US Quantum Technology Leadership: Strategies for Innovation, Talent, and Security

Quantum technology, often imagined as the “operating system of the universe,” is rapidly advancing from abstract physics to practical computing, poised to trigger a revolution comparable to the dawn of the internet or the proliferation of artificial intelligence. In this ongoing transformation, American leadership is at a critical juncture. Recent testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology offers not just a window into the state of this rapidly evolving field but a call to action for policymakers, industry, and academia alike.

The Quantum Information Revolution: Opportunity and Urgency​

Quantum mechanics has long been perceived as esoteric, governing phenomena invisible in day-to-day life. Today, we’re at a threshold where decades of research can be transformed into powerful technologies: quantum computers, quantum networks, and advanced quantum sensors. As Dr. Charles Tahan, Partner at Microsoft Quantum and former Director of the National Quantum Coordination Office, stated in his testimony, “We are on the cusp of a new technological revolution—a quantum information revolution.” This revolution is about more than academic progress; it is poised to create entirely new information technologies, opening possibilities for breakthroughs in medicine, chemistry, materials science, and national security.
Why this matters so urgently now is the context of global competition. While the National Quantum Initiative Act of 2018 enabled coordinated quantum research across 20+ agencies (including the Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and Defense Department), America’s lead is not secure. Competitor nations—most notably China—are dramatically increasing their investments and seeking to define the rules, standards, and supply chains of the coming quantum era. Maintaining leadership in quantum technology isn’t simply about scientific prestige; it is a matter of economic competitiveness and national security.

Quantum in the Age of Artificial Intelligence​

The dramatic rise of artificial intelligence since 2023 has redefined what’s technically possible and what’s at stake. Yet even the most advanced AI running on conventional “classical” computers is fundamentally limited. Dr. Tahan noted, “There are problems that AI and classical computing will never be able to solve... because of the fundamental limitations of how they are designed.” Quantum computers, on the other hand, promise exponential speed-ups for certain classes of problems. Two vivid applications stand out:

• Cryptography and National Security: A sufficiently large quantum computer could break today’s commonly used encryption systems in days—a task that would take a lifetime for any classical computer. The threat is real and imminent enough that agencies like NIST are accelerating efforts on “quantum-resistant” cryptography.
• Creation of New Materials and Medicines: Quantum computers can simulate molecular interactions with unmatched precision, vastly accelerating the design of novel drugs, materials, or energy solutions. This power isn’t just hypothetical. Early-stage quantum systems have already demonstrated “quantum advantage” for specialized problems in chemistry and optimization, though general-purpose systems remain a distant milestone.

The intersection of quantum and AI further magnifies opportunity and risk. AI-driven discovery processes, when fused with quantum simulation capabilities, could accelerate scientific breakthroughs at a pace never before imaginable. Conversely, a failure to maintain quantum leadership could reverse decades of technological and security gains.

Microsoft’s Quantum Roadmap: Research, Collaboration, Real-World Impact​

Two Decades of Persistent Investment​

Microsoft has been pursuing quantum computing technology for over 20 years, spanning three CEOs and an evolving landscape of research. The company’s commitment is not merely financial—it is a strategic bet on the future. At the core of Microsoft’s approach is the pursuit of topological qubits—exotic quantum bits thought to be more robust and scalable than others, thanks to their unique physics.
Developing these qubits isn’t simple. It required Microsoft’s team to take an 80-year-old scientific theory and manufacture a new state of matter, then design chip-scale devices to demonstrate this phenomenon. In early 2025, Microsoft showcased its “Majorana 1” chip, a product of two decades of investment, integrating all the essential ingredients—cryogenic electronics, advanced wiring, and topologically suitable microchips.
According to DARPA, whose teams spent two years evaluating Microsoft’s hardware, the approach, and its scalability, this was “an incredibly rigorous and deeply technical analysis from what is almost certainly the world’s best quantum computing test and evaluation team.” Microsoft is now part of the final phase of DARPA’s Underexplored Systems for Utility-Scale Quantum Computing (US2QC) program, a clear sign that its roadmap is considered “real” by technical leaders.

