If the dizzying array of names for Microsoft's AI assistant has you scratching your head, fret no more! Microsoft MVP Loryan Strant has come to the rescue with a novel resource aptly named Let Me Correct That For You. This website is a beacon for both die-hard fans and casual users of Microsoft products, especially during a time when product names seem to change more often than most of us change socks.
Strant, feeling the pain of seeing the Microsoft community flounder through names like "Copilot," "CoPilot," and "Co-pilot," decided enough was enough. The rebranding frenzy at Microsoft has been nothing short of dizzying, with the product now known as "Microsoft 365 Copilot" undergoing several transformations—from "Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365" to its most recent iteration. This merry-go-round of nomenclature becomes particularly entertaining when you toss in "Bing Chat," another name for the same concept.
Much to Strant's chagrin, many product names still escape the CamelCase conventions that Microsoft often employs. After all, a simple differentiation can lead to puzzling conversations among users—one might say "It's in the Team site," but depending on what you mean, this could refer either to Microsoft Teams or a SharePoint site.
The overhaul goes beyond just AI products. Strant also highlights the name change from "Azure AD" to "Entra ID," revealing the confusing history that has left people with lingering thoughts of the old name. Such confusion is exacerbated by errors like "Entraid" or "EntraId" still being alive and well in user discussions.
And let’s not overlook the term "on-premise." Strant takes a linguistic detour here, explaining that the correct term should be "on-premises," as "premise" refers to a conclusion or an argument, not to a physical location. You can only imagine the surprise from IT professionals who casually mention their hardware being "on premise," thinking they’re just fine.
Moreover, the topic of brand consistency at Microsoft has been raised; given the recent upheaval in naming conventions, don’t we all wish someone would be tapped as a "brand consistency czar"? Strant, ever so keen, has even initiated a GitHub repository dedicated to tracking typos and incorrect logos across Microsoft's many services—a true sign of a community-oriented MVP.
The irony is rich here: Strant claims he’s had extra time on his hands between jobs, which led him to develop yet another impressive site, M365roadmap.com. With features that provide detailed visualizations and searches through Microsoft's strategies, the brilliance of leveraging downtime has never been so clear.
As we dive deeper into Microsoft’s ecosystems from Windows 10 and 11 to Azure and beyond, it pays to stay informed about the terminology. Let us acknowledge Strant’s efforts, take a deep breath, and remind ourselves: whether it’s Copilot, CoPilot, or something entirely different, at least now we have a place to turn when the names start spinning out of control. Happy navigating!
Source: The Register Microsoft MVP creates site to track BrandChanges
Why the Site Was Born
Strant, feeling the pain of seeing the Microsoft community flounder through names like "Copilot," "CoPilot," and "Co-pilot," decided enough was enough. The rebranding frenzy at Microsoft has been nothing short of dizzying, with the product now known as "Microsoft 365 Copilot" undergoing several transformations—from "Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365" to its most recent iteration. This merry-go-round of nomenclature becomes particularly entertaining when you toss in "Bing Chat," another name for the same concept.Much to Strant's chagrin, many product names still escape the CamelCase conventions that Microsoft often employs. After all, a simple differentiation can lead to puzzling conversations among users—one might say "It's in the Team site," but depending on what you mean, this could refer either to Microsoft Teams or a SharePoint site.
Navigating the Minefield of Microsoft Terminology
Strant's site acts as a handy reference to differentiate between the various names and terminologies cascading out of Redmond. He points out that Microsoft's "team" can mean a specific site template in SharePoint, often leading to confusion when users casually toss around the term "team site." For the uninitiated, that conversation could lead to faces filled with bewilderment as they try to discern whether you're referring to Microsoft Teams or an actual SharePoint project—a real-life tech love triangle!The overhaul goes beyond just AI products. Strant also highlights the name change from "Azure AD" to "Entra ID," revealing the confusing history that has left people with lingering thoughts of the old name. Such confusion is exacerbated by errors like "Entraid" or "EntraId" still being alive and well in user discussions.
And let’s not overlook the term "on-premise." Strant takes a linguistic detour here, explaining that the correct term should be "on-premises," as "premise" refers to a conclusion or an argument, not to a physical location. You can only imagine the surprise from IT professionals who casually mention their hardware being "on premise," thinking they’re just fine.
Strant's Vision
Touched by his own frustrations and those shared by other users, Strant emphasizes that this site is more than a personal project: it’s a mission to help create clearer, error-free content. A neurodiverse individual himself, he understands the irritation brought on by inconsistencies—because, let’s face it, we could all do without unnecessary hurdles in our tech terminology navigation.Moreover, the topic of brand consistency at Microsoft has been raised; given the recent upheaval in naming conventions, don’t we all wish someone would be tapped as a "brand consistency czar"? Strant, ever so keen, has even initiated a GitHub repository dedicated to tracking typos and incorrect logos across Microsoft's many services—a true sign of a community-oriented MVP.
The irony is rich here: Strant claims he’s had extra time on his hands between jobs, which led him to develop yet another impressive site, M365roadmap.com. With features that provide detailed visualizations and searches through Microsoft's strategies, the brilliance of leveraging downtime has never been so clear.
Wrapping Up
In essence, Let Me Correct That For You serves as a much-needed lifeline for those navigating the evolving landscape of Microsoft's branding labyrinth. With a dash of humor and a wealth of clarity, Strant not only tackles the chaos but also embarks on a mission to usher in a new era of product name awareness.As we dive deeper into Microsoft’s ecosystems from Windows 10 and 11 to Azure and beyond, it pays to stay informed about the terminology. Let us acknowledge Strant’s efforts, take a deep breath, and remind ourselves: whether it’s Copilot, CoPilot, or something entirely different, at least now we have a place to turn when the names start spinning out of control. Happy navigating!
Source: The Register Microsoft MVP creates site to track BrandChanges
Last edited: