Vista's true development time

Discussion in 'Windows Vista Help and Support' started by Matt, Aug 27, 2008.

  1. Matt

    Matt Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    8
    http://win7mag.com/2008/08/windows-vista-didnt-take-5-years-to-develop/

    I made a post about the development of Windows Vista.
     
  2. Kyle

    Kyle New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,634
    Likes Received:
    53
    Well, I wouldn't say it only took two years, but it surely wasn't five years. Of all the work they actually used coming from the end of XP to the start of Vista's RTM, it was probably a little over three years worth of work.

    Even though Longhorn was dropped in favor of a code refresh, many things (Like the sidebar) made their way into Vista.
     
  3. Matt

    Matt Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    8
    That's true. But then again, a lot of the thing in Windows 2000 were in Windows XP, so they always build from another OS.

    But I agree, it might be more like 2 1/2 years or 3 years for it.
     
  4. ViennaX

    ViennaX New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, I always though that Vista was based on Longhorn..
    But now i know better
     
  5. Matt

    Matt Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    861
    Likes Received:
    8
    Nope, Server 03 is what it's based on, though you can find some builds of longhorn still out there.
     
  6. BeatleManU

    BeatleManU New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Longhorn, that would have been a cool name to use, I like it better than Vista, they should use in the future!
     

Share This Page

Loading...