Microsoft Copilot Risks: Managing Data Oversharing Effectively

  • Thread Author
If you've been keeping an eye on Microsoft's developments or have a checklist titled "Innovation Wishlist for 2025,” you've likely come across their powerhouse tool, Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365. It’s the kind of cutting-edge application that earns a standing ovation in boardrooms—automating routine tasks like summarizing emails, generating presentations, and even reviewing complicated contracts. But before you break into applause, there’s a looming shadow beyond its bright prospects: the very real and risky possibility of data oversharing.
With organizations rushing to incorporate Copilot into their daily workflows, there’s one pressing question every IT administrator needs to address: how do you prevent Copilot from spilling your organization's secrets into unintended corners? Let’s dive into this issue—and rest assured, there’s a framework for assessing and mitigating these risks. Enter Knostic’s readiness assessment and continuous improvement model.

Vibrant neon lights swirl around a glowing abstract logo in a futuristic cityscape.
The Functionality That Makes Copilot Revolutionary — and Risky​

Microsoft Copilot integrates seamlessly with the Microsoft 365 suite, promising miraculous productivity boosts. Picture this: an AI summarizing emails that would otherwise consume half your Monday morning, or developing sleek PowerPoint decks in minutes instead of hours. It truly feels like having a super-organized and tireless personal assistant, with the added bonus that Copilot never asks for coffee breaks.
However, as amazing as Copilot is, one of its assets—deep integration across tools like Outlook, Teams, OneDrive, and SharePoint—doubles as its Achilles’ heel. This level of access is both Copilot's selling point and a potential Pandora's box.
Here’s where the trouble comes in. Imagine:
  • Accidental Overreach: Copilot drafts a summary for a casual email but inadvertently pulls in confidential HR files due to loosely configured permissions.
  • Business Missteps: What if the AI pulls financial details or patient records into a presentation meant for external partners?
  • Compliance Nightmares: Enterprises dealing with data governed by laws like GDPR or HIPAA might find themselves walking on eggshells every time Copilot lifts sensitive data into its results.
Microsoft designed Copilot to “assist” but not “overstep,” yet the responsibility for safe deployment ultimately rests with enterprises. Hence, the buzz around governance controls and risk assessments.

Knostic’s Readiness Assessment: A Risk-Reduction Beacon for Copilot​

Knostic, an enterprise-focused cybersecurity company, has proposed a timely readiness framework. In an age where technology deployment happens at lightspeed but risk mitigation lags behind, Knostic has designed a program addressing oversharing concerns directly tied to AI-driven tools like Copilot.
Here’s what their readiness assessment promises to cover:
  • Pinpointing Risk Zones: Their approach provides organizations with a baseline understanding of over-permissioned accounts—users or systems with more access to data than they reasonably need.
  • Establishing Governance Controls: Tools and methodologies to set stricter boundaries on what Copilot should access.
  • Continuous Improvement Loop: This isn’t a one-and-done process. Knostic advocates running these assessments continuously, ensuring permissions remain appropriate as staff roles evolve, projects shift, and data sensitivity fluctuates.
Interestingly, this assessment is not just technical fluff. It’s grounded in practical risk governance, and let’s face it: while IT teams might love to tinker, enterprise boardrooms are swayed by structured frameworks.

The Backstage Experts: Sounil Yu and Adrian Sanabria​

Bolstering credibility for this venture, Knostic introduced Sounil Yu, their CTO, at a recent webinar. Sounil isn’t just an IT guy with a keyboard—he’s a cybersecurity visionary. Known for creating the Cyber Defense Matrix and the enterprise strategy model DIE Triad, Yu’s portfolio includes former leadership roles at Bank of America and JupiterOne. More importantly, as someone who’s seen the scary stick of data breaches up close, he understands how critical proper governance is.
Joining him is Adrian Sanabria, a voice known for telling uncomfortable truths about the security industry. Together, they’re combining technical expertise with practical, research-backed remediation strategies.

To AI or Not to AI: The Bigger Governance Picture​

Risk governance isn’t just an IT department problem anymore—it’s an enterprise-level imperative, especially when AI enters the picture. Let me paint the larger picture of what deploying Copilot without preparation might look like. Think of it like mismanaging Pandora’s Box after so many years of nagging questions, "What's the worst that could happen?"
  • A Snowballing Compliance Catastrophe: Depending on your industry, even an accidental overshare (say…an employee’s social security number in a summarized email) could cost six figures in penalties. GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA—pick your acronym, and you’ll find hefty financial consequences waiting for the careless.
  • Reputation Tarnish: Leaked sensitive info can dampen customer trust like a leaky roof in a cyclone.
  • Erosion of Competitive Edge: Trade secrets or intellectual property, dragged unintentionally by Copilot, could end up in the wrong email thread or document.
On the flip side, adopting tools like Knostic’s assessment ensures that AI functionalities are used judiciously, extracting the juice without dropping the pulp all over sensitive areas.

Action Plan for WindowsForum Community Members​

If your organization plans to roll out Microsoft Copilot—or already has—now's the moment to act. Here’s what we recommend for tighter governance:
  • Audit Account Permissions: Perform a deep dive into the access rights across your digital ecosystem, specifically where Copilot is integrated. Tools like Azure Active Directory’s access reviews can be excellent places to start.
  • Enable Conditional Access Policies: Microsoft offers a way to add conditional access rules that only allow data interactions under specific scenarios.
  • Leverage Third-Party Risk Tools: Knostic isn’t the only game in town, but it certainly proposes a tailored and proactive AI-data assessment model.
  • Train Your Teams: Employees are both the strongest and weakest links in deployment. Make sure they understand the scope and limitations of Copilot’s permission levels.
  • Test the System for Edge Cases: One surefire way to identify oversharing risks is to intentionally experiment. Have IT “misuse” Copilot in lab-like conditions to discover potential leaks before they appear when it really matters.

Final Thoughts​

Microsoft’s Copilot is undeniably an enticing leap forward for productivity. But, like any great leap, it requires a stable landing zone—which means your enterprise needs to commit to governance and continuous improvements. Throwing caution to the wind could mean more than a few embarrassing email leaks; it could pave the way for devastating reputational harm or compliance penalties.
Take the first step: audit permissions. The second step? Look into a readiness assessment like Knostic’s. After all, it’s not just about using the technology—it’s about controlling it.
So, WindowsForum members: How ready are you to deploy Copilot responsibly? And how do your organizations currently control over-permissioning? Join the discussion in the comments below. Cheers to safe, productive AI experiences!

Source: SC Media Microsoft Copilot Oversharing: A Framework for Assessing and Remediating
 

Last edited:
Back
Top