Life Without Barriers Security Refresh: Unified Microsoft Stack Reduces Risk

Life Without Barriers’ recent security refresh shows how human‑services organisations can use integrated Microsoft tooling to both reduce risk and free frontline staff for the work that matters.

Background / Overview​

Life Without Barriers (LWB), one of Australia’s largest human‑services nonprofits, has moved from a fragmented, legacy IT estate toward a unified security and data‑governance posture built on Microsoft technologies. The organisation — which Microsoft and LWB materials state operates with roughly 8,000 employees and volunteers supporting more than 16,000 clients — partnered with Microsoft and the local partner Increment to adopt the Microsoft Security Program for Nonprofits. The implementation bundled Microsoft 365 E3 with security and compliance add‑ons, Microsoft Purview for classification and DLP, Microsoft Defender components (for Office 365, Endpoint, Identity, Cloud Apps) and Entra ID for identity and role‑based access control. (microsoft.com) (lwb.org.au)
The public customer story reports immediate, measurable outcomes: Purview and Defender tools identified over 321,000 documents containing sensitive data, with 95–96% accuracy from custom classifiers developed with Increment, and more than 8.3 million business activities monitored during the initial rollout. Those detections enabled automated labeling, smarter access controls, and reduced administrative burden for frontline staff. (microsoft.com)
This article summarises that project, evaluates the technical and operational choices, highlights the practical benefits for human‑services organisations, and surfaces risks and hard lessons to watch for when adopting an integrated Microsoft security stack.

---

Why this mattered for Life Without Barriers​

Human‑services providers hold highly sensitive personal data — health records, case notes, financial details, and often information about minors or vulnerable adults. That creates two simultaneous pressures: strong protection is essential, and excessive lock‑down can hinder care delivery.
LWB’s challenges were typical of fast‑growing nonprofits:

• A patchwork of legacy systems and siloed data producing no single source of truth.
• Security tools that worked well in isolation but were costly to operate and created visibility blind spots.
• Administrative overhead and context‑switching for IT staff, plus friction for frontline workers who need simple, timely access to client information.

Microsoft’s customer story frames the solution as a shift from reactive, multi‑vendor firefighting to a more unified, contextual, and automated security posture — one that treats identity, devices, applications and data as a single, correlated surface. The organisation’s earlier Azure modernisation gave it a cloud foundation, which made the layered Microsoft security approach possible. (microsoft.com)

---

What LWB implemented — technical snapshot​

Core components deployed​

• Microsoft 365 E3 with Security & Compliance add‑ons (productivity + baseline governance).
• Microsoft Purview for data classification, sensitivity labels, and Data Loss Prevention (DLP).
• Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) for role‑based access, Conditional Access, and identity governance.
• Microsoft Defender suite:
• Defender for Office 365 (email and collaboration protection),
• Defender for Endpoint (EDR),
• Defender for Identity,
• Defender for Cloud Apps (CASB).
• Partner services from Increment to run discovery, build custom classifiers and map data flows to real business processes. (microsoft.com) (increment.inc)

Phased and low‑impact approach​

Rather than flipping switches and enforcing hard blocks immediately, Increment and LWB ran tools in passive (monitoring) mode at first. This helped:

• Observe real user behaviour and data flows.
• Validate classifier performance against actual business processes.
• Avoid breaking legitimate clinical and care workflows.
• Build staff confidence and governance buy‑in before enforcement.

Custom classifiers in Purview were tuned to LWB’s specific high‑risk categories (client health records, financial information, case notes, etc.). Those classifiers reportedly achieved 95–96% detection accuracy for the sensitive categories that mattered most to LWB. (microsoft.com)

---

The wins: visibility, automation, and frontline impact​

The Microsoft case story highlights several practical benefits LWB realised quickly.

• Mass discovery and classification at scale: Over 321,000 sensitive documents were identified across Exchange and SharePoint, enabling targeted remediation and labeling instead of guessing where risks lived. This provides a rapid ‘truth‑finding’ capability for compliance and incident response. (microsoft.com)
• Operational telemetry: Monitoring of 8.3 million business activities gave security and privacy teams a baseline of normal behaviour and allowed anomaly detection tuned to LWB’s context. (microsoft.com)
• Reduced burden on frontline staff: With classification and labeling automated where possible, clinicians and carers face fewer security roadblocks and less manual paperwork — the story emphasizes time reclaimed for client care. (microsoft.com)
• Better identity and access hygiene: Entra ID simplified sign‑on and role‑based access, reducing support calls and enabling staff to “turn on the laptop, log in and go”, according to the story. That ease of use is essential in organisations where staff turnover and shift patterns are high. (microsoft.com)
• A roadmap for scale: The project was positioned as the first of three strategic horizons, with future work including HR‑driven automated access provisioning, expanded auto‑labeling, and stricter role‑based restrictions to minimise exposure. (microsoft.com)

