Just when you thought your cloud environment was slicker than a Silicon Valley demo, along comes a fresh warning to spoil the illusion: organizations worldwide are diving headlong into the open-source AI pool, but too many are coming up hacking. The latest alarm comes courtesy of Tenable’s Cloud AI Risk Report 2025, a rollicking read for anyone who enjoys tales of widespread vulnerability, sprawling dependency chains, and the ever-looming shadow of misconfiguration over your virtual infrastructure.
If you work in tech, especially at the intersection of artificial intelligence and cloud computing, you’ve likely noticed: adoption is soaring. A McKinsey Global Survey, unearthed by Tenable, points to a dizzying leap—72 percent of organizations had adopted AI in at least one business function by early 2024, up from 50 percent just two years prior. Could you feel the FOMO? It’s palpable in boardrooms from Boston to Bangalore.
Open-source frameworks have greased this adoption at breakneck speed. Teams can scaffold new machine learning solutions overnight—often with code written and maintained by communities continents away. Packages like Scikit-learn and Ollama are embedded in nearly 28 and 23 percent of AI workloads, respectively. This sprawling web of dependencies brings acceleration, creativity, and—a fact often swept under the nearest digital rug—a riot of lurking vulnerabilities. Each library is a potential Pandora’s box, and the chains of reliance stretch so deep that vulnerabilities are nearly impossible to trace without a forensic microscope.
Here’s the kicker: complexity blooms beneath the surface, in all those default configurations and convenience switches. Too often, “just get it working” is the mantra, and “secure by default” is a carved pumpkin grinning from the sidelines. Excessive permissions, unchecked network access, and open data buckets are not so much bugs as features—sometimes quietly enabled the moment you click “Accept.”
Attackers are getting craftier. If you’re running open-source AI workloads on Unix derivatives, consider yourself a prime target. Your crown jewels—models, data, even configuration scripts—might be just one exploit or permission slip away from public viewing. And since these environments are so customizable, there’s no universal fix; every “unique snowflake” setup can become a unique snowflake failure.
Cloud platforms offer dozens of toggles, from access management to encryption settings. Unfortunately, in the mad rush to launch new services and algorithms, these settings are often left untouched. Default configurations might be generous to the point of recklessness, assigning broad privileges where only the narrowest should suffice. The complexity of the environment only amplifies risk, inviting attackers to probe for weakly guarded entry points.
Dependency sprawl isn’t merely a hygiene issue; it’s a ticking bomb. Each unvetted library is a possible hiding spot for malware or logic bombs that won’t trigger until the right command or dataset comes along. As organizations blend open-source with proprietary code and managed cloud glue, the attack surface balloons—one accidental exposure away from disaster.
This goldmine effect is amplified by the very power AI offers. Attackers who compromise an AI asset could do more than leak information—they could manipulate outcomes, poison models, or insert subtle biases. The nightmare scenario isn’t just data loss, but a corrupted decision pipeline—where your business “intelligence” is now working for the wrong side.
Staying compliant isn’t just jumping through bureaucratic hoops. Many regulations now require provable asset mapping, ironclad access controls, and rigorous audit trails. If your cloud environment can’t cough up a report on where all your AI assets reside and who’s had their digital fingers on them, prepare to get roasted by auditors, if not the press.
Here’s the short version of their gospel:
1. Map and Monitor Everything. If it exists in your cloud—or is squatting on your Unix—track it. Use continuous monitoring tools to maintain situational awareness, flagging unexpected assets and odd behaviors in real time.
2. Classify AI Assets as “Sensitive.” Models, datasets, weights, and even supporting scripts should be treated like intellectual property—because they are. Regular scans, patch management, and even honey pots can help reveal attempted exploits early.
3. Clamp Down on Access Controls. The principle of least privilege isn’t just a cute phrase, it’s a working philosophy. Review permissions regularly, strip out excessive roles, and never, ever trust default settings to keep you safe.
