Litera Joins Microsoft AI Inner Circle to Embed AI in 365 Apps

Litera’s selection to Microsoft’s 2025–2026 AI Business Solutions Inner Circle underscores a decisive moment in legal technology: a major legal‑tech vendor has won a place among Microsoft’s top AI partners, reinforcing a strategy that embeds AI where lawyers already work — inside Microsoft 365 — and signaling accelerated adoption of agentic legal assistants and Microsoft‑native legal workflows across law firms and corporate legal teams.

Background​

Litera, a long‑standing vendor in legal productivity and risk tools, announced its selection to Microsoft’s 2025–2026 AI Business Solutions Inner Circle, a program reserved for the very highest‑performing partners in Microsoft’s AI Business Solutions ecosystem. Membership in this peer group is contingent on measured sales performance and strategic alignment with Microsoft’s AI Business Solutions initiatives, and is widely recognized as a marker of both commercial success and close product collaboration with Microsoft.
This recognition arrives amid a flurry of Litera product and partnership announcements over the last 18 months: a unified Litera One interface designed to consolidate drafting, review, knowledge, and firm intelligence; the launch of Lito, an agentic legal AI assistant built into Litera One; and strategic M&A and investment moves aimed at beefing up CRM/ERM and business‑development capabilities that run on Microsoft platforms. Together, these moves position Litera as a vendor marrying traditional legal workflow tools with next‑generation AI capabilities and deep Microsoft platform integrations.

---

Overview: What the Inner Circle award actually means​

What Inner Circle status signals​

• Market performance recognition. Inner Circle membership is awarded to a small fraction of Microsoft’s partner base — the program is described by Microsoft and many partner announcements as representing the top tier (commonly referred to as the “top 1%”) of Microsoft Business Applications/AI Business Solutions partners globally.
• Strategic access and influence. Members participate in an Inner Circle Summit and a series of curated executive and technical briefings with Microsoft leadership, gaining early insight into road maps, product strategy, and integration opportunities.
• Go‑to‑market leverage. Achieving Inner Circle status amplifies a partner’s visibility to large enterprise customers, often translating to priority engagements, co‑selling opportunities, and deeper product engineering collaboration with Microsoft.

Why this matters for the legal sector​

Litera’s Inner Circle recognition is notable because the legal industry — historically conservative about changing core drafting and practice workflows — has tended to adopt new platforms more slowly than other sectors. A top‑tier Microsoft partnership accelerates Litera’s ability to:

• integrate features directly into Microsoft Word, Outlook, and Teams;
• leverage Microsoft Copilot and Azure AI services for enterprise‑grade deployments; and
• combine Dynamics 365/Power Platform/Dataverse capabilities to manage client and matter data at scale.

For law firms that standardize on Microsoft 365 and Azure, this reduces integration friction and shortens deployment timelines for advanced AI‑powered legal workflows.

---

Litera’s strategy: AI within the tools lawyers already use​

From standalone AI to embedded intelligence​

Litera’s public positioning is explicit: rather than release standalone consumer‑style AI apps, the company is embedding AI into existing, proven products across drafting, knowledge, business development, and governance. The headline components of that strategy include:

• Litera One: a unified interface that brings drafting, review, knowledge, and firm intelligence into a single environment inside Microsoft Word and Outlook.
• Lito: an agentic legal AI assistant intended to act as a virtual team member that can orchestrate workflows, retrieve context, and execute tasks in Outlook and web interfaces.
• Foundation / Foundation Insights / Foundation Dragon / Kira: a set of ML‑ and GenAI‑powered capabilities for deal‑point extraction, contract review, and firm intelligence.
• Platform focus: deep use of Microsoft technologies — Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Dataverse, Microsoft 365 integrations, Outlook, Teams, and Azure — for both data, process orchestration, and enterprise security.

This approach is deliberately pragmatic: keep the interface familiar (Word, Outlook), reduce context switching, and add AI as workflow accelerants rather than as separate novelty apps.

Business moves and consolidation​

Litera has made targeted acquisitions and investments to expand its Microsoft‑centered footprint in legal CRM/ERM and business development. These transactions tighten Litera’s value proposition for firms seeking to unify client engagement, matter management, and business development data inside Microsoft‑based ecosystems.

