- Joined
- Apr 15, 2009
- Messages
- 46,999
- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2023
- Messages
- 36,305
Trump's AG is an Expert at Covering Up Crimes
In a recent video titled "Trump's AG is an Expert at Covering Up Crimes", Thom Hartmann delves into the controversial actions of William Barr, Donald Trump’s Attorney General, particularly regarding the Mueller investigation. Hartmann's analysis reviews Barr's historical role in shielding presidential misconduct and raises critical questions about his effectiveness and motivations as AG.
Barr's appointment was not coincidental; he was specifically chosen by Trump during a pivotal moment when the administration sought to navigate the potential fallout from the Mueller report. Barr previously asserted that a sitting president cannot be indicted for obstruction of justice, aligning him closely with Trump's interests from the outset.
Hartmann illuminates Barr's extensive history of covering up presidential wrongdoings, including his involvement in significant events like the Iran-Contra affair and the Iraq-gate scandal in the early '90s. His actions back then earned him the nickname “cover-up general,” an epithet that seems relevant even today as he selectively summarized the findings of the Mueller report.
### Key Takeaways from the Video:
- Historical Context: The video provides a historical overview of Barr's previous cover-ups, demonstrating a recurrent theme in his legal career where he protects powerful individuals at the expense of transparency.
- Current Implications: Hartmann questions whether Congress will show the same complicity as it did in 1993 when similar patterns emerged under George H.W. Bush’s administration. He wonders if today's media environment will allow for a more stringent scrutiny compared to the past.
- Media Responsibility: A significant portion of the discourse centers around the role of media in either perpetuating or challenging the narrative set forth by figures like Barr. Hartmann argues that if the media does not amend its approach, history may repeat itself, compromising justice and accountability.
Hartmann's insights prompt viewers to reconsider their perceptions of governmental accountability and the role of leadership in justice. The discussion encourages the audience to critically evaluate how history can inform current events and the importance of an engaged and vigilant press.
Community Discussion: What are your thoughts on the historical context shared in Hartmann's video? Do you think the media is doing enough to hold powerful individuals accountable today? Share your experiences or perspectives on how media coverage has evolved over the years!
This video serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate around governmental power, media integrity, and the essential need for accountability in a democracy.
In a recent video titled "Trump's AG is an Expert at Covering Up Crimes", Thom Hartmann delves into the controversial actions of William Barr, Donald Trump’s Attorney General, particularly regarding the Mueller investigation. Hartmann's analysis reviews Barr's historical role in shielding presidential misconduct and raises critical questions about his effectiveness and motivations as AG.
Barr's appointment was not coincidental; he was specifically chosen by Trump during a pivotal moment when the administration sought to navigate the potential fallout from the Mueller report. Barr previously asserted that a sitting president cannot be indicted for obstruction of justice, aligning him closely with Trump's interests from the outset.
Hartmann illuminates Barr's extensive history of covering up presidential wrongdoings, including his involvement in significant events like the Iran-Contra affair and the Iraq-gate scandal in the early '90s. His actions back then earned him the nickname “cover-up general,” an epithet that seems relevant even today as he selectively summarized the findings of the Mueller report.
### Key Takeaways from the Video:
- Historical Context: The video provides a historical overview of Barr's previous cover-ups, demonstrating a recurrent theme in his legal career where he protects powerful individuals at the expense of transparency.
- Current Implications: Hartmann questions whether Congress will show the same complicity as it did in 1993 when similar patterns emerged under George H.W. Bush’s administration. He wonders if today's media environment will allow for a more stringent scrutiny compared to the past.
- Media Responsibility: A significant portion of the discourse centers around the role of media in either perpetuating or challenging the narrative set forth by figures like Barr. Hartmann argues that if the media does not amend its approach, history may repeat itself, compromising justice and accountability.
Hartmann's insights prompt viewers to reconsider their perceptions of governmental accountability and the role of leadership in justice. The discussion encourages the audience to critically evaluate how history can inform current events and the importance of an engaged and vigilant press.
Community Discussion: What are your thoughts on the historical context shared in Hartmann's video? Do you think the media is doing enough to hold powerful individuals accountable today? Share your experiences or perspectives on how media coverage has evolved over the years!
This video serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate around governmental power, media integrity, and the essential need for accountability in a democracy.
