- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 47,191
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 39,399
The End of California? Fukushima Radiation And Related Deaths
In an alarming video titled "The End of California? Fukushima Radiation And Related Deaths," presenter Susan du Clos delves into the unsettling consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster and its potential impact on public health, particularly in California. The video was shared on November 5, 2014, and it raises significant concerns about the rising incidences of brain aneurysms and tumors among residents in the Bay Area.
Du Clos highlights a troubling email received by Steve Quayle, a figure associated with the topic. The email recounts the case of a woman who, at only 33 years old, experienced multiple ruptured brain aneurysms and a stroke with no prior medical history. Tragically, three other young women in their 20s to 40s—friends of the email's author—have also died recently from similar conditions. This pattern raises questions regarding a potential link to Fukushima radiation, sparking a broader investigation into similar health incidents across the west coast.
In the video, Du Clos emphasizes the lack of media attention connecting these health issues to the nuclear disaster, despite reports of elevated radiation levels along the California coastline. Various studies mentioned in the video suggest that exposure to ionizing radiation can increase the risk of developing brain tumors. The situation is compounded by unreported high radiation readings recorded by Geiger counters over time, leading to concerns about a cover-up or suppression of data related to health risks associated with Fukushima.
Du Clos calls for accountability from local media and authorities, urging them to investigate and report on these public health concerns—a sentiment that resonates with those in the community who are aware of the connection between environmental hazards and health consequences.
This video compels viewers to consider not just the science behind radiation exposure but also the broader implications for affected communities, particularly in terms of health risks that may go unacknowledged. The questions posed about the future of California underscore a growing unease regarding the enduring effects of the Fukushima disaster, reflecting a need for transparency and proactive health measures to safeguard public well-being.
As we reflect on this video's content, it's crucial to continue the conversation about environmental health and the consequences of nuclear incidents. Have any community members noticed similar patterns or health issues linked to environmental concerns? What steps can be taken to raise awareness and ensure that health risks are appropriately monitored and communicated? Share your thoughts and experiences in this discussion!
In an alarming video titled "The End of California? Fukushima Radiation And Related Deaths," presenter Susan du Clos delves into the unsettling consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster and its potential impact on public health, particularly in California. The video was shared on November 5, 2014, and it raises significant concerns about the rising incidences of brain aneurysms and tumors among residents in the Bay Area.
Du Clos highlights a troubling email received by Steve Quayle, a figure associated with the topic. The email recounts the case of a woman who, at only 33 years old, experienced multiple ruptured brain aneurysms and a stroke with no prior medical history. Tragically, three other young women in their 20s to 40s—friends of the email's author—have also died recently from similar conditions. This pattern raises questions regarding a potential link to Fukushima radiation, sparking a broader investigation into similar health incidents across the west coast.
In the video, Du Clos emphasizes the lack of media attention connecting these health issues to the nuclear disaster, despite reports of elevated radiation levels along the California coastline. Various studies mentioned in the video suggest that exposure to ionizing radiation can increase the risk of developing brain tumors. The situation is compounded by unreported high radiation readings recorded by Geiger counters over time, leading to concerns about a cover-up or suppression of data related to health risks associated with Fukushima.
Du Clos calls for accountability from local media and authorities, urging them to investigate and report on these public health concerns—a sentiment that resonates with those in the community who are aware of the connection between environmental hazards and health consequences.
This video compels viewers to consider not just the science behind radiation exposure but also the broader implications for affected communities, particularly in terms of health risks that may go unacknowledged. The questions posed about the future of California underscore a growing unease regarding the enduring effects of the Fukushima disaster, reflecting a need for transparency and proactive health measures to safeguard public well-being.
As we reflect on this video's content, it's crucial to continue the conversation about environmental health and the consequences of nuclear incidents. Have any community members noticed similar patterns or health issues linked to environmental concerns? What steps can be taken to raise awareness and ensure that health risks are appropriately monitored and communicated? Share your thoughts and experiences in this discussion!