---

What law firms and legal teams stand to gain​

Productivity and workflow consolidation​

• Fewer tool boundaries. Consolidating drafting, review, knowledge retrieval, and client info into a single Microsoft‑native interface reduces the cognitive and time cost of toggling among multiple specialist tools.
• Faster drafting and review. Integrated comparison, clause libraries, and AI‑assisted drafting workflows can shorten routine document drafting and review by measurable hours per week.
• Better client engagement. When CRM/ERM and matter data are unified on Dynamics/Dataverse and surfaced directly in Outlook or Word, relationship intelligence becomes actionable — enabling timely outreach and more targeted business development.

Security, compliance, and enterprise operational advantages​

• Enterprise controls and governance. Solutions deployed on Azure and integrated with Microsoft 365 can tap into enterprise security controls, conditional access, DLP policies, and audit trails that law firms and corporate legal departments rely on.
• Faster enterprise deployment. For firms that already standardize on Microsoft stack, Litera’s Microsoft‑native approach can reduce integration costs and time‑to‑value compared with bespoke or third‑party integration projects.

---

The technology inside the claim: agentic AI, Copilot, and integrations​

Lito and agentic assistants​

Agentic AI refers to systems that go beyond conversational responses to act on the user’s behalf: pulling data, running workflows, and initiating actions. Lito is positioned as an agentic assistant tailored for legal workflows: it is designed to orchestrate drafting, review, and knowledge retrieval tasks with contextual understanding of the firm’s data and policies.
Agentic systems can deliver huge time savings — automating tedious tasks like initial document assembly, precedent retrieval, or contract redlining — but they also raise important governance questions around accuracy, authority, and traceability.

Microsoft platform tooling: Copilot, Dynamics 365, Power Platform, Dataverse, Azure​

Litera’s architecture builds on a stack of Microsoft technologies that together enable data modeling, automation, and AI:

• Microsoft Copilot and Copilot integrations: enable conversational and contextual AI inside Microsoft 365 apps, which Litera can augment with legal‑specific workflows and data.
• Dynamics 365 and Power Platform: provide CRM/ERM, case/matter management capabilities and low‑code automation for custom legal processes.
• Dataverse: supplies a normalized data layer for relationship, matter, and client data across the Microsoft ecosystem.
• Azure and Azure AI services: are used for scalable compute, model hosting, security, and regional compliance.

This combination helps Litera position solutions as enterprise‑ready while giving firms the security posture they expect from Azure and Microsoft 365.

---

Critical analysis: strengths, limitations, and risks​

Strengths — why Inner Circle endorsement matters for Litera and customers​

• Credibility and engineering alignment. Inner Circle status is a strong endorsement of both commercial success and engineering collaboration with Microsoft. Firms can expect faster bug resolution, privileged engineering channels, and possibly prioritized feature road‑mapping.
• Reduced integration friction. Microsoft‑native deployments simplify many operational headaches for firms already on M365 and Azure, lowering cost and risk barriers.
• Comprehensive legal domain focus. Litera’s long history in legal workflows gives domain depth that many generic AI vendors lack, particularly for specialized drafting and firm governance needs.
• End‑to‑end workflow vision. Combining drafting, knowledge management, business development, and matter management into one platform offers tangible ROI potential through time savings and risk reduction.

Limitations and implementation friction​

• Vendor lock‑in risk. Deeper dependence on a single vendor stack (Litera + Microsoft) can increase switching costs. Firms should evaluate long‑term flexibility and data portability.
• Complex deployment at scale. Integration with firm‑specific practice management systems, matter lifecycles, and legacy DMS/ECM repositories still requires planning, especially across global offices with different data residency rules.
• Customization vs. upgradeability. Heavy customizations on top of Dynamics or Power Platform can complicate future upgrades and product parity across offices.

AI‑specific risks and governance challenges​

• Hallucination and legal accuracy. Agentic assistants and generative models are still prone to hallucination. In legal practice, an incorrect clause suggestion or misinterpreted obligation can have serious client and ethical consequences.
• Auditability and explainability. Firms must demand clear provenance, logging, and auditable decision trails for AI‑driven outputs to meet malpractice, regulatory, and client obligations.
• Data residency and confidentiality. Attorney‑client privilege and cross‑border data regulation require careful architecture: firms must ensure data used to train or contextualize models is handled under strict policies, and that models do not leak confidential content.
• Model governance and legal ethics. Deployment policies should address who is accountable for AI outputs, what disclaimers are necessary, and when human signoff is mandatory.

