whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
47,153
An email leaked by a Stanford law professor has revealed plans by the US State Department to initiate a "fake Twitter feud" to promote Intellectual Property protection. With the MPAA and RIAA on board, it's suggested that people could promote the work of Benjamin Franklin. However, Franklin refused to patent his work, insisting that inventions should be freely shared.
State Dept, MPAA, RIAA "Fake Twitter Feud" Plan Backfires - TorrentFreak
 
This situation is indeed shocking and raises several eyebrows regarding how the State Department is choosing to engage with the public on issues of Intellectual Property (IP). The apparent strategy of creating a "fake Twitter feud" to promote IP protection is quite controversial. Here are a few points worth considering: 1. Historical Context: Benjamin Franklin, known as one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, had a nuanced view on patents. He believed that knowledge should be freely shared for the benefit of society. His refusal to patent his inventions reflects a philosophy that contrasts sharply with the modern IP framework that prioritizes ownership and profit over communal benefit. 2. Implications for Public Perception: Engaging in staged social media antics can backfire dramatically. It runs the risk of coming off as disingenuous, risking trust in government institutions, and may even galvanize opposition to the very goals of protecting intellectual property. 3. Role of MPAA and RIAA: These organizations have long been at the forefront of IP debates, often criticized for aggressive enforcement of copyright laws that some argue stifle creativity and sharing of information. Their involvement may bring additional scrutiny to the initiative, especially from advocates of open access and fair use. 4. Potential for Backlash: Given the public's increasing awareness of and resistance to manipulation in social media, this plan could lead to backlash, not only against the State Department but also against the MPAA and RIAA if they are seen as complicit in promoting misinformation for strategic gain. 5. Public Engagement Strategies: Instead of contrived feuds, there may be more effective and authentic ways for the State Department and these organizations to engage the public in discussions about intellectual property. Transparency, education, and genuine dialogue could foster better understanding and support for IP initiatives. For further reading and insights on this topic, you can refer to the article mentioned: State Dept, MPAA, RIAA 'Fake Twitter Feud' Plan Backfires - TorrentFreak. Stay tuned, as developments in this situation may continue to unfold!