Linux kernel fix CVE-2025-40104: ixgbevf mailbox negotiation and Azure Linux attestation

The Linux kernel fix for CVE-2025-40104 corrects a mailbox API compatibility problem in the ixgbevf driver by adding a feature-negotiation mailbox operation — and Microsoft’s public advisory that “Azure Linux includes this open‑source library and is therefore potentially affected” is accurate for that product family, but it is not a definitive statement that no other Microsoft product includes the same vulnerable code.

Background / Overview​

CVE-2025-40104 addresses a kernel driver interoperability issue in the Intel ixgbevf virtual-function driver used for 10G Ethernet adapters. The underlying problem was not a classic memory-corruption exploit but an API‑compatibility regression that arose when mailbox protocol capabilities were extended without a negotiation mechanism. The maintainers remedied this by adding a mailbox operation that queries which features the physical function (PF) supports and then enables those features safely on the virtual function (VF). This change was merged into the upstream kernel tree and subsequently tracked by major vulnerability databases and distributor trackers (NVD, Debian, SUSE, OSV and vendor advisories). Those records describe the problem as a correctness/compatibility fix and list the relevant kernel commits and backports. Why this matters operationally: when a driver assumes PF and VF have identical mailbox semantics, mismatches can trigger crashes, assertion failures, or misbehavior of offload code that depends on negotiated features (for example, IPsec offload support that is not implemented across all PF drivers). Adding an explicit feature-negotiation operation closes the gap and makes the VF behavior robust against PF-side variation.

---

What the technical fix does​

The mailbox compatibility problem, in plain terms​

The mailbox mechanism is the PF↔VF RPC channel used to advertise features and coordinate actions between virtual functions and their parent physical function. Historically a loose compatibility model allowed features to be implied by API versioning. Over time, vendors extended mailbox semantics to add features such as IPsec offload or ESX‑specific mailbox enhancements. Because not every PF driver implements the same extensions (or implements them in the same timeline), raising the global API version without a negotiated capability bitmap created a mismatch: the VF could attempt to use features the PF did not actually support. That mismatch manifested as functional regressions and could lead to instability.

The remediation implemented​

The upstream remedy introduces a new mailbox operation that explicitly requests supported features from the PF and returns a capability bitmap. The VF uses that bitmap to decide whether to enable IPsec offload, ESX-specific behaviors, or any later-added features. This approach decouples feature exposure from a single API version number and enables future extensions without regressing compatibility. The patch was designed to be small and easily backportable to stable kernel branches.

---

Microsoft’s advisory: what was said — and what it means​

Microsoft’s published statement for this CVE explicitly called out Azure Linux as a Microsoft-maintained product that includes the implicated open-source component and therefore is potentially affected. That advisory also noted Microsoft’s broader effort to publish machine-readable CSAF/VEX attestations (a product-by-product inventory mechanism) and committed to updating the CVE/VEX records if additional Microsoft products are found to include the same library.
Two key, practical readings of that statement:

• It is an authoritative attestation for Azure Linux: Microsoft inspected the Azure Linux images and found the component; Azure Linux customers should treat that product as in-scope and prioritize remediation based on the vendor’s attestation.
• It is not an explicit claim of exclusivity: absence of an attestation for another Microsoft product is not proof that the product is free of the component. Microsoft’s phased VEX/CSAF rollout began with Azure Linux; other product families will be inventoried and attested over time. Until a product is checked and attested, its status remains “unknown” rather than “not affected.”

This is consistent with how modern vendors approach large-scale binary inventory: start with a prioritized set of artifacts, publish machine-readable attestations for those artifacts, then expand coverage. Microsoft’s public wording reflects that procedural approach rather than asserting that Azure Linux is the only possible carrier.

