Schneider Electric Annunciators: Critical Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Strategies

  • Thread Author
Schneider Electric’s remote annunciators—models ASCO 5310 and ASCO 5350—have recently come under the microscope for a series of vulnerabilities that could expose critical industrial environments to remote attacks. Although these devices might seem far removed from your everyday Windows desktop, the repercussions of such weaknesses can ripple through industrial networks, potentially impacting environments where Windows systems interface with control systems. Let’s dive into the nitty-gritty details, explore the technical breakdowns, and discuss real-world mitigations for these alarming flaws.

An Overview of the Vulnerabilities​

Schneider Electric’s advisory lays out four primary vulnerabilities in the ASCO 5310/5350 remote annunciator series. The key concerns are:
Download of Code Without Integrity Check (CVE-2025-1058)
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CVE-2025-1059)
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information (CVE-2025-1060)
Unrestricted Upload of File With Dangerous Type (CVE-2025-1070)
Each of these vulnerabilities carries nontrivial Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) ratings, with some scoring as high as 8.7 when measured against the latest CVSS v4 metrics. Such high scores underscore the severity and potential impact on device integrity, availability, and confidentiality.

Affected Products and Deployment​

Both the ASCO 5310 Single-Channel and ASCO 5350 Eight-Channel Remote Annunciators, across all versions, are affected. These devices are deployed worldwide in environments including commercial facilities, critical manufacturing setups, and energy sectors. Schneider Electric, headquartered in France, has a global footprint, meaning these vulnerabilities have far-reaching implications.

Delving into the Technical Details​

1. Download of Code Without Integrity Check (CVE-2025-1058)​

  • What It Means: This vulnerability allows an attacker to initiate a download of firmware without checking its integrity. In simple terms, if an attacker delivers malicious firmware, the device might unknowingly install it—resulting in an inoperative or compromised unit.
  • CVSS Ratings:
    • CVSS v3 base score: 8.1
    • CVSS v4 base score: 7.2
  • Implications: A low attack complexity and remote exploitability mean that adversaries need little more than network access to launch potentially devastating attacks on these devices.

2. Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CVE-2025-1059)​

  • What It Means: Here, the device lacks proper throttling, allowing an attacker to send malicious packets to overload the webserver feature of the annunciator, causing a communication breakdown.
  • CVSS Ratings:
    • CVSS v3 base score: 7.5
    • CVSS v4 base score: 8.7
  • Implications: Such vulnerabilities can be weaponized to execute denial-of-service attacks that interrupt normal operations—a serious concern in environments that rely on these annunciators for critical processes.

3. Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information (CVE-2025-1060)​

  • What It Means: Data transmitted by these devices is not encrypted, exposing sensitive information during network exchanges. In the hands of an attacker equipped with simple network sniffing tools, this can translate to compromised data confidentiality.
  • CVSS Ratings:
    • CVSS v3 base score: 7.5
    • CVSS v4 base score: 8.7
  • Implications: In today’s cybersecurity landscape, cleartext data transmission is akin to sending your confidential documents via postcard—if intercepted, the consequences can be dire.

4. Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type (CVE-2025-1070)​

  • What It Means: The annunciator accepts file uploads without proper validation, allowing an attacker to upload a malicious file that might render the device inoperable.
  • CVSS Ratings:
    • CVSS v3 base score: 8.1
    • CVSS v4 base score: 7.2
  • Implications: With this vulnerability, an attacker may cause device failure and interfere with service availability by leveraging file upload mechanisms.

