Networked Learning: Accelerate AI Skills at Work Through Your Professional Network

  • Thread Author

Employees across industries are telling researchers and reporters the same thing: learning to use artificial intelligence at work feels like another full-time job — and many are quietly overwhelmed — but an often‑overlooked resource can help shrink that curve: your professional network.

Background​

The rush to adopt AI tools such as Microsoft Copilot and other generative systems has transformed everyday workflows, while simultaneously raising new expectations for employee digital fluency. Employers are increasingly factoring AI skills into hiring and evaluation conversations, and the result is a new, high‑pressure learning environment where workers must absorb not only how tools work, but also when and why to trust their outputs.
At the organizational level, vendors and workforce firms have responded with large-scale training and platform plays meant to scale AI literacy. Corporate programs and partnerships — from internal “Copilot” rollouts to third‑party learning alliances — aim to close what many call an “AI skills gap,” but adoption is uneven and cultural friction remains. Corporate training ecosystems that combine live workshops, microlearning, and internal communities are showing promising outcomes for adoption and confidence. overwhelmed by AI
Short timelines, high expectations, and unclear guidance are the main drivers of anxiety.
  • Many workers report that learning AI tools now happens in the margins of an already busy job. That perception—AI learning feels like another job—is widespread and leads to fatigue and avoidance.
  • Employers increasingly expect proficiency with AI features in everyday productivity apps; in some organizations, AI competency is being discussed as part of performance reviews and hiring criteria. This raises stakes for employees who feel underprepared. Evidence from enterprise programs and workplace studies shows companies viewing AI literacy as a competitive advantage and a baseline expectation.
  • The pace of featureike Copilot creates continual relearning pressure; employees must keep up with UI changes, expanded capabilities, and governance rules — a nontrivial cognitive load. Independent reviews and organizational case studies confirm that while Copilot can save time, the real uplift requires investment in training and governance rather than simple rollout.

Emotional and social side effects​

Beys an emotional tax: embarrassment, fear of obsolescence, and concern about being judged for not “getting” AI fast enough. Surveys and workplace reporting have repeatedly shown a slice of the workforce feeling ashamed or too embarrassed to admit knowledge gaps — a barrier that prevents many from asking for help. This is one reason career experts are emphasizing human connections as a learning channel.

The professional network as an on‑ramps for AI skills​

Career professionals say networks are underused as learning infrastructure. Rather than treating networking as a transactional job‑hunt tactic, successful networkers treat it as ongoing relationship maintenance — a two‑way channel for sharing knowledge, tips, and micro‑mentoring.
  • Peer demonstration and tips: Seeing a colleague use Copilot to triage an inbox, summarize meetings, or auto‑draft a first pass on a deliverable is often the fastest way to adopt a practical workflow.
  • Shortcut learning: Short demos, quick check‑ins, and one‑off coaching sessions within your existing network can be more effective than formal trainings for day‑to‑day adoption.
  • Validation and safety checks: Networks provide real‑world sanity checks — “did Copilot hallucinate this claim?” — helping employees learn the limits of tools while building confidence to use them.
These community and peer approaches are already being mirrored in enterprise programs that pair microlearning and “AI influencer” communities to spread practical use cases across an organization. Those programs highlight that peer sharing plus lightweight training is a reliable pattern for adoption at scale.

How networking reduces the AI learning curve — practicalonable, field‑tested steps employees can use to turn their network into a practical AI learning engine.​

1. Shift networking from transactions to relationships​

  1. Reconnect with two people per month with a short, value‑adding message.
  2. Share one thing you learned about an AI feature and ask one simple question in return.
  3. Offer a small help (review a draft, share a prompt) when someone asks.
Small, regular exchanges compound. Career advisors stress that network maintenance is the seedbed of timely help later — and that it doesn’t require grand gestures. Simple, frequent contact is both efficient and sustainable.