Embracing the Quantum Ecosystem: Strategic Collaborations​

Microsoft’s role extends beyond its in-house technology. As a platform company, it has prioritized customer needs over technological tribalism, supporting software compatibility and integration across different quantum hardware types, from ion traps to neutral atoms.
Strategic partnerships with leading startups—such as Atom Computing, Quantinuum, and Photonic—have delivered tangible milestones. In 2024, Microsoft and Quantinuum demonstrated the first logical qubits that perform better than the underlying physical qubits. Subsequent collaboration saw them create 12 and then 24 logical qubits on commercially relevant hardware platforms. These advances, moving the industry from so-called “NISQ” systems (noisy intermediate-scale quantum) to “Level 2” resilient quantum computing, mark a dramatic turning point: the first commercially available logical qubits are now accessible.
These collaborations not only showcase practical advances, but also validate Microsoft’s ongoing relevance and leadership. However, even these achievements pale in comparison to the vision of truly utility-scale quantum computers (with millions of qubits and full error correction). Reaching that goal will demand sustained, large-scale investments—by both private sector and government.

Three Pillars of Sustained U.S. Quantum Leadership​

Dr. Tahan identified three focus areas policymakers must prioritize to anchor American global leadership in quantum technology:

1. Advancing Quantum Research​

America’s track record of scientific leadership has been built on public investment, open research, and a healthy interplay between foundational science and industry application. The National Quantum Initiative catalyzed significant growth, with federal funding for quantum research doubling from $456 million in 2019 to over $1 billion by 2022. However, funding has currently plateaued or shrunk—President Biden’s FY2025 budget includes a request of $998 million, even as China is estimated to invest approximately $15 billion in quantum R&D.
A sustained—and, arguably, expanded—public investment is necessary. Policymakers are urged to:

• Fully Fund & Expand Quantum Initiatives: Ensure stable, growing support for Department of Energy labs, the National Science Foundation, NIST, NASA, the Department of Defense, and other critical agencies.
• Increase Directed Quantum R&D Funding: Shift from fragmented, scattershot funding to more coordinated, strategic allocations, emulating some of the advantages seen in China’s centralized strategy.
• Expand Translational Research: Grow programs that bridge “lab bench” discovery and commercial applications, such as DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative, through funding, grants, and testbeds.
• Encourage Public-Private Collaboration: Use incentives—matching grants, consortia, innovation challenges—to multiply the effect of federal funding with private sector investments.
• Streamline Access to Capabilities: Open government-funded quantum hardware to the broader U.S. research community, accelerating discovery and workforce development while derisking industry bets.

A look at history demonstrates this approach’s effectiveness: American investments in semiconductor research, the development of the internet, and GPS all began with robust public funding and produced decades of prosperity. The next generation of quantum breakthroughs will require the same commitment.

2. Developing and Attracting Quantum Talent​

The future quantum workforce faces not only a “skills gap” but a supply crisis. There are roughly three open jobs for every qualified quantum professional globally, according to recent McKinsey data. The U.S. has traditionally benefited from attracting international talent: 43% of doctorate-level scientists and engineers in the U.S. are foreign-born, and over half of advanced STEM graduate workers were not born in the country.
Meanwhile, other nations have outpaced the U.S. in producing STEM graduates. For example, in 2020, the U.S. awarded approximately 900,000 undergraduate STEM degrees, compared to China’s 2 million and India’s 2.5 million. The European Union, India, and China now lead in the concentration of quantum-trained specialists. Without a domestic pipeline of skilled quantum professionals and the continued attraction of international talent, American quantum ambitions will falter.
Policy recommendations include:

• Expand STEM Education: Strengthen STEM from K-12 through degree programs, emphasizing quantum science as an emerging frontier.
• Support Higher Education & Training: Increase funding for scholarships, fellowships, and research assistantships in quantum-related fields; expand proven programs like NSF’s Research Experiences for Undergraduates.
• Retrain and Upskill the Existing Workforce: Leverage Department of Labor and NSF platforms for adult education and certificate training, allowing workers to pivot into quantum roles.
• Streamline Immigration for Talent: Ease visa and green card processes for advanced STEM and quantum graduates, especially those educated in U.S. institutions, and expand opportunities for highly skilled international scientists to stay post-graduation.
• Foster International Collaboration: Initiate joint research, exchange programs, and academic partnerships with trusted global allies.

A comprehensive “quantum talent” strategy that combines domestic education, retraining, and international talent attraction will be a prerequisite for U.S. leadership.

