- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 95,734
- Thread Author
-
- #2
LG’s reversal — promising to let TV owners delete the Microsoft Copilot shortcut after a wave of complaints — is a reminder that the living room is still a battleground for control over both software and user data. The change rolled out silently in a recent webOS firmware push and immediately touched a raw nerve: owners found a Copilot tile pinned to their home screens with no uninstall option, a discovery that went viral on Reddit and across tech press. Faced with community backlash, LG told reporters it would add a true delete option in a future update — a climbdown that answers the immediate outrage but leaves deeper questions about update practices, privacy defaults, and vendor responsibility unresolved.
Key weaknesses in the response:
Source: Bloomberg.com https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-microsoft-copilot-after-customer-complaints/
How Copilot reached the TV
Microsoft’s Copilot — the company’s conversational AI assistant — has been a central plank of a broad industry push to bring large language model (LLM) capabilities to everyday devices. At CES and through product roadmaps, TV makers signaled plans to surface Copilot and other assistants on living-room screens as part of 2025 lineup strategies; LG positioned Copilot as an extension of its webOS “AI TV” features and AI Search experience. The behavior that sparked outrage was not a concept pitch but a real-world firmware update that placed a Copilot tile in users’ app rows.The immediate trigger
Community reports and screenshots showed the Copilot icon appearing after a routine webOS over‑the‑air (FOTA) software update. When owners tried to remove the icon through the TV’s normal app-management workflows it lacked an uninstall affordance; at best it could be hidden — and in many cases it reappeared after a factory reset. That pattern strongly suggests the component was provisioned as a privileged system item or baked into the firmware image, not installed as a removable app from the content store. Multiple outlets and forum investigations corroborated this behavior as affecting a range of LG models following the December update.What exactly happened — step by step
- LG pushed a webOS update to certain TV models.
- A Microsoft Copilot tile appeared on the TV home screen and app row.
- Users attempted normal app management and discovered no uninstall option; only hide/disable was available.
- Community posts, especially a Reddit thread that ballooned in visibility, drew tens of thousands of reactions and attracted media coverage.
- Under pressure, LG said it would add a delete option for the Copilot shortcut in a future update, although no firm timeline was provided.
Why this happened — commercial drivers and technical mechanics
Business incentives: reach and monetization
- Ecosystem expansion: Microsoft benefits by placing Copilot in front of millions of living-room users; OEMs get a differentiator to market as “AI‑enabled TV.”
- Data and personalization: The ad and recommendation value of contextual signals (what’s on screen, who’s speaking, viewing habits) increases when an assistant can use them — a commercial incentive for OEMs to stitch partner services into system UX.
- Default‑on convenience: Preloading features and pinning shortcuts into the home screen make them discoverable and more likely to be used; from a product-growth perspective that helps adoption metrics.
Technical reasons: why the app may be “undeletable”
There are two standard mechanisms that make an app effectively non‑removable on embedded platforms like webOS:- The manufacturer installs the component as a privileged system package outside the user sandbox. Settings may permit hiding or disabling, but not full uninstall.
- The component is baked into the firmware image delivered by FOTA. A factory reset restores the firmware image and the app returns.
Community tests — hide vs uninstall workflows and the tile’s return after resets — strongly point to one of these mechanisms in the Copilot case. That’s standard embedded‑systems engineering, but it runs counter to common consumer expectations about control over bought hardware.
The privacy and control debate
What owners fear
- Loss of device autonomy: Users expect to control what runs on hardware they purchased. A non‑removable feature erodes that expectation.
- Expanded telemetry: If Copilot is married to on‑screen Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) features — marketed by LG as Live Plus or similar ACR/Live Promotion functions — it can draw on richer contextual signals that raise privacy concerns. Even if microphone features are disabled by default, ACR can still surface viewing data used for profiling or ad personalization.
What LG has said
LG clarified that the Copilot tile is a shortcut to a web‑based Copilot page that opens in the TV’s browser, rather than a native, deeply embedded AI service. LG also emphasized that features such as microphone input are activated only with explicit user consent. After the media wave, LG told reporters it “respects consumer choice” and would take steps to let users delete the shortcut icon. No specific rollout date for the deletion option was given. Those remarks were reported by multiple outlets quoting LG’s statement.What remains unverified
- Whether Copilot expands the classes of telemetry collected beyond existing webOS flows (for example, turning on ambient microphones by default, or cross‑device profiling) is not confirmed publicly by LG or Microsoft. Independent forensic analysis would be required to validate claims of new telemetry categories. Community reporting and forum tests are strong signals but are not a substitute for vendor disclosure or technical audit. Treat such claims as plausible but unverified until direct technical evidence is published.
The viral moment: Reddit, outrage, and the press cycle
A Reddit post on r/mildlyinfuriating — showing a screenshot of Copilot among other app tiles and noting the absence of an uninstall option — exploded, garnering tens of thousands of upvotes and drawing hundreds of comments. That thread served as the ignition point: once images and first‑hand accounts reached critical mass, mainstream tech outlets picked up the story and amplified pressure on LG to respond. The sequence is a textbook example of how social platforms catalyze product PR crises for hardware vendors.Practical guidance for owners (what to do now)
If you own an affected LG TV and want to reduce Copilot’s visibility or telemetry exposure, here are practical, ordered steps from least to most disruptive:- Hide the Copilot tile through the home‑screen edit controls (if available). This removes daily visibility but not the package.