4. Devote Yourself to Configuration Sanity. Audit every environment, aligning settings with cloud provider security best practices. Don’t assume “out of the box” means “out of risk.”
5. Kill Alert Fatigue. Floods of alerts help no one. Prioritize the remediation of critical vulnerabilities and use advanced tools to separate noise from fire drills.
6. Become Best Friends with Compliance. Regulations are becoming more tech-savvy. Stay updated with frameworks like NIST’s, not just to avoid fines, but to actually reduce the chance of a catastrophic breach.
Nigel Ng, Senior Vice President at Tenable APJ, distills the dilemma: “The very openness and flexibility that make these tools powerful also create pathways for attackers. Without proper oversight, these hidden exposures could erode trust in AI-driven outcomes and compromise the competitive advantage businesses are chasing.”
It’s a gut punch: the rush to build the future might be sowing the seeds for tomorrow’s spectacular breaches.
Awareness and training—boring as they sound—are foundational. Security isn’t solved by the cleverest algorithm, but by a culture that values pause, review, and critical thinking as much as launch metrics.
The smartest organizations in 2025 won’t be those with the most sprawling AI portfolios or the shiniest cloud dashboards. They’ll be the ones that sweat the details, treat their AI pipelines as crown jewels, and assume that any new dependency, configuration, or service is a gift-wrapped parcel—possibly containing either gold or a live grenade.
The bottom line is clear: open-source AI frameworks and cloud services are now the arteries of digital business. But like all arteries, they need robust defenses to avoid clots, leaks, and outside contamination. Without careful oversight, vigilant monitoring, and a willingness to challenge “set it and forget it” mindsets, organizations risk not just a breach, but an erosion of the very trust that AI is supposed to foster.
AI, we’re told, will shape the future of business. But only if built on a secure, thoughtful, and—dare we say—paranoid foundation. In the race for digital glory, a pause for security isn’t just advisable. It may be the ultimate competitive advantage. Stay paranoid, stay patched—and may your logs be ever in your favor.
Source: SecurityBrief Asia Organisations face risk with open-source AI & cloud use
The Open-Source AI Wild West
If you work in tech, especially at the intersection of artificial intelligence and cloud computing, you’ve likely noticed: adoption is soaring. A McKinsey Global Survey, unearthed by Tenable, points to a dizzying leap—72 percent of organizations had adopted AI in at least one business function by early 2024, up from 50 percent just two years prior. Could you feel the FOMO? It’s palpable in boardrooms from Boston to Bangalore.Open-source frameworks have greased this adoption at breakneck speed. Teams can scaffold new machine learning solutions overnight—often with code written and maintained by communities continents away. Packages like Scikit-learn and Ollama are embedded in nearly 28 and 23 percent of AI workloads, respectively. This sprawling web of dependencies brings acceleration, creativity, and—a fact often swept under the nearest digital rug—a riot of lurking vulnerabilities. Each library is a potential Pandora’s box, and the chains of reliance stretch so deep that vulnerabilities are nearly impossible to trace without a forensic microscope.
Cloud Services: So Simple, So Scary
One of cloud AI’s chief selling points is that it’s supposed to be simple. Need an AI chatbot? “One click and you’re live!” And yet, that simplicity is a mirage—one engineered by default settings and overly friendly permission structures. On Microsoft Azure, 60 percent of organizations have adopted Azure Cognitive Services, 40 percent Azure Machine Learning, and 28 percent Azure AI Bot Service. Meanwhile, AWS users are flocking to SageMaker (25 percent) and Bedrock (20 percent). Google’s Vertex AI Workbench appears in a fifth of GCP environments.Here’s the kicker: complexity blooms beneath the surface, in all those default configurations and convenience switches. Too often, “just get it working” is the mantra, and “secure by default” is a carved pumpkin grinning from the sidelines. Excessive permissions, unchecked network access, and open data buckets are not so much bugs as features—sometimes quietly enabled the moment you click “Accept.”