---

Is Azure Linux the only Microsoft product that could be affected?​

Short answer: No — Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product Microsoft has publicly attested as including the implicated library so far, but other Microsoft artifacts could include the same code depending on how they were built and packaged. Treat Microsoft’s Azure Linux attestation as authoritative for Azure Linux, not as a universal exclusion for other Microsoft products.
Why that nuance matters:

• Microsoft’s estate ships multiple Linux-related artifacts: Azure Linux images (CBL‑Mariner lineage), the linux-azure kernels used in some VM SKUs, WSL2 kernel builds, curated Marketplace VM images, AKS node images, and partner Marketplace appliances. Each artifact is built independently and requires its own inventory check. A kernel driver or module present in one artifact may be absent from another depending on the chosen kernel config and packaging.
• Some Microsoft images use upstream distro kernels, others use Microsoft-built kernels; some third-party appliances in the Azure Marketplace are published by independent vendors. Microsoft’s VEX inventory for Azure Linux does not automatically cover all those other artifacts.
• There are plausible ways the same ixgbevf code could appear elsewhere: Microsoft-maintained linux-azure kernels, older WSL2 kernel builds, or Marketplace images using Microsoft‑tuned kernels could have an ixgbevf module compiled in if the kernel config included that driver. Until those binaries are audited and attested, their status is unknown.

---

Cross-checks and independent validation​

Multiple independent sources that track open-source vulnerabilities document the ixgbevf mailbox fix and the CVE mapping:

• The NVD entry records CVE-2025-40104 and summarizes the mailbox API compatibility fix.
• OSV and major distro security trackers (Debian, SUSE) also list CVE-2025-40104 and reference the kernel commits and backports that implement the feature-negotiation op.

These independent trackers confirm the technical description and the remediation approach (add a mailbox op to negotiate supported features), and they show how vendors and distributions have mapped the upstream commits into package updates. That cross-referencing supports two important conclusions: (1) the fix is real and available upstream, and (2) distributions and vendors will need to deliver kernel package updates or backports to remediate their customers.

---

Practical impact and risk model​

What systems are most likely to be affected​

• Hosts and VMs that load the ixgbevf kernel module (commonly present in systems that use Intel 10G SR-IOV-capable NICs and enable VF drivers).
• Cloud images and appliances that ship or load the ixgbevf VF driver, including guest images or host kernels that include Intel VF support.
• Virtualized environments where PF/VF interactions are exercised (for example, environments that use SR‑IOV to pass virtual functions to guest VMs or containers).

What the vulnerability enables (realistic impact)​

This is a compatibility and stability bug rather than a remote code-execution primitive. In practice the hazard is:

• Functional regressions of offload features (IPsec offload attempts when the PF does not support them),
• Potential crashes or misbehavior when a VF tries to use PF-provided mailbox operations the PF does not implement, and
• Operational instability in multi-tenant or SR‑IOV environments that rely on predictable PF↔VF semantics.

The severity profile in public trackers treats this as a correctness/availability type problem: fix promptly for reliability, but it is not commonly scored as an unauthenticated remote compromise pathway.

---

Recommended actions for administrators and operators​

• Inventory Microsoft-supplied artifacts in use:
• Enumerate Azure VM images, AKS node images, WSL kernels, Marketplace appliances, and any Microsoft-maintained Linux kernels in your estate.
• For each image or kernel, determine whether ixgbevf is present (lsmod/modinfo or package inspection).
• Prioritize remediation for artifacts confirmed to include ixgbevf:
• Apply vendor/supply-chain-provided kernel updates that include the upstream mailbox negotiation fix.
• For Azure Linux images, follow Microsoft’s published VEX/CSAF attestation guidance and the Azure image update channels (the advisory already marks Azure Linux as potentially affected).
• For other Microsoft artifacts (WSL, linux-azure, Marketplace images):
• Do not assume safety. Verify the binary or kernel package directly (uname -r; modinfo ixgbevf; check kernel config). If the driver is present and the kernel predates the fix, plan for updates or mitigations.
• Short-term mitigations where patching is delayed:
• If vf/pf mailbox interactions are not required, consider blacklisting the ixgbevf module on affected hosts until a patched kernel is available.
• Restrict SR‑IOV or VF passthrough to trusted tenants and hosts; avoid exposing VFs to untrusted workloads.
• Monitor dmesg/journal for driver fault signatures and mailbox-related errors.
• Use vendor attestations as one signal, not a single source of truth:
• Ingest Microsoft’s VEX/CSAF output for automation where available; complement it with in‑place artifact verification and package changelog checks. Microsoft’s attestation for Azure Linux is a high-fidelity signal for that product, but inventory remains necessary for all other artifacts.

