whoosh

Cooler King
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
47,165
"The Japanese government has moved to crack down on independent reportage and criticism of the government's policies in the wake of the disaster by deciding what citizens may or may not talk about in public. A new project team has been created by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, the National Police Agency, and METI to combat "rumors" deemed harmful to Japanese security in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

The government charges that the damage caused by earthquakes and by the nuclear accident are being magnified by irresponsible rumors, and the government must take action for the sake of the public good. The project team has begun to send "letters of request" to such organizations as telephone companies, internet providers, cable television stations, and others, demanding that they "take adequate measures based on the guidelines in response to illegal information. "The measures include erasing any information from internet sites that the authorities deem harmful to public order and morality."
The message from the Ministry of Intenal Affairs : The ministry today for telecommunications carriers affiliate, false rumors about the earthquake on the Internet pertaining to East, to respond appropriately while considering that freedom of expression and various organizations affiliated with telecommunications carriers, Satoshi Amane requested that and necessary measures.

 Today, "working team to ensure safety measures in the affected areas such as" in, "such measures in the affected areas to ensure safety" has been determined.
 The measures in the East after the earthquake, and uncertain information concerning the earthquake, the false rumors to incite public unrest prank, circulated by the light of the circumstances to write to the bulletin boards, etc., concerned about false rumors on the Internet. agencies work together for the site administrator, etc., including information voluntarily remove obscene laws and requested to take appropriate action and make efforts so that accurate information is provided to users has been.
 Based on the measures, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Telecommunications Carriers Association, Telecom Services Association of Japan, the Japan Cable Television Association and the Japan Internet Providers Association, on false rumors on the Internet pertaining to East earthquake , to respond appropriately while considering that freedom of expression and telecommunications carriers belonging to each group, requested that the necessary measures and well known.
YouTube - Japan Calls for WORLDWIDE CENSORSHIP of Fukushima Radiation Info on the Web! April 22, 2011
 


"The Japanese Government's Crackdown on Independent Reportage Post-Fukushima" The ongoing challenges around government censorship and control of information have been spotlighted following the catastrophic events surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Since that crisis, the Japanese government has initiated measures to contain what it describes as "rumors" that could threaten national security. This crackdown, led by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, in collaboration with agencies like the National Police Agency and METI, has raised serious concerns about the implications for freedom of expression in Japan.

Understanding the Government's Stance​

The Japanese government contends that misinformation could exacerbate the existing damage caused by both earthquakes and the nuclear incident. Consequently, they’ve established a task force aimed at mitigating the spread of what they deem harmful information. This team is actively reaching out to various communication platforms—including internet providers and cable stations—to demand the removal of any content classified as detrimental to public order . In a detailed communication, officials urged these providers to consider their messages about the importance of freedom of speech while also taking necessary actions against supposedly invasive falsehoods. The tone of these requests highlights a balancing act: ensuring public safety while navigating the delicate landscape of civil liberties .

What This Means for Information Sharing​

The implications of such measures extend far beyond mere regulation. The project team’s directives involve significant censorship, where they can compel internet service providers to eliminate information they consider inappropriate. This authority could lead to a chilling effect on independent journalism and citizens' willingness to discuss sensitive topics related to the disaster. Officials assert that the project's goal is to combat falsehoods that might instigate widespread unrest. However, concerns are raised that this could lead to overly broad applications of censorship and create an environment where legitimate discourse is stifled .

Conclusion​

Ultimately, the communication strategies adopted in the aftermath of Fukushima serve as a pressing reminder that the balance between security and freedom remains a crucial debate, especially in the context of government actions post-disaster. As discussions continue, it's vital for citizens and media advocates to remain vigilant and engaged in protecting the integrity of information sharing—even amid attempts to regulate it. What are your thoughts on the balance between safety and freedom of expression in the context of government regulation? Have you observed similar actions in other countries? Share your experiences and insights!
 


Back
Top