---

Practical guidance for legal buyers and legal operations​

Due diligence checklist before adopting Litera’s Microsoft‑native AI offerings​

• Verify the data handling model: where data is stored, whether PII or privileged content is used for model tuning, and whether data is retained in customer‑controlled environments.
• Require model transparency and SLAs: seek commitments for error rates, model update cadence, and support escalation paths in contractual terms.
• Confirm audit and logging capabilities: ensure every agentic action and AI recommendation is recorded with provenance metadata that can be audited.
• Validate security posture: request SOC/Security attestations, encryption at rest/in transit, and compatibility with the firm’s conditional access and DLP policies.
• Plan a staged roll‑out: pilot with non‑live matters, evaluate outputs, and introduce human‑in‑the‑loop checkpoints before full production use.

Implementation best practices​

• Start with high‑value, low‑risk workflows (e.g., clause retrieval, precedent search) before tackling full agentic automation.
• Embed legal ops and compliance teams in the project governance structure to manage policies and change control.
• Institute periodic quality reviews and QA processes to spot model drift or content inaccuracies.
• Provide clear user training focused on limitations of AI, how to check AI outputs, and when to escalate.

---

Market implications and competitor landscape​

Litera’s Inner Circle recognition elevates its standing relative to both traditional legal software vendors and new AI entrants. Key market implications include:

• Acceleration of Microsoft‑centric legal ecosystems. Law firms that standardize on M365/Azure may increasingly prefer Microsoft‑native legal stack providers to reduce integration complexity.
• Pressure on specialist vendors. Smaller point‑solution vendors that lack deep Microsoft integrations may face tougher competitive dynamics unless they offer unique IP or superior model governance.
• Channel for differentiated services. Legal consultancies and systems integrators with Microsoft and Litera expertise will find new demand for modernization projects, migrations, and agentic‑AI enablement.

At the same time, competitive pressures will force Litera to demonstrate measurable accuracy, compliance readiness, and transparent governance to sustain trust with high‑risk legal customers.

---

What to watch next​

• Product maturity of Lito. Agentic assistants are powerful but also complex. Monitor Lito’s rollout, especially real‑world performance metrics, error rates, and governance features such as audit trails and human override capabilities.
• Co‑engineering with Microsoft. Look for deeper Copilot and Copilot Studio integrations, and whether Litera gains early access to new Microsoft agentic features via Inner Circle channels.
• Regulatory and bar guidance. Watch for professional responsibility guidance from bar associations and regulators addressing AI use in legal practice; this will materially affect adoption and required controls.
• Customer case studies and third‑party audits. Independent assessments, customer ROI studies, and third‑party security audits will be crucial evidence for risk‑averse law firms.

---

Conclusion​

Litera’s elevation into Microsoft’s AI Business Solutions Inner Circle is a meaningful signal: it confirms the vendor’s commercial momentum and establishes a stronger engineering channel with Microsoft at a moment when legal teams are actively experimenting with AI‑augmented workflows. For law firms, the promise is clear — more seamless Microsoft‑native experiences, agentic assistants that can automate repetitive legal tasks, and a consolidated platform for drafting, knowledge, and client intelligence.
But the opportunity comes with obligations. Successful and safe adoption will require rigorous governance, clear contractual protections, staged rollouts, and an insistence on auditability and accuracy. Firms that combine Litera’s deep domain capabilities with disciplined model governance and tight operational controls can unlock substantial productivity gains. Those that overlook the risks expose themselves to compliance, confidentiality, and professional responsibility hazards.
The Microsoft‑Litera alignment tightens the path toward ubiquitous AI in legal workflows. The next 12–18 months will determine whether agentic legal assistants like Lito move from promising pilots to trusted, auditable tools that actually reduce risk while amplifying lawyer productivity.

---

Source: Morningstar https://www.morningstar.com/news/business-wire/20250922605740/litera-achieves-the-2025-2026-microsoft-ai-business-solutions-inner-circle-award/

 

[ChatGPT]

Litera’s selection for Microsoft’s 2025–2026 AI Business Solutions Inner Circle is a significant milestone for the legal‑technology vendor and a clear signal that Microsoft is treating legal workflows as a strategic arena for Copilot, Dynamics 365, and Power Platform‑driven automation. This recognition places Litera among the highest‑performing partners in Microsoft’s Business Applications ecosystem and amplifies the company’s ability to shape product roadmaps, deepen engineering collaboration, and accelerate enterprise deployments where lawyers already work: inside Microsoft 365.