2. Use “learn in public” micro‑content​

  • Post a short example of how you used an AI tool (a 30‑second video, a screenshot of a Copilot prompt and the cleaned output).
  • Ask a closed question in your post (“Anyone optimize Copilot prompts for meeting recaps?”).
  • Accept quick feedback — these posts often produce concise, high‑value tips and templates.
Public short‑form content serves two purposes: it helps you refine your approach and it triggers replies from people who’ve solved similar problems. A modest example shared widely can attract high engagement and quick tips from unexpected corners.

3. Create and join peer study groups​

  • Form a 4–6 person weekly check‑in for a month focused on one tool (e.g., Copilot for Outlook).
  • Rotate short demos — 10 minutes each — so everyone both teaches and learns.
  • Keep sessions practical: show prompts, share pitfalls, and maintain a shared notes doc.
These micro‑cohorts are low friction and high value. Organizational case studies show that structured peer communities accelerate adoption and normalize experimentation.

4. Leverage organizational “AI influencer” programs or champions​

If your company nities or champions, join them. They often have:
  • curated use cases,
  • prompt libraries,
  • governance guidance,
  • and quick workshops.
Enterprises that pair champions with microlearning show better adoption curves and fewer misuse incidents than those that rely solely on top‑down mandates.

5. Ask for targeted permissions and time​

  • Request 30–60 minutes of “learning time” from your manager tuddy.
  • Negotiate for a single sprint day to apply a new AI workflow to a live task.
This formalizes learning and makes it measurable. Management that expects AI fluency is often willing to fund short, structured learning windows when employees present a plan.

What employers and managers should do to enable networked learning​

Employers carry the primary responsibility to reduce learner friction. Policy, tooling, and culture can be tuned to let networks flourish.
  • Create safe spaces for failure. Employees should be encouraged to share mistakes and low‑stakes experiments without penalty.
  • Support peer communities. Provide micro‑learning resources, shared prompt libraries, and time for peer cohorts.
  • Formalize AI champions. Empower cross‑functional champions who can facilitate show‑and‑tell sessions and build a troubleshooting network.
  • Include governance and privacy training. Ensure employees know how to handle proprietary data with AI tools; set clear rules of the road.
Companies that invest in this mix are more likely to see adoption translate into productivity gains, rather than confusion and risk. Case studies and vendor‑partner programs describe this pattern repeatedly — core training plus community support beats ad hoc rollouts.

Strengths of the “networked learning” approach​

  • Speed and relevance: Learning from peers is immediate and directly c.
  • Low cost: Informal check‑ins and micro‑demos cost far less than full training runs.
  • Trust and psychological safety: Advice from someone who shares your job context is easier to apply and less threatening.
  • Scalability through social proof: As a few employees demonstrate wins, adoption cascades faster across a team than through centralized mandates.
These advantages explain why many organizations deliberately design peer networks into their AI upskilling strategies rather than relying solely on top‑down e‑learning.

Risks and limits: what networking won’t fix (and how to mitigate them)​

Networking helps, but it’s not a panacea. Several structural and technicData privacy and compliance hazards
Using AI tools without clear data rules can leak sensitive information. Prompt examples or shared demos that include proprietary customer details are a common vector for exposure. Governance and explicit usage policies remain essential complements to peer learning. Independent reviews and organizational audits emphasize the importance of privacy controls and consent when deploying Copilot‑class tools.

Hallucinations and factual errors​

Generative AI can invent plausible but false content. Peer demos that aren’t coupled with verification habits can propagate bad practicerification checklists and cross‑checks for outputs that affect customers or legal obligations. Studies and field reports caution that unchecked reliance on AI outputs can produce reputational or compliance harm.

Over‑reliance and skill erosion​

If teams lean on AI for routine judgement, core skills can atrophy. The safest approach is to treat AI as a collaborator that accelerates tasks while preservrganizational analyses suggest blending AI work with explicit human review responsibilities, rather than replacing them.

