Windows 11 vs Ubuntu 24.10: Intel Core Ultra 7 Performance Benchmarks

  • Thread Author
In the ever-evolving landscape of computing, the perpetual debate between Windows and Linux persists, punctuated recently by benchmarks focusing on Intel's latest technological marvel—the Core Ultra 7 200V 'Lunar Lake.' The recent sneak peek from Phoronix compares the performance of Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.10 on this new hardware, and spoiler alert: it's a thriller!

A sleek ASUS laptop displaying the Windows 11 home screen on a white desk.The Contenders: Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.10​

The stage is set with the ASUS Zenbook S 14 (specifically the UX5406SA model), a powerful machine equipped with the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V. This chip features a unique architecture with 4 performance cores (P-cores) and 4 efficiency cores (E-cores), summing up to 8 cores without hyper-threading and capable of boosting up to 4.8 GHz. It also boasts 16GB of LPDDR5X-8533 memory, making it a formidable opponent for any operating system vying for performance.
Before unveiling the results, let’s establish the battlegrounds.

Windows 11 Setup​

Upon acquiring the Zenbook, the reviewer ran several benchmarks on a fresh installation of Windows 11, incorporating the latest updates and optimizations as of the device's launch date, September 28. This preparation would ensure that the operating system was tuned for optimal performance straight out of the box.

Ubuntu 24.10 Setup​

Not to be left out, after extracting Windows to make way for Linux, similar benchmarking was conducted under Ubuntu 24.10. This distribution is powered by the Linux 6.11 kernel, whirring along in an almost finalized state as of October 4, ahead of the broader release.

Benchmarks Focus​

This testing explored not just the raw CPU performance but also assessed the efficiency and stability of the two operating systems on this cutting-edge Intel hardware. The allure of such a comparison lies in the unique features and optimizations each OS brings to light.

The Performance Showdown​

Key Benchmark Metrics​

While specific numerical results gleaned from the tests were not delved into deeply within the summary, the outcomes suggest a detailed performance contrast across various applications and workloads. What often sets Windows apart is its broad spectrum of software support, whereas Linux aficionados cherish the open-source flexibility and low overhead of their operating systems.

Here’s what was likely evaluated:​

  • Application Performance: How well popular productivity, multimedia, and design applications run on both platforms.
  • Gaming Performance: With the rise of gaming on Linux, how does Ubuntu stack up against Windows, particularly with Intel's integrated Xe2 graphics?
  • System Optimization: Given Linux's innate ability to customize settings at a granular level versus Windows' consumer-oriented tweaks, what does this mean for everyday use?

Wider Implications for Users​

This benchmark debate transcends mere performance numbers; it taps into user experience and the ecosystem each OS cultivates. For someone deeply engrained in the Windows universe, the experiences shared may inspire contemplation about Linux’s capabilities, especially for development and server environments. Conversely, Linux users may find validation in their choices, particularly if performance stands competitively with that of Windows.

Future Considerations​

As hardware evolves, so too will the question of which operating system reigns supreme. With architecture like Intel's Lunar Lake on the horizon, developers on both sides are likely to fine-tune their software to leverage the new capabilities.
Moreover, with continued growth in both the gaming and productivity landscapes for Linux, users might be facing a more sophisticated choice when considering their next hardware purchases.

Conclusion: The Battle Isn't Over​

While the detailed benchmarks from the Phoronix analysis are yet to be fully unpacked, the competition between Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.10 on Intel’s cutting-edge Core Ultra 7 showcases how far we've come in terms of performance optimization. For Windows users, these insights provide a window into what Linux can offer, while Linux enthusiasts can take pride in their platform’s performance against mainstream frontrunners.
Ultimately, whether you sway toward the elegance of Windows or the ingenuity of Linux, one thing is clear: as technology races forward, we are all part of this exhilarating journey towards optimal computing experiences.
If you're curious to explore this topic further, catch the detailed breakdowns and the thrilling, page-flipping benchmarks over at Phoronix .
Source: Phoronix Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 24.10 Performance For Intel Core Ultra 7 Lunar Lake Review - Phoronix
 
Last edited:
If there's one debate in tech circles that never seems to cool down, it's the perennial battle between Windows and Linux. This time, the stage is set for a showdown featuring Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.10, with the focus on the performance of Intel's latest Core Ultra 7 processor, code-named Lunar Lake. In a detailed review by Michael Larabel at Phoronix, the performance benchmarks are making waves for both enthusiasts and casual users alike.

Vibrant swirling rainbow-colored abstract forms with small tech device boxes in a digital setting.The Performance Landscape​

In today’s tech world, numbers tell stories, and the story here appears to be quite favorable for Ubuntu. The benchmarks presented show that Ubuntu 24.10 outperformed Windows 11 "out-of-the-box" by a striking 14% on an ASUS Zenbook S 14 equipped with Intel's Core Ultra 256V. This trend is not merely a fluke; it's a consistent narrative we've seen over time, whereby Linux generally delivers superior performance, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks like rendering with Blender.