Background​

What the Inner Circle is — and why it matters​

Microsoft’s Inner Circle for Business Applications — now often referenced in partner communications as the AI Business Solutions Inner Circle — is an invitation‑only cohort that recognizes a small group of partners for exceptional sales performance, co‑sell success, and demonstrated customer outcomes across Dynamics 365, Power Platform, and Copilot scenarios. Partners in this cohort receive privileged engagement with Microsoft product leaders, access to curated briefings and the Inner Circle Summit, and increased visibility in joint go‑to‑market activities. Multiple partner announcements for the 2025–2026 cycle consistently describe Inner Circle membership as belonging to the top tier of partners globally.
It’s important to be precise: partner press releases routinely describe Inner Circle as representing roughly the top 1% of Business Applications partners, but Microsoft does not publish a single public tally that makes that percentage independently verifiable. As such, the “top 1%” figure is a widely repeated industry shorthand rather than a Microsoft‑published metric. Readers should treat that framing as representative of elite status rather than a regulated or audited statistic.

Litera’s announcement and corporate context​

Litera’s press release (distributed via Business Wire and republished across news outlets) confirms the company’s inclusion in the 2025–2026 Inner Circle and highlights the practical benefits: invitations to the Inner Circle Summit in Spring 2026, executive briefings, and opportunities to collaborate with Microsoft on roadmaps and product strategy. Litera emphasized that this placement reflects strong sales performance and deep technical alignment with Microsoft platform technologies.
Litera also used the announcement to reiterate strategic messaging that has guided its product roadmap across 2024–2025: a Microsoft‑native approach that embeds AI into Microsoft Word, Outlook, Teams and Dynamics 365 workflows rather than shipping standalone consumer‑style apps. Key recent product moves include the launch of Litera One — a unified, Microsoft 365‑integrated platform — and Lito, an agentic legal AI assistant intended to orchestrate tasks within Outlook and web workflows. These innovations underline Litera’s effort to deliver AI where lawyers already work.

---

Why Litera’s Inner Circle status matters for legal teams​

Acceleration of Microsoft‑native legal workflows​

For law firms and corporate legal departments that have standardized on Microsoft 365 and Azure, Litera’s Inner Circle status materially reduces friction for advanced AI adoption. Firms already invested in Word, Outlook, Teams, and Dynamics 365 gain a partner that is both deeply embedded in that stack and privileged in Microsoft’s partner channels — which typically results in earlier access to platform previews, prioritized engineering support, and co‑sell motions that lower procurement friction. This matters when deployments must meet strict confidentiality, governance, and auditing needs typical in legal practice.

Improved time‑to‑value for legal automation​

Litera’s strategy centers on embedding AI into familiar tools (Word/Outlook) and connecting drafting, review, precedent retrieval, and matter data through a unified surface. For many legal workflows, that reduces context switching and can yield measurable productivity gains: Litera’s own product materials point to time savings in drafting and review workflows, with integrated clause libraries, litera Draft upgrades and agentic features designed to accelerate repetitive tasks. Independent reporting on Litera One’s rollout corroborates those claims about consolidation and reduced fragmentation across legal toolchains.

---

Product and platform details — what Litera brings to Microsoft​

Litera One and Litera AI+​

Litera One is a unified, cloud‑first platform designed to bring drafting, review, knowledge management, and firm intelligence into a single Microsoft 365‑embedded experience. The platform is intended to present a consistent interface in Word and Outlook while connecting to backend services such as Foundation insights and Firm Intelligence. Litera also markets Litera AI+ as its GenAI engine and Lito as an agentic assistant that can orchestrate cross‑tool workflows. These features are explicitly positioned to operate within Microsoft 365 and Azure environments, leveraging the security and governance controls those platforms provide.

Microsoft technologies Litera leans on​

Litera’s public materials and the Inner Circle announcement emphasize deep reliance on Microsoft technologies:

• Microsoft 365 (Word/Outlook/Teams) for the user experience and embedded workflows.
• Dynamics 365, Power Platform, and Dataverse for CRM/ERM, matter management, and relationship intelligence.
• Azure and Azure AI services for scalable compute, model hosting, and enterprise security controls.

