• Thread Author
Microsoft Intune administrators are facing a wave of unease after Microsoft officially acknowledged a significant flaw affecting security baseline customizations, casting a spotlight on the evolving landscape of modern device management. In a recent update, Microsoft revealed that custom tweaks made to Intune security baselines might not persist through an update, leaving IT teams scrambling to manually reapply critical configurations. This admission from Redmond not only surfaces serious questions about the reliability of cloud-first management tools but also invites renewed debate about the future of endpoint security administration in a world where on-premises staples like WSUS are being sunsetted.

The Heart of the Issue: Security Baseline Customizations at Risk​

At the center of this incident is the security baseline, a foundational concept in Intune. A security baseline is essentially a curated template—a bundle of configuration settings with values recommended by Microsoft to ensure devices remain secure and compliant out of the box. While Microsoft’s defaults cater to the broadest audience, organizations frequently adjust these settings to suit unique security policies, regulatory requirements, or sector-specific needs.
However, Microsoft’s latest disclosure puts these customizations in jeopardy. When administrators update security baselines—say from version 23H2 to 24H2—any custom settings layered atop the baseline may be silently replaced by Microsoft’s defaults, erasing painstakingly crafted security postures. Microsoft’s current guidance is stark: “While we work on the fix, we recommend that admins manually reapply their customizations after updating their baseline policies.” For IT professionals managing fleets of devices or highly tailored environments, this is more than an inconvenience—it introduces a critical operational risk.

The Evolution of Microsoft Endpoint Management​

To fully grasp the scale of this problem, it’s important to understand the shifting context of Microsoft’s endpoint management portfolio. Intune is Microsoft’s cloud-based endpoint management solution, providing centralized control over configuration, compliance, and updates for everything from Windows PCs to mobile devices.
Intune emerged as a modern alternative to classic on-premises tools like Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), now officially declared “no longer in development” as of Windows Server 2025. This marks a significant inflection point: WSUS, once the backbone of Windows update management for enterprises, is being retired—leaving Intune and its kin as the primary path forward.
Even so, many organizations don’t get by with Intune alone. Microsoft Configuration Manager, with roots tracing back to the Systems Management Server (SMS) of the 1990s, remains vital for comprehensive, hybrid environments. The interplay between these tools means any misstep in their design or operation—such as the losing of customizations during baseline updates—cascades across IT teams, policies, and ultimately end users.

Analyzing the Incident: How Did This Happen?​

Microsoft’s openness about the Intune baseline update flaw is commendable, but the episode also reveals potential cracks in cloud-based service design. According to multiple administrator reports and confirmation from Microsoft’s own documentation, the bug affects any scenario where baseline policies are updated to a newer version. Instead of preserving organization-specific changes, Intune overwrites them with the latest defaults, effectively discarding custom security decisions.

The Update Process Explained​

A normal Intune security baseline update workflow is supposed to be seamless:
  • Microsoft releases a new baseline (e.g., for 24H2), featuring new recommended settings.
  • Administrators compare new settings to their customized versions, often leveraging Intune’s reporting and comparison tools.
  • Post-evaluation, organizations selectively adopt new recommendations, merging or retaining prior customizations as needed.
The current flaw breaks this process at step three, resulting in a wholesale reset to Microsoft’s defaults. Notably, this problem only appears during the update between baseline versions, not during routine policy refreshes or slight revisions within the same version.

The Real-World Consequences​

For enterprises running large fleets, especially those in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, government), this disruption isn’t just a matter of convenience. Custom security baselines often encode requirements for advanced logging, unique lockout policies, encryption strength, or application whitelisting. A sudden reversion to less stringent defaults can create compliance violations or open security gaps until administrators manually reapply previous settings.
Admins are now forced into a fraught race against time—auditing all devices for missing customizations and urgently restoring intended configurations, often with limited personnel and under mounting pressure from compliance and security teams.

Workarounds, Risks, and Microsoft's Response​

The immediate workaround, as reiterated by Microsoft, is manual intervention: reapply all desired customizations after updating each security baseline. While this keeps organizations afloat, it is laborious, error-prone, and may not scale for environments with dozens of baselines and thousands of endpoints.

Risk Analysis​

  • Operational Overhead: Large organizations often have multiple baselines and dozens of customizations per baseline; manual intervention across many tenants is a heavy drain on IT resources.
  • Security Gaps: Temporary lapses can occur, during which systems revert to Microsoft defaults—introducing the possibility of exposure to threats custom settings were meant to mitigate.
  • Human Error: The higher the manual workload, the greater the potential for mistakes—missed settings, inconsistencies, configuration drift.
  • Compliance Impacts: For organizations with legal or regulatory mandates, even brief lapses in prescribed configurations can result in costly violations or audit failures.

Microsoft’s Communication​

To its credit, Microsoft has acknowledged the issue openly and is communicating progress toward a permanent fix. Transparency in cloud service management is a core expectation among enterprises, and Microsoft’s calm, albeit unsatisfying, updates strike a professional tone. However, the company has not offered a precise timeline for resolution, nor concrete details on whether lost customizations can be restored from any hidden backup or log.
While Microsoft’s documentation and service health dashboards outline the problem and workaround, some critics on platforms such as Reddit and Spiceworks argue that the fix roadmap lacks granularity, leaving users to speculate on risk windows and longer-term mitigation options.

How Did We Get Here? The Promise and Peril of Modern Management​

The Intune forgetfulness episode epitomizes the double-edged sword of cloud-based device management: agility and centralized control come with trade-offs in transparency, predictability, and, occasionally, reliability. In a world where updates are faster and more frequent, seemingly minor lapses or oversights by platform vendors can have sweeping ramifications for customers.