Unix: The Quiet (Risky) Backbone
AI workloads love Unix. The operating system’s open-source ethos and robust performance make it a darling of ML practitioners everywhere. But what’s good for performance is often good for attackers, sadly. Unix’s reliance on open-source libraries means any unpatched vulnerability—however obscure—can linger for months, waiting for someone (or something) to poke at it.Attackers are getting craftier. If you’re running open-source AI workloads on Unix derivatives, consider yourself a prime target. Your crown jewels—models, data, even configuration scripts—might be just one exploit or permission slip away from public viewing. And since these environments are so customizable, there’s no universal fix; every “unique snowflake” setup can become a unique snowflake failure.
The Mirage of Security in Managed Services
The philosophy behind managed services is seductive: delegate the headache to the experts. But here, Tenable’s report injects a dose of reality. Using managed AI services on platforms like AWS, Azure, or GCP is like hiring a security guard but leaving the back door open. The provider handles the infrastructure, sure, but your configurations, identities, and permissions? That’s on you.Cloud platforms offer dozens of toggles, from access management to encryption settings. Unfortunately, in the mad rush to launch new services and algorithms, these settings are often left untouched. Default configurations might be generous to the point of recklessness, assigning broad privileges where only the narrowest should suffice. The complexity of the environment only amplifies risk, inviting attackers to probe for weakly guarded entry points.
The Dependency Dilemma: Explosive Growth, Explosive Risk
A classic AI environment is a small universe of dependencies. Each open-source framework—be it Scikit-learn, Ollama, PyTorch, or TensorFlow—pulls in scores of supporting libraries, each with its own development cadence and vulnerabilities. The dizzying pace of innovation means there’s little time to review every update or audit every new dependency.Dependency sprawl isn’t merely a hygiene issue; it’s a ticking bomb. Each unvetted library is a possible hiding spot for malware or logic bombs that won’t trigger until the right command or dataset comes along. As organizations blend open-source with proprietary code and managed cloud glue, the attack surface balloons—one accidental exposure away from disaster.
The AI Data Goldmine: Prime Target for Attackers
AI lives and dies by its data. The storage, movement, and access of these goldmines are top-of-mind for attackers. Sensitive customer records, proprietary models, training datasets sourced from years of company research: they’re all irresistible targets. When you consider how frequently datasets are mounted with excessive access, or left unencrypted entirely in cloud buckets, the scope for disaster becomes obvious.This goldmine effect is amplified by the very power AI offers. Attackers who compromise an AI asset could do more than leak information—they could manipulate outcomes, poison models, or insert subtle biases. The nightmare scenario isn’t just data loss, but a corrupted decision pipeline—where your business “intelligence” is now working for the wrong side.
Regulatory Headwinds: The Works-in-Progress
As the world races ahead with AI, regulation is in frantic catch-up mode. Frameworks—like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework—are being written, rewritten, and debated at breakneck speed. Tenable’s report warns that organizations must stay apprised of these requirements. The landscape is shifting beneath our feet, and ignorance is a career-ending excuse.Staying compliant isn’t just jumping through bureaucratic hoops. Many regulations now require provable asset mapping, ironclad access controls, and rigorous audit trails. If your cloud environment can’t cough up a report on where all your AI assets reside and who’s had their digital fingers on them, prepare to get roasted by auditors, if not the press.
Mitigation, Or: How Not To Lose Sleep at Night
So, what’s a responsible CIO, CISO, or ambitious AI engineer to do in the face of this digital minefield? Tenable’s answer: get holistic, get vigilant, and get real about the threats.Here’s the short version of their gospel:
1. Map and Monitor Everything. If it exists in your cloud—or is squatting on your Unix—track it. Use continuous monitoring tools to maintain situational awareness, flagging unexpected assets and odd behaviors in real time.