This stack choice enables Litera to deliver governed, enterprise‑grade deployments while simplifying integration for firms already standardized on Microsoft. However, it also concentrates architectural dependency on a single hyperscaler and its partner‑ecosystem modalities.

---

Critical analysis: strengths, limits, and real‑world risks​

Strengths — why this is a strong commercial and technical position​

• Engineering alignment and privileged channels. Inner Circle membership typically grants partners earlier product previews, prioritized engineering access, and opportunities to surface product feedback to Microsoft leaders — advantages that speed integration and problem resolution.
• Work-in‑place approach. Embedding AI in Word and Outlook reduces disruption to attorney workflows, which is crucial for adoption in a profession resistant to radical UI changes. Litera’s unified Litera One experience and connector strategy lower the cognitive cost of using AI features.
• Domain expertise in legal workflows. Litera has a long history in legal drafting, review, and governance tools; this domain depth makes its AI features more narrowly tuned to legal use cases versus generalist AI vendors. Litera’s product roadmap and acquisitions reflect a deliberate focus on legal CRM/ERM and matter management integrated into Microsoft platforms.

Risks and implementation caveats​

• Vendor coupling and lock‑in. A tightly Microsoft‑native architecture reduces integration overhead for Microsoft‑standardized firms, but it increases switching costs and potential vendor negotiation exposure. Firms should assess long‑term data exportability, IP ownership of models, and portability of workflows.
• Agentic AI governance. Agentic assistants like Lito — which can act on behalf of users to retrieve data, execute workflows, or alter documents — introduce governance, audit, and liability concerns. In legal work, a hallucinated clause or incorrect obligation is not merely an operational error but a potential malpractice risk. Firms must insist on auditable provenance and human‑in‑the‑loop controls.
• Data residency and privileged content. Attorney‑client privilege and cross‑border data rules mean that model training, prompt context, and caching strategies must be explicit and controllable. Firms must verify where contextual data is stored, whether models are fine‑tuned on customer content, and how long transient logs are retained.
• Operational scaling complexity. Large law firms operate across geographies with differing data residency, practice management systems, and DMS/ECM repositories. Successful enterprise rollouts require global delivery templates, disciplined change control, and predictable upgrade paths on both Litera and Microsoft platforms.

Unverifiable or cautionary claims​

• The Inner Circle press materials and partner messaging frequently state “top 1%” status. While this is a consistent industry characterization, Microsoft has not published an official percentage that would verify this exact number. Treat the statistic as illustrative of elite partner status rather than a formally confirmed metric.

---

Due diligence checklist for law firms and legal operations​

Before committing to a Litera + Microsoft‑native AI deployment, legal buyers should require explicit answers and contractual protections in these areas.

• Data handling and residency
• Where will client and matter data be stored (region, tenant, controlled storage)?
• Will any customer content be used to fine‑tune models? If so, under what controls and with what opt‑outs?
• Model governance and audit trails
• Can Litera provide auditable provenance metadata for every agentic action (who/what triggered it, what prompts were used, what data sources were consulted)?
• Are logs immutable and retained in a manner that supports legal auditability?
• Accuracy SLAs and red‑team testing
• Request baseline error rates, red‑team/hallucination case studies, and remediation playbooks.
• Negotiate service level agreements covering model performance, update cadence, and access to post‑deployment fixes.
• Security and compliance posture
• Require SOC/ISO attestations, encryption standards, and integration compatibility with your conditional access, DLP, and EDR solutions.
• Portability and exit terms
• Define data export formats, model migration strategies, and support for migrating on‑prem or to other cloud vendors if needed.
• Human oversight and sign‑off rules
• Define policies for when human sign‑off is mandatory (e.g., first draft for critical contract clauses, final review before submission).
• Pilot and staged roll‑out
• Start with low‑risk, high‑value workflows (clause retrieval, precedent search).
• Run pilots on archival matters or non‑binding documents to validate outputs and workflows.

This checklist is practical and directly actionable. Firms should include these topics in procurement scoring and request tailored implementation runbooks from vendors.

---

What customers should expect from Inner Circle access​

Earlier feature previews, not guaranteed product fixes​

Inner Circle partners often report earlier visibility into Microsoft roadmaps, co‑engineering sessions, and prioritized technical briefings — advantages that speed integration. That said, Inner Circle status does not equate to exclusive access to all future Microsoft features, nor does it guarantee all feature requests will be implemented. It increases influence; it does not create an unconditional entitlement to bespoke platform features.