Strengths of Intune and Cloud-Based Management​

  • Rapid innovation: Regular baseline updates empower organizations to respond quickly to emerging security threats.
  • Centralized visibility: Modern management tools provide single-pane-of-glass over diverse device fleets.
  • Simplified deployment models: Cloud-first tools relieve IT of complex, hardware-intensive infrastructure.

Potential Risks​

  • Opaque update mechanics: Customers have limited insight or control over backend changes.
  • Default-over-customer logic: Incidents where vendor preferences override organizational priorities undermine trust.
  • Dependency on vendor communication: Breakdowns like this require organizations to rapidly adapt to short-lived but critical bugs with little warning.

Comparing with On-Premises Tools​

For many IT pros, this incident brings unflattering comparisons to WSUS or Configuration Manager, which, while clunky by today’s standards, gave administrators tighter, deterministic control over policies and updates. In WSUS, for example, administrators could snapshot baseline configurations, test in isolated lab environments, and only deploy after exhaustive testing.
Intune’s cloud-first approach streamlines deployment but—until this issue is resolved—lacks the granularity and assurance that customizations are fully preserved during all upgrade scenarios. This is a key trade-off for organizations considering a full leap into modern management.

Guidance for Organizations: Mitigating the Impact​

Until Microsoft delivers an automated fix, organizations are advised to take several concrete steps to minimize risk and disruption:

1. Inventory and Document All Customizations​

  • Maintain a detailed, versioned record of all baseline customizations, ideally automated via export scripts or third-party tools.
  • Revisit documentation for each baseline update, ensuring quick restoration if customizations are lost.

2. Schedule Updates Strategically​

  • Plan baseline updates during maintenance windows with ample time for manual review and restoration.
  • Communicate expected changes and risks internally to stakeholders ahead of update windows.

3. Use Change Tracking/Fast Restore Options​

  • Leverage Intune’s reporting and audit capabilities to quickly identify which settings have reverted.
  • Consider scripting reapplication of settings where possible to reduce human error.

4. Monitor Microsoft’s Channels​

  • Regularly check Microsoft’s Service Health Dashboard, Intune blogs, and community forums for updates or tools to aid in migration.

5. Prepare for Hybrid and Contingency Solutions​

  • For especially sensitive configurations, organizations may need to temporarily supplement Intune with on-premises tools or deploy layered controls (e.g., Group Policy applied through Active Directory).

The Bigger Picture: Intune’s Role in Microsoft’s Security Vision​

Intune is at the heart of Microsoft’s broader vision for secure, cloud-forward device management, encompassing not just Windows, but a growing menagerie of cross-platform devices. As organizations shift ever more into remote and hybrid models, the reliability and predictability of cloud-based policy management becomes paramount.
This incident, while challenging, ultimately reinforces the need for robust update mechanisms and customer choice within cloud management platforms. Enterprise IT cannot afford unexpected policy drift even for short durations—a reality that Microsoft, to its credit, seems to recognize in its ongoing communications.

Community Response: Frustration, Workarounds, and Dark Humor​

Unsurprisingly, frontline administrators are sharing war stories and workarounds on tech forums and social media. Some jest that “admins everywhere are rolling their eyes so hard that the Earth has shifted slightly on its axis.” Others, less whimsically, share scripts and compare notes on which policy elements are most critical to reapply immediately post-update.
A recurring theme is the wish for more granular roll-back/restore capabilities in Intune—features commonly found in on-premises tools but not yet fully ported to cloud services. The hope is that this episode spurs Microsoft to offer smoother, non-destructive update paths or at minimum, comprehensive export/import functions for policy settings.

Critical Analysis: Lessons Learned and What Needs Fixing​

While Microsoft should be applauded for prompt communication, the underlying flaw exposes two weaknesses in Intune’s current architecture:
  • Lack of robust customization preservation: Updates should never automatically discard carefully tailored organization settings. Future iterations of Intune must prioritize merging or at least clearly flagging potential setting losses before changes are finalized.
  • Insufficient change previewing: Administrators would benefit from preview or impact-reporting tools to understand precisely what will change before an update, with side-by-side comparisons of before-and-after states.
Only by addressing these technical and UX gaps can Microsoft sustain trust among large enterprise customers betting their security and compliance on the cloud.

What Comes Next: The Road Ahead for Microsoft Intune​

For the moment, organizations must shoulder the burden of manual remediation—a situation that, while frustrating, at least has clear guidance and workarounds. Microsoft, meanwhile, faces the dual challenge of quickly crafting a permanent fix and evolving Intune’s update posture to ensure history does not repeat.
The episode serves as a timely warning for all organizations: cloud agility does not absolve customers from the need for careful documentation, regular policy audits, and proactive engagement with vendors. As the technological pendulum swings ever closer to cloud-only device management, such incidents are likely to shape the design ethos of next-generation management tools—for Microsoft and its rivals alike.
Both the strengths and the pitfalls of Intune’s modern management approach are on full display in this saga. For now, vigilance, documentation, and a certain amount of patience are the order of the day. The hope is that future updates will not only solve the immediate issue, but also embed greater resilience, transparency, and customer control deep within the platform’s DNA.

Conclusion: Staying One Step Ahead​

The Intune forgetfulness incident should not discourage adoption of modern endpoint management—but it is a clear reminder that even the most advanced cloud tools must earn, not assume, user trust. With proper change management, clear documentation, and a watchful eye on vendor communication, organizations can weather bumps in the road and emerge with stronger, more resilient security practices.
For IT professionals everywhere, the lesson is as old as software itself: Always expect the unexpected, keep your documentation at hand, and never mistake “set and forget” for real-world security. As Microsoft addresses this bump in the Intune journey, vigilant administrators will ensure their organizations remain compliant, secure, and a step ahead of the next unexpected twist.

Source: theregister.com Microsoft admits to Intune forgetfulness