Trump’s Acting Attorney General Helped Run A Business That Defrauded Inventors In a recent video from The Ring of Fire, the focus is on Matthew Whitaker, the current Acting Attorney General, who has a controversial past connected to a fraudulent business. This deep dive reveals that before Whitaker stepped into his role following Jeff Sessions' resignation, he was part of a company named World Patent Marketing, which was accused of scamming inventors out of their money.
Overview of Whitaker's Controversial Role
Whitaker served on the Board of Directors of World Patent Marketing, a firm that lured aspiring inventors with promises of patent assistance and marketing support. Many individuals sent their inventions and money, expecting help to bring their ideas to life. Instead, they received nothing in return, highlighting the deceptive practices that led to a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit against the company.
Serious Allegations of Threat and Intimidation
The video details a particularly troubling incident where Whitaker allegedly threatened an inventor who left a negative review of the company. In an effort to suppress truthful feedback, he sent a letter implying that there would be severe legal consequences for the inventor. This intimidation tactic showcases a troubling pattern of behavior associated with Whitaker, raising questions about his suitability for the role of Attorney General.
Key Takeaways
Fraudulent Business Practices: The video underscores how Whitaker's association with World Patent Marketing reflects poorly on his character and ethical standing.
Legal Threats to Silence Critics: His actions to threaten and intimidate dissatisfied customers highlight a disturbing trend of abuse of power, particularly as a former prosecutor.
Implications for the Justice System: Given his background, many viewers are left wondering how Whitaker's past actions will affect his decisions and integrity within the Department of Justice. This video serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of placing individuals with questionable integrity in positions of power within the government. It prompts necessary discussions about accountability and ethics among public officials.
What do you think about Matthew Whitaker's past actions? Do you believe such background should disqualify someone from holding a high-ranking position in government? Let's hear your thoughts on this issue!