Those gains align with what independent Microsoft partner guidance and Purview best practices recommend: discover first, instrument the estate, tune classifiers, then enforce policies with human oversight. Increment’s public material demonstrates the vendor’s emphasis on organisational change management as much as on technology — an important cultural component for adoption. (increment.inc)

---

Critical analysis — strengths and design choices​

Strengths​

• Platform integration reduces friction: Choosing an integrated stack (Entra + Purview + Defender + Microsoft 365) removes a lot of the cross‑product stitching that produces alert overload and manual correlation work. When identity, endpoint and data signals are shared natively, triage is faster and automated containment actions can be more precisely targeted. (microsoft.com)
• Real‑world mapping of workflows: Building classifiers against actual business processes — not generic templates — produced high detection accuracy and fewer false positives. That’s the single biggest technical lever for making DLP and classification usable in care settings. (microsoft.com)
• Gradual enforcement model: Running in passive mode first lowered operational risk and allowed LWB to understand impacts before breaking workflows. That incremental approach preserves staff trust and reduces the chance of rollback. (microsoft.com)
• Partner‑led change management: The project’s success was credited not just to the tech, but to Increment’s role in delivery and governance coaching — critical where domain knowledge (care workflows, privacy obligations) must shape policy. (increment.inc)

What worked technically​

• Custom classifiers: Delivering ~95–96% accuracy on mission‑specific categories is a strong operational outcome. High precision reduces false positives that otherwise swamp helpdesks.
• Correlated telemetry: Monitoring millions of business activities provides the behavioural baseline required for modern risk engines and Conditional Access policies.

---

Risks, trade‑offs and caveats​

The Microsoft story is an encouraging blueprint, but several risks and trade‑offs deserve scrutiny.

1) Over‑reliance on a single vendor ecosystem​

A single‑stack approach delivers integration benefits, but it also concentrates operational and supply risks. If organisations lean heavily on one vendor for discovery, enforcement, and logs, they must ensure adequate:

• Contractual SLAs, especially for incident response support.
• Exportable audit logs and data portability for compliance and forensic needs.
• Independent logging paths to a customer‑controlled SIEM or archive for long‑term retention and regulatory audits.

These are practical governance requirements, not theoretical objections; they matter for accountability and audit readiness.

2) Classifier blind spots and drift​

Custom classifiers are powerful, but they can suffer from:

• Concept drift: Care terminology and document formats change over time. Without ongoing retraining and monitoring, classifier accuracy can degrade.
• Edge cases: Some sensitive content is context‑dependent (e.g., client names in administrative notes may be non‑sensitive in some contexts and highly sensitive in others). Over‑aggressive blocking risks hindering lawful sharing for clinical care.

LWB’s passive‑first approach mitigates early problems, but there must be an operational plan to maintain classifier quality over months and years.

3) Identity recovery and admin protection​

Modern identity controls can be both a strength and a single point of failure. A strong Entra ID posture needs:

• Just‑in‑time privileged access controls and Privileged Identity Management (PIM) for administrative roles.
• Break‑glass procedures and secondary account recovery to survive catastrophic directory loss or compromise.
• Backup practices for service principals, certificates and secrets (some directory metadata cannot be trivially exported).

Failure to bake in identity recovery plans can turn a successful security posture into a brittle one in a crisis.

4) Data residency and privacy considerations​

Human‑services datasets are often bound by local privacy laws and sector rules. Organisations must be explicit about:

• Where metadata and classified content are stored and processed.
• How sensitive content is handled by cloud‑native analytics and whether secondary indexing creates new data flows.
• Consent and lawful basis for processing personal data, especially for children and people under guardianship.

Microsoft’s cloud provides strong controls, but legal teams must be involved to align technical measures with statutory obligations.

5) Automation and the human‑in‑the‑loop balance​

Automation reduces toil but risks “set‑and‑forget” scenarios. LWB’s story shows good governance early, but the organisation must sustain:

• Regular audits of automated labeling and blocking rules.
• Human review queues for edge cases.
• Training to keep staff aware of what automation does and how to request exceptions when care requires flexibility.