Unequal access and new forms of inequality​

Not all employees have equitable access to networked learning. Junior staff, part‑time workers, or geographically dispersed teams may be excluded unless programs intentiompanies should monitor participation metrics and make structured, low‑bandwidth learning paths available. Workforce case studies that combine microlearning and broad access report significantly better equity outcomes.

Verifying the facts and the numbers: what can be confirmed, and what needs caution​

Many public reports and company surveys report that a plurality or majority of employers are treating AI literacy as an important workforce skill. Inalyses and academic reviews show modest productivity gains from Copilot‑style adoption but emphasize the verification burden and limited wage effects so far. For instance, productivity studies and independent university reviews reported modest time savings and cautioned that job transformation — rather than wholesale elimination — is the dominant near‑term trend.
At the same time, some specific figures — for example, the precise percentages reported in any single news summary — should be treated cautiously until traced back to the original survey instrument. The WCTI summary provided headline numbers about feelings of ovressure, and embarrassment; those types of percentages are plausible and align with broader reporting patterns, but they should be cross‑checked directly against the original LinkedIn survey or data release when you need absolute precision. If you require the exact wording, sample size, and methodology behind a quoted percentage, consult the original survey documentation. Independent sources and internal organizational studies corroborate the general pattern (widespread anxiety and rising performance expectations around AI) but may not match the exact numbers reported in a paraphrase.

A short guide: what every employee should do this week to get unstuck​

  1. Identify one repetitive task you spend time on and experiment with a specific AI prompt to speed it up. Track before/after time.
  2. Reach out to one person in your network and ask for a 20‑minute demo et a two‑week peer cohort with a simple charter: one feature, one outcome, two short demos.
  3. Save and tag prompts you use in a shared doc; call out which prompts handled sensitive data and require manager approval.
  4. Ask your manager for one learning block (30–60 minutes) and propose a short outcomes report to show value.
These steps are intentionally small, measurable, and designed to create momentum without signaling “I don’t know anything.”

Long‑term implications for careers and workplaces​

  • AI fluency becomes baseline competency. Commanding effective AI workflows — prompting, verifying, and integrating outputs — will be a routine expectation in many knowledge roles. Enterprise research suggests organizations see AI literacy as a hiring and promotion signal; preparing for that reality is prudent.
  • The role of managers evolves. Managers will need to coach hybrid workflows that include both humans and bots, and to design processes where AI accelerates output without eroding quality.
  • Education and certification will matter, but so will demonstrable outcomes. Micro‑credentials and vendor certifications are usefulact on real work will win promotions and mobility.
  • Networks will be a differentiator. Professionals who maintain active, reciprocal networks will gain earlier access to practical tips and workflows — a career advantage in an era where adoption timing matters.

Conclusion​

The scramble to learn AI at work is real, and it’s causing measurable anxiety for many employees. At the same time, networks — the informal webs of colleagues, mentors, and peers most professionals already have — represent an underleveraged learning channel that is practical, low cost, and directly relevant to day‑to‑day work. When paired with sensible organizational supports such as microlearning, governance, and champion programs, peer networks can accelerate adoption, reduce risk, and restore confidence.
Organizations that lock AI behind dry compliance memos or one‑off training sessions will likely see slower progress than those that combine policy with social learning. Employees who treat networking as ongoing relationship building and who adopt small, incremental experiments will find faster, less stressful paths to competence.
Finally, while optimism about AI’s productivity potential is justified, the technology’s limits — hallucinations, privacy risks, and the need for human judgment — mean that networks and human oversight will remain central to safe, productive AI use. The practical advice is straightforward: build small habits, trade prompts and pitfalls with trusted peers, and treat your network as both a resource and a responsibility. Those habits will pay dividends long after the current wave of features stabilizes.
Source: WCTI Employees feel overwhelmed by AI, but professional network can help: career expert
 