2. Classify AI Assets as “Sensitive.” Models, datasets, weights, and even supporting scripts should be treated like intellectual property—because they are. Regular scans, patch management, and even honey pots can help reveal attempted exploits early.
3. Clamp Down on Access Controls. The principle of least privilege isn’t just a cute phrase, it’s a working philosophy. Review permissions regularly, strip out excessive roles, and never, ever trust default settings to keep you safe.
4. Devote Yourself to Configuration Sanity. Audit every environment, aligning settings with cloud provider security best practices. Don’t assume “out of the box” means “out of risk.”
5. Kill Alert Fatigue. Floods of alerts help no one. Prioritize the remediation of critical vulnerabilities and use advanced tools to separate noise from fire drills.
6. Become Best Friends with Compliance. Regulations are becoming more tech-savvy. Stay updated with frameworks like NIST’s, not just to avoid fines, but to actually reduce the chance of a catastrophic breach.
The Price of Speed: Why Nobody Pauses for Security
Let’s state the obvious: speed is the mother of invention—and misconfiguration. Under the relentless pressure to out-innovate competitors, teams are shipping code and cloud services at warp speed. Security checks? Often retrofitted, if done at all. The same flexibility that lets open-source and managed AI services sparkle on the résumé also welcomes attackers through hidden doorways.Nigel Ng, Senior Vice President at Tenable APJ, distills the dilemma: “The very openness and flexibility that make these tools powerful also create pathways for attackers. Without proper oversight, these hidden exposures could erode trust in AI-driven outcomes and compromise the competitive advantage businesses are chasing.”
It’s a gut punch: the rush to build the future might be sowing the seeds for tomorrow’s spectacular breaches.
The Human Factor: Oversight or Overlooked?
It would be comforting to believe that better software or a hardened cloud shell alone could solve it all. Yet, the human factor remains uncomfortably central. Insiders misconfigure. Engineers copy-paste unvetted code from Stack Overflow. Documentation goes unread, and that critical library update falls through the cracks.Awareness and training—boring as they sound—are foundational. Security isn’t solved by the cleverest algorithm, but by a culture that values pause, review, and critical thinking as much as launch metrics.
The Road Ahead: Trust, But Verify (Everything)
AI is, undeniably, the future of enterprise. But as organizations race to outdo each other in lightning-fast deployment, the temptation to trust and deploy without verify is everywhere. Tenable’s report slaps a bright yellow warning across the industry: AI’s power lies partially in its opacity—its inscrutability makes it valuable, flexible, and, at times, dangerously easy to manipulate.The smartest organizations in 2025 won’t be those with the most sprawling AI portfolios or the shiniest cloud dashboards. They’ll be the ones that sweat the details, treat their AI pipelines as crown jewels, and assume that any new dependency, configuration, or service is a gift-wrapped parcel—possibly containing either gold or a live grenade.
The bottom line is clear: open-source AI frameworks and cloud services are now the arteries of digital business. But like all arteries, they need robust defenses to avoid clots, leaks, and outside contamination. Without careful oversight, vigilant monitoring, and a willingness to challenge “set it and forget it” mindsets, organizations risk not just a breach, but an erosion of the very trust that AI is supposed to foster.
A Call for Pragmatic Optimism
For all the doom, a dose of optimism: the problems of open-source AI and cloud security are solvable. With the right mix of continuous vigilance, user education, and ironclad processes, organizations can harness AI’s transformative potential while guarding against the wild, often invisible risks that come with the territory.AI, we’re told, will shape the future of business. But only if built on a secure, thoughtful, and—dare we say—paranoid foundation. In the race for digital glory, a pause for security isn’t just advisable. It may be the ultimate competitive advantage. Stay paranoid, stay patched—and may your logs be ever in your favor.
Source: SecurityBrief Asia Organisations face risk with open-source AI & cloud use
Last edited:
