- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,195
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 39,485
Jared's Immigration Plan Is A 'Complete Whiff'
In a recent segment of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Jared Kushner's immigration plan was humorously critiqued as a "complete whiff." The plan aims to shift the U.S. immigration system toward a merit-based framework, favoring those with high skills, degrees, and job offers while minimizing family-based visas. Colbert ridicules this approach, suggesting that it's ironic for Kushner, a product of privilege, to advocate against familial connections in immigration.
During the monologue, Colbert points out that this new plan prioritizes a point system for assessing immigrants based on professional skills, education, age, and English proficiency—along with an emphasis on "patriotic assimilation." This idea brings laughter and skepticism from the audience as it implies that potential immigrants might be judged on trivial aspects of American culture, such as their opinions on snacks.
Colbert also highlighted bipartisan criticism of the proposal, referencing media outlets labeling it a "complete whiff" and suggesting it’s more of a conversation starter than a serious legislative effort. The plan has drawn scrutiny not only for its practicality but also for its vague metrics of "patriotism," aligning poorly with what many view as a fair immigration process.
As viewers weigh their opinions, it's clear that this immigration policy proposal is filled with contentious points and comedic fodder. What are your thoughts on this immigration overhaul? Could there’ve been a more effective approach? Let's discuss!
In a recent segment of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Jared Kushner's immigration plan was humorously critiqued as a "complete whiff." The plan aims to shift the U.S. immigration system toward a merit-based framework, favoring those with high skills, degrees, and job offers while minimizing family-based visas. Colbert ridicules this approach, suggesting that it's ironic for Kushner, a product of privilege, to advocate against familial connections in immigration.
During the monologue, Colbert points out that this new plan prioritizes a point system for assessing immigrants based on professional skills, education, age, and English proficiency—along with an emphasis on "patriotic assimilation." This idea brings laughter and skepticism from the audience as it implies that potential immigrants might be judged on trivial aspects of American culture, such as their opinions on snacks.
Colbert also highlighted bipartisan criticism of the proposal, referencing media outlets labeling it a "complete whiff" and suggesting it’s more of a conversation starter than a serious legislative effort. The plan has drawn scrutiny not only for its practicality but also for its vague metrics of "patriotism," aligning poorly with what many view as a fair immigration process.
As viewers weigh their opinions, it's clear that this immigration policy proposal is filled with contentious points and comedic fodder. What are your thoughts on this immigration overhaul? Could there’ve been a more effective approach? Let's discuss!
Similar threads
