PowerSYSTEM Center Vulnerabilities: Insights and Mitigation Strategies

An In-Depth Look at the PowerSYSTEM Center Vulnerability Announcements​

Recent security advisories from Subnet Solutions Inc. have spotlighted vulnerabilities within their PowerSYSTEM Center (PSC) product line, affecting the 2020 version and earlier releases up to version 5.24.x. This advisory, which has drawn attention from cybersecurity agencies such as CISA, underscores critical vulnerabilities that demand a proactive approach to risk mitigation by IT professionals and system administrators.

Executive Overview​

The vulnerabilities affecting PowerSYSTEM Center are characterized by a relatively low attack complexity, but their potential impact should not be underestimated. Key details from the advisory include:

• CVSS v4 Score: 6.9 (reflecting moderate risk)
• Vulnerability Types: Out-of-bounds read and deserialization of untrusted data
• Impacted System: PowerSYSTEM Center (PSC) 2020
• Vendor: Subnet Solutions Inc.
• Target Audience: Operational technology in critical manufacturing and energy, deployed globally

While these vulnerabilities are not remotely exploitable, their improper handling could still lead to denial-of-service (DoS) conditions, emphasizing the importance of immediate risk-focused improvements.

Technical Breakdown​

1. CVE-2025-31354: Out-of-Bounds Read (CWE-125)​

PowerSYSTEM Center’s SMTPS notification service is vulnerable due to the improper processing of EC certificates with crafted parameters. More specifically, the problem arises during the evaluation of F2m curve parameters, causing the system to consume excessive CPU resources during curve computations. Key technical insights include:

• Attack Details: An attacker may import a malicious EC certificate, thereby triggering extensive CPU processing and resulting in system slowdown or DoS condition.
• CVSS Assessments:
• CVSS v3.1: Base score of 4.3 indicates a lower-level risk in this version.
• CVSS v4: Base score increased to 5.3, reflecting nuanced differences in assessment criteria.

This vulnerability is a classic example of how subtle errors in security validation routines, such as bound checks, can lead to resource exhaustion under non-remote scenarios.

2. CVE-2025-31935: Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502)​

Another key issue lies in the area of exceptional condition management related to deserialization of untrusted data. Maliciously crafted data input to the PowerSYSTEM Center API can trigger exceptions that lead to service interruptions or denial-of-service events. Highlights of this vulnerability include:

• Attack Dynamics: The mishandling of exceptions during data deserialization can force the application into unpredictable states, halting operations.
• CVSS Evaluations:
• CVSS v3.1: A base score of 6.2 conveys a moderately high level of risk.
• CVSS v4: This score is raised to 6.9, underscoring increased severity when viewing the vulnerability through the lens of updated assessment methodologies.

Both vulnerabilities contribute to a scenario where, despite low remote exploitability, if an attacker gains indirect access, they can precipitate critical service disruptions.

Broader Impacts and Real-World Considerations​

The advisory emphasizes that while these vulnerabilities are not directly exploitable from the internet, they present significant risks to organizations in critical infrastructure sectors such as manufacturing and energy. The global deployment of PowerSYSTEM Center means that an unmitigated exposure could have widespread operational impacts including:

• Service Disruptions: Resulting in potential operational downtime in sectors where constant uptime is crucial.
• Risk of Lateral Movement: Misconfigurations or indirect attacks could pave the way to further exploitation within secured networks.
• Impact on Operational Resilience: Even transient system unavailability in control systems can lead to cascading production delays or safety risks.

IT professionals should ask: How resilient is our control network against internal misuse or mismanagement? What strategies are in place to detect early signs of resource depletion and system interruptions?

Mitigation Strategies​

In light of these vulnerabilities, Subnet Solutions Inc. advises immediate actions to mitigate potential risks. The recommendations include both direct upgrades and practical defensive measures:

• Immediate Upgrades:
• Upgrade to PowerSYSTEM Center PSC 2020 Update 25 or move to the PSC 2024 version to benefit from patches that address these vulnerabilities.
• Interim Mitigations if Upgrades Are Not Feasible:
• Disable system services involved in email dispatch or notifications to avoid processing malicious data.
• Configure network firewalls to restrict connections only to authorized email servers.
• Strengthen administrator access protocols on the PSC operating system.
• Analyze and monitor user activity logs meticulously to ensure compliance with acceptable usage policies.

Moreover, cybersecurity authorities, including CISA, recommend additional security practices:

• Network Isolation: Position control systems behind robust firewalls and separate them from general business networks.
• Secured Remote Access: Leverage VPNs for remote management but ensure they are consistently updated and reviewed for known vulnerabilities.
• Vigilance Against Social Engineering: Implement training sessions and enforce regulations to thwart phishing and unauthorized access attempts.

Such measures are designed to provide layers of defense, ensuring that even if a particular vulnerability is exploited, the overall system retains a degree of resilience.

Industry Implications​

The vulnerabilities highlighted in PowerSYSTEM Center share common themes with broader industrial cybersecurity challenges. They serve as a stark reminder that even well-established systems may harbor latent issues due to complex operations and integrations. Key takeaways include:

• Regular Patch Management: Organizations must prioritize the timely application of patches not just for consumer devices but also for critical control systems.
• Holistic Security Posture: A combination of technical, administrative, and physical measures is needed to safeguard systems from both digital and social engineering threats.
• Risk Awareness: IT leaders should continuously assess and factor in the potential indirect repercussions of low-complexity vulnerabilities that can lead to high operational impacts.

The advisory by Subnet Solutions Inc. and the supporting recommendations from CISA integrate a proactive defense-in-depth approach, emphasizing not only vulnerability patching but also strategic network isolation and user education.

Cybersecurity Best Practices for Control Systems​

To put this information into perspective for IT professionals and security teams managing industrial control systems, consider the following checklist:

• Update Regularly: Evaluate current PSC versions and update to enhanced releases that mitigate known vulnerabilities.
• Enforce Access Controls: Limit administrative access and employ strict authentication mechanisms to reduce insider risks.
• Network Segmentation: Isolate control systems from external networks, focusing on a zero-trust approach even in internal environments.
• Monitor System Health: Automate the collection and analysis of system logs to catch anomalous behaviors early.

This approach aligns with broader cybersecurity advisories and best practices, ensuring that infrastructure remains protected even when inherent vulnerabilities are discovered.

Conclusion​

Subnet Solutions Inc.'s disclosure regarding the PowerSYSTEM Center vulnerabilities reiterates the need for continuous vigilance in securing critical infrastructure systems. By addressing both the out-of-bounds read and deserialization issues, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of denial-of-service conditions that might destabilize operations. While the vulnerabilities are not directly exploitable remotely, their potential impact on power and control systems in crucial sectors cannot be overlooked.
IT administrators and system architects should prioritize implementing the recommended updates and mitigations. In doing so, they can ensure that their environments remain fortified against both known and emerging cybersecurity threats. The lessons learned from this advisory echo an important truth for all technology stakeholders: robust security is not an endpoint but a continuous process of improvement and adaptation.
In an age where digital threats evolve relentlessly, taking immediate and comprehensive action is not just good practice—it is essential for maintaining operational integrity and public trust in the security of critical industrial systems.

---

Source: CISA Subnet Solutions PowerSYSTEM Center | CISA