- Turn off Live Plus / Automatic Content Recognition: Settings → All Settings → General → System → Additional Settings → Live Plus (menu labels vary). This reduces contextual on‑screen signals used for personalization.
- Avoid signing into Microsoft services on the TV. Without account linkage, cloud personalization and cross‑device features are limited.
- Use an external streaming box (Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, Nvidia Shield) and treat the TV as a dumb display — preserves UX control at the cost of convenience.
- If you are technically comfortable, block known telemetry or ad domains at the router level (Pi‑hole, DNS filtering, firewall rules). This reduces data exfiltration risk but can break services and requires careful whitelist management.
- As a last resort, keep the TV offline. This prevents cloud calls but disables auto‑updates and streaming functionality.
Broader industry context: not an isolated trend
LG is not the only OEM bundling conversational AI into TVs. Rival manufacturers have rolled similar integrations — Samsung has documented Copilot availability on select 2025 models, TCL and others have experimented with Google’s Gemini and other assistants, and the broader trend is clear: TV platforms are becoming AI surfaces. That convergence amplifies the commercial logic (differentiation, ecosystem lock‑in, ad personalization), but it also repeats the same set of policy and UX pitfalls: default‑on features, opaque update models, and limited uninstallability.Critical analysis — strengths and risks
Strengths and product potential
- Convenience and discovery: Conversational assistants on a TV can improve accessibility, discovery, and family‑friendly interactions — for example, voice‑based content search, summarization, and contextual Q&A are real value adds.
- Innovation in UX: Large screens offer unique opportunities for multimodal interactions — combining visual suggestions, scene summaries, and voice queries in ways a phone can’t match.
- Ecosystem benefits: For Microsoft, presence on TVs expands Copilot’s reach; for OEMs, AI capabilities are a visible, marketable feature.
Risks and consumer harms
- Erosion of ownership: Shipping non‑removable components on paid hardware damages consumer trust and fuels the “bloatware” narrative.
- Privacy creep: Combining assistants with ACR frameworks and default settings that favor personalization can expand telemetry surface area without clear consent.
- Regulatory scrutiny and brand damage: Forced features can invite consumer protection complaints, bad press, and potential regulatory attention in jurisdictions sensitive to dark patterns and data‑collection practices.
- Patchwork remedies: Promises to add delete options after backlash are reactive and leave owners exposed between rollout and remediation. That timing gap matters to privacy‑conscious users.
Why LG’s response matters — and why it’s only a partial fix
LG’s public pledge to add an uninstall path is a pragmatic response that restores a baseline expectation: users should be able to remove optional software. It’s a necessary step to rebuild trust. But it’s also reactive rather than proactive; the rollout that created the problem used an update model that assumed privilege without prior notice or an easy opt‑out.Key weaknesses in the response:
- No timeline: Saying “we will allow deletion” without a concrete schedule leaves owners in limbo and signals that user control was afterthought, not design principle.
- Transparency gap: LG’s clarification that Copilot is a web shortcut is relevant, but it doesn’t fully explain the packaging model or whether any new telemetry flows accompany the update.
- Trust deficit: Promises after a viral backlash repair optics slowly. Owners have already internalized the practice: features can be forced onto hardware they own.
Technical recommendations for manufacturers and platform owners
- Ship partner services as truly optional store components unless tight OS integration is necessary.
- Clearly document FOTA update contents in update notes, including whether a system image change is being applied that affects removable app status.
- Default to privacy‑minimal settings and require explicit opt‑in for telemetry-intensive features (for example, ACR or cross‑device profiling).
- Provide a one‑click removal path for partner shortcuts and a transparent account‑unlinking workflow.
- When system components are necessary, clearly label them in the UI and in the update changelog so owners understand what is changing on their devices.
Legal and regulatory lens
The Copilot episode sits at the intersection of consumer protection, digital privacy, and software update policy. Regulators have recently focused on dark patterns, default privacy settings, and the limits of reasonable consumer expectations for connected devices. A pattern of forcing non‑removable software onto paid‑for hardware could attract scrutiny under unfair‑practice laws or data‑protection rules, depending on jurisdiction and whether the bundled software expands data collection in ways users did not reasonably expect. Public commitments to add removal options are helpful, but regulators and privacy advocates are likely to look for durable policy changes rather than one‑off fixes.Final assessment and what to watch next
- LG’s promise to add a deletion option for the Copilot shortcut is a meaningful, necessary correction to a misstep in update policy. It restores consumer choice on paper, but the lack of a firm timeline and the opacity around packaging and telemetry mean trust recovery will take time.
- The broader trend — TVs and other “always‑on” home devices becoming AI surfaces — will continue. Consumers, advocacy groups, and regulators must push for clearer defaults: privacy‑preserving settings, transparent update disclosures, and simple removal workflows for optional services.
- For owners, immediate mitigations are practical: hide the tile, opt out of Live Plus/ACR, avoid signing into partner accounts, or use an external streamer when possible. These are imperfect but effective stopgaps until OEMs deliver better controls.
Source: Bloomberg.com https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-microsoft-copilot-after-customer-complaints/
Similar threads
- Featured
- Article
- Featured
- Article
- Featured
- Article
- Featured
- Article