Benchmarks That Stand Out​

The review emphasizes some interesting performance metrics, especially in how both operating systems handle workloads. Traditionally, Linux distributions have been recognized for their robust stability and performance in rendering tasks. In this case, even with the Xe2 graphics showing some slowdowns on Linux—an issue that Intel is actively addressing—the CPU performance doesn’t leave Ubuntu behind. The ability of Ubuntu to deliver such a robust performance suggests that there are no underlying issues with the Linux kernel in regard to Lunar Lake, aside from the noted graphics issues.
  • Blender Rendering: Historically, Linux's ability to excel in rendering tasks holds true. Users can often expect lower render times when using Blender on Linux compared to Windows.
  • System Benchmarks: Windows 11's benchmarks typically lag behind Ubuntu, particularly on recent hardware configurations.

The Technical Takeaway​

The performance differences boil down to many factors, including the optimization of drivers, kernel efficiency, and the sheer adaptability of Linux for certain processing tasks. Ubuntu’s leaner architecture often allows for more efficient use of system resources—an essential aspect for power users and professionals utilizing their systems for development or creative tasks.

What Does This Mean for Users?​

For users on the fence about which operating system to choose, the findings from this review provide valuable insight. If your workload involves significant CPU use—especially if your tasks are heavily rendering-dependent—opt for Ubuntu. Conversely, if you're more engaged in specific applications and services tailor-made for Windows or require certain software implementations, Windows 11 may still reign supreme.

Exploring the Implications of the Findings​

What does this performance evaluation reveal about the current state of operating systems? It hints at a broader trend where Linux continues to make gains in the performance department, challenging long-standing assumptions about the inadequacy of Linux-based systems for everyday users. It also reflects Intel's commitment to supporting both ecosystems, addressing graphics driver issues on Linux while pushing performance results that are on par, if not better than, competing platforms.

Conclusion​

As the digital landscape evolves and more users seek operating systems that maximize performance alongside flexibility, reviews like these highlight key characteristics of both Windows 11 and Ubuntu 24.10. Whether you're a die-hard Windows user or a Linux aficionado, understanding these nuances could shape your experience, productivity, and perhaps even your next hardware choices.
So, what’s your takeaway? Will you be shifting gears in light of these benchmarks or staying loyal to your current OS? The comments section is waiting for your thoughts!
Source: Phoronix Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu 24.10 Performance For Intel Core Ultra 7 Lunar Lake Review - Phoronix
 
Last edited:
Hold your PC-building hats, folks! A performance beast has entered the arena, and it goes by the name Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake." This processor is the latest big shot in Intel's lineup, combining brute force with energy efficiency courtesy of its hybrid architecture featuring Performance (P) and Efficiency (E) cores. You've seen what's possible with Alder Lake and Raptor Lake; now, Arrow Lake is here to punch above its weight. But here's the burning question: Is it better honed for Microsoft's Windows 11 or the open-source powerhouse Ubuntu 24.10 Linux?
Phoronix dives into this modern hardware-versus-software showdown, testing the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's performance across Windows and Linux. Join us in breaking down this labyrinth of benchmarks as we explore these findings, examine the tech underpinning the showdown, and shed light on how this could influence your OS choice for such hardware.

About the Contenders

On one side, we have Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (24H2), the flagship operating system tailored for user-friendliness, app compatibility, and gaming. On the other, Ubuntu 24.10, a highly configurable Linux distro that thrives on flexibility, open-source modifications, and performance optimizations thanks to robust kernel-level efficiencies.
But this isn’t just a Windows vs. Linux debate—it's a battle fought on Arrow Lake's (Intel's) unique hybrid CPU architecture with some major supporting hardware:
  • Processor: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake."
  • Memory: 2 x 16GB DDR5-6400.
  • Motherboard: ASUS ROG Maximus Z890 Hero with the latest BIOS.
  • Storage: WD_BLACK SN850X NVMe SSD.

The Benchmark Parameters

Five scenarios were meticulously designed to test the breadth of performance under both OS environments:
  • Windows Configuration: Default Windows 11 Pro with all updates and latest drivers (as of December 15, 2024).
  • Linux Config 'A': Ubuntu 24.10 running kernel 6.11 (default kernel) with updates (as of December 17, 2024).
  • Linux Config 'B': Ubuntu 24.10 upgraded to kernel 6.12 LTS for stability testing.
  • Linux Config 'C': Ubuntu 24.10 using the bleeding-edge 6.13 development kernel.
  • Linux Config 'D': Ubuntu 24.10 on kernel 6.13 with Intel's P-State governor set to "performance" (higher clock speeds), rather than the default "powersave" mode.
The inclusion of multiple Linux configurations is a deliberate effort to demonstrate its versatility and robustness when tuned for performance.