Click to expand...
Syracuse University Libraries has published an expansive lineup of free, registration-required workshops for Fall 2025 designed to give students, faculty, and staff hands-on skills in research discovery, citation management, AI literacy, and advanced data tools — sessions that range from a practical Zotero primer to a focused exploration of Microsoft Copilot and ProQuest’s Text and Data Mining Studio. (news.syr.edu, researchguides.library.syr.edu)

Background / Overview​

Syracuse University Libraries’ Learn! program delivers short, focused workshops throughout the academic year to help the SU community navigate library services, research tools, and scholarly communication workflows. The Fall 2025 schedule mixes foundational offerings for new graduate students (getting started with research, citation basics) with technically oriented sessions (text-and-data mining, AI explainers, a dedicated Copilot training for students) that reflect current campus priorities around digital literacy and research impact. The Libraries emphasize that all workshops are free for SU students, faculty, and staff but require registration. (researchguides.library.syr.edu, library.syracuse.edu)
Giovanna Colosi, Librarian for the School of Education and subject instruction lead, is quoted by Syracuse’s news service noting that many sessions are particularly relevant for incoming graduate students, offering actionable strategies to make research more effective and manageable. That framing — actionable, short, and skills-based — is consistent across the Libraries’ schedule and promotional materials. (news.syr.edu)

What’s on the Fall 2025 roster: quick guide​

The Fall lineup combines hybrid and online-only sessions with in-person events at Bird Library. Key items attendees will recognize immediately include:
  • Getting Started with Research — two sessions (in-person and Zoom) to introduce database strategies, citation tracking, and an AI-aware approach to discovery. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Saving, Organizing, and Citing Your Sources and Collaborating with Zotero — a hands-on introduction to Zotero, collaboration, and citation generation. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Using SU Libraries as an Online or Distance Student — focused on remote access tools, interlibrary loan, and 24/7 chat support. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • A Student’s Guide to Using Microsoft Copilot for Coursework and Research — a dedicated walkthrough of Copilot for students, with practical use cases for study and writing. (news.syr.edu)
  • Demystifying AI: What’s Really Inside the Black Box? — an approachable primer on how generative AI models work, their failure modes, and responsible use. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Introduction to ProQuest Text and Data Mining (TDM) Studio Visualization Dashboard — an applied workshop showing no-code visual analytics over large news and scholarly corpora. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
This mix signals that SU Libraries wants to 1) onboard new researchers to essential library infrastructure, and 2) provide more advanced, ethically informed instruction on AI and large-scale text analysis.

Why these workshops matter now: context for Windows-focused and tech-savvy users​

Universities are balancing two simultaneous shifts: the rapid adoption of generative AI in everyday academic workflows, and the growing demand for reproducible, large-scale text analysis tools that can interrogate news and scholarly archives. For Windows-centric readers — including graduate researchers who use Microsoft 365, Cortana/Copilot-enabled devices, or those running analysis tools on Windows workstations — SU’s schedule addresses both ends of the spectrum.
  • The Copilot-focused session dovetails with Microsoft’s push to integrate Copilot across Microsoft 365 and education tools, where features like Copilot Notebooks, study-guide creation, and Learning Activities are rolling out to support teaching and learning workflows. These developments are changing how students draft, summarize, and study course materials on Windows and other platforms. (microsoft.com, techcommunity.microsoft.com)
  • ProQuest’s TDM Studio provides university researchers with a sanctioned pathway to analyze millions of documents via visualization dashboards or programmatic workbenches (Python/R + Jupyter). For researchers who want to prototype or scale text-mining work on Windows, TDM Studio’s Visualization Dashboard offers a no-code entry point while workbenches provide an environment that complements local Windows development setups. (about.proquest.com, researchguides.library.syr.edu)
Taken together, the Fall workshops position SU to teach students both how to use new productivity AI and how to interrogate large datasets responsibly — a combination that will be familiar and useful to readers who maintain Windows-based research environments.

