia’s plan implicitly acknowledges that Gaza’s recovery is not an imminent prospect. The evacuation and treatment of 2,000 patients, while dramatic, equate to a fraction of the need. However, it also provides an avenue for targeted, high-impact aid, ensuring that some of the most vulnerable have at least a temporary reprieve from the cycle of violence.

---

Implementation: From Vision to Reality​

Patient Selection and Evacuation​

The process of choosing which wounded Gazans will travel to Galang is among the most ethically complex aspects of the plan. Working with international health agencies and local medical authorities, Indonesian officials must prioritize candidates based on both medical urgency and feasibility of evacuation. Children, the elderly, and those with complicated or untreatable medical conditions in local settings are likely to be overrepresented.
Evacuation corridors remain unstable. The ability to move patients out of Gaza, through Rafah or other crossings, is contingent on fluctuating geopolitical dynamics. Each transfer mission may become a test of diplomatic acumen as much as of humanitarian resolve.

Medical Infrastructure and Patient Care​

Galang’s facilities will undergo a rapid retrofit, focusing on:

• Expansion of operating theatres and ICUs
• Installation of modern diagnostic and imaging equipment
• Augmentation of pharmaceutical and medical supply chains
• Recruitment of multilingual care teams

Infection control poses a critical challenge, as many patients are likely to arrive with extensive wounds, resistant bacteria, or diseases acquired in makeshift shelters. The initiative must also incorporate mental health services, recognizing the psychological trauma that shadow physical injuries.

Temporary Family Housing​

Most Palestinian patients would be accompanied by close relatives, especially in the case of children or those unable to speak English or Indonesian. Accommodations must balance privacy, security, and integration, minimizing risk of social isolation or further trauma. Plans call for modular shelter units, communal kitchens, prayer spaces, and recreational facilities to provide a humane and restorative environment.

---

Broader Geopolitical and Humanitarian Implications​

Redefining Regional Humanitarianism​

Indonesia’s Galang initiative could redefine what is possible for Asian nations in international aid. Traditionally, countries in the region have contributed funds or technical professionals to disaster operations; rarely have they shouldered the logistical and political burdens of trans-national patient care on this scale. If successful, the project might catalyze broader regional cooperation, setting new standards for cross-border humanitarian action amid global crises.

Risks of Replication​

Although innovative, Indonesia’s approach may be difficult to emulate elsewhere. Few countries have the combination of available territory, medical infrastructure, diplomatic will, and public support required for such an undertaking. Additionally, the long-term psychological and social impact on both patients and their families—many of whom may never fully recover or find their homes irreparably changed—remains unknown.

---

Ethical Considerations and Future Outlook​

Temporary Sanctuary or Precedent for Refuge?​

Indonesia’s decision to guarantee only temporary treatment and eventual return for Gaza’s wounded raises unresolved questions about the ethics of repatriation to a war zone. The government’s cautious framing seeks to avoid the specter of permanent displacement or international resettlement—a fraught subject in conflict response. Still, if conditions in Gaza remain dire, the moral dilemma of sending patients back to instability could spark controversy both domestically and abroad.

The Role of International Oversight​

Sustaining transparency through independent monitoring and international cooperation will be vital. The involvement of multilateral organizations in patient selection, transfer, and return must ensure the rights and autonomy of Palestinian patients are fully respected. Regular disclosure of outcomes and learning from each stage will also help improve global standards for similar efforts in future crises.

---

Conclusion​

Indonesia’s activation of the Galang Island medical centre for wounded Palestinians is an audacious, high-stakes intervention—offering a narrow but vital window of respite from Gaza’s devastation. By leveraging its history, geographic assets, and humanitarian ambition, Indonesia is charting a new path for Asian engagement in global emergencies. Yet the effort’s success will hinge on overcoming daunting technical, diplomatic, and ethical obstacles, and its legacy will be measured not just in the number of lives saved, but in the example set for collective action in the face of human catastrophe. Amid a world increasingly fractured by war and displacement, Indonesia’s bold experiment offers both hope and hard lessons for those determined to answer the call of humanitarian need.

---

Source: TRT Global TRT Global - Indonesia readies island medical centre for 2,000 wounded Palestinians in Gaza