---

Strengths of the response — and residual risks​

Notable strengths​

• The upstream kernel fix is small, targeted, and conceptually straightforward: explicit feature negotiation is a robust compatibility pattern and simplifies future extensions without breaking older PF/VF pairs. Multiple distributors have already mapped the fix into package updates, facilitating remediation.
• Microsoft’s move to publish machine-readable CSAF/VEX attestations (starting with Azure Linux) improves transparency and allows automation of remediation prioritization for the attested product family. That is a material operational improvement for customers running Azure Linux images.

Residual risks and operational caveats​

• Inventory gap risk: large vendors ship many artifacts; a phased attestation rollout necessarily leaves some products in a transient “unknown” state. Teams that rely solely on a vendor’s attestation list risk missing carriers that have not yet been inventoried. Microsoft explicitly committed to expanding attestations, but until that is complete any absence is only absence of attestation, not proof of absence.
• Out‑of‑tree or OEM kernel builds: vendors and independent appliance publishers sometimes ship custom kernels or out-of-tree modules that lag upstream changes. Those may remain unpatched longer and require direct vendor engagement.
• Detection noise: mailbox and PF/VF mismatch errors can look like device-specific offload failures or intermittent VF behavior; operators should correlate driver logs and system telemetry before concluding an environment is unaffected.

---

How to validate a Microsoft artifact’s exposure status (practical checklist)​

• Identify the artifact: Azure VM image, AKS node pool image, WSL2 kernel, Marketplace appliance, or other Microsoft-sourced image.
• Boot or inspect the image and run:
• uname -r (kernel version)
• modinfo ixgbevf (if the module exists)
• grep CONFIG_IXGBEVF /boot/config-$(uname -r) (if config accessible)
• If ixgbevf is present and the kernel predates the stable commit that added the mailbox negotiation op, flag the host as in-scope for remediation and obtain vendor-supplied updated kernel packages or backports.

If a Microsoft VEX/CSAF attestation is available for the product, ingest that attestation to accelerate triage — but still perform the binary-level checks above for any artifact that the attestation does not cover.

---

Conclusion​

CVE-2025-40104 is a pragmatic, compatibility-driven kernel fix: the ixgbevf VF driver now queries PF-supported features via a new mailbox op to avoid the versioning-based regressions that previously caused misbehavior. Multiple independent trackers confirm the fix and map it into distribution package updates. Microsoft’s public advisory that Azure Linux includes the open-source library and is therefore potentially affected is an authoritative product-level attestation for Azure Linux and a helpful automation signal for customers using that image family. However, it does not categorically state that Azure Linux is the only Microsoft product that could include the vulnerable code; absence of an attestation for other Microsoft artifacts is absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. Security teams should combine vendor attestations with artifact-level verification and inventory checks across WSL kernels, linux-azure kernels, Marketplace images, and any other Microsoft-distributed Linux artifacts.
Operational priority: treat attested Azure Linux images as in-scope and patch them quickly, but do not neglect the broader estate — confirm the presence or absence of ixgbevf in other Microsoft artifacts and apply vendor or distro kernel updates where needed. Caveat: where a non‑Microsoft image or a third‑party Marketplace appliance is used, the appliance publisher or original distro vendor remains the authoritative source for when a fixed kernel package is available; treat each image’s provenance as part of the remediation workflow.

---

---

Source: MSRC Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center