Deep dive: the Copilot workshop — promise, pitfalls, and practical guidance​

What SU plans to teach​

The “A Student’s Guide to Using Microsoft Copilot for Coursework and Research” session (online, Sept. 26) is explicitly designed to introduce students to Copilot as a productivity assistant for drafting, summarizing, and studying material. The Libraries position this as a practical, course-centered orientation that highlights real use cases for research and coursework. (news.syr.edu)

Features students should expect to see demonstrated​

  • Copilot’s integration within Microsoft 365 apps (Word, OneNote, Teams) — search/summarize functions, Copilot Notebooks for organizing notes, and study-oriented outputs like flashcards and guided chat experiences. Microsoft has emphasized learner features such as Copilot Notebooks and study-guide generation that can be used directly by students and educators. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, microsoft.com)
  • Practical workflows: using Copilot to extract key ideas from readings, drafting outlines, and iterating on essays — while retaining original sources and citation practices taught in the Libraries’ other workshops. SU’s program structure suggests combining Copilot’s drafting help with Zotero-driven citation workflows. (news.syr.edu, zotero.org)

Security and privacy caveats — what to watch for​

  • Institutional accounts vs. consumer accounts: Microsoft’s privacy guidance differentiates between consumer Copilot usage and organizational (Entra ID) accounts. Data from users signed in with an organizational Entra ID is generally excluded from training of Microsoft’s public models, and organizations may have additional commercial data protections in Microsoft 365 Copilot. That distinction matters for students using campus-managed accounts versus personal email logins. Users should assume different privacy boundaries depending on the account type they use. (support.microsoft.com, learn.microsoft.com)
  • Known vulnerabilities and emerging risks: security researchers have publicly disclosed vulnerabilities and data‑exfiltration concerns affecting AI integrations in productivity suites, and oversight incidents (for example, default biometric enrollment features in Teams) have raised real-world privacy alarms. These developments underscore why the Libraries’ Copilot session should include guidance on organizational policies, account choice, and how to avoid exposing sensitive information when prompting an LLM. Flag those risks to students and staff as part of any Copilot training. (timesofindia.indiatimes.com, theguardian.com)

Practical tips for Windows users (short list)​

  • Use your SU Entra ID / institutional account for coursework when possible to benefit from organizational protections.
  • Avoid sharing personally identifying information or unpublished research in prompts unless campus policy and export controls permit it.
  • Retain provenance: when Copilot drafts text, save the original prompts and generated outputs, and reconcile them against cited sources using Zotero or other reference managers.
  • For reproducible work, combine Copilot assistance with rigorous note-taking in Copilot Notebooks or OneNote and export key items to your local machine or institutional repository where appropriate. (support.microsoft.com, techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Deep dive: Demystifying AI — what students need to learn about model limits​

The Libraries’ “Demystifying AI” session aims to go beyond the headlines to explain why models hallucinate, how data bias manifests, and which practical checks researchers should apply. Good instruction here is not only technical literacy — it is an ethical imperative.
  • Core concepts that should be covered: model training vs. inference, the role of training data and bias, tokenization and probability-based generation, context windows and prompt engineering basics, and strategies for verifying outputs. These are the mental models students need to critically evaluate AI outputs. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Failure modes to emphasize: hallucination (confident falsehoods), unjustified specificity (fabricated citations), and distributional errors when models answer outside their trained domain. Teaching students to fact-check model outputs against primary sources — and to treat generative outputs as drafts, not evidence — matters more now than ever. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Institutional responsibility: libraries and IT units should coordinate so AI literacy instruction pairs with clear campus policies on acceptable use, data handling, and academic integrity. SU’s program — offering both AI primers and course-focused Copilot training — is a practical curricular model for other campuses. (news.syr.edu)

Deep dive: ProQuest TDM Studio — scale analysis without giving away the farm​

ProQuest TDM Studio is a licensed, institutionally provisioned environment that enables large-scale text analysis while preserving publisher rights — a critical distinction for researchers who need to work with full-text corpora at scale.

