Trump's Going After The Constitution And He Visits Mourning Pittsburgh Even When Asked Not To
In a recent episode of The Young Turks, the discourse around President Trump's controversial plans to dismantle the 14th Amendment took center stage. Host Cenk Uygur and his panel discussed the potential implications of Trump’s pursuit to eliminate birthright citizenship, a right granted by the Constitution that has been a topic of fierce debate, especially in an election year. This debate intensified when Trump announced his visits to Pittsburgh, following the tragic synagogue shooting, despite local leaders, including Mayor Bill Peduto, urging him to stay away.
### The 14th Amendment Controversy
The discussion opened with the claim that President Trump believes he can abolish the constitutional right of birthright citizenship through an executive order. Despite widespread legal consensus indicating that such a move would be unconstitutional, Trump continues to promote the idea that legislation could achieve this aim without needing a constitutional amendment. Uygur criticized this viewpoint, asserting that Trump's claims are not only legally unfounded but also politically strategic aimed at rallying his base ahead of the elections.
Uygur pointed out a critical misconception held by Trump, arguing that the U.S. is not unique in providing birthright citizenship, as numerous countries globally follow similar practices. The panel indicated that Trump's rhetoric serves as an appeal to his supporters while simultaneously alienating Latino voters, who have been historically underrepresented at the polls.
### Trump's Visit to Pittsburgh
The discussion then shifted to Trump’s visit to Pittsburgh after the mass shooting at a synagogue, an event that deeply shocked the nation. The hosts expressed their concern over Trump's intention to visit, suggesting his presence might overshadow the mourning process. Protests erupted in Pittsburgh, with many community members feeling that Trump’s arrival was opportunistic rather than supportive.
Panelists noted that Trump's history of inflammatory remarks, particularly regarding race and immigration, has perpetuated division and fear. One of the key points made during the segment was a critique of Trump's tendency to equate peaceful protests against him with the violent rhetoric that often surfaces in his speeches. Several panelists emphasized the need for more significant accountability among politicians who incite violence with their rhetoric.
### Implications for Voter Engagement
As the episode concluded, the discussion highlighted the potential fallout of Trump’s actions both politically and socially. The sentiment emerged that his attempts to galvanize his base could further alienate moderate and independent voters, particularly in suburban areas with significant Latino populations. The panel called for increased voter registration efforts among Latino communities as a counter to Trump's divisive policies.
This episode serves as a stark reminder of the intersection of political action and community response, emphasizing the importance of civic engagement in shaping the future of policy and presidential action.
---
What are your thoughts on Trump's approach to the constitution and his visit to Pittsburgh? Do you think it will have a lasting impact on voter attitudes leading up to the upcoming elections? Share your opinions below!