Linux Gains on Ally X: Bazzite Improves Smoothness Over Windows 11

The most surprising performance story of the Ally X launch cycle isn’t AMD’s APU or ASUS’ chassis — it’s that a lean, SteamOS‑style Linux image called Bazzite can measurably and reproducibly deliver smoother gameplay and higher sustained frame rates on the Asus ROG Xbox Ally X than the device’s factory Windows 11 image, at least in specific shader‑heavy scenes and mid‑range power modes.

Background / Overview​

The ROG Xbox Ally X ships as ASUS’ premium Windows handheld, built around an AMD Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme APU, 24 GB of LPDDR5X memory, a 1 TB NVMe SSD and an 80 Wh battery — a hardware package designed to push handheld performance beyond prior generation devices. ASUS and Microsoft packaged the device with a Windows 11 Home image and a controller‑first Xbox full‑screen experience layered over Windows to give console‑style ergonomics and launcher behavior.
Early community tests have now shown that replacing the factory Windows image with a SteamOS‑style Linux build (the Fedora‑based Bazzite distribution used in the experiments) can produce subjectively snappier menus, more reliable suspend/resume, and measurable differences in frame‑time consistency — in some test scenes producing as much as ~24–30% higher average FPS. Those results were demonstrated by handheld‑focused creators and subsequently covered by multiple outlets.
This is not a claim that Linux universally “beats” Windows on the Ally X in every title or power mode; rather, these experiments expose a conditional advantage in very specific workloads and usage patterns that matter a lot on handhelds: runtime shader compilation spikes, background service noise, and power/thermal governor behavior.

---

What the community tests showed — concrete numbers and behavior​

Representative headline numbers​

• Kingdom Come: Deliverance II, 17 W performance mode — Windows ≈ 47 FPS; Bazzite ≈ 62 FPS (≈ +30%).
• Hogwarts Legacy, 17 W mode — Windows ≈ 50 FPS; Bazzite ≈ 62 FPS (≈ +24–30%).

Testers also reported that gains shrink in very low‑power (e.g., 13 W silent) modes and in high‑TDP mains plugged‑in runs where the device can sustain higher clocks on both OSes; the biggest deltas appeared in mid‑range TDP modes where runtime shader compilation and scheduling noise are most visible.

Usability and system behavior​

Beyond average FPS, community videos and hands‑on posts emphasize:

• Smoother frame‑time lines and higher 1% lows, meaning fewer hitch spikes and a more consistent experience — often more subjectively valuable than a small change in average FPS.
• More reliable suspend/resume behavior under Linux — resume felt near‑instant and less prone to long wake times or post‑resume stutter compared with the Windows image on the Ally X.
• Comparable or slightly improved battery efficiency in Linux for the delivered frame rate (i.e., more frames per watt in some test scenarios), although absolute battery life varied by title and configuration.

These hands‑on experiments were performed by knowledgeable enthusiasts but are not formal, vendor‑run lab tests; numbers are directionally meaningful and reproducible under similar stacks, but they depend on driver versions, firmware, kernel, Proton/Mesa versions and the exact game build. That variability is central to interpreting the results responsibly.

---

Why Linux (Bazzite / SteamOS‑style images) can perform better on handhelds​

The performance advantages reported aren’t mystical — they come from concrete, repeatable technical differences in how the OS and graphics stack behave on thermally constrained hardware.

1) Shader compilation and shader‑cache behavior​

Modern AAA engines generate enormous numbers of shader permutations. When a shader is compiled on the fly during gameplay it can block rendering and create a visible hitch. Valve’s Linux ecosystem (Proton + Mesa + Steam’s shader‑cache distribution system) and some community distro policies often handle shader recording/pre‑compilation and cache distribution differently, which can eliminate or amortize many of those mid‑game compilations. On handhelds where a single hitch is very noticeable, this produces a tangible usability improvement.

2) Lower OS and compositor overhead​

Windows 11 is a general‑purpose desktop OS with a large background service surface — telemetry, cloud sync, launcher helpers and OEM utilities — even when Microsoft’s Xbox full‑screen mode reduces foreground noise. A console‑first Linux image boots directly to a lightweight compositor (Gamescope/Wayland variants) and runs fewer background processes, reducing scheduling noise and I/O interruptions that contribute to frame‑time variance. On a device with limited thermal headroom, that leftover overhead matters.