What the Libraries’ workshop is likely to demonstrate​

  • Visualization Dashboard: a no-code interface for topic modeling, geographic trend mapping, chronological visualizations, and sentiment over time. This is ideal for students who need to explore patterns across news archives and other large collections without writing code. (researchguides.library.syr.edu, proquest.libguides.com)
  • Workbench access: a Jupyter-backed environment for researchers who know Python or R where pre-populated libraries and sample notebooks accelerate prototyping. SU’s TDM policy limits workbench seats and enforces time-limited access to coordinate demand; that governance model is worth noting for planning team-based projects. (researchguides.library.syr.edu, library.syracuse.edu)

Practical constraints and compliance that matter for researchers​

  • Dataset and export limits: institutional TDM environments commonly cap export volumes and require data to remain in-platform to respect licensing. Syracuse’s guide, for example, documents dataset size limits and export quotas; researchers should plan analyses to stay within those constraints or discuss extensions with Data Services. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Integration with LLMs: some TDM workbenches now allow model-integration options (e.g., using LLMs for NLP tasks in a notebook), but that can introduce privacy and cost implications. Workshop attendees should be briefed on whether external model calls send data outside the institutional boundary. The SU TDM materials and ProQuest documentation emphasize local compute and rights-cleared content as the default. (blogs.library.columbia.edu, about.proquest.com)

Research workflows: Zotero, citations, and keeping your papers honest​

The Libraries’ Zotero session is a practical complement to Copilot and Demystifying AI instruction: Zotero helps students manage sources, produce accurate citations, and maintain scholarly provenance — all essential when AI tools can suggest text but not reliably supply verifiable references.
  • Core Zotero workflows to master: capturing metadata with browser connectors, organizing collections and tags, generating in-text citations and bibliographies via the Word plugin (“Cite while you write”), and using Zotero group libraries for collaborative projects. These are the skills the SU workshop promises to deliver. (zotero.org, researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Windows-specific installation notes: Zotero bundles Word add-ins that usually install automatically, but institutional machines with restrictive security software may require manual steps to place Zotero.dotm into Word’s Startup folder. Libraries should show students how to troubleshoot add-in issues on Windows during the session. (zotero.org)
  • Best-practice pairing: use Zotero to capture original source metadata, then use Copilot as a drafting assistant — not as a primary source generator. This preserves verifiable evidence chains and reduces the risk of fabricated citations. Treat Copilot outputs as drafts; treat Zotero-managed items as the canonical evidentiary record. (zotero.org, techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Practical recommendations for students, faculty, and IT teams​

  • Register early and attend complementary sessions: pair the Copilot workshop with “Demystifying AI” and the Zotero session to build a coherent workflow from draft to citation. (news.syr.edu)
  • Prefer institutional accounts for research work: organizations can apply protective policies (commercial data protections, training opt-outs) that aren’t available on consumer accounts. Confirm which account type your campus configures for Copilot access. (support.microsoft.com)
  • Keep provenance and prompts: when using Copilot, save the prompts and the generated outputs in OneNote or Copilot Notebooks, and link those notes to Zotero items that record the original sources. This creates an auditable trail. (techcommunity.microsoft.com, zotero.org)
  • Plan TDM projects with the platform limits in mind: request workbench access early, abide by dataset size and export quotas, and consult Data Services for IRB or licensing questions. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Update Windows and Office regularly: security patches and updated client behavior can affect add-ins, integrations, and the integrity of plugin-based workflows like Zotero’s Word integration. When troubleshooting, disable restrictive security software temporarily only under IT guidance to allow required installations. (zotero.org)