Go‑to‑market advantages and joint selling​

Inner Circle membership is designed to unlock co‑sell motion and go‑to‑market alignment. Practically, that means partner‑led opportunities can receive more coordinated support from Microsoft field teams, and strategic customers may see stronger joint proposals. This can shorten procurement cycles for firms evaluating Copilot or Dynamics‑based legal accelerators.

---

Market and competitive context​

Why Microsoft‑centric legal platforms are gaining ground​

Microsoft’s strategic pivot to infuse Copilot and agent capabilities into Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, and the Power Platform has reshaped partner economics. Vendors that can deliver industry‑specific copilots and agentic scenarios inside Microsoft apps gain a compelling commercial narrative for buyers who prioritize security, governance, and integration with existing productivity tooling. Litera’s deep Microsoft integrations place it among the incumbents that can convert that platform momentum into legal outcomes.

Pressure on standalone legal AI point solutions​

Stand‑alone AI applications that require frequent context switching and bespoke integrations will face increased competition from Microsoft‑native players. That’s not to say specialized vendors will vanish — many point solutions offer unique IP or superior niche functionality — but the bar for seamless enterprise adoption is steadily rising. Partnerships with systems integrators and consultancies that can bridge Microsoft and legal tech expertise will be a differentiator in migration engagements.

---

Implementation playbook: practical steps for IT and legal ops teams​

• Phase 1 — Discovery and alignment
• Map existing tool footprint (DMS, practice management, matter lifecycle).
• Prioritize workflows where integration into Word/Outlook reduces friction (document drafting, clause libraries, precedent retrieval).
• Phase 2 — Contractual guardrails and security checks
• Complete security questionnaire, require SOC/third‑party attestation, and set model/data residency clauses.
• Phase 3 — Pilot and validation
• Run a timebound pilot with real but non‑mission critical matters.
• Evaluate hallucination incidence, QA processes, and audit traceability.
• Phase 4 — Governance and training
• Draft AI usage policies, define human sign‑off thresholds, and run mandatory user training emphasizing limitations and verification.
• Phase 5 — Scale and continuous monitoring
• Use operational KPIs (time saved per matter, error rate, user adoption) and periodic red‑team exercises to measure drift and sagging accuracy.

These steps reduce deployment risk while permitting legal teams to realize productivity gains. Litigation and corporate practice groups, where a single clause error can be material, should adopt conservative phasing with extended human verification.

---

What to watch next​

• Lito’s real‑world performance metrics. Monitor pilot results and customer case studies for hallucination rates, provenance quality, and user acceptance. These operational metrics will be more important than marketing claims.
• Inner Circle Summit outcomes in Spring 2026. Partners will likely share pilots and co‑engineering priorities; attendees’ announcements will reveal which Microsoft agentic features are prioritized and how tightly partners can integrate them into customer workflows.
• Regulatory and bar guidance for AI in legal practice. Legal regulators and bar associations are increasingly attentive to AI‑usage standards; guidance or formal rules could reshape acceptable deployment patterns and required disclosures.

---

Conclusion​

Litera’s inclusion in Microsoft’s 2025–2026 AI Business Solutions Inner Circle is a validation of its Microsoft‑first product strategy and its ambition to embed AI directly into lawyers’ existing workflows. For law firms and corporate legal teams that are already standardized on Microsoft 365 and Azure, the combination of Litera’s domain expertise and Inner Circle access to Microsoft’s product channels can shorten time‑to‑value for Copilot‑style legal automation. However, those benefits come with tradeoffs: closer coupling to Microsoft’s stack, renewed emphasis on model governance and auditability, and the need for rigorous contractual protections around data usage and model behavior.
The practical path forward for legal buyers is pragmatic: validate vendor claims with pilot data, insist on auditable provenance and SLAs, phase deployments into low‑risk workflows, and codify human oversight and training. When treated with appropriate governance, the Citadel of Microsoft + Litera has the potential to streamline legal work and reduce routine load, but success will ultimately depend on disciplined implementation, transparent model controls, and measurable outcomes.

---

Source: Business Wire https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250922605740/en/Litera-Achieves-the-2025-2026-Microsoft-AI-Business-Solutions-Inner-Circle-Award/