---

Practical lessons for other human‑services organisations​

For nonprofits and public sector providers considering a similar path, LWB’s approach offers several repeatable takeaways.

• Start with discovery, not enforcement. Use passive monitoring to build realistic baselines and avoid disrupting care delivery.
• Map security controls to actual business processes. Classification rules should reflect how workers share files, not how vendors imagine they do.
• Keep frontline usability front and centre. Identity and SSO improvements that reduce friction have outsized returns in adoption and fewer support calls.
• Invest in partner‑led change management. Technical configuration is only part of the work; training, comms and governance make or break adoption.
• Plan for long‑term classifier maintenance and governance reviews — security is continuous, not a one‑off project.

These practical steps mirror guidance from experienced Microsoft partners and Purview implementation playbooks: discovery → tune → automate → govern. (increment.inc)

---

Implementation checklist — a practical blueprint​

• Run a discovery sprint:
• Inventory data stores (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, file shares).
• Collect a representative sample of documents and communications for classifier training.
• Build classification rules and custom classifiers:
• Start with high‑risk categories (health records, financial data, child protection).
• Test classifiers in passive mode for several weeks.
• Configure Entra ID basics:
• Enforce MFA for all admins and high‑risk users.
• Enable Conditional Access for unmanaged devices and risky sign‑ins.
• Deploy PIM for privileged roles.
• Integrate Defender telemetry:
• Forward key alerts and DLP events to a central SIEM.
• Configure automated containment for high‑confidence threats (isolation, token revocation).
• Pilot automation with human review:
• Automate labeling for high‑precision categories.
• Route ambiguous detections to a small, trained review team.
• Governance and training:
• Run role‑based training for frontline workers.
• Publish an easy‑to‑use playbook for exception requests and appeals.
• Continuous improvement:
• Schedule periodic classifier revalidation.
• Maintain a measurable set of KPIs (false positive rate, mean time to remediate, user support calls).

---

What to watch next — wider context and evolving capabilities​

Microsoft’s security tooling is evolving rapidly. New capabilities in Purview and Defender increasingly target AI‑era data flows and Copilot interactions, and Microsoft’s own reporting highlights large telemetry volumes and automation features that feed these products. While this increases detection power, it also raises questions about visibility, data handling, and regulatory alignment — especially when automated agents and copilots have access to sensitive content. Organisations should keep an active interest in product roadmaps and ensure contractual clarity around telemetry and data processing. (microsoft.com, wwwqa.microsoft.com)
At the partner level, regional Microsoft partners such as Increment focus on combining technical deployments with organisational change and governance — a necessary capability where care work and privacy obligations intersect. Increment’s public materials show a consistent emphasis on the human elements of Purview adoption: know your org, map workflows, and invest in adoption. That combination is what delivered measurable results at LWB. (increment.inc)

---

Limitations and claims that need ongoing verification​

• The public case story states 321,000 sensitive items detected and 95–96% classifier accuracy during the initial phase. Those are strong figures and come from Microsoft’s customer story, which is a vendor‑published account; they should be treated as reported outcomes rather than independently audited metrics. Organisations reviewing this case should validate comparable numbers in their own pilots and require independent verification where regulatory compliance depends on the metric. (microsoft.com)
• Roadmap outcomes described (future horizons, automation of HR‑driven controls) are planned outcomes rather than completed milestones. Readers should treat these as intended next steps rather than finished deliverables. (microsoft.com)

---

Conclusion​

Life Without Barriers’ project is a practical example of how a major human‑services organisation can reconcile two competing imperatives: protect highly sensitive personal data, and preserve the speed and simplicity clinicians need to deliver care. The combination of Microsoft Purview for data governance, Entra ID for identity, and Defender for detection and response — delivered with partner expertise and a passive‑first approach — produced immediate discovery and automation wins while keeping staff usability central.
The story is not a plug‑and‑play recipe: classifier maintenance, identity recovery planning, legal alignment on data residency, and ongoing human oversight remain critical. But for nonprofits and public sector agencies wrestling with sprawling data estates and tight budgets, the LWB example illustrates a repeatable path: discover broadly, tune to real workflows, automate high‑confidence decisions, and keep people — both staff and the people they serve — at the centre of the program. (microsoft.com, lwb.org.au, increment.inc)

---

Source: Microsoft Life Without Barriers boosts data security, empowers human services with Defender, Purview, and Entra ID | Microsoft Customer Stories