Mitigation Strategies and Best Practices​

Until Schneider Electric rolls out an official remediation (with updates promised in future versions), immediate defensive measures are essential. Here’s a concise, strategic guide to reduce your risk exposure:
  1. Network Segmentation and Firewall Configuration
    • Ensure that these devices are placed in protected network segments. Avoid exposing them to the public internet by isolating them behind firewalls.
    • Configure firewalls to block unauthorized access on Port 80/HTTP—the communication channel used by these annunciators.
  2. Change Default Passwords
    • Default credentials are a common gateway for many device exploits. Ensure that you change default administrative passwords immediately.
  3. Limit Network Exposure
    • Deploy these devices in environments with tightly controlled network access. Consider using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) for remote management, but also ensure these VPNs are updated with the latest security patches.
  4. Regular Monitoring and Log Analysis
    • Keep a vigilant eye on network traffic and device logs for any signs of anomaly. Early detection can be a lifesaver in preventing widespread damage.
  5. Stay Informed with Security Notifications
    • Subscribe to Schneider Electric’s security notification service to stay updated on new advisories and available patches. Being in the loop can make the difference between a contained risk and full-scale exploitation.

Broader Implications and Interactions with Windows Environments​

While these vulnerabilities directly affect Schneider Electric’s remote annunciators, their impact can extend to broader network environments, particularly where Windows-based systems interface with industrial control systems. Here’s why Windows administrators should pay attention:
  • Interconnected Environments:
    Many industrial networks have overlapping boundaries with corporate IT networks where Windows systems reside. A compromise in control systems can lead to lateral movement, potentially affecting Windows endpoints.
  • Integration Challenges:
    Securing industrial control systems (ICS) often involves integrated management platforms, some of which run on or interact with Windows. The presence of these vulnerabilities emphasizes the need for strict network segmentation and robust communication security protocols across all systems.
  • Dual Evaluation Metrics:
    Notably, the dual scoring using both CVSS v3 and v4 underscores evolving threat assessments. As these metrics influence resource allocation for remediation, administrators should be proactive in reviewing their network security policies in light of updated vulnerability assessments.

Practical Defense: A Step-by-Step Guide for Administrators​

Here’s a quick checklist to help you secure networks that might interact with these types of devices:
  1. Identify and Assess:
    • Determine if any ASCO 5310 or 5350 devices exist within your network.
    • Map out how these devices interact with Windows servers or other critical network components.
  2. Segregate Networks:
    • Protect ICS networks by placing them in a distinct VLAN or physical network segment separated from the business or Windows network.
  3. Enhance Authentication:
    • Audit device credentials and implement strong, unique passwords. Consider integrating multifactor authentication where possible.
  4. Deploy Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS):
    • Leverage IDS/IPS systems to monitor for unusual traffic patterns, especially on open HTTP ports vulnerable to exploitation.
  5. Regular Updates and Patch Management:
    • While waiting for Schneider Electric’s remediation plan, apply any firmware updates that may contain interim fixes.
    • Maintain an aggressive patch management schedule for both industrial devices and associated Windows systems.
  6. Employee Training and Awareness:
    • Frequent reminders and training sessions about phishing attacks or social engineering can prevent the initial breach that might cascade into industrial control systems.

Conclusion​

Schneider Electric’s advisory on the ASCO 5310/5350 remote annunciators puts the spotlight on a critical intersection of industrial control and cyber risk management. Though not a Windows-specific threat, the vulnerabilities highlight how interconnected modern networks are. Whether you're managing a Windows server farm or overseeing an industrial control system, the lessons are clear:
• Proactive defense and comprehensive network segmentation are non-negotiable.
• Regular firmware updates and strict credential policies can mitigate many risks.
• Vigilance—both technical and operational—is essential in navigating an ever-evolving threat landscape.
Even if your day-to-day revolves around Windows 11 updates and Microsoft security patches, remember that threats to one part of your network can—and often do—affect the entire infrastructure. As the cybersecurity landscape rapidly evolves, staying informed and ready to adapt remains your best defense against potential attacks.
By integrating these practices, IT professionals and Windows administrators alike can safeguard not just their immediate systems, but the entire ecosystem that supports critical business operations and industrial processes.

Source: CISA Schneider Electric ASCO 5310/5350 Remote Annunciator | CISA
 

Back
Top