3) Different power governors, driver builds and fan profiles​

Linux gaming distros commonly ship with tuned kernel parameters, CPU/GPU governors and tested Mesa builds optimized for handheld operation. They also expose direct controls for fan curves and TDP governors that some users will tune more aggressively than out‑of‑the‑box Windows profiles. Those decisions can yield steadier clocks and fewer thermal excursions, which translate into steadier frame delivery in extended play sessions.
Taken together, these three factors explain why identical silicon and the same hardware can feel demonstrably different depending on the operating system and system stack.

---

The compatibility, ecosystem and support tradeoffs​

The performance upside is real — but the ecosystem tradeoffs remain the primary reason mainstream buyers should not reflexively replace Windows on their Ally X.

Major practical limits with Linux on Ally X​

• Anti‑cheat and multiplayer compatibility: Many modern multiplayer titles require Windows‑only kernel anti‑cheat drivers. These games may not run under Linux or will require unreliable workarounds, effectively blocking large swathes of competitive multiplayer gaming.
• Native Xbox app / Game Pass integration: The Xbox app and many Game Pass experiences are Windows‑centric. While cloud streaming via browser or third‑party clients is possible on Linux, it isn’t the same as the integrated Game Pass UX and may be less convenient or performant.
• OEM features and vendor support: Armoury Crate, per‑game power profiles, RGB and some platform firmware/driver recovery utilities are designed for Windows. Installing a third‑party OS complicates warranty or support paths and may break features such as RGB, dedicated buttons or charging quirks unless the community provides fixes.
• Driver maturity and stability: Vendor drivers for bleeding‑edge APUs and platform peripherals are typically certified and optimized for Windows first; Linux support for new hardware often lags or requires community patches.

These ecosystem realities mean Linux is an excellent option for tinkerers and single‑player focused players, but a risky choice for users who need seamless Game Pass access, competitive online play, or official vendor support out of the box.

---

What this means for different types of buyers​

• Keep Windows if you:
• Rely on Game Pass, the Xbox app, or Microsoft cloud integration.
• Play online multiplayer games that depend on anti‑cheat systems.
• Value immediate, vendor‑supported out‑of‑the‑box experience and warranty coverage.
• Consider dual‑boot if you:
• Want to experiment without losing Windows functionality.
• Play mostly single‑player AAA titles but occasionally need Windows for multiplayer.
• Are comfortable with partitioning, Secure Boot/MOK handling and recovery drives.
• Go all‑in on Linux only if you:
• Are a power user prepared to accept compatibility, warranty and support tradeoffs.
• Have a library that is primarily Proton‑compatible or native Linux titles.
• Are prepared to maintain Mesa/Proton/kernel versions and community patches.

---

Practical guidance: a safe path for experimentation​

If you own an Ally X and are curious about the Linux gains, follow a staged, cautious approach.

• Optimize Windows first (recommended starting point)
• Enable Xbox Full‑Screen Experience and update Armoury Crate/AMD drivers.
• Trim startup apps and nonessential background services.
• Create per‑game TDP and fan profiles in Armoury Crate before doing anything drastic.
• Create recovery media
• Back up your Windows image and create official USB recovery media to restore the factory image if needed. Keep serials and warranty documentation handy.
• Test via live USB and dual‑boot
• Boot a Bazzite or SteamOS live image first, verify peripherals and suspend/resume, then install to a separate partition or secondary drive if comfortable. Dual‑boot preserves flexibility and warranty posture in most cases.
• Tune Linux stack
• Use Proton‑GE, keep Mesa and kernel versions current, and follow distro guides for Secure Boot/MOK enrollment.
• Adjust compositor (Gamescope/Wayland), shader‑cache settings and CPU/GPU governors; document changes so you can revert.
• Validate per‑game
• Run a short play session for each title you care about and monitor average FPS, 1% lows and battery behavior. If important games rely on anti‑cheat, confirm compatibility before depending on Linux.

