- Thread Author
- #1
On my 64 bit Windows 7 desktop, I used to have two Western Digital 500 GB drives, each with one partition (C: and D: respectively). But recently those two drives both started failing their self-tests; so I am replacing them with two 1 TB drives.
So then I'll have two partitions, C: and D:, each of which is 1 TB in size.
Would you recommend splitting each drive into two or more partitions (so I would end up with at least four partitions total)? Or is a 500 GB partition for C: considered rather small with the advent of ever larger Microsoft bloatware?
I guess in general I don't know what the pros and cons are for having more or fewer partitions.
So then I'll have two partitions, C: and D:, each of which is 1 TB in size.
Would you recommend splitting each drive into two or more partitions (so I would end up with at least four partitions total)? Or is a 500 GB partition for C: considered rather small with the advent of ever larger Microsoft bloatware?
I guess in general I don't know what the pros and cons are for having more or fewer partitions.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 15,156
As you know, 1 TB partitions are not legally too large.
But how you partition would need to meet your work habits. One thing I consider is system recovery. Will you be making a backup image to restore your system..if so you might think about what would actually need to be in the image and what type of data could be stored elsewhere.
Other than that, your drives are basically just a filing cabinet and you just need to consider what would be more efficient for you.
But how you partition would need to meet your work habits. One thing I consider is system recovery. Will you be making a backup image to restore your system..if so you might think about what would actually need to be in the image and what type of data could be stored elsewhere.
Other than that, your drives are basically just a filing cabinet and you just need to consider what would be more efficient for you.
- Thread Author
- #4
cliffordcooley
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2010
- Messages
- 480
The answer you are asking for depends upon user preference.
To answer this question, I am currently using a 60GB SSD for my Windows 7 OS partition. The smaller you can keep your OS partition, the easier it is to store OS recovery images.Or is a 500 GB partition for C: considered rather small
shubhamstunter
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Messages
- 22
I somehow disagree with your comment.The answer you are asking for depends upon user preference.
To answer this question, I am currently using a 60GB SSD for my Windows 7 OS partition. The smaller you can keep your OS partition, the easier it is to store OS recovery images.
my opinion is that less partition more size easy working and finding.
cliffordcooley
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2010
- Messages
- 480
Nothing is easier than never looking for files on the OS partition. The only files I need to look for are the ones I place on the Data Partition. How much easier can you make it?I somehow disagree with your comment.
my opinion is that less partition more size easy working and finding.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 986
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 16K
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 5K