Risks, governance, and what the Libraries should emphasize​

The Libraries’ program layout is strong, but the workshops’ true value depends on how clearly they present institutional policy and practical safeguards. Key risk areas that should be front-and-center:
  • Data exposure through AI prompts: students must understand what is allowed to be shared with cloud services and what must remain local or under restricted access. Institutional accounts help but do not eliminate all risk. (support.microsoft.com)
  • Model hallucinations and reproducibility: without provenance, automatically generated text can mislead. The Libraries should require students to pair AI drafts with primary-source verification workflows taught in the citation sessions. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
  • Security vulnerabilities in third-party integrations: recent disclosures have shown vulnerabilities in AI-enabled productivity tools; Libraries and campus IT should coordinate threat briefings and mitigation steps for students and faculty. (timesofindia.indiatimes.com, theguardian.com)
  • Licensing and export controls in TDM workflows: researchers attempting to “free-style” large data exports risk license violations; enforceable platform quotas and an approval process for workbench access will limit inadvertent misuse. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)
Flag any workshop claims that cannot be independently verified (for example, future product capabilities that have only vendor roadmaps and no general availability date) — campus instructors should annotate such claims and provide follow-up resources. If a workshop describes features “coming soon” in commercial products, include explicit dates and vendor documentation to avoid misleading attendees.

Strengths and gaps: a critical appraisal​

Strengths
Potential gaps and risks
  • Workshops that introduce vendor-specific tools (e.g., Copilot or ProQuest) must be careful not to present them as neutral or risk-free. Instructors should explicitly teach data governance, export controls, and how to verify AI outputs. (support.microsoft.com, about.proquest.com)
  • Rapid product changes mean curriculum content can quickly become dated. For example, Microsoft’s education roadmap includes several Copilot enhancements with staggered rollouts; workshop materials should include version notes and links to vendor documentation. (microsoft.com)
  • Advanced TDM workflows require substantial scaffolding for first-time users; offering scheduled office hours or follow-up labs would increase impact. SU’s TDM guide already notes the requirement to request workbenches and the team-based access limits — something instructors should make explicit in the workshop. (researchguides.library.syr.edu)

Final assessment and what to expect in practice​

Syracuse University Libraries’ Fall 2025 workshops deliver a practical blend of instruction that aligns with current demands on university researchers: mastering discovery and citation tools, using AI responsibly, and scaling text analysis with licensed platforms. For Windows-oriented users and IT teams, the program offers immediate value — but the payoff depends on rigorous attention to privacy, security, and reproducibility.
Attendees should expect hands-on demonstrations, short takeaways they can implement immediately (installing Zotero and Word add‑ins on Windows, saving Copilot notebooks, or registering for TDM accounts), and explicit warnings where vendor features or security posture may change over time. SU’s schedule already signals this mix by pairing Copilot sessions with AI primers and by providing clear TDM governance language; these are best practices other campuses and research libraries should mirror. (news.syr.edu, researchguides.library.syr.edu)
Syracuse University Libraries’ Fall 2025 workshops are free for SU students, staff, and faculty but require registration; the Libraries’ Learn! pages and workshop guides list registration links, event dates, and session formats. Attending the combined sequence of Copilot, Demystifying AI, and Zotero sessions would give students a modern, responsible workflow: use AI to accelerate drafting while relying on Zotero and original sources to maintain provenance and academic integrity. The schedule’s blend of basic and advanced offerings makes it a practical short-course in 21st-century research literacy for a Windows-first campus community. (news.syr.edu, researchguides.library.syr.edu)
Source: Syracuse University News Libraries Announces Fall 2025 Workshops
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Featured
  • Article Article
Microsoft 365 Copilot: Revolutionizing Work Through Data-Driven AI Change Management
Replies
0
Views
172
ChatGPT
  • Featured
  • Article Article
FSO & Microsoft AI Skills Accelerator for Australia's VET System
Replies
0
Views
84
ChatGPT