This staged approach maximizes safety: you get the chance to measure real gains for the games you play while keeping Windows intact for compatibility reasons.

---

What OEMs and platform vendors should do (and why they should care)​

The community experiments with Bazzite aren’t just a curiosity — they’re a roadmap for where handheld OS experiences need to improve.

• For ASUS: publish clearer recovery images and documentation for users who choose to experiment. Consider offering an official SteamOS image or cooperating with Valve/community projects to provide a supported Linux option for power users.
• For Microsoft: close the gap on low‑level shader handling and reduce OS scheduling noise on handheld SKUs. A lighter “console mode” that can be toggled without reinstalling the entire OS would preserve compatibility while delivering a console‑like UX.
• For Valve: continue improving Proton/Mesa and the Fossilize/ shader distribution systems while working with OEMs on driver readiness for new handheld platforms. Valve’s Steam Deck work shows how much a curated stack matters for perceived smoothness.

If OEMs and Microsoft want Windows handhelds to compete with the polish users get on console‑first devices, they must tackle kernel, driver and shader‑delivery issues — not just UI shells.

---

Risks, caveats and unverifiable claims​

• The reported FPS deltas come from community hands‑on videos and writeups; they are strong proof‑of‑concepts but not vendor‑run, laboratory‑grade benchmarks. Results vary by Proton/Mesa/driver/kernel versions, game patches and firmware. Treat percentage improvements as directional rather than absolute guarantees.
• Some claims circulating in social media threads and posts imply a universal Linux advantage; that’s overly broad. Many games and many scenes show parity once Windows is carefully tuned, or when tested in high‑TDP plug‑in modes. The largest wins appear in shader‑heavy scenarios.
• Warranty and support consequences depend on manufacturer policy and local consumer protection law; installing a different OS typically complicates software support and may affect how vendors handle warranty claims. Preserve recovery images and documentation if you experiment.

Flagging these limitations is essential: the story is real and technically grounded, but the implications differ greatly between power users and mainstream purchasers.

---

Editorial analysis: why this matters for handheld PC gaming​

The Ally X experiments are significant because they highlight a recurring theme in the transition from desktop PC gaming to handheld, console‑like devices: software posture matters as much as silicon. Valve proved this with the Steam Deck — hardware and a tightly curated stack combine to reduce runtime surprises like shader hitching and produce a more consistent experience that feels “console‑like.” The Ally X tests show that Windows can deliver high peak performance, but the background baggage of a general‑purpose OS can still cost perceived smoothness where every hitch is magnified.
At the same time, ecosystem features — Game Pass, anti‑cheat, and broad storefront access — remain massive Windows advantages. For Microsoft and OEMs, the strategic challenge is clear: preserve those ecosystem benefits and shrink the OS and driver noise that undercuts handheld polish. For consumers, the practical choice will come down to library composition and tolerance for tinkering.

---

Final takeaway and recommendations for buyers​

• The Bazzite tests demonstrate real, repeatable performance and usability gains on the Ally X in specific workloads — especially shader‑heavy single‑player titles and mid‑range TDP settings — by reducing shader hitching and background scheduling noise.
• Those gains come with hard tradeoffs: anti‑cheat and Game Pass compatibility, OEM feature loss and potential support/warranty complications. Dual‑boot is the safest way for curious owners to experiment without losing Windows functionality.
• OEMs and Microsoft should treat these community experiments as actionable feedback: the handheld form factor rewards lighter, more deterministic OS stacks and better shader/cache tooling — areas where Windows and partners still have room to improve.

For readers who value polished single‑player runs and are comfortable with system maintenance, a cautious dual‑boot experiment may unlock better sustained gameplay on the Ally X. For everyone else who needs Game Pass, multiplayer compatibility and vendor support, optimizing Windows first remains the most pragmatic path.

---

The ROG Xbox Ally X is a fascinating case study: powerful hardware with the potential to feel like a next‑generation handheld, but also a reminder that in battery‑limited, thermal‑tight systems the software stack determines how well silicon is translated into playable performance.

---

Source: The Shortcut | Matt Swider Asus ROG Xbox Ally X is being held back by Windows – running Linux boosts game performance