3. Securing the Quantum Supply Chain​

Quantum devices require specialized components: cryogenic systems, ultralow-noise electronics, photonic elements, and sophisticated packaging. Most of these are produced by only a handful of global suppliers, often outside the U.S.—with typical lead times for some components stretching to 12–18 months. This presents a significant vulnerability, raising the specter of supply bottlenecks or outright security threats if key components are withheld or disrupted.
Recommendations for policymakers include:

• Develop a National Quantum Supply Chain Strategy: Map key vulnerabilities, establish domestic goals, and outline actionable roadmaps for reducing dependence on foreign sources.
• Diversify Sources of Critical Components: Use federal purchasing and advance procurement to guarantee multiple domestic suppliers, or at least partnerships with trusted international allies.
• Establish Quantum Manufacturing Facilities: Build specialized U.S. facilities (public, private, or hybrid) for quantum chip fabrication, packaging, and system assembly—either as new entities or via expansion of the National Labs infrastructure.
• Prioritize Domestic Production: Offer tax credits, grants, or direct investment incentives for scaling U.S. production of quantum-specific lasers, microwaves, chips, and refrigeration devices.

A resilient, domestic quantum supply chain, underpinned by federal coordination and public-private partnership, will reduce risk and support robust innovation.

Critical Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Risks​

Strengths​

• Long-Term Vision and Realistic Appraisal: The consensus among American quantum leaders is clear-eyed about the difficulty and timelines involved. There are no promises of “quantum supremacy” overnight. Rather, the focus is on utility-scale systems, with clear milestones and measured probability.
• Ecosystem Approach: Microsoft’s openness to developing platforms across multiple hardware and software stacks demonstrates flexibility, reducing risk of technological lock-in. This also maximizes collaboration and accelerates technical maturity across the field.
• Sustained Government-Industry-Academy Partnership: History shows that the U.S. model—fueled by federal investment, open science, and entrepreneurial culture—works. Recent advances, built atop close government-industry ties and competitive grantmaking, suggest this can scale with further commitment.

Challenges and Risks​

• Global Competition and Security: With China’s $15 billion quantum commitment, America can no longer afford fragmentation, inconsistent funding, or slow policy response. Should the U.S. trail in quantum hardware, it risks strategic vulnerabilities in defense and cryptography.
• Talent Shortage and Immigration Policy: U.S. dominance in advanced technology has depended on attracting the best and brightest globally. Current visa backlogs and competitive global education strategies threaten to erode this edge. Without rapid, intentional action, the talent shortfall will become critical.
• Supply Chain Fragility: As witnessed during the semiconductor shortages of the early 2020s, overreliance on single-source suppliers is a recipe for disaster. The same could happen for quantum-specific components barring aggressive supply chain risk mitigation.
• Funding Volatility: The bipartisan support that launched the National Quantum Initiative must endure. Any significant decrease in federal R&D funding or inconsistent priorities could yield irreversible setbacks, especially if competitor nations maintain large, centralized investments.

Unverifiable or Uncertain Claims​

While the testimony and supporting documentation are generally well referenced, some claims about future quantum computer capabilities—such as the timeline for breaking public-key cryptography or the scalability of topological qubits—are necessarily speculative. Leading physicists agree that scaling quantum to thousands or millions of qubits is plausible but far from guaranteed, and timelines are hotly debated in the peer-reviewed community. Readers should treat bold claims of “quantum advantage” or “exponential improvement” with cautious optimism, recognizing the extraordinary technical challenges yet to be solved.

The Road Ahead: Policy and Industry Implications​

Leadership in quantum technology cannot be achieved by any single company or agency. It requires:

• Congressional Reauthorization and Expanded Funding: Reauthorizing the National Quantum Initiative Act, expanding appropriations, and providing multiyear funding certainty.
• Workforce Development: Federal, state, and local programs to expand quantum awareness and skills, plus immigration reform focused on high-end science and engineering talent.
• Accelerated Public-Private Partnerships: Fostering innovation consortia and matching funds, and opening access to quantum facilities to academia and startups.
• Secure Domestic Supply Chains: Strategic investments in manufacturing, testing facilities, and prototyping centers for quantum hardware, dovetailing with wider “reshoring” efforts in microelectronics and critical materials.

Conclusion​

Quantum technology now stands at the inflection point where imagination meets engineering. The U.S. has the scientific pedigree, the industrial might, and the entrepreneurial mindset to lead—if it maintains strategic focus, invests ambitiously in research and workforce, and acts decisively to build resilient supply chains. The stakes are immense: from the future of national security to the next wave of American prosperity, leadership in quantum will shape not only which companies and nations own the future, but the fundamental capabilities of science and technology for decades to come.
Government, industry, and academia must seize this moment—with urgency, clarity, and unity—to ensure the benefits of quantum technology are realized and that American leadership endures, defining the next century of innovation and progress.

---

Source: The Official Microsoft Blog Supporting American leadership in quantum technology - Microsoft On the Issues