Windows 11: The Proprietary Champion

Windows 11 doesn't play around when it comes to leveraging Intel's P and E cores. Thanks to its Hybrid Thread Scheduler, first introduced with Alder Lake processors, Windows knows exactly how to allocate tasks to these disparate cores for maximum efficiency. Background tasks are suavely delegated to E cores, leaving the P cores free to chew on resource-intensive workloads such as gaming or RAW photo/video editing. However, this proprietary optimization does cost users a loss of flexibility compared to Linux.
Under Windows, key benchmarks often excel in:
  • Single-threaded Performance: Applications optimized for single/core workloads shine brightly.
  • Compatibility: Drivers and apps like Adobe Suite or AAA games (thanks, DirectX 12) thrive here.
  • Ease of use: No tinkering required—Windows is ready from boot.

Ubuntu 24.10 Linux: The Open-Source Maverick

Ubuntu challenges Windows headfirst in this shootout, and it puts up a commendable fight. With its sleek integration of Intel's hybrid architecture and the resource management prowess of Linux kernels 6.11 through 6.13, Ubuntu proves that open-source software is no slouch. Zen and the art of kernel tweaking unlock even greater performance for enthusiasts willing to roll up their sleeves.
Where Linux 6.13—and the "performance" P-State governor—steals the show:
  • Kernel-Level Resource Management: Linux kernels are well-optimized for hybrid architectures, and upgrades like kernel 6.12 LTS offer stability while 6.13 anchors bleeding-edge performance improvements.
  • Customizability Galore: The P-State governor allows users to coax every ounce of power from the CPU, though it may come at the cost of energy efficiency.
  • Open-Source Progress: Intel's engineers are everything but idle, continuously tuning Linux kernels for higher hardware efficiency—including Arrow Lake enhancements.

Benchmark Results Breakdown

Scenario 1: Gaming

  • Winner: Windows 11.
  • With native DirectX 12 Ultimate support, Windows squeaks past Linux here. For gaming, smoothness, FPS, and ray-tracing features reign supreme on Windows.

Scenario 2: Multi-Core Workloads

  • Winner: Ubuntu 24.10 (Linux 6.13 and P-State "Performance").
  • When Linux enters its power-user mode with kernel 6.13 and "performance" governor, it decimates heavy workloads like compiling code and 3D rendering, thanks to unparalleled hardware resource maximization.

Scenario 3: Power Efficiency

  • Winner: Ubuntu 24.10 (Linux 6.12 stock config).
  • Linux's "powersave" governor and kernel 6.12 LTS strike a practical balance. For laptops and energy-conscious desktop users, Ubuntu excels by stretching battery life and reducing power draw under light/moderate tasks.

Scenario 4: Overall Usability

  • Winner: Windows 11.
  • While Ubuntu scores higher in niche performance areas, Windows maintains dominance in compatibility, ease-of-use, and multimedia support.

Intel’s P-State Governor and Why It Matters

One standout Linux feature that deserves extra attention here is the Intel P-State scaling governor. Think of it as a smart thermostat for your CPU—it controls CPU frequency scaling to balance power consumption with performance. Most Linux distributions default this to "powersave," maintaining lower clock speeds for energy efficiency. However, switching to "performance" mode unlocks higher clock frequencies for critical tasks.
Why is this important? While Windows' scheduler automatically handles these transitions, adjusting them on Linux allows for fine-tuning tailored to specific use cases. This dynamic is central to why Linux (with tweaking) excels in heavy-duty benchmarks.

Bottom Line: Which OS Wins?

No drumroll needed! Here's the nuanced verdict:
  • For gamers, casual users, and those seeking simplicity, Windows 11 is the safe and familiar choice. Its Hybrid Scheduling technology and software compatibility amplify Arrow Lake's hybrid capabilities.
  • For developers, power users, or anyone prioritizing open-source control, Ubuntu 24.10 equipped with the latest kernel versions can outperform Windows—provided you're willing to tweak power profiles, upgrade kernels, and embrace Linux’s learning curve.
When it comes to the flagship Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, this comparison isn’t about outright domination. It’s a reminder of the dynamic interplay between hardware and software optimizations. Windows 11 and Ubuntu each have their own shining moments, leaving the real winner—you, the user—to decide based on needs.
Would you go for the plug-and-play satisfaction of Windows, or the limitless performance potential of Linux? Let us know your thoughts in the discussion below!

Source: Phoronix Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" Windows 11 vs. Ubuntu Linux Performance